Regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations with respect to ESG matters, including climate-change related matters, are rapidly evolving. While the potential effects of climate change are highly uncertain, climate change and climate-related events could result in, among other things, an increase in extreme weather events, such as floods, hurricanes and wildfires, as well as changes in rainfall patterns, storm patterns and intensities and temperature levels, rising sea levels and limitations on water availability and quality. Our operating results are significantly influenced by weather; therefore, major changes in weather patterns could have a significant effect on our future operating results. Extreme weather conditions could limit the availability of resources, cause supply chain disruptions or increase the costs of our projects, reduce productivity, or could cause projects to be delayed or canceled. We could experience project cancellations, reduced demand or reduced productivity if climate change results in a significant increase in adverse weather conditions in a given period, or from potential market-related or macroeconomic effects of climate-related factors that affect our business, which could negatively affect our revenue and profitability. We could also be exposed to increased risk of liability in locations potentially affected by climate-related risks, for example, in areas where the risk of wildfires is increased. The risks associated with the physical effects of climate change have affected, and could continue to negatively affect, our insurance premiums or the amount of coverage that insurers are willing to make available under our insurance policies. In addition, limitations on access to clean water or other natural resources in the communities where we conduct our operations could disrupt our or our customers' operations and result in work stoppages, project delays, reduced productivity and increased costs. All of the above climate-related factors could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Climate-related factors could also affect the projects our customers award. Concerns about climate change could result in new regulations, regulatory actions or requirements related to energy efficiency or reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, any of which could negatively affect our customers, or decrease the number, scope or types of projects they award, which could decrease demand for our services. Demand for power projects, underground pipelines or other projects could be negatively affected by significant changes in weather or by climate-related legislation or regulations. Legislative and/or regulatory responses related to climate change could also affect the availability of goods, increase our costs or otherwise negatively affect our operations. In addition, demand for our services could be negatively affected by market and consumer response to climate-related matters, as well from changes in technology. Our ability to compete could be affected by labor shortages resulting from lack of available skilled labor for new or emerging climate-related technologies. Additionally, if our stakeholders do not have a favorable view of our values and practices in the transition to a low-carbon economy, we could suffer reputational risk or an increase in our cost of, or a reduction in the availability of, capital. Increased or new or changing reporting and compliance requirements relating to climate change matters, including from the recently passed legislation in California related to reporting greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risk or from the SEC's draft proposal on climate-related disclosures, which, among other requirements, could mandate disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions, could negatively affect our business, results of operations and cash flows due to the increased costs of compliance, diversion of management's attention and exposure to risk of non-compliance.
There are significant environmental regulations and policies under consideration or reconsideration to encourage the use of clean energy technologies and regulate emissions of greenhouse gases to address climate change, which could cause uncertainty for our customers and our operations. We cannot predict future changes to environmental regulations and policies, nor can we predict the effects that any such changes would have on our business. The establishment of rules limiting greenhouse gas emissions or mandating lower carbon infrastructure could affect overall customer demand, reduce the need for certain of our services and/or affect our ability to perform construction services or to perform these services at current levels of profitability. For example, if new regulations were adopted regulating greenhouse gas emissions, we could experience a significant increase in environmental compliance costs in light of our large fleet and the amount of construction machinery we own. New regulations requiring us to acquire different equipment or change processes could result in an impairment of our current fleet or other equipment assets. Additionally, such new equipment may not be available, or we may not be able to purchase or rent this equipment in a cost-effective manner.
Compliance with any new laws or regulations relating to the reduction of greenhouse gases could result in significant required changes to our operations and a significant increase in the cost of conducting our business. In addition, our reputation could suffer and/or we could experience a reduction in the amount of future work we are awarded if our operations are perceived to result in high levels of greenhouse gas emissions or to otherwise pose environmental risks. Reductions in project awards, project deferrals, delays or cancellations, or increases in costs related to the effects of climate change, climate change initiatives or climate change regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
In addition, stakeholder expectations with respect to ESG matters have been rapidly evolving and expanding. In recent years, companies across all industries are facing increasing expectations and scrutiny related to their ESG and sustainability practices from a variety of stakeholders, including customers, investor advocacy groups, proxy advisory firms, institutional and other investors, lenders, employees and ratings agencies, among others. If we do not adapt to or comply with stakeholder expectations and standards on ESG matters as they continue to evolve, or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately or quickly enough to growing concern for ESG and sustainability issues, regardless of whether there is a regulatory or legal requirement to do so, it could result in loss of business and an inability to attract and retain customers and talented personnel, or we could suffer reputational damage and/or increased risk of potential litigation, all of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, and could result in an increase in our cost of capital and/or a decline in the price per share of our common stock.
Additionally, from time to time, we establish strategies and expectations relative to ESG matters. Our ability to achieve any such strategies or expectations is subject to numerous factors and conditions, many of which are outside of our control. Failures or delays in achieving our strategies or expectations, whether actual or perceived, could adversely affect our business, operations and reputation, and could increase our risk of litigation.
In addition, our continuing efforts to research, establish, accomplish and accurately report on our ESG strategy and commitments may create operational risks, increase our expenses and expose us to reputational, legal and other risks. Some of the statements in our voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters may be based on hypothetical expectations and assumptions that may or may not be representative of current or actual risks or events or forecasts of expected risks or events, including the costs associated therewith. Such expectations and assumptions are uncertain and could be inaccurate or subject to misinterpretation given the nature of the disclosures and commitments and the difficulty in identifying, measuring and reporting on such ESG matters.