Xylo Technologies Ltd (XYLO) Risk Factors

A significant portion of our intellectual property has been developed by our employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the Israeli Patent Law, 5727-1967, or the Patent Law, inventions conceived by an employee in the course and as a result of or arising from his or her employment with a company are regarded as "service inventions," which belong to the employer, absent a specific agreement between the employee and employer giving the employee service invention rights. The Patent Law also provides that if there is no such agreement between an employer and an employee, the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee, or the Committee, a body constituted under the Patent Law, will determine whether the employee is entitled to remuneration for his inventions. Recent case law clarifies that the right to receive consideration for "service inventions" can be waived by the employee and that in certain circumstances, such waiver does not necessarily have to be explicit. The Committee will examine, on a case-by-case basis, the general contractual framework between the parties, using interpretation rules of the general Israeli contract laws. Further, the Committee has not yet determined one specific formula for calculating this remuneration (but rather uses the criteria specified in the Patent Law). Although we generally enter into assignment-of-invention agreements with our employees pursuant to which such individuals assign to us all rights to any inventions created in the scope of their employment or engagement with us, we may face claims demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned inventions. As a consequence of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current and/or former employees, or be forced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.

Eventer's operations involve the storage and transmission of artist and ticket purchaser data or information. Cyberattacks and other malicious internet-based activity continue to increase, and cloud-based platform providers of services are expected to continue to be targeted. Threats include traditional computer "hackers," malicious code (such as viruses and worms), employee theft or misuse and denial-of-service attacks. Sophisticated nation-states and nation-state supported actors now engage in such attacks, including advanced persistent threat intrusions. The ticket sales solution included in Eventer's platform stores credit card data and other customer personal information. Hackers and malicious actors may target Eventer in order to obtain credit card information. Despite significant efforts to create security barriers to such threats, it is virtually impossible for Eventer to entirely mitigate these risks. If Eventer's security measures are compromised as a result of third-party action, employee or customer error, malfeasance, stolen or fraudulently obtained log-in credentials, or otherwise, Eventer's reputation could be damaged, its business may be harmed, and it could incur significant liability. Eventer may be unable to anticipate or prevent techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to compromise its systems because they change frequently and are generally not detected until after an incident has occurred. As Eventer relies on third-party and public-cloud infrastructure, it will depend in part on third-party security measures to protect against unauthorized access, cyberattacks, and the mishandling of customer data. A cybersecurity event could have significant costs, including regulatory enforcement actions, litigation, litigation indemnity obligations, remediation costs, network downtime, increases in insurance premiums, and reputational damage. Many companies that provide cloud-based services have reported a significant increase in cyberattack activity.

Gix Internet uses artificial intelligence technologies ("AI") throughout its business and continuously attempts to improve its use of such technologies. For example, Gix Internet uses AI to translate articles from English into multiple languages on its content platform. As with many technological innovations, there are significant risks and challenges involved in developing, maintaining, and deploying these technologies and there can be no assurance that the usage of such technologies will always enhance Gix Internet's products or services or be beneficial to its business, including to its efficiency or profitability. In addition, the market for AI is rapidly evolving and remains unproven in many industries, including Gix Internet's own. Gix Internet cannot ensure that the market will continue to grow or that it will grow in the manner it anticipates. Gix Internet is currently in various stages of development of its AI systems, and it may not be successful in such development in the face of novel and evolving technical, reputational and market factors. The development, maintenance and operation of Gix Internet's artificial intelligence technologies are expensive and complex, and may involve unforeseen difficulties including material performance problems, undetected defects, or errors. Furthermore, Gix Internet uses third-party AI technologies or software, which may introduce significant risks to its cybersecurity as these could spread vulnerabilities, defects viruses, ransomware, or malware through our products and/or services across its supply chain and operations. Gix Internet may encounter technical obstacles, and it is possible that it may discover additional problems that may prevent its technologies from operating properly, which could adversely affect its business, customer relationships and reputation. Gix Internet faces significant competition from other companies in its industry in relation to the development and deployment of AI. Those other companies may develop AI technologies that are similar or superior to Gix Internet's and/or are more cost-effective and/or quicker to develop and deploy. If Gix Internet cannot develop, offer, or deploy new AI technologies as effectively, as quickly and/or as cost-efficiently as its competitors, Gix Internet could experience a material adverse effect on its operating results of operation, customer relationships and growth.

Eventer's business is highly sensitive to rapidly changing public tastes and is dependent on the availability of popular artists and events. Eventer's live entertainment business depends on its ability to anticipate the tastes of consumers and offer events that appeal to them. Since Eventer relies on unrelated parties to create and perform at live music events as well as online events, any lack of availability of popular artists could limit its ability to generate revenue. If artists do not choose to perform, or if Eventer cannot secure performances and events to be managed and ticketed through its platform, Eventer's business would be adversely affected. Furthermore, Eventer's business could be adversely affected if artists utilizing its platform do not tour or perform as frequently as anticipated, or if such tours or performances are not as widely attended by fans as anticipated due to changing tastes, general economic conditions or otherwise.

If it is not able to negotiate acceptable pricing and other terms with vendors or if vendors experience performance problems or other difficulties, it could negatively impact its operating results and its customers' experience. It is also subject to volatility in ocean freight rates that are driven, in part, by seasonality, capacity availability, and other factors, including fuel-related regulations affecting the shipping industry. In addition, its ability to receive inbound inventory efficiently and ship merchandise to clients may be negatively affected by inclement weather, fire, flood, power loss, earthquakes, labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, and similar factors. It is also subject to the risk of damage or loss during delivery by its shipping vendors. If its products are not delivered in a timely fashion or are damaged or lost during the delivery process, its customers could become dissatisfied and cease using its products or services, which would adversely affect its business and operating results.

Our subsidiaries and we receive, collect, store, process, transfer, and use personal information and other data relating to users of our products, our employees and contractors, and other persons. We have legal and contractual obligations regarding the protection of confidentiality and appropriate use of certain data, including personal information. We are subject to numerous federal, state, local, and international laws, directives, and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and data security and the collection, storing, sharing, use, processing, transfer, disclosure, and protection of personal information and other data, the scope of which are changing, subject to differing interpretations, and may be inconsistent among jurisdictions or conflict with other legal and regulatory requirements. We are also subject to certain contractual obligations to third parties related to privacy, data protection and data security. We strive to comply with our applicable policies and applicable laws, regulations, contractual obligations, and other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection, and data security to the extent possible. However, the regulatory framework for privacy, data protection and data security worldwide is, and is likely to remain for the foreseeable future, uncertain and complex, and it is possible that these or other actual or alleged obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that we do not anticipate or that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other legal obligations or our practices. Further, any significant change to applicable laws, regulations or industry practices regarding the collection, use, retention, security or disclosure of data, or their interpretation, or any changes regarding the manner in which the consent of users or other data subjects for the collection, use, retention or disclosure of such data must be obtained, could increase our costs and require us to modify our services and features, possibly in a material manner, which we may be unable to complete, and may limit our ability to store and process user data or develop new services and features. If our subsidiaries or we were found in violation of any applicable laws or regulations relating to privacy, data protection, or security, our business may be materially and adversely affected, and we would likely have to change our business practices and potentially the services and features available through our platform. In addition, these laws and regulations could impose significant costs on us and could constrain our ability to use and process data in manners that may be commercially desirable. In addition, if a breach of data security were to occur or to be alleged to have occurred, if any violation of laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection or data security were to be alleged, or if we had any actual or alleged defect in our safeguards or practices relating to privacy, data protection, or data security, our solutions may be perceived as less desirable, and our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We also expect that there will continue to be new laws, regulations, and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection, and information security proposed and enacted in various jurisdictions. For example, the data protection landscape in the European Union ("EU") is currently evolving, resulting in possible significant operational costs for internal compliance and risks to our business. The EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR, which became effective in May 2018, and contains numerous requirements and changes from previously existing EU laws, including more robust obligations on data processors and heavier documentation requirements for data protection compliance programs by companies. Among other requirements, the GDPR regulates the transfer of personal data subject to the GDPR to third countries that have not been found to provide adequate protection to such personal data, including the United States. In addition to the GDPR, the European Commission has another draft regulation in the approval process that focuses on a person's right to conduct a private life. The proposed legislation, known as the Regulation of Privacy and Electronic Communications, or ePrivacy Regulation, would replace the current ePrivacy Directive. Originally planned to be adopted and implemented at the same time as the GDPR, the ePrivacy Regulation is still being negotiated. Although it remains under debate, the proposed ePrivacy Regulation may further raise the bar for the use of cookies, and the fines and penalties for breach may be significant and could affect our services, business and revenues. We cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business. In addition, the U.K.'s General Data Protection Regulation (the "UK GDPR"), imposes robust obligations for the collection, control, use, sharing, disclosure and other processing of personal data and contains documentation and accountability requirements for data protection compliance. The UK GDPR exposes us to two parallel regimes (GDPR and UK GDPR), each of which authorizes similar fines and may subject us to increased compliance risk based on differing, and potentially inconsistent or conflicting interpretation and enforcement by regulators and authorities (particularly, if the laws are amended in the future in divergent ways). Failure to comply with these obligations can result in significant fines and other liability under applicable law. In particular, under the GDPR, fines of up to EUR 20 million (or GBP 17.5 million under the UK GDPR) or up to 4% of the annual global revenue of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater, could be imposed for violations of certain of the GDPR's requirements. The GDPR requirements apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of data between us and our subsidiaries, including employee data. Because our services are accessible worldwide, certain foreign jurisdictions may claim that we are required to comply with their laws, including in jurisdictions where we have no local entity, employees or infrastructure. On November 1, 2022, the Digital Markets Act, (the "DMA"), entered into force and on November 16, 2022, the Digital Services Act (the "DSA"), followed. For the DSA, most provisions became applicable on February 17, 2024. The DSA and the DMA focus on creating a safer digital space, protecting fundamental rights of all users of digital services, and establishing a level playing field for businesses and consumers with regards to online platforms. As further guidance is issued and interpretation of both the DSA and the DMA evolves, it is difficult to assess the impact of the DSA and DMA on our and our subsidiaries' business or operations, but, to the extent applicable, it may require us to modify our practices and policies and we could incur substantial costs as a result. Additionally, legal developments in Europe in recent years, have created complexity and uncertainty regarding transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States. On June 27, 2021, the European Commission published a new set of modular standard contractual clauses (the "New SCCs"). The New SCCs must be used for all relevant transfers of personal data outside the EEA (since December 27, 2022) and organizations must ensure that all new and existing contracts involving the transfer of personal data outside the EEA contain New SCCs and, for transfers out of the UK, the International Data Transfer Agreement ("IDTA") or the UK Addendum to the New SCCs. In addition to the use of a valid data transfer mechanism, transfer impact assessments must be carried out in respect of planned transfers of personal data from the EEA/UK to third countries including the U.S., and failure to do so may expose us to further compliance risk. The Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") decision also cast doubt over the effectiveness of the SCCs. The European Data Protection Board, which subsequently issued a revised set of SCCs for organizations to utilize, released their comments on the supplementary measures that can be used to ensure a sufficient level of data protection when transferring personal data. The comments indicated that organizations need to perform a data transfer impact assessment to evaluate the legal regime applicable in the destination country, in particular applicable surveillance laws and rights of individuals, and that additional measures and/or contractual provisions may need to be put in place. However, the nature of these additional measures is currently uncertain. Additionally, recent legal developments in EU have created complexity and uncertainty regarding transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States and other non-adequate jurisdictions. The EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (EU-U.S. DPF), the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF), and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (Swiss-U.S. DPF) were developed to facilitate transatlantic commerce by providing U.S. organizations with reliable mechanisms for personal data transfers to the United States from the European Union / European Economic Area, the United Kingdom (and Gibraltar), and Switzerland that are consistent with EU, UK, and Swiss law. On July 10, 2023, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. DPF. The adequacy decision concludes that the United States ensures an adequate level of protection – compared to that of the EU - for personal data transferred from the EU to US companies participating in the EU-U.S. DPF. On October 12, 2023, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, known as the UK-US Data Bridge, took effect, allowing the transfers of personal data from the United Kingdom (UK) to the US without the need of having additional mechanism or safeguards in place. Further, the European Commission regularly re-examines its adequacy decisions, including its Decision 2011/61/EU regarding the adequacy of Israeli law. On January 15, 2024, the European Commission successfully concluded its review of 11 existing adequacy decisions. These decisions had been adopted under the EU data protection legislation that preceded the GDPR. The European Commission finds that personal data transferred from the European Union to Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, Switzerland and Uruguay, continues to benefit from adequate data protection safeguards. Therefore, the adequacy decisions adopted for these eleven countries and territories remain in place and data can continue to flow freely to these jurisdictions. In addition, while the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision for the UK on June 28, 2021, allowing the continued flow of personal data from the EEA to the UK, this decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the European Commission re-assesses and renews or extends that decision. The decision will be regularly reviewed by the European Commission going forward and may be revoked if the UK diverges from its current data protection laws and the European Commission deems the UK to no longer provide adequate protection of personal data. Additionally, in June 2018, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which provides new data privacy rights for California consumers and new operational requirements for covered companies. Specifically, the CCPA provides that covered companies must provide new disclosures to California consumers and afford such consumers new data privacy rights that include the right to request a copy from a covered company of the personal information collected about them, the right to request deletion of such personal information, and the right to request to opt-out of certain sales of such personal information. The California Attorney General can enforce the CCPA, including seeking an injunction and civil penalties for violations. The CCPA also provides a private right of action for certain data breaches expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may require us to modify our data practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in order to comply. On November 3, 2020, California voters passed the California Privacy Rights Act into law, which took effect in January 2023 and significantly expands the CCPA, including by introducing additional obligations such as data minimization and storage limitations, granting additional rights to consumers. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. More generally, some observers have noted the CCPA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent United States state and federal privacy legislations, which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business. Additional U.S. states have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, similar new laws or regulations (for example, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act ("VCDPA"), which took effect on January 1, 2023, and the Colorado Privacy Act ("CPA"), which took effect on July 1, 2023, Connecticut Data Privacy Act ("CDPA") which took effect on July 1, 2023 Utah Consumer Privacy Act ("UCPA") which took effect on December 31, 2023) that impose new privacy rights and obligations that resemble the CCPA. More generally, some observers have noted that the CCPA, VCDPA, CPA, CDPA and UCPA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent United States federal privacy legislation, which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business. Moreover, other federal laws have been enacted. For example, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule that restricts online service providers' collection of user data on minors as well as distribution of materials deemed harmful to minors. In many respects, these state laws focus on advertising activities, mandating that businesses that engage in certain advertising uses of consumer personal data to offer and honor an opt-out of such activities, including, in some states, through browser or device-based preference signals. These state privacy laws also provide consumers other rights, such as to access, correct or delete their personal data (subject to certain limitations), opt out of certain processing of their personal data, and impose special rules on the collection of data from minors, as well as transparency and data governance obligations. Additionally, new state privacy laws (including, privacy laws, social media regulations, children online data laws and data broker laws) are expected to become effective in 2024, including privacy laws in Florida, Oregon, Texas, and Montana, and additional states are expected to follow in future years. There are also a number of legislative proposals pending before the U.S. Congress and various state legislative bodies concerning various data protection topics, including, privacy, children data, data brokers, which could affect us. The abovementioned laws, regulations and decisions could impact our services, business operations, practices, products, or our ability to receive information necessary to conduct our business. In addition, failure to comply with the Israeli Privacy Protection Law 5741-1981, and its regulations as well as the guidelines of the Israeli Privacy Protection Authority, may expose us to administrative fines, civil claims (including class actions), and in certain cases, criminal liability. Current pending amendment to the Israeli Privacy Protection Law, 1981 is expected to enhance fines and sanctions for breaching the Israeli Privacy Law and to strengthen the enforcement capacity of the Israeli Privacy Protection Authority. There have also been privacy bills enacted in other countries around the world, such as Brazil, which have introduced new or expanded privacy requirements and we expect that privacy legislation will continue to evolve in the coming years. Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether and how such existing laws and regulations will apply to and impact the internet and our business. On January 15, 2024, the European Commission successfully concluded its review of 11 existing adequacy decisions. These decisions had been adopted under the EU data protection legislation that preceded the GDPR. The European Commission finds that personal data transferred from the European Union to Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Uruguay, continues to benefit from adequate data protection safeguards. Therefore, the adequacy decisions adopted for these eleven countries and territories remain in place and data can continue to flow freely to these jurisdictions. Any failure or perceived failure by our subsidiaries or by us to comply with our posted privacy policies, our privacy-related obligations to users or other third parties, or any other legal obligations or regulatory requirements relating to privacy, data protection, or data security may result in governmental investigations or enforcement actions, litigation, claims, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others and could result in significant liability, cause our users to lose trust in us, and otherwise materially and adversely affect our reputation and business. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, other obligations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our users may limit the adoption and use of, and reduce the overall demand for, our platform. Additionally, if third parties we work with violate applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations, such violations may put our users' data at risk, could result in governmental investigations or enforcement actions, fines, litigation, claims, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others and could result in significant liability, cause our users to lose trust in us, and otherwise materially and adversely affect our reputation and business. Further, public scrutiny of, or complaints about, technology companies or their data handling or data protection practices, even if unrelated to our business, industry, or operations, may lead to increased scrutiny of technology companies, including us, and may cause government agencies to enact additional regulatory requirements, or to modify their enforcement or investigation activities, which may increase our costs and risks. While it is generally the laws of the jurisdiction in which our business is located apply, there is a risk that data protection regulators of other countries may seek jurisdiction over our remotely activities in locations in which we process data of our customers, but do not have an operating entity. Where the local data protection and privacy laws of a jurisdiction apply, we may be required to register our operations in that jurisdiction or make changes to our business so that personal data is only collected and processed in accordance with applicable local law. In addition, because our services are accessible worldwide, certain foreign jurisdictions may claim that we are required to comply with their privacy and data protection laws, including in jurisdictions where we have no local entity, employees, or infrastructure. In such cases, we may require additional legal review and resources to ensure compliance with any applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations. In addition, in many jurisdictions there may in the future be new legislation that may affect our business and require additional legal review. Additionally, if third parties we work with violate applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations, such violations may put our users' data at risk, could result in governmental investigations or enforcement actions, fines, litigation, claims, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others and could result in significant liability, cause our users to lose trust in us, and otherwise materially and adversely affect our reputation and business. Further, public scrutiny of, or complaints about, technology companies or their data handling or data protection practices, even if unrelated to our business, industry, or operations, may lead to increased scrutiny of technology companies, including us, and may cause government agencies to enact additional regulatory requirements, or to modify their enforcement or investigation activities, which may increase our costs and risks.

The Israeli government currently provides major tax and capital investment incentives to domestic companies, as well as grant and loan programs relating to research and development and marketing and export activities. In recent years, the Israeli Government has reduced the benefits available under these programs and the Israeli Governmental authorities have indicated that the government may in the future further reduce or eliminate the benefits of those programs. We currently take advantage of these programs. There is no assurance that such benefits and programs would continue to be available in the future to us. If such benefits and programs were terminated or further reduced, it could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we or our manufacturers or other third-party contractors fail to comply with applicable federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, including with respect to healthcare and data privacy, we could be subject to regulatory actions, which could affect our ability to develop, market and sell our current products or any future products which we may develop in the future and could harm our reputation and lead to reduced demand for or non-acceptance of our proposed products by the market.

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, and our employees, including management members, operate from our offices that are located in Tel Aviv, Israel. In addition, a number our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, our business and operations are directly affected by economic, political, geopolitical and military conditions in Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region. These conflicts have involved missile strikes, hostile infiltrations and terrorism against civilian targets in various parts of Israel, which have negatively affected business conditions in Israel. In October 2023, Hamas terrorists infiltrated Israel's southern border from the Gaza Strip and conducted a series of attacks on civilian and military targets. Hamas also launched extensive rocket attacks on Israeli population and industrial centers located along Israel's border with the Gaza Strip and in other areas within the State of Israel. These attacks resulted in extensive deaths, injuries and kidnapping of civilians and soldiers. Following the attack, Israel's security cabinet declared war against Hamas and a military campaign against these terrorist organizations commenced in parallel to their continued rocket and terror attacks. The intensity and duration of Israel's current war against Hamas is difficult to predict, as are such war's economic implications on our business and operations and on Israel's economy in general. These events may be intertwined with wider macroeconomic indications of a deterioration of Israel's economic standing, for instance, a downgrade in Israel's credit rating by rating agencies (such as the recent downgrade by Moody's of its credit rating of Israel from A1 to A2, as well as the downgrade of its outlook rating from "stable" to "negative" and the S&P Global lowered its long-term credit rating from AA- to A+, as well as a downgrade of its short-term credit ratings from A-1+ to A-1, with an outlook on the long-term ratings "negative"). which may have a material adverse effect on our Company and our ability to effectively conduct its operations. In connection with the Israeli security cabinet's declaration of war against Hamas and possible hostilities with other organizations, several hundred thousand Israeli military reservists were drafted to perform immediate military service. Certain of our employees and consultants in Israel, in addition to employees of our service providers located in Israel, have been called, and additional employees may be called, for service in the current or future wars or other armed conflicts with Hamas and others, and such persons may be absent for an extended period of time. As a result, our operations may be disrupted by such absences, which disruption may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, the absence of employees of our Israeli suppliers and contract manufacturers due to their military service in the current or future wars or other armed conflicts may disrupt their operations, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our ability to deliver or provide products and services to customers. Following the attack by Hamas on Israel's southern border, Hezbollah in Lebanon also launched missile, rocket, drone and shooting attacks against Israeli military sites, troops and Israeli towns in northern Israel. In response to these attacked, the Israeli army has carried out a number of targeted strikes on sites belonging to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Recently, Iran has directly joined the hostilities against Israel by firing hundreds of drones, ballistic missiles and guided missiles to Israel causing further uncertainty in the region. While currently no damages were registered in Israel from such attack, the situation is developing and could lead to additional wars and hostilities in the Middle East. It is possible that other terrorist organizations, including Palestinian military organizations in the West Bank will join the hostilities. Such hostilities may include terror and missile attacks. In the event that our facilities are damaged as a result of hostile actions, or hostilities otherwise disrupt our ongoing operations, our ability to deliver or provide products and services in a timely manner to meet our contractual obligations towards customers and vendors could be materially and adversely affected. Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of certain direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that such government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, some countries around the world restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities in Israel or political instability in the region continue or increase. These restrictions may limit materially our ability to sell our products and provide our services to companies and customers in these countries. In addition, there have been increased efforts by activists to cause companies and consumers to boycott Israeli goods and services. Such efforts, particularly if they become more widespread, may materially and adversely impact our ability to sell and provide our products and services outside of Israel. Furthermore, following Hamas' attack on Israel and Israel's security cabinet declaration of war against Hamas, the Houthi movement, which controls parts of Yemen, launched a number of attacks on marine vessels traversing the Red Sea, which marine vessels were thought to either be in route towards Israel or to be partly owned by Israeli businessmen. The Red Sea is a vital maritime route for international trade traveling to or from Israel. As a result of such disruptions, we may experience in the future delays in supplier deliveries, extended lead times, and increased cost of freight, increased insurance costs, purchased materials and manufacturing labor costs. The risk of ongoing supply disruptions may further result in delayed deliveries of our products. Prior to the Hamas attack in October 2023, the Israeli government pursued extensive changes to Israel's judicial system, which sparked extensive political debate and unrest. In response to such initiative, many individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have voiced concerns that the proposed changes may negatively impact the business environment in Israel including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest or transact business in Israel, as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates, increased volatility in security markets and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. The risk of such negative developments has increased in light of the recent Hamas attacks and the war against Hamas declared by Israel, regardless of the proposed changes to the judicial system and the related debate. To the extent that any of these negative developments do occur, they may have an adverse effect on our business, our results of operations and our ability to raise additional funds, if deemed necessary by our management and board of directors.