We believe that our intellectual property is essential to the success of our products and to our competitive position. We dedicate significant resources to the protection of our intellectual property assets (including trademarks, designs, production processes and technologies, utility patents and other distinctive marks) in the jurisdictions in which we operate. There can be no assurance, however, that we will succeed in protecting our intellectual property rights.
With respect to designs in particular, design rights do not prevent our competitors from developing products that are substantially equivalent to or better than our products, while not infringing our intellectual property rights. Moreover, any actions we take to establish and protect our designs, trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property rights may not be adequate to prevent counterfeiting, imitation of our products by competitors or other third parties or to prevent these persons from asserting rights in, or ownership of, our brand trademarks and other intellectual property rights. We may therefore be forced to spend significant resources to defend our intellectual property from infringement or from third party claims. In addition, should third parties register intellectual property rights which overlap with ours, or should we attempt to enter new markets where third parties have registered intellectual property rights which are similar to those which we would wish to register, we may be constrained from developing our business in such markets or we may have to spend more resources to support our registration. In addition, applications to register intellectual property may face objections from the trademark offices we seek to register them in and may not mature into registrations. If we were to face judicial or administrative challenges involving our registered intellectual property rights, for instance requesting cancellation on grounds of non-use, we may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. Each of the above could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the laws of certain countries may not protect trademarks, designs, copyrights and other intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States or the European Union.
Third parties could make claims or bring legal action against us for an alleged infringement of such third parties' intellectual property rights. As a result, we may be required to discontinue the sale of certain products, pay damages, incur licensing costs, modify our production processes and/or products, or have the scope or validity of our intellectual property rights determined in court in order to be authorized to sell such products.
For instance, on June 28, 2021 Adidas AG ("adidas") commenced an action against Thom Browne, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, for, among other things, trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution and various state claims, in connection with the use of Thom Browne's five color grosgrain ribbon and the four bars on sleeves and pants on its sporting goods, sportswear and athletic wear, allegedly infringing the three stripe marks of adidas. The case was assigned to a jury trial and, on January 12, 2023, the jury found that at no time did Thom Browne, Inc. infringe on any of adidas's trademarks. Adidas has filed a notice of appeal, following which Thom Browne, Inc. has filed a notice of cross-appeal. In addition, based on evidence submitted in another trial against Thom Browne Inc., adidas has filed a motion requesting a new trial based on discovery flaws. The appeal from the jury verdict remains pending before the Court of Appeals and the parties have been called for oral argument on April 17, 2024. The motion for a new trial is pending before the lower court judge who has been notified of the oral argument before the Court of Appeals; we therefore expect a rapid decision on the pending motion to reopen the case.
Meanwhile, the opposition filed by adidas against several trademarks which Thom Browne Inc. filed for registration in the European Union was denied, except with respect to one mark which has yet to be decided. Thom Browne has commenced cancellation proceedings in the European Union as well as in the UK against a number of adidas's trademarks that could be used to restrain access of Thom Browne Inc.'s products to these markets. As a result, adidas has filed counterclaims for infringement of those marks by Thom Browne Inc.'s use of its grosgrain ribbon signature as well as the four bar design. On challenge, adidas has voluntarily cancelled a number of the marks at issue. The first hearing in the UK is set for July 17, 2024 and trial is expected to conclude during the week of July 24.
In addition, in 2022 adidas commenced a lawsuit before the Nuremberg-Furth District Court in Germany against Thom Browne, Inc. and Thom Browne Retail Italy S.r.l., alleging Thom Browne's four-bar signature infringed adidas's three stripe mark. Counsel's service of the documentation was flawed and formed the basis of default judgments against both Thom Browne, Inc. and Thom Browne Retail Italy Srl. Upon discovery of the defaults, Thom Browne obtained the suspension of both judgments. The parties have submitted their arguments and are now waiting for the judge to decide or for the District Court to assign a trial period.
Thom Browne intends to vigorously defend its position in all the aforementioned proceedings.
These or any other such events may entail significant losses in addition to legal costs, with possible adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For information on legal costs incurred in connection with this matter until December 31, 2023, see "Item 5-Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Non-IFRS Financial Measures" and Note 5 - Segment reporting to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this document.