In September 2009, we filed an action against our former President and CEO in the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada (Parks! America, Inc. vs. Eastland; et al., Case No. 09-A-599668). We brought this action in an attempt to obtain a Temporary Restraining Order and injunctive relief against the Eastland Defendants (our former President and CEO Larry Eastland and his related companies) as to the Eastland Defendants attempt to install a new Board of Directors for the Company. The Temporary Restraining Order was granted, as was the Preliminary Injunction.
In June 2012, we amended our complaint against the Eastland Defendants to, among other things, add new claims for relief, as well as join Stanley Harper and Computer Contact Service, Inc., an entity controlled by Mr. Harper (collectively, the "Harper Defendants") as defendants. In the First Amended Complaint, we sought to recover damages for, among other things, breaches of contract and fiduciary duty with regard to the Company's purchase of TempSERV on September 30, 2007 and its subsequent re-conveyance of TempSERV to Computer Contact Service, Inc. as of January 1, 2009. Pursuant to the claims set forth in the First Amended Complaint, the Company was seeking damages in excess of $1.8 million against the Eastland Defendants and the Harper Defendants.
Discovery was conducted on the claims between the parties, after which the Harper Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment asking that the claims against them be dismissed and that the claims asserted by the Harper Defendants against the Company be granted. After briefing and argument, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Harper Defendants. Because one of the contracts at issue contained a legal fee provision, the Harper Defendants filed a motion seeking to recover legal fees and costs. On October 24, 2014, the Court granted the Harper Defendants' motion in part and ordered the Company to pay $304,328 in costs and attorney's fees to the Harper Defendants.
We appealed the summary judgment orders and the award of costs and attorney's fees. On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada issued an order mostly affirming the Eighth Judicial District Court's summary judgment rulings and award of attorney's fees and costs in favor of the Harper Defendants. After exhausting our options to further pursue our action against the Harper Defendants, we reached a final settlement with the Harper Defendants totaling $372,416, inclusive of additional attorney's fees, costs and interest, which was paid on November 8, 2016.
The portion of our District Court action against the Eastland Defendants remains pending. On September 15, 2016, we filed an Application for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order with Notice and Motion for Preliminary Injunction or, alternatively, Application for Pre-Judgment Writ of Attachment, seeking to prevent Larry Eastland and/or Global Public Strategies, Ltd. ("GPS"), a foreign entity believed by us to be controlled by Larry Eastland, from transferring the approximately 10 million shares of our stock believed to be held by GPS to a third party. On September 21, 2016, we obtained a Temporary Restraining Order, enjoining Larry Eastland and GPS from transferring any shares of the Company's stock. The parties were before the Court on November 22, 2016 for an evidentiary hearing as to the true ownership of the GPS stock as part of the Company's Motion for Preliminary Injunction or, alternatively, Application for Pre-Judgment Writ of Attachment. Following the evidentiary hearing, the Court issued minutes denying our motion and lifting the Temporary Restraining Order, holding that the Court cannot enjoin GPS, a non-party, from selling the shares of our stock that it currently holds. A final order on that decision is pending, but has not yet been issued by the District Court. We are our considering our options as to the denial of a preliminary injunction regarding the GPS stock.
We intend to proceed with our claims against the Eastland Defendants. At this time, the Eastland Defendants are not asserting any separate claims against the Company.
Except as described above, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is our property the subject of a pending legal proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or otherwise material to the financial condition of our business. None of our directors, officers or affiliates is involved in a proceeding adverse to our business or has a material interest adverse to our business.