SPI Energy Co (SPIEF) Risk Factors

As of the date of this annual report, we had 30,292,960 ordinary shares outstanding, including 6,023,204, ordinary shares, or approximately 19.88% of our total ordinary shares outstanding, held by Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, our director, executive chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer. The possibility that substantial amounts of our outstanding ordinary shares may be sold by Mr. Xiaofeng Peng or the perception that such sales could occur, or "equity overhang," could adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares, and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities in the future. We are subject to litigation risks, including securities class actions and shareholder derivative actions, which may be costly to defend and the outcome of which is uncertain. From time to time, we are subject to legal claims, with and without merit, that may be costly, and which may divert the attention of our management and our resources in general. In addition, our solar projects may be subject to litigation or other adverse proceedings that may adversely impact our ability to proceed with construction or grid connection or sell a given project, which would adversely affect our ability to recognize revenue with respect to such project. We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. See "Item 1. Business -Legal Proceedings." The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Lawsuits filed against us may assert types of claims that, if resolved against us, could give rise to substantial damages, and an unfavorable outcome or settlement of one or more of these lawsuits, or any future lawsuits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Even if these lawsuits are not resolved against us, the costs of defending such lawsuits may not be covered by our insurance policies. We cannot assure you that additional litigation will not be filed against us in the future.

There is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States (and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments). However, such a judgment will generally be recognized and enforced at common law by the courts of the Cayman Islands, without any re-examination or re-litigation of the merits of the case, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt, provided that: (a) the foreign court had jurisdiction over the parties to the dispute; (b) the judgment is for a liquidated sum; (c) the judgment is final, conclusive and not subject to appeal; (d) the judgment is not of a public, revenue or penal nature; (e) the judgment was not obtained by fraud or in proceedings contrary to natural justice; (f) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to Cayman Islands public policy; (g) the judgment is not inconsistent with sections 91 or 92 of the Trusts Act (as revised) of the Cayman Islands; (h) the process by which the judgment is enforced is not barred under laws relating to the prescription and limitation of actions; and (i) the judgment is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same cause or point at issue between the same parties. However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce a judgment obtained from the U.S. courts under civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities law if such judgment is determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands to give rise to obligations to make payments that are penal or punitive in nature. Because such a determination has not yet been made by a court of the Cayman Islands, it is uncertain whether such civil liability judgments from U.S. courts would be enforceable in the Cayman Islands.

Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association permits our board of directors, without shareholder approval, to authorize the issuance of preferred shares. The board of directors may classify or reclassify any preferred shares to set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares, including the issuance of preferred shares that have preference rights over our ordinary shares with respect to dividends, liquidation and voting rights. Furthermore, substantially all of our ordinary shares for which our outstanding stock options are exercisable are, once they have been purchased, eligible for immediate sale in the public market. We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make these rights available in the United States unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause a registration statement to be declared effective. Moreover, we may not be able to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in your holdings. The issuance of additional shares in our capital or the exercise of stock options or warrants could be substantially dilutive to your shares and may negatively affect the market price of our ordinary shares.

The price of our ordinary shares has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to many events or factors, including those discussed in the preceding risk factors relating to our operations, as well as: - actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results, actual or anticipated gross profit as a percentage of net sales, our actual or anticipated rate of growth and our actual or anticipated earnings per share;         - changes in expectations as to future financial performance or changes in financial estimates;         - changes in governmental regulations or policies in the countries in which we do business;         - our, or a competitor's, announcement of new products, services or technological innovations;         - the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;         - news and commentary emanating from the media, securities analysts or government bodies relating to us and to the industry in general;- changes in the general condition of the global economy and credit markets;         - general market conditions or other developments affecting us or our industry;         - announcements regarding patent litigation or the issuance of patents to us or our competitors;         - release or expiry of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding ordinary shares;         - sales or perceived sales of additional ordinary shares; and         - commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation. Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which our ordinary shares will trade. We cannot give any assurance that these factors will not occur in the future again. In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also have a material adverse effect on the market price of our ordinary shares. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of their stock, many companies have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we become involved in similar securities class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management's attention and resources and could harm our stock price, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ordinary shares are currently listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. If we remain listed, there are a number of requirements that must be met in order for our ordinary shares to remain listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and the failure to meet any of these listing standards could result in the delisting of our ordinary shares from NASDAQ. We cannot assure you that we will be able to timely file all required reports or comply with all other NASDAQ Listing Rules at all times in the future, or regain compliance in a timely manner in case of a default and avoid any subsequent adverse action taken by the Listing Qualifications Department, including but not limited to delisting.

We suffered net losses of $44.8 million and $33.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively. We also had an accumulated deficit of $670.8 million and a working capital deficit of $107.7 million as of December 31, 2022. In addition, we have substantial amounts of debt that became due in 2023. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through cash flows from bank borrowings, financing from issuance of convertible bonds, operating activities and proceeds from private placements and registered offerings. However if we failed to achieve the goal, we may need additional financing to repay debt obligation and execute our business plan, and we may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. Without access to sufficient level of capital from operations or through bank borrowings or other sources, we may not be able to execute our growth strategy or pursue additional projects, or may not even be able to satisfy repayment requirements on our borrowings. These uncertainties may create concerns for our creditors, suppliers, customers and other counterparties, and cause them to make it more difficult for us to raise our financing, conduct our business and meet our debt and other obligations. Although we have formulated a plan as summarized under Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report to continue implementing various measures to boost revenue and control the cost and expenses within an acceptable level, and other measures including negotiate with potential buyers for sales of Solar PV projects, obtain equity financing from certain subsidiaries' initial public offering and seek credit facilities, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully execute this plan. The amount of liquidity that we need may be greater than we currently anticipate as a result of additional factors and events beyond our control, such as global economic slowdown, potential financial crises globally or in any region where we conduct a significant portion of our business, changes in the regulatory and business environments, including international trade-related sanctions, which may prevent us from operating normally or from effectively competing in the PV industry. All of these and other factors and occurrences may increase our cash requirements and make us unable to satisfy repayment requirements on our borrowings. We have recognized the fact that additional actions were needed to reposition our operations to minimize our cash outflows. Therefore, we undertook a number of initiatives in order to conserve or generate cash on an incremental basis in 2022. For a detailed discussion of these initiatives and strategies, please see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-B. Liquidity and Capital Resources- Capital Resources and Material Known Facts on Liquidity." However, there is no assurance that these initiatives and strategies will be successfully implemented, or even if successfully implemented, our cash position and our operational efficiency will be improved. In the event that our business initiatives and strategies do not achieve the expected results, our business, financial conditions, results of operations and liquidity position may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we have identified several business related risk factors, such as compliance with laws and regulations, contingent liabilities arising from litigations, suspected related party transactions and unusual transactions, which could cause cash position to further deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013 Framework). Based on this evaluation, we noted the following deficiencies that we believe to be material weaknesses: a. Failure to maintain an effective control environment of internal control over financial reporting;     b. Failure to develop an effective risk assessment process to identify and evaluate at a sufficient level of detail all relevant risks of material misstatement, including business, operational, and fraud risks;     c. Ineffective monitoring activities to assess the operation of internal control over financial reporting;     d. Ineffective process-level controls associated with the revenue, purchasing and inventory, treasury, property and equipment, tax, and payroll processes that (a) addressed relevant risks, (b) provided sufficient evidence of performance, and (c) established appropriate segregation of duties, during the financial reporting processes;     e. Lack of sufficient controls designed and implemented for financial information processing and reporting and lacked resources with requisite skills for the financial reporting under U.S. GAAP; and     f. Lack of sufficient controls designed and implemented in IT environment and IT general control activities, which mainly associated with areas of logical access security, system change, computer operation and service organization control monitoring activities. Certain process-level automated controls and manual controls that are dependent on the completeness and accuracy of information derived from the affected information technology systems were also ineffective. As a result of the above material weaknesses, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2022. To remediate the material weaknesses described above, we plan to continue to establish a comprehensive and effective internal control system with the assistance from third party consulting firm which shall provide relevant professional advisory services to us. We plan to continue to assess our standardized processes to further enhance the effectiveness of our financial review, including the analysis and monitoring of financial information in a consistent and thorough manner. The Company's remediation actions to be taken were highlighted as follows: a. Strengthen overview and monitoring from the Company's governance, and set up the Company's internal audit department who reports to the audit committee directly, to ensure enhanced oversight over the Company's financial reporting function;     b. Engage a professional adviser to review, test and optimize the Company's internal control system, particularly focusing on the material weaknesses identified as above.     c. Launch and improve the internal control execution plan to supervise and monitor the operational functions;     d. Establish a formal and systematic risk assessment program and involve upper management to identify and analyze risks.     e. Provide our accounting team and other relevant personnel with more comprehensive guidelines and training on the policies and controls over financial reporting under U.S. GAAP and SEC rules and requirements     f. Strengthen the review controls on journal entries and accounting treatments and adjustment by providing our accounting team with more comprehensive guidelines on the policies and controls over financial reporting under U.S. GAAP and SEC rules and requirements.     g. Enhance management monitoring and review of key processes with more comprehensive guidelines on the policies and controls over financial reporting.     h. Strengthen the monitoring and evaluation of the independent and competent tax and accounting agencies.     i. Strengthen the supervision and controls on the IT functions, including the enhancement of logical security and monitor service provider. Any failure to remedy additional weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that may be discovered in the future or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of such controls, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could, in turn, affect the future ability of our management to certify that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could also subject us to the scrutiny of the SEC and other regulatory bodies which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and subject us to civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation, which could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our securities. In addition, if we identify additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market's confidence in our financial statements and harm our share price. Furthermore, additional deficiencies could result in future non-compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"). Such non-compliance could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including review by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Before we achieve economies of scale in terms of our IPP projects and receive steady electricity generation income, our revenue in a given period will depend on the number of solar projects sold under our BT model and sale of PV modules and solar component, and therefore is subject to significant fluctuations. For instance, we may generate a significant portion of our revenues from the one-time sale of solar projects for certain periods. Moreover, certain aspects of our operations will also be subject to seasonal variations. For example, we may schedule significant construction activities to connect solar projects to the grids prior to a scheduled decrease in FIT rates in order to qualify for more favorable FIT policies.

Phoenix had accumulated deficit of $28.6 million as of December 31, 2022. Phoenix have incurred a net loss of $12.7 million and $14.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Phoenix may incur significant losses in the future and may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. Its management is developing plans to alleviate the negative trends and conditions described above and there is no guarantee that such plans will be successfully implemented. Its business plan is focused on providing sustainable and cost-effective solutions to the commercial transportation sector but is still unproven. There is no assurance that even if we successfully implement our business plan, that Phoenix will be able to curtail its losses or ever achieve profitable operations.

Phoenix has had negative cash flow from operating activities of $14.9 million and 12.9 million for years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Phoenix anticipate that it will continue to have negative cash flow from operating and investing activities through the remainder of 2023 as it expects to incur research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses and make capital expenditures in its efforts to increase sales and ramp up operations. Its business also will at times require significant amounts of working capital to support its growth. An inability to generate positive cash flow for the near term may adversely affect its ability to raise needed capital for its business on reasonable terms, diminish supplier or customer willingness to enter into transactions with Phoenix, and have other adverse effects that may decrease its long-term viability. There can be no assurance that Phoenix will achieve positive cash flow in the near future or at all.

Although we believe Phoenix has sufficient capital resources and capital availability to meet its needs for the remainder of 2023, we expect that phoenix will not be able to maintain the levels of capital and operating expenditures necessary to perform its current business plan, including launch and ramp of its Gen 4 products unless Phoenix generates additional cash from operations or obtain additional financing. In light of its operating history and the expected schedule to bring Gen 4 to market, we expect that it will be necessary to obtain additional financing, either through the existing SEPA equity line to issue registered shares, private placement of un-registered shares, or debt financing. We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available to Phoenix on favorable terms when required, or at all. Recent turmoil in the capital markets, including the tightening of credit and rise of interest rates, may cause Phoenix to face higher borrowing costs, less available capital, more stringent terms and tighter covenants. In such circumstances, if Phoenix cannot raise additional capital, its financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if Phoenix raises additional capital through issuances of equity, through the SEPA or otherwise, Phoenix's stockholders could experience dilution.

The design, manufacture and sale of electric vehicles is a capital-intensive business. Although Phoenix pursues an "asset light strategy" for growth, its business plan to design, produce, sell and service commercial electric buses, vans and trucks, including the Gen 4, Gen 5, EF-1 truck and EF-1 V van, is expected to require continued capital investment and incur substantial costs including research and development expenses, raw material procurement costs, sales and distribution expenses as Phoenix builds its brand and market its vehicles, and general and administrative expenses as Phoenix scales its operations, identify and commit resources to investigate new areas of demand and incur costs as a public company. its ability to become profitable in the future will not only depend on its ability to complete the design and development of its vehicles but also to control its capital expenditures and costs. As Phoenix expands its product portfolio, including the scheduled release of Gen 4 in 2023, Phoenix will need to manage costs effectively to sell those products at its expected margins. If Phoenix is unable to cost efficiently design, manufacture, market, sell and distribute and service its vehicles and provide its services, its business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows would be materially and adversely affected. Unlike established EV automotive manufacturers that have greater financial resources than Phoenix does, there can be no assurance that Phoenix will have access to the capital Phoenix needs on favorable terms when required or at all. In addition, future debt financing into which Phoenix enters may impose upon us covenants that restrict its operations, including limitations on its ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, redeem its stock, make certain investments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. If Phoenix is unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, Phoenix may be required to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of one or more of its EV products, restrict its operations or obtain funds by entering into agreements on unattractive terms, which would likely have a material adverse effect on its business, stock price and its relationships with third parties with whom Phoenix has business relationships, at least until additional funding is obtained. If Phoenix does not have sufficient funds to continue operations, Phoenix could be required to seek bankruptcy protection or other alternatives that would likely result in its stockholders losing some or all of their investment in us. In addition, its ability to achieve profitability or to respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.

We currently have only indirect partnership relationships with consumer financing providers, through a third-party platform. We are in the process of establishing direct relationships with several financing providers; however, we can give no assurance whether or when we can establish such relationships. Historically, there have been a limited number of investors that generate sufficient profits and possess the requisite financial sophistication to provide financing for solar energy systems for homeowners, and a lack of depth in this market might limit our ability to find partners which can provide financing for our consumers. Our larger competitors might be able far more readily than we to offer financing options to customers, including PPAs, pursuant to which solar energy systems are installed at little cost to the consumer. Certain types of home solar energy system financing also depend on the existing tax regulatory environment. We are uncertain whether this type of financing will continue to be available to us, as the legal and regulatory landscape may shift in a manner that reduces or eliminates the attractiveness of such financing opportunities.

We have outstanding convertible bonds of $35.0 million under a convertible bond agreement ("Convertible Bond Agreement") with certain bond holders, which were defaulted in June 2016 and not repaid through December 31, 2022. We have also defaulted a $2.1 million convertible loan entered into with Streeterville Capital, LLC as of as of the date of this annual report. If we are unable to reach satisfactory settlement with applicable counterparties, we could be forced to cease operations.

We require a significant amount of cash to meet our capital requirements and fund our operations, including payments to suppliers for PV modules and components and to banks for project loans. As of December 31, 2022, we had $10.1 million in outstanding short-term borrowings (and the current portion of long-term borrowings) and $6.6 million in outstanding long-term borrowings (excluding the current portion). Our existing debt may have significant consequences on our operations, including: - reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes as a result of our debt service obligations;         - limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;         - making us more vulnerable to changes in our business, our industry and the general economy;         - potentially increasing the cost of any additional financing; and         - limiting our ability to make future acquisitions. Any of these factors and other consequences that may result from our substantial indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our existing debt facilities. Our ability to meet our payment obligations under our existing debt facilities depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control.

The development of solar projects requires significant upfront cash investments, including the costs of permit development, construction and associated operations. Since 2014, we have been expanding our solar project portfolio primarily by acquiring solar projects across different development stages. Such expansion strategy requires significant upfront capital expenditures which, depending on the respective development stages of the acquired projects, may not be recouped for a significant period of time. As a result, we are required to pursue a wide variety of capital resources to fund our operations, including private placements, bank loans, financial leases and other third-party financing options. Our ability to obtain sufficient financing is subject to a number of uncertainties, including: - our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;         - the general condition and liquidity of global equity and debt capital markets;         - local regulatory and government support for solar power in markets where we operate, such as through tax credits and FIT schemes;         - the availability of credit lines from banks and other financial institutions;         - economic, political, social and other conditions in the markets where we operate;         - our level of indebtedness and ability to comply with financial covenants under our debt financing; and         - tax and securities laws which may hamper our ability to raise capital. Due to these or other reasons, we may not be successful in obtaining the required funds for future acquisitions. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance our bank borrowings on favorable terms, or at all, upon the expiration or termination of our existing loan facilities. In addition, rising interest rates could adversely affect our ability to secure financing on favorable terms. Our failure in securing suitable financing sources in a timely manner or at all, or on commercially acceptable terms, could significantly limit our ability to execute our growth strategies or future acquisitions, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We intend to expand our business within our existing markets and in a number of selected new locations in the future. We also intend to expand our global project development business in the future. As our operations evolve, we expect to encounter additional challenges in our internal management, construction contracting management, investment and acquisition management, project management, project funding infrastructure and financing capabilities. Our existing operations, personnel, systems and internal control may not be adequate to support our business expansion and may require new investments in our internal management infrastructure. To manage the future growth of our operations, we will be required to improve our administrative, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, and maintain, expand, train and manage a growing number of employees.

We may continue to grow our operations through acquisitions, as well as joint ventures or other strategic alliances when appropriate opportunities arise. Such acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances may expose us to additional operational, regulatory, market and geographical risks as well as risks associated with additional capital requirements and diversion of management attention. In particular, any future strategic alliances may expose us to the following risks: - There may be unforeseen risks relating to our counterparty's business and operations or liabilities that were not discovered by us through our legal and business due diligence prior to our investment. Such undetected risks and liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations in the future.         - We may not have experience acquiring, managing or investing in other companies. Business acquisitions may generally divert a significant portion of our management and financial resources from our existing business and the integration of the target's operations may pose significant business challenges, potentially straining our ability to finance and manage our existing operations.         - There is no assurance that the expected synergies from any business acquisition, joint venture or strategic alliances will materialize. If we are not successful in the integration of a target's operations, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue from its operations to recover costs and expenses of the acquisition.         - Acquisition or participation in a new joint venture or strategic alliance may involve us in the management of operation in which we do not possess extensive expertise. The materialization of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There is currently intense competition in the solar industry, particularly in the downstream project development segment. Solar projects encounter competition from utilities, industrial companies and other independent power producers. In recent years, there has been increasing competition for the award of PPAs, which has in some markets resulted in an excess supply above designated reserve margins and has been contributing to the declining electricity prices in many markets. In light of these conditions, we may not be able to obtain PPAs for our new solar projects under our IPP model, and we may not be able to renew PPAs on the same terms and conditions upon expiration, particularly in terms of securing an electricity sale price that enables profitable operation or the sale of a project at anticipated value, if at all. We have expanded our business to include global project development and may not have the same level of expertise and customer base as our competitors, which may affect our ability to successfully establish our presence in the global market. Our current or potential competitors may have greater operational, financial, technical, market share, scale, management or other resources than us in our existing or target markets. Our competitors may also enter into strategic alliances with other competitors to our detriment, or may ally with our suppliers or contractors, thereby limiting our procurement choices and our flexibility in project development. Our current or potential competitors may offer PV solutions comparable or superior to ours at the same or lower prices, or adapt more quickly to industry trends than we do. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share.

The solar industry faces intense competition from all other players within the energy industry, including both conventional energy providers such as nuclear, natural gas and fossil fuels and other renewable energy providers, such as geothermal, hydropower, biomass, wind and nuclear energy. Other energy sources may benefit from innovations that reduce their costs and increase safety, and therefore improve their competitiveness. New natural resources may be discovered, or global economic, business or political developments may disproportionately benefit conventional energy sources or other renewable energy sources at the expense of solar. Governments may strengthen their support for other renewable energy sources and reduce their support for the solar industry. Changes in supply and demand of conventional energy sources or other energy sources may reduce the cost of such sources and render solar power less attractive. The decline in oil prices would adversely impacted the competitiveness of solar energy. Failure for our customers, other business partners or us to compete with the providers of other energy sources may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Phoenix competes with a number of commercial EV manufacturers, including those such as Lightning eMotors, GreenPower Bus, SEA Electric and Arrival. In addition to Tesla & Rivian, a number of traditional global automobile manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors, Mercedes Benz, and Nissan-Renault- Mitsubishi-Toyota, have entered the consumer EV business, and a few, including BYD, Ford, General Motors, Tesla and Daimler have begun entry into the commercial EV market. These companies have far greater resources, brand recognition, and distribution channels than Phoenix or the Company does, which could make it difficult for Phoenix to gain widespread market acceptance. There can be no assurance that Phoenix will be able to compete successfully with other market participants, and, if Phoenix cannot, then its business could fail.

The solar energy industry is highly competitive and continually evolving, as participants strive to distinguish themselves within their markets and compete with large utilities. We believe that our competitors include established utilities that supply energy to homeowners by traditional means, and we compete with these utilities primarily based on price, predictability of price, and the ease by which homeowners can switch to electricity generated by our solar service offerings. If we cannot offer compelling value to customers based on these factors, then our business and revenue will not grow. We also compete with traditional installers who face similar challenges. The production of solar energy depends heavily on suitable meteorological and environmental conditions. If meteorological or environmental conditions are unexpectedly unfavorable, the electricity production from our solar service offerings might be below our customers' expectations, reducing the attractiveness of our offerings compared with traditional energy suppliers. We also face competition from other residential solar service providers. Many of these competitors have a higher degree of brand name recognition, differing business and pricing strategies, and greater capital resources than we have, as well as extensive knowledge of our target markets. If we are unable to establish or maintain a consumer brand that resonates with customers, maintain high customer satisfaction, or compete with the pricing offered by our competitors, our sales and market share position might be adversely affected, as our growth is dependent on originating new customers. We also face competitive pressure from companies that might offer lower-priced consumer offerings than we do. We compete with companies that are not regulated like traditional utilities but that have access to the traditional utility electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure. These power service companies are able to offer customers electricity supply-only solutions that are competitive with our solar service offerings on both price and usage of solar energy technology, which might limit our ability to attract customers, particularly those who wish to avoid long-term contracts or have an aesthetic or other objection to putting solar modules on their roofs. We also face competition from purely finance-driven nonintegrated competitors that subcontract out the installation of solar energy systems, from installation businesses (including solar partners) that seek financing from external parties, from large construction companies, and from electrical and other roofing companies. Local installers that might otherwise be viewed as potential solar partners might gain market share by being able to be the first providers in new local markets, and some of these competitors might provide energy at lower costs than we do. We also face competition from companies offering consumer loans for solar module products, since declining prices for solar modules and related equipment has resulted in an increase in consumers' purchasing, instead of leasing, solar energy systems. As the solar industry grows and evolves, we will continue to face existing competitors as well as new competitors who are not currently in the market (including those resulting from the consolidation of existing competitors) that achieve significant developments in alternative technologies or new products such as storage solutions, loan products, or other programs related to third-party ownership. Our failure to adapt to changing market conditions, to compete successfully with existing or new competitors and to adopt new or enhanced technologies could limit our growth and have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

The roofing industry is very competitive based on the large number of contractors, and there is intense competition over the pricing of roof repairs and installations, and our business might suffer if our competitors reduce their prices to where we can no longer profitably operate.

Most of our project awards are determined through a competitive bidding process in which price is the determining factor, and we compete against multiple competitors in many of the markets in which we operate. Some of our competitors are larger than we and are vertically integrated, and competitors larger than us may be able to better exploit economies of scale to receive higher discounts or rebates when purchasing materials. An increase in competition may result in decreases in new project awards to us at acceptable profit margins, and a downturn in private residential and commercial construction could materially and adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

The solar power market worldwide is at a relatively early stage of development compared to conventional power markets and other renewable power markets, such as that for hydropower. Thus, trends in the solar industry are based only on limited data and may be unreliable. Many factors may affect the demand for solar projects worldwide, including: - the cost and availability of project financing for solar projects;         - fluctuations in economic and market conditions that improve the viability of competing energy sources;         - the cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of solar projects compared to conventional and other non-solar energy sources;         - the availability of grid capacity allocated to solar power;         - political opposition to solar power due to environmental, land use, safety or other local concerns;         - the availability of government subsidies and incentives to support the development of the solar industry;         - public perceptions of the utility, necessity and importance of solar power and other renewable energies;         - the success of other alternative energy generation technologies, such as fuel cells, wind power and biomass; and         - utility and grid regulations that present unique technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the development, transmission and use of solar energy. Our analysis and predictions concerning the future growth of the solar industry are based on complex facts and circumstances and may be incorrect. If market demand for solar projects in our existing or target markets fails to develop according to our expectations, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Obtaining long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our IPP model at prices and on other terms favorable to us will be essential for obtaining financing or completing construction of these projects. We must compete for PPAs against other developers of solar and renewable energy projects. Furthermore, other sources of power, such as natural gas-fired power plants, have historically been cheaper than the cost of solar power and power from certain types of projects, such as natural gas-fired power plants, can be delivered on a firm basis. The availability of PPAs is subject to a number of economic, regulatory, tax and public policy factors. The inability to compete successfully against other power producers or otherwise enter into PPAs favorable to us would negatively affect our ability to develop and finance our projects and negatively impact our revenue.

The solar energy industry is a new and rapidly growing market opportunity. We believe the solar energy industry will continue still take several years to fully develop and mature, but we cannot be certain that the market will grow to the size or at the rate that we expect. Any future growth of the solar energy market and the success of our solar service offerings depend on many factors beyond our control, including recognition and acceptance of the solar service market by consumers, the pricing of alternative sources of energy, a favorable regulatory environment, the continuation of expected tax benefits and other incentives, and our ability to provide our solar service offerings cost-effectively, and our business might be adversely affected should the markets for solar energy do not develop to the size or at the rate we expect. Solar energy has yet to achieve broad market acceptance and depends in part on continued support in the form of rebates, tax credits, and other incentives from federal, state and local governments. If this support diminishes materially, our ability to attract customers for our products and services could be adversely affected. Growth in residential solar energy also depends on dynamic macroeconomic conditions, retail prices of electricity and customer preferences. Declining macroeconomic conditions, including labor markets and residential real estate markets, could contribute to instability and uncertainty among customers and impact their financial ability, credit scores or interest in entering into long-term contracts, even if such contracts would generate immediate and long-term savings. Market prices of retail electricity generated by utilities or other energy sources also could decline for a variety of reasons, as discussed further below. Any such declines in macroeconomic conditions, changes in retail prices of electricity or changes in customer preferences would adversely impact our business. We have historically benefited from declining costs in our industry, and our business and financial results might be harmed not only as a result of any increases in costs associated with our solar service offerings, but, also, by any failure of these costs to continue to decline as we currently expect. If we do not reduce our cost structure in the future, we may not achieve profitability. Declining costs related to raw materials, manufacturing and the sale and installation of our solar service offerings have been a key driver in the pricing of our solar service offerings and customer adoption of solar energy. The prices of solar modules and raw materials have declined, however the cost of solar modules and raw materials could increase in the future, and such products' availability could decrease, due to a variety of factors, including restrictions stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, tariffs and trade barriers, export regulations, regulatory or contractual limitations, industry market requirements, and changes in technology and industry standards. Other factors may also impact costs, such as our choice to make significant investments to drive growth in the future.

Phoenix's growth requires adoption of commercial vehicle operators to adopt EVs for their fleets and on its ability to produce, sell and service vehicles that meet their needs. EVs' use in the medium-duty commercial vehicle market is a relatively new development, particularly in the United States, and is characterized by rapidly changing technologies and evolving government regulation, industry standards, and customer views of the merits of using electric vehicles in their businesses. This process has been slow, as, without including the impact of government or other subsidies and incentives, the purchase prices for Phoenix's EVs currently is higher than those for diesel-fueled vehicles. The relatively low price of oil has also hurt Phoenix's over the last few years. Phoenix must educate fleet managers regarding the economic benefits that Phoenix believes result over the life of its EVs. Phoenix believes that these benefits depend on the following: - the difference in the initial purchase prices of commercial electric vehicles and vehicles with comparable gross vehicle weight powered by internal combustion engines or hybrids, both including the effect of government and other subsidies and incentives designed to promote the purchase of electric vehicles;     - the total cost of ownership of the vehicle over its expected life, which includes the initial purchase price and ongoing operating and maintenance costs;     - the availability and terms of financing options for purchases of vehicles and, for commercial electric vehicles, financing options for battery systems;     - the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate electric vehicles and future regulations requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles;     - government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;     - fuel prices, including volatility in the cost of diesel fuel;     - cost and availability of other alternatives to diesel fueled vehicles, such as vehicles powered by natural gas or hybrids;     - corporate sustainability initiatives;     - commercial electric vehicle quality, performance and safety (particularly with respect to lithium-ion battery packs);     - the quality and availability of service for the vehicle, including the availability of replacement parts;     - the range over which commercial electric vehicles may be driven on a single battery charge;     - access to charging stations and related infrastructure costs, and standardization of electric vehicle charging systems;     - electric grid capacity and reliability; and     - macroeconomic factors. If, in weighing these factors, operators of commercial vehicle fleets determine that there is no compelling business justification for purchasing commercial EVs, the market for commercial EVs may not develop as, or may develop more slowly than, Phoenix expects which would adversely affect Phoenix's business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

The development of solar projects involves numerous risks and uncertainties and require extensive research, planning and due diligence. Before we can determine whether a solar project is economically, technologically or otherwise feasible, we may be required to incur significant capital expenditure for land and interconnection rights, preliminary engineering, permitting, legal and other work. Success in developing a particular solar project is contingent upon, among others: - securing the rights to suitable project locations with access to the grid, necessary rights of way, and satisfactory land use permissions;         - rezoning land, as necessary, to support a solar project;         - negotiating and receiving on schedule the required permits and approvals for project development from government authorities;         - completing all required regulatory and administrative procedures needed to obtain permits and agreements;         - obtaining rights to interconnect the solar project to the grid or to transmit energy;         - paying interconnection and other deposits, some of which are non-refundable;         - negotiating favorable payment terms with module and other equipment suppliers and contractors;         - signing PPAs or other off-take arrangements that are commercially acceptable and adequate for providing financing;         - obtaining construction financing, including debt financing and equity contributions, as appropriate; and         - satisfactorily completing construction on schedule.

Phoenix's Zeus line of buses and trucks are designed for use with, and is dependent upon, existing electric vehicle technology. As new companies and larger, existing vehicle manufacturers enter the electric vehicle space, Phoenix may lose any technological advantage Phoenix may have had in the marketplace and suffer a decline in its position in the market. As technologies change, Phoenix plans to upgrade or adapt its products to continue to provide products with the latest technology. However, its products may become obsolete or its research and development efforts may not be sufficient to adapt to changes in or to create the necessary technology to effectively compete. As a result, its potential inability to adapt to and develop the necessary technology may harm its competitive position.

Phoenix's future business depends in large part on its ability to execute on its plans to develop, manufacture, market and sell its vehicles. Any delay in the financing, design, manufacture, regulatory approval, launch or delivery of its vehicles could materially damage its brand, business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows, and could cause liquidity constraints. Vehicle manufacturers often experience delays in the design, manufacture, and commercial release of new products. To the extent Phoenix delay the launch of its vehicles, its growth prospects could be adversely affected as Phoenix may fail to establish or grow its market share. Furthermore, Phoenix relies on third-party suppliers for the provision and development of the key components and materials used in its vehicles. To the extent its suppliers experience any delays in providing us with or developing necessary components Phoenix could experience delays in delivering on its timelines.

We have developed various production process related know-how and technologies, which have a critical role in our quality assurance and cost reduction. We have also implemented our research and development programs to develop techniques and processes that will improve production efficiency and product quality. Our intellectual property and proprietary rights from our research and development programs will be crucial in maintaining our competitive edge in the solar power industry. As of the date of this prospectus, we have two patents and two other pending patent applications in the US Our patents' validity is generally ten years, and we plan to sustain protection for our intellectual property and proprietary knowledge with patents and otherwise, but cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining patents in the US in a timely manner or at all. We also use contractual arrangements with employees and trade secret protections to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, but contractual arrangements afford only limited protection and the actions we might take to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights might not be adequate. Other parties might obtain knowledge of our know-how and technologies through independent development, and our inability to protect our production process, related know-how and technologies, our intellectual property and proprietary rights or any combination of the above might undermine our competitive position. Third parties may infringe upon or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary rights. Policing unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive, and litigation can be costly and diverts management attention and other resources away from our business, but might be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. We cannot assure you that we will prevail in any potential litigation, and an adverse determination might impair our intellectual property and proprietary rights and harm our business, prospects and reputation.

We rely primarily on trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information to protect our intellectual property. Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantage. Third parties may be able to use the technologies that we have developed and compete with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our failure to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights may undermine our competitive position. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary rights. Policing the unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. In particular, the laws and enforcement procedures certain markets where we operate are uncertain or do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws and enforcement procedures of the United States. We may need to resort to court proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights in the future. Litigation relating to our intellectual property might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and adversely affect our business, prospects and reputation.

The development, construction and operation of solar projects are highly regulated. We conduct our operations in many jurisdictions and are subject to different laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to building codes, taxes, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection, metering and other matters. Our establish subsidiaries also have operations in these countries and jurisdictions that are required to comply with various local laws and regulations. While we strive to work with our local counsel and other advisers to comply with the laws and regulations of each jurisdiction where we operate, there have been, and may continue to be, instances of non-compliances such as late filings of annual accounts with the appropriate governmental authorities, failure to notify governmental authorities of certain transactions, failure to hold annual meetings as required, failure to register director or address changes or other local requirements which may result in fines, sanctions or other penalties against our non-complying subsidiaries and its directors and officers. While we do not believe our past and continuing non-compliances, singularly or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, we cannot assure you that similar or other non-compliances will not occur in the future which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We are responsible for obtaining a variety of approvals, permits and licenses from various authorities for our solar projects. The procedures for obtaining such approvals, permits and licenses vary from country to country, making it onerous and costly to adhere to the varying requirements and standards of individual localities. Failure to obtain the required approvals, permits or licenses or to comply with the conditions associated therewith may result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal liabilities, which could material and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new government regulations pertaining to our business or solar projects may result in significant additional expenses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance with our internal policies and procedures. Failure to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, own and operate solar projects may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The market demand for solar power is strongly influenced by government regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry as well as by policies promulgated by electric utilities in each of the markets we operate. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection of electricity generation. Customer purchases of alternative energy sources, including solar power technology, could be deterred by these regulations and policies, which may significantly reduce the demand for our PV solutions. For example, without a regulatory-mandated exception for solar power systems, utility customers are often charged interconnection or standby fees for putting distributed power generation on the electric utility grid or limit the production capacity to the grid. The county-level government may also levy additional tax related to land use or potential plants recovery that was not initially included during the development or construction phase. These fees could increase, rendering solar power less cost competitive in these markets and our PV solutions less desirable. It is difficult to ensure ongoing compliance with the changing requirements of individual markets. Any new government regulations or utility policies pertaining to solar projects may result in significant additional expenses to us or other industry participants and as a result could cause a significant reduction in demand for our PV solutions.

Federal, state and local government statutes and regulations concerning electricity heavily influence the market for our solar service offerings and are constantly evolving. These statutes, regulations, and administrative rulings relate to electricity pricing, net metering, consumer protection, incentives, taxation, competition with utilities, and the interconnection of homeowner-owned and third party-owned solar energy systems to the electrical grid. Governments, often acting through state utility or public service commissions, change and adopt different rates for residential customers on a regular basis and these changes can have a negative impact on our ability to deliver savings, or energy bill management, to customers. Many utilities, their trade associations, and fossil fuel interests, which have significantly greater economic, technical, operational, and political resources than the residential solar industry, are currently challenging solar-related policies to reduce the competitiveness of residential solar energy. Any adverse changes in solar-related policies could have a negative impact on our business and prospects.

Interconnection rules establish the circumstances in which rooftop solar will be connected to the electricity grid, and interconnection limits or circuit-level caps imposed by regulators may curb our growth in key markets. Utilities throughout the country have different rules and regulations regarding interconnection and some utilities cap or limit the amount of solar energy that can be interconnected to the grid. Our systems do not provide power to customers until they are interconnected to the grid. Interconnection regulations are based on claims from utilities regarding the amount of solar energy that can be connected to the grid without causing grid reliability issues or requiring significant grid upgrades. Some states require the activation of some advanced inverter functionality to head off presumed grid reliability issues, which might require more expensive equipment and more oversight of the operation of the solar energy systems over time. Such regulations might hamper our ability to sell our offerings in certain markets and increase our costs, adversely affecting our business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects. These advanced functions will become more commonplace as regions start to require 1547-2018 inverters, with activation of some advanced functions starting January 2022 in Colorado and elsewhere.

At present, solar power is not cost competitive with other energy sources in our existing markets and the new markets we plan to expand into. For a variety of technological and economic reasons, the cost of generating electricity from solar energy in these markets currently exceeds and, absent significant changes in technological or economic circumstances, will continue to exceed the cost of generating electricity from conventional and certain other competing energy sources. Therefore, government subsidies and incentives, primarily in the form of feed-in tariffs, or FIT, price support schemes, tax credits, net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of solar products are generally required to enable companies such as us to successfully operate in these markets. Government subsidies and incentives vary by geographic market. The availability and size of such subsidies and incentives depend, to a large extent, on political and policy developments relating to environmental concerns and other macro-economic factors. These government subsidies and incentives are expected to gradually decrease in scope or be discontinued as solar power technology improves and becomes more affordable relative to other types of energy. Reductions have occurred in certain countries where we have operations, and subsidies and incentives may be further reduced or discontinued in countries where we currently or intend to operate. Reductions may apply retroactively to existing solar projects, which could significantly reduce the value of our existing solar projects and other businesses. Even if reductions in government subsidies and economic incentives apply only to future solar projects, our operations in that country could be materially and adversely affected as we would not be able to leverage our existing presence to drive further growth. Moreover, certain solar subsidies and incentives are designed to expire or decline over time, are limited in total funding, require renewal from regulatory authorities or impose certain investment or performance criteria on our business partners or us, which we may not be able to satisfy. In addition, we may not be able to upgrade our technologies rapidly enough to compensate for foreseeable reductions in government subsidies and incentives. As a result, a significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government incentive programs in our existing and target markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The installation and ongoing operations and maintenance of roofing products or roof-top solar energy systems requires individuals hired by us or third-party contractors, including our employees, to work at heights with complicated and potentially dangerous electrical systems. The evaluation and modification of buildings as part of the installation process requires these individuals to work in locations that may contain potentially dangerous levels of asbestos, lead, mold or other materials known or believed to be hazardous to human health. There is substantial risk of serious injury or death if proper safety procedures are not followed. Our operations are subject to regulation OSHA and equivalent state and local laws, and changes to OSHA requirements, or stricter interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations, could result in increased costs. If we fail to comply with applicable OSHA, even if no work-related serious injury or death occurs, we might be subject to civil or criminal enforcement and be required to pay substantial penalties, incur significant capital expenditures or suspend or limit operations. Because individuals hired by us or on our behalf to perform installation and ongoing operations and maintenance of our solar energy systems and energy storage systems, including our dealers and third-party contractors, are compensated on a per project basis, they are incentivized to work more quickly than installers that are compensated on an hourly basis. While we have not experienced a high level of injuries to date, this incentive structure may result in higher injury rates than others in the industry and could accordingly expose us to increased liability. Individuals hired by or on behalf of us may have workplace accidents and receive citations from OSHA regulators for alleged safety violations, resulting in fines. Any such accidents, citations, violations, injuries or failure to comply with industry best practices may subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position and adversely affect our business. A failure to comply with laws and regulations relating to interactions by us or our dealers with current or prospective residential customers could result in negative publicity, claims, investigations and litigation, and adversely affect our financial performance. Our business substantially focuses on transactions with residential customers. We must comply with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern matters relating to interactions with residential consumers, including those pertaining to consumer protection, marketing and sales, privacy and data security, consumer financial and credit transactions, mortgages and refinancing, home improvement contracts, warranties and various means of customer solicitation. These laws and regulations are dynamic and subject to potentially differing interpretations, and various federal, state and local legislative and regulatory bodies may initiate investigations, expand current laws or regulations, or enact new laws and regulations, regarding these matters. Changes in these laws or regulations or their interpretation could dramatically affect how we and our dealers do business, acquire customers, and manage and use information collected from and about current and prospective customers and the costs associated therewith. We strive to comply with all applicable laws and regulations relating to interactions with residential customers. It is possible, however, that these requirements might be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our customary practices.

The solar industry has also faced constraints related to shipping. Pandemic-related spending on goods increased global shipping, leading to shortages in containers and port congestion in the United States, impacting virtually every sector, including the solar industry. National lockdowns restricted both manufacturing and shipping as the pandemic began, and many shipping containers, such as those used to hold goods such as solar modules, became stranded and started to accumulate in the United States. Lockdowns continued in the United States as restrictions in China eased, and containers could not be returned to China, which caused a container shortage in China where containers were needed to continue exporting goods. Production of containers also decreased in 2020, further contributing to the shortage and causing prices of shipping containers to escalate. Increased imports, resulting from pandemic spending, has also increased port congestion in the United States, which congestion is exacerbated by significant recent increases in the size of container ships leading to longer unloading times, since each ship can now carry tens of thousands of shipping containers. If the shipping constraints and the increases in shipping costs continue for a long period of time our solar business might be affected. Future delays in shipping and increases in shipping costs or other materials could result in an increase in costs to us, price increases to our customers or reduced margins. A May 2022 IHS Markit article noted that COVID-19 related supply chain challenges and issues in shipping products from China to the U.S. have continued due to sustained congestion and other delays at both U.S and Chinese ports, as well as an insufficient number of shipping containers. The shipping challenges have also contributed to higher container shipping rates between China and the U.S., and the article reports that the rate in May 2022 of a typical 40-foot container from China to the U.S. West Coast was $14,226, several thousand dollars more than the comparable rate from China to ports in Northern Europe. The article also noted that in increasing number of ships which are operating at only partial capacity is magnifying the port congestion and delays in unloading cargo.

Significant supply constraints and price increases in the lumber SJ America uses in its roofing business have occurred due to COVID-19 driven layoffs and plant closings. Lumber prices have been highly volatile since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the following supply chain disruptions. In the event our ability to source lumber continues to be restricted or the prices of lumber continue to increase, the roofing business of SJ America may be affected. We hope these supply issues are only short term, but there can be no assurance as to the timing when these supply constraints will end. Future increases in the price of lumber or scarcity of lumber could result in an increase in costs to us, price increases to our customers or reduced margins.

Our business and financial condition have been, and could continue to be, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on the U.S. economy and has impacted our business. The effects of COVID-19, such as the widespread growth in infections, travel restrictions, quarantines, return-to-work restrictions, government regulations, supply chain disruptions, workforce shortages, and site closures have impacted and may continue to impact our ability to staff sales and operations centers and install and maintain solar energy systems in the field, as well as direct-to-home sales activities. The rise and resurgence of increasingly infectious variants, despite efforts to combat the virus with vaccinations, has presented additional challenges and unpredictability that have, and may continue to have, resulted in workforce constraints, delays, and additional costs, particularly in regions experiencing significant outbreaks. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to significant volatility in global financial markets, which could negatively affect our cost of and access to capital and could have an adverse impact on customer demand and the financial health and credit risk associated with our customers. Future disruptions or instability in capital markets could also negatively impact our ability to raise capital from third parties, such as tax equity partners, to grow our business. In addition, significant inflation, a recession, or a market correction resulting from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic has and could continue to adversely affect our business and the value of our common stock. The full economic impact of the pandemic is still not known. COVID-19 has caused disruptions to the supply chain across the global economy, including within the solar industry. Certain suppliers have experienced, and may continue to experience, delays related to a variety of factors, including logistical delays, and component shortages from upstream vendors. We continue to monitor the situation and are working closely with our solar partners and suppliers to develop contingency plans for potential operations and supply chain interruptions. The ultimate impact of the pandemic is highly uncertain, beyond our control, dependent on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted, and subject to change. We will continue to monitor developments affecting our workforce, our customers, and our business operations generally and will take additional actions that we determine are necessary in order to mitigate the impacts, however, any steps we take may be inadequate and, as a result, our business may be harmed.

On February 24, 2022, the Russian Federation launched an invasion of Ukraine that has had an immediate impact on the global economy resulting in higher energy prices and higher prices for certain raw materials and goods and services which in turn is contributing to higher inflation in the United States and other countries across the globe with significant disruption to financial markets. We do not have any operations or business in Russia or Ukraine, however, we may be potentially indirectly adversely impacted any significant disruption it has caused and may continue to escalate. In addition, the United States and other countries have imposed sanctions on Russia which increases the risk that Russia may resort to retaliatory actions, including the launching of cyberattacks. It is possible that these attacks could have collateral effects on additional critical infrastructure and financial institutions globally, which could adversely affect our operations. It is difficult to assess the likelihood of such threat and any potential impact at this time. Any one or more of these events may impede our operation and delivery efforts and adversely affect our sales results, or even for a prolonged period of time, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.