Perdoceo Education (PRDO) Risk Analysis

As a provider of postsecondary education and a participant in federal and state programs providing financial assistance to students, we are subject to extensive laws and regulation at both the federal and state levels as well as by accrediting agencies. These requirements cover virtually all aspects of our business. In particular, the Higher Education Act authorizes Title IV Programs and subjects participants to extensive regulations by the Department, state education authorizing agencies, and accrediting agencies. Our institutions' participation in education assistance programs administered by the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs also subjects us to oversight by those agencies. In addition, other federal agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") and the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and various state agencies and state attorneys general enforce a broad range of consumer protection and other laws applicable to activities of postsecondary educational institutions, such as recruiting, marketing, the protection of personal information, student financing and payment servicing. Because of these regulatory requirements, we are subject to compliance reviews and audits, as well as claims of noncompliance and lawsuits by government agencies based on claims by students, current and former employees and other third parties. These matters often require the expenditure of substantial time and resources to address and, additionally, they may damage our reputation, even if such actions are eventually determined to be without merit. For example, the Department has broad powers to request information and review records of an institution participating in Title IV Programs. These requests can be open-ended and do not necessarily relate to any specific allegations of wrongdoing or assert any compliance failures of any kind. We received such a request from the Department in December 2021. The inquiry was subsequently closed in January 2025 without any findings. Due process safeguards and protections for institutions subjected to this type of information request are limited to the Department's interpretation of the boundaries of its authority over institutions participating in Title IV programs. The Department, under the Biden Administration, took an ever-expanding view on its authority over the administration of Title IV programs, institutions and loans, including overruling or ignoring a number of historical precedents and due process safeguards. The Department partnered with advocacy groups critical of the for-profit education sector in numerous aspects of its agenda, which have lobbied for targeting the sector and our schools. The postsecondary education regulatory environment may change in the future as a result of the U.S. federal election in November 2024. The new Presidential Administration and new Congress may act to change or eliminate currently effective ED regulations and final ED regulations that have been promulgated but are not yet effective. In addition to responding to compliance reviews and audits and other informational requests, we have had significant matters pending against us in the past which have resulted in the payment of significant amounts to settle the matters and our agreement to ongoing compliance and operational oversight. In this regard, see Item I, "Business – Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters – Other Compliance Matters," for discussion of agreements undertaken in connection with several matters resolved in recent years. Compliance with reviews and audits and applicable laws, regulations, standards or policies may impose significant burdens and a failure to comply could result in substantial financial penalties, severe restrictions on or closure of our operations, loss of federal and state financial aid funding for our students, or loss of authorization to operate our institutions.

As discussed above, states and other regulatory bodies have increased their focus on the for-profit postsecondary education sector. In 2019, we entered into an agreement with the FTC to bring closure to inquiries by them. See Item 1, "Business – Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters – Other Compliance Matters" for information about this agreement. This agreement may ultimately result in negative impacts on our business, any one of which may be material. Pursuant to the agreement with the FTC, we agreed to various operating provisions including the operation of a system to monitor lead aggregators and generators involving a compliance review by, or on behalf of, the Company of the various sources a prospective student interacts with prior to the Company's purchase and use of the prospective student lead. The compliance costs related to these agreements may be greater than anticipated and may have a negative impact on our ability to compete effectively and maintain and grow student enrollments at our institutions, and a failure to comply may lead to additional enforcement action by the FTC. In addition, we may receive requests from states and other regulatory bodies to provide ongoing proof that we are complying with applicable laws and regulations and meeting our obligations pursuant to this agreement. Compliance with these requests results in significant additional costs and a failure to respond, whether required or not, could result in additional enforcement actions.

The regulations, standards and policies of our regulators change frequently and are subject to interpretation, and interpretations may change over time or due to changes in presidential administrations. In particular, the Department under the Biden Administration promulgated a number of new regulations that depending on the date of publication became effective or will be effective on July 1, 2023, 2024 and 2026, including the Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Rule, and revised financial responsibility, administrative capability, 90-10, distance education and certification rules. We have been operating with dramatic shifts in regulatory approaches across different presidential administrations, resulting in a significant number of regulations being adopted, subsequently rescinded or revised, then re-adopted. While President Trump's previous priorities are apparent by actions taken in his first term, we have limited information on the priorities for private postsecondary education for his second term. We anticipate a number of regulatory changes may be forthcoming. The Higher Education Act guides the federal government's support of postsecondary education. The U.S. Congress is required to periodically reauthorize the Higher Education Act and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. Congress last reauthorized the Higher Education Act in 2008. The reauthorization of the Higher Education Act results in a change in the requirements for existing programs and its participation in Title IV programs. Additionally, funding for student financial assistance programs may be impacted during appropriations and budget actions. See Item 1, "Business-Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation-Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives," for more information about the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. In recent years, Congress, the Department, states, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondary education sector. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector," for more information about the focus on our industry. This scrutiny and efforts of the Biden Administration led to significant regulatory changes designed to target and limit for-profit postsecondary education. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives," for an overview of regulatory initiatives by the Department. Ongoing efforts by activists to change state authorization regulations, State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement ("SARA") reciprocity rules, and state-by-state standards could increase regulatory burdens on our business. See Item 1, "Business - Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters - State Regulation," for more information about state regulation and SARA. As in the past, recent and future regulatory changes may have significant impacts on our business, potentially requiring a large number of operational changes, changes to and elimination of certain educational programs, or other fundamental changes to our business. These actions may reduce our student enrollments and profitability or limit our ability to maintain or grow our business. These recent and future regulatory changes may also make compliance with regulatory requirements even more complex and difficult.

Under revised regulations effective for calendar year 2023, any of our institutions may lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs if, on modified cash basis accounting, the percentage of the cash receipts derived from federal funding programs for two consecutive fiscal years is greater than 90%. The Department specified the sources of federal funding to be included in the 90-10 Rule in mid-December 2022, well after a substantial majority of students for the upcoming 2023 calendar year, a majority of those students which were in the process of continuing through their program, had already enrolled and elected financing for upcoming classes. Federal funding now includes tuition assistance under the Title IV program as well as tuition assistance benefits provided to members of the military and veterans as well as a significant number of other federal programs supporting higher education and training. Under this modified 90-10 Rule, an institution that derives more than 90% of its cash receipts from federal funding sources for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional participation status for its next two fiscal years and is required to issue notices to existing students about the potential loss of Title IV funding. The issuance of any required notice could deter prospective students from enrolling at our institutions and current students from continuing in their programs. We have substantially no control over the amount of Title IV student loans and grants, military or veteran education benefits, or other federal education assistance funds sought by or awarded to our students and given the significant existing student populations at our institutions when these rules were adopted, the 90-10 Rule operates retroactively to capture the significant federal funding those students were already utilizing and entitled to. Additionally, we may not know at the time of receipt that funding used by a student was derived from a federal program. In addition, if the institution violates the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years and becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs, but continues to disburse Title IV Program funds, the Department would require the repayment of all Title IV Program funds received by it after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. The Department also noted in its publication of the new rule that its expectation was to encourage a shift in enrollment away from for-profit schools and toward taxpayer subsidized community colleges. As such, we expect unfavorable treatment from the Department in its interpretations, guidance, and enforcement with regard to institutional compliance. Several factors have adversely impacted our 90-10 percentages in recent years, including increases in Title IV Program aid availability including year-round Pell Grant funds and budget reductions for state grant programs, workforce training programs, and other funding programs. We expect this negative trend to continue. Additionally, the lack of visibility into federal fund sources that students utilize, the timing of the identification of the federal fund sources applicable to the 90-10 Rule, the lack of clarity regarding the definition of federal funds which funds count in the "10", as well as other technical aspects of the calculation methodology, and interest levels and variability in the timing of receipts of future cash payments made for allowable non-Title IV programs offered by our institutions, all make it difficult to predict future compliance with the 90-10 Rule. We have implemented various measures intended to reduce the percentage of our institutions' cash basis revenue attributable to designated federal funding sources, including efforts to diversify the sources of our revenue. However, these measures may not be adequate to prevent our compliance with the 90-10 Rule and may not be sufficient to allow our institutions to serve degree-seeking prospective students at the same rates as we have historically, or may require limiting the type or volume of new students we enroll or programs we offer. We may be required to modify our business operations, including reducing our investments in prospective student outreach and recruitment, in order to preserve our existing students' ability to continue benefitting from financial assistance for their education pursuant to Title IV Programs. For example, in 2023, we materially reduced prospective student enrollment, marketing and outreach processes at AIUS during the year to limit the volume of new federal funding that the institution would receive to preserve available funding for existing students. Any necessary business changes could materially impact our revenue, operating costs and opportunities for growth. Furthermore, these business changes could make more difficult our ability to comply with other important regulatory requirements. The ability of our institutions to comply with the 90-10 Rule will depend upon the composition of our future student population and their personal circumstances, as well as on regulatory changes and other factors outside of our control, including those cited above. While the Department may attempt to impose additional sanctions on institutions that fail the 90-10 Rule, but there is only limited precedent available to determine their legality or predict what those additional sanctions might be. For example, the new financial responsibility rule, discussed further below, imposes a mandatory trigger for failure to comply with one year of the 90-10 Rule. It would require a minimum financial protection of 10 percent of the previous year's Title IV funds. This protection would remain in place until the institution passes the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive years. The Department has discretion to impose a wide range of additional conditions as part of its provisional certification and the institutions' continued participation in Title IV Programs. These conditions may include, but are not limited to: restrictions on the total amount of Title IV Program funds that may be distributed to students attending the institutions; restrictions on programmatic, enrollment, and geographic expansion; requirements to obtain and post letters of credit; and additional reporting requirements to include additional interim financial or enrollment reporting. See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - ‘90-10 Rule,'" for more information about the 90-10 Rule and the measures we have implemented to improve our compliance. If any of our institutions lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs due to violation of the prior or modified 90-10 Rule, the institution would experience a dramatic decline in revenue and would be unable to continue its business as it currently is conducted. Efforts to reduce the 90-10 Rule percentage for our institutions have and may in the future involve taking measures that reduce our revenue, increase our operating expenses or involve interpretations of the 90-10 Rule or other Title IV regulations that are without clear precedent (or all of the foregoing, in each case perhaps significantly).

See "Negotiated Rulemaking: Financial Responsibility," "Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations," "Negotiated Rulemaking: Administrative Capability" and "Negotiated Rulemaking: Certification Procedures" above for an overview of the current rules relating to the financial responsibility, administrative capability and certification procedures. If our institutions fail to maintain financial responsibility or administrative capability, they could lose their eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, have that eligibility adversely conditioned or be subject to similar negative consequences under accreditor and state regulatory requirements, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. In particular, limitations on participation in Title IV Programs resulting from the failure to demonstrate financial responsibility or administrative capability could materially reduce the enrollments and revenue at the impacted institution, and a termination of participation would cause a dramatic decline in revenue and we would be unable to continue our business as it currently is conducted.

See the "Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations" above for an overview of the current rules relating to Borrower Defense to Repayment. We cannot predict the impact various defense to repayment regulations will have on student enrollments, the volume of claims for loan discharge (including closed school discharge), the amount of claims for loan discharge the Department approves, the amount of discharged loans the Department asserts we have repayment liability for, our future financial responsibility as determined by the Department, or any sanctions or other actions the Department might take against our institutions based on loans discharged, all of which could be materially adverse to our business.

An institution must be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Department in order to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, "Business – Accreditation, Jurisdictional Authorizations and Other Compliance Matters – Institutional Accreditation." The failure to comply with accreditation standards subjects an institution to additional oversight and reporting requirements, accreditation proceedings such as a show-cause directive, an action to defer or deny action related to an institution's application for a new grant of accreditation, an action to suspend an institution's accreditation or a program's approval, or other negative actions. Future inquiries or actions by state or federal agencies could negatively impact our accreditation status. If our institutions or programs are subject to accreditation actions or are placed on probationary or other negative accreditation status, we may experience adverse publicity, impaired ability to attract and retain students and substantial expense to obtain unqualified accreditation status. The inability to obtain reaccreditation following periodic reviews or any final loss of institutional accreditation after exhaustion of the administrative agency processes would result in a loss of Title IV Program funds for the affected institution and its students. In addition, if an accrediting body of our institutions loses recognition by the Department, that institution could lose its ability to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information. Many states and professional associations require professional programs to be accredited. While programmatic accreditation is not a sufficient basis to qualify for institutional Title IV Program certification, programmatic accreditation may be a prerequisite for or improve employment opportunities of program graduates in their chosen field. Those of our programs that do not have such programmatic accreditation, where available, or fail to maintain such accreditation, particularly in programs in the health sciences field, may experience adverse publicity, declining enrollments, litigation or other claims from students or suffer other adverse impacts, which could result in it being impractical for us to continue offering such programs.

Our institutions must maintain systems and processes to identify and prevent fraudulent applications for enrollment and financial aid. We cannot be certain that our institutions' systems and processes will continue to be adequate in the face of increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes, or that we will be able to expand such systems and processes at a pace consistent with the changing nature of these fraud schemes. We believe the risk of outside parties attempting to perpetrate fraud in connection with the award and disbursement of Title IV program funds, including as a result of identity theft, is heightened due to being an exclusively online education provider. The Department requires institutions that participate in Title IV Programs to refer to the Department's Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") credible information about fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV programs. If the systems and processes that our institutions have established to detect and prevent fraud are inadequate, the Department may find that our institutions do not satisfy the Department's administrative capability requirements, which could have the adverse effects described in the risk factor captioned "A failure to demonstrate "financial responsibility" or "administrative capability" or meet new "certification" requirements would have negative impacts on our operations." In addition, our ability to participate in Title IV Programs is conditioned on maintaining accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the Department. Any significant failure to adequately detect fraudulent activity related to student enrollment and financial aid could cause us to fail to meet accreditors' standards. Furthermore, accrediting agencies that evaluate institutions offering online programs, must require such institutions to have processes through which the institution establishes that a student who registers for such a program is the same student who participates in and receives credit for the program. Failure to meet the requirements of our institutions' accrediting agencies could result in the loss of accreditation of one or more of our institutions, which could result in their loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs.

A substantial majority of our students rely upon Title IV Programs to assist in financing their education, and we derive a substantial majority of our revenue and cash flows from Title IV Programs. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2024, a majority of our students who were in a program of study at any date during that year participated in Title IV Programs, which resulted in Title IV Program cash receipts of approximately $484 million. As a result, any legislative or regulatory action that significantly reduces Title IV Program funding or the ability of our students to participate, or that places significant additional burdens on or eliminates our ability to participate, would materially reduce the number of students who enroll at our institutions, our revenue and our profitability, and we would be unable to continue our business as it currently is conducted.

Our institutions frequently need to obtain approvals from regulatory agencies in the conduct of their business. For example, to establish a new educational program or substantive changes to existing programs, we are required to obtain the appropriate approvals from the Department and applicable state and accrediting regulatory agencies. Staffing levels at the Department and other regulatory agencies and the volume of applications and other requests may delay our receipt of necessary approvals. Further, approvals may be conditioned or denied in a manner that could significantly affect our strategic plans and future growth. Approval by these regulatory agencies may also be negatively impacted due to regulatory inquiries or reviews and any adverse publicity relating to such matters or the industry generally.