Breakdown | ||||
Jun 2024 | Jun 2023 | Jun 2022 | Jun 2021 | Jun 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement | Total Revenue | |||
54.87M | 57.65M | 61.29M | 55.12M | 33.26M | Gross Profit |
40.52M | 49.60M | 53.46M | 48.48M | 31.04M | EBIT |
16.19M | 18.15M | 23.29M | 24.11M | 10.71M | EBITDA |
23.37M | 23.49M | 28.04M | 28.08M | 12.52M | Net Income Common Stockholders |
10.74M | 24.06M | 22.82M | 9.52M | 9.31M |
Balance Sheet | Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments | |||
33.74M | 22.49M | 22.68M | 25.51M | 14.59M | Total Assets |
141.39M | 140.98M | 150.01M | 141.38M | 27.59M | Total Debt |
5.73M | 2.16M | 2.60M | 2.74M | 1.96M | Net Debt |
-22.12M | -20.33M | -20.08M | -22.77M | -12.64M | Total Liabilities |
20.01M | 18.63M | 21.24M | 21.07M | 8.50M | Stockholders Equity |
121.38M | 122.34M | 128.77M | 120.13M | 18.93M |
Cash Flow | Free Cash Flow | |||
16.66M | 18.59M | 24.69M | 22.93M | 10.73M | Operating Cash Flow |
17.05M | 19.07M | 24.95M | 23.02M | 10.81M | Investing Cash Flow |
4.90M | -479.76K | -4.13M | 852.72K | -1.20M | Financing Cash Flow |
-16.83M | -18.99M | -24.24M | -12.87M | -8.98M |
City of London Investment Group PLC reported its half-year results for the period ending December 31, 2024, highlighting a slight decrease in funds under management to $9.9 billion compared to the start of the financial year. Despite this, the company maintained strong performance across most investment strategies, with net fee income rising to $35.3 million and an unchanged interim dividend of 11p per share declared. The company continues to focus on growth and diversification, with a significant shift in asset composition and strategic efforts to enhance client communications and operational efficiency.
City of London Investment Group PLC reported a decrease in Funds under Management to $9.9 billion as of December 31, 2024, reflecting a 2.9% decline compared to six months prior. The company experienced net investment outflows totaling $564 million, mainly from EM, International Equity, and KIM strategies, although some strategies like OV and alternatives saw net inflows. Despite these outflows, the investment performance was ahead of benchmarks for most core strategies, placing them in the first or second quartile against peers. This reflects a robust performance but indicates challenges in client rebalancing and asset allocation shifts.