tiprankstipranks
Leddartech Holdings Inc (LDTC)
:LDTC
US Market
Holding LDTC?
Track your performance easily

LeddarTech Holdings (LDTC) Risk Factors

137 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

LeddarTech Holdings disclosed 65 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. LeddarTech Holdings reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q3, 2024

Risk Distribution
65Risks
43% Finance & Corporate
18% Tech & Innovation
12% Legal & Regulatory
11% Macro & Political
9% Ability to Sell
6% Production
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
LeddarTech Holdings Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q3, 2024

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 28 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 28 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
65
-26
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
65
-26
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
7Risks added
1Risks removed
13Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
7Risks added
1Risks removed
13Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
Number of Risk Changed
13
+13
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
13
+13
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of LeddarTech Holdings in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 65

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 28/65 (43%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights12 | 18.5%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
Added
It is not possible to predict the actual number of shares we will sell to Yorkville under the SEPA, or the actual gross proceeds resulting from those sales.
On April 8, 2024, the Company entered into the SEPA with Yorkville, effective April 15, 2024, pursuant to which the Company has the right from time to time to issue and sell to Yorkville up to US$50.0 million in Common Shares over the course of 36 months after the date of the SEPA. We generally have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our Common Shares to Yorkville under the SEPA and, through December 17, 2024, we had issued a total of 5,490,000 Common Shares under the SEPA for gross proceeds of approximately US$9.0 million. We expect to issue additional Common Shares under the SEPA. Sales of our Common Shares, if any, to Yorkville under the SEPA will depend upon, among other things, market conditions, the trading price of our Common Shares, determinations by us as to the appropriate sources of funding for our business and operations, and other factors to be determined by us. We may ultimately decide to sell to Yorkville all, some or very few of the remaining Common Shares that may be available for us to sell to Yorkville pursuant to the SEPA. Because the per-share price of any Common Shares that we may elect to sell to Yorkville under the SEPA, if any, will fluctuate based on the market prices of our Common Shares at the time we elect to sell such Common Shares, if any, it is not possible for us to predict prior to any such sales the number of Common Shares that we will sell to Yorkville under the SEPA, the purchase price per share that Yorkville will pay for Common Shares purchased from us under the SEPA, or the aggregate gross proceeds that we will receive from those purchases by Yorkville under SEPA. However, the SEPA has been negotiated so that Yorkville would always purchase our Common Shares pursuant to its terms at a discount to market and, accordingly, our shareholders may not experience a similar rate of return on any Common Shares purchased by them on the open market, which would not have the benefit of any such discounts. Any such at-the-market purchases may make it harder for our shareholders to profit from their investments in our Company, when compared to Yorkville or otherwise. Yorkville will not be required to purchase any SEPA Shares if such sale would result in Yorkville's beneficial ownership exceeding 9.99% of the then issued and outstanding Common Shares. Our inability to access a part or all of the amount available under the SEPA, in the absence of any other financing sources, could have a material adverse effect on our business. For more information, see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and capital management - Financing Transactions - Standby Equity Purchase Agreement."
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Added
The Common Shares being offered for resale by Yorkville in the prospectus that is part of the SEPA Registration Statement and by the Selling Securityholders in the prospectus that is part of the First Registration Statement represent a substantial percentage of our outstanding Common Shares, and the sales of such shares, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our Common Shares to decline significantly.
We previously registered for the offer and sale from time to time by Yorkville of up to 20,000,000 Common Shares pursuant to the SEPA Registration Statement. Further, the prospectus that is part of the First Registration Statement relates to the offer and sale from time to time by the Selling Securityholders named in the First Registration Statement or their permitted transferees of up to 40,582,699 Common Shares, which includes (i) 22,663,638 outstanding Common Shares beneficially owned by such Selling Securityholders, (ii) up to 6,632,416 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of Private Placement Warrants held by Sponsor; (iii) up to 2,031,250 Common Shares issuable upon conversion of Class A Non-Voting Special Shares held by Sponsor; (iv) up to 4,378,500 Common Shares issuable upon the conversion of our secured convertible notes held by the applicable Selling Securityholders; (v) up to 263,890 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of the Lender Warrants; (vi) up to 449,013 Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of the Legacy Director Warrants; (vii) up to 71,267 Common Shares issued or that remain issuable upon vesting or vesting and exercise, as applicable, of Director Awards; and (viii) up to 4,092,725 Common Shares issuable upon the conversion of Company Earnout Non-Voting Special Shares. The number of Common Shares offered for resale under the prospectus that is part of the First Registration Statement and the SEPA Registration Statement significantly exceeds the number of Common Shares constituting our public float, and the sale of all Common Shares offered for resale by the Selling Securityholders under the First Registration Statement, the sale by Yorkville of all Common Shares offered for resale under the SEPA Registration Statement, or the perception that these sales could occur, could depress the market price of our Common Shares. Even if the trading price of our Common Shares were to continue to trade significantly below US$10.00 per share, the offering price for the units sold in the Prospector IPO, certain of the Selling Securityholders under the First Registration Statement may still have an incentive to sell our Common Shares because they may still experience a positive rate of return on the securities they purchased due to the differences in the purchase prices paid by such Selling Securityholders and the public trading price of our Common Shares. Additionally, the SEPA has been negotiated so that Yorkville would always purchase our Common Shares pursuant to its terms at a discount to market. Accordingly, our shareholders may not experience a similar rate of return on any Common Shares purchased by them on the open market, which would not have the benefit of any such discounts and due to differences in the purchase prices. Any such at-the-market purchases may make it harder for our shareholders to profit from their investments in our Company, when compared to those certain Selling Securityholders under the First Registration Statement, Yorkville under the SEPA Registration Statement or otherwise.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
Added
Our Common Shares have a short trading history on Nasdaq. An active trading market for our Common Shares may not be sustained and the market price of our Common Shares may be volatile.
Although our securities are listed on Nasdaq, the market for our Common Shares has demonstrated varying levels of trading activity. Prior to the listing, there was not a public market for any of our securities and the current level of trading may not be sustained in the future. The lack of an active market for our Common Shares may impair investors' ability to sell their shares at the time they wish to sell them or at a price that they consider reasonable, may reduce the fair market value of their shares and may impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire additional intellectual property assets by using our shares as consideration. In addition, we cannot predict the price at which our Common Shares may trade on Nasdaq, and the market price of our Common Shares may fluctuate significantly in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on our Common Shares and our Common Shares may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of the Company's securities may not recover and may experience a further decline. Factors affecting the trading price of the Company's securities may include: - actual or anticipated fluctuations in the Company's quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to the Company;- changes in the market's expectations about the Company's operating results;- the public's reaction to the Company's press releases, the Company's other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;- speculation in the press or investment community;- success of competitors;- the Company's operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;- changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning the Company or the market in general;- operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company;- the Company's ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;- changes in laws and regulations affecting the Company's business;- commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving the Company;- changes in the Company's capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;- the volume of shares of the Common Shares available for public sale;- any major change in the Company's board or management;- sales of substantial amounts of Common Shares by the Company's directors, officers or significant shareholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and - general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, breakouts of pandemics and epidemics and acts of war or terrorism. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our Common Shares irrespective of the Company's operating performance. The stock market in general and Nasdaq specifically have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our Common Shares, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for the stocks of other companies that investors perceive to be similar to the Company could depress its stock price regardless of its business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our Common Shares also could adversely affect its ability to issue additional securities and its ability to obtain additional financing in the future. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert the Company's management's attention and resources, and could also require the Company to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle litigation.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
Added
Nasdaq has notified the Company that the Company is not in compliance with certain continued listing requirements, and if we are unable to regain compliance with the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market, our Common Shares may be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and could make it more difficult for you to sell your shares.
Our Common Shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, and we are therefore subject to its continued listing requirements, including requirements with respect to the market value of publicly-held shares, market value of listed shares, and minimum bid price per share, among others, and requirements relating to board and committee independence. If we fail to satisfy one or more of the requirements, we may be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market. On July 31, 2024, we received notice (the "Minimum Bid Price Notice"), from Nasdaq that we are not currently in compliance with the US$1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). The Minimum Bid Price Notice indicated that, consistent with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(i), we have until January 25, 2025 to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by having the closing bid price of our Common Shares meet or exceed US$1.00 per share for at least ten consecutive business days. If we do not regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by January 25, 2025, we may be eligible to transfer the listing of our Common Shares from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market if, at the time of such transfer, we meet the initial listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares (US$1.0 million) and all other initial listing standards for the Nasdaq Capital Market (except for the minimum bid price requirement) and provide Nasdaq with written notice of our intention to cure the minimum bid price requirement deficiency. In response, Nasdaq may provide us an additional 180 day period to satisfy the minimum bid price requirement. However, if it appears to the Nasdaq staff that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if we are not eligible, Nasdaq will provide notice to us that our Common Shares will be subject to delisting as described below. On August 5, 2024 we received notice (the "Minimum Market Value of Publicly Held Shares Notice"), from Nasdaq that we are not currently in compliance with the US$15.0 million minimum market value of publicly held shares requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(2)(C). The Minimum Market Value of Publicly Held Shares Notice indicated that, consistent with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(D), we have until February 3, 2025 to regain compliance with the minimum market value of publicly held shares requirement by having the closing market value of publicly held shares meet or exceed US$15.0 million for at least ten consecutive business days. On August 5, 2024 we received notice (the "Minimum Market Value of Listed Securities Notice"), from Nasdaq that we are not currently in compliance with the US$50.0 million minimum market value of listed securities requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(2)(A). The Minimum Market Value of Listed Securities Notice indicated that, consistent with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C), we have until February 3, 2025 to regain compliance with the minimum market value of listed securities requirement by having the closing market value of listed securities meet or exceed US$50.0 million for at least ten consecutive business days. The foregoing notices had no immediate effect on the listing of our Common Shares and our Common Shares will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "LDTC" at this time. If we fail to regain compliance with any such requirements during the applicable compliance periods, we will receive notification from Nasdaq that our Common Shares are subject to delisting. At that time we may then appeal the delisting determination to a hearings panel. Such notification will have no immediate effect on our listing on the Nasdaq Global Market, nor will it have an immediate effect on the trading of our Common Shares pending such hearing. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to regain compliance with each of Nasdaq's minimum market value of publicly held shares requirement, Nasdaq's minimum market value of listed securities requirement, and Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement. If we regain compliance with each requirement, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements for the Nasdaq Global Market, or that our Common Shares will not be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market in the future. In addition, we may be unable to meet other applicable listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market, in which case our Common Shares could be delisted notwithstanding our ability to demonstrate compliance with the minimum market value of publicly held shares, minimum market value of listed securities and the minimum bid price requirements. Delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market may adversely affect our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equity securities, may significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and may negatively affect the value and liquidity of our Common Shares. Delisting also could have other negative results, including the potential loss of employee confidence, the loss of institutional investors or interest in business development opportunities. Moreover, a delisting of our Common Shares could result in an event of default under our outstanding debt. If we are delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market and we are not able to list our Common Shares on another exchange, our Common Shares could be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or in the "pink sheets." As a result, we could face significant adverse consequences including, among others: - a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;- a determination that our Common Shares are a "penny stock" which will require brokers trading in our Common Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;- a limited amount of news and little or no analyst coverage for us;- we would no longer qualify for exemptions from state securities registration requirements, which may require us to comply with applicable state securities laws; and - a decreased ability to issue additional securities (including pursuant to short-form registration statements on Form F-3) or obtain additional financing in the future.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
Changed
The Company is an emerging growth company subject to reduced disclosure requirements, and there is a risk that availing itself of such reduced disclosure requirements will make its Common Shares less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an "emerging growth company" within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile. Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountant standards used. Once we lose our "emerging growth company" status, we will no longer be able to take advantage of certain exemptions from reporting, and we will also be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will incur additional expenses in connection with such compliance and our management will need to devote additional time and effort to implement and comply with such requirements.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
Changed
Future resales of Common Shares may cause the market price of the Company's securities to drop significantly, even if the Company's business is doing well.
Subject to certain exceptions, the PIPE Investors and LeddarTech shareholders prior to the Business Combination other than the PIPE Investors agreed not to transfer or sell their Common Shares for six months and four years, respectively, following the Closing. However, following the expiration of such lockup, the Sponsor, PIPE Investors and certain shareholders of the Company will not be restricted from selling Common Shares held by them, other than by applicable securities laws. As such, sales of a substantial number of shares of Common Shares in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of Common Shares. The Sponsor and the shareholders of LeddarTech Inc. immediately prior to completion of the Business Combination (including Common Shares issued in the PIPE Financing pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, but not including Common Shares reserved in respect of the LeddarTech equity awards outstanding as of immediately prior to the Closing that were converted into awards based on Common Shares) collectively owned approximately 69.5% of the outstanding Common Shares immediately following completion of the Business Combination. As restrictions on resale end and registration statements (filed after the Closing to provide for the resale of such shares from time to time) are available for use, the sale or possibility of sale of these shares could have the effect of increasing the volatility in the Company's share price or the market price of Common Shares could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
Because the Company is a public reporting company by means other than a traditional underwritten initial public offering, our shareholders may face additional risks and uncertainties.
Because the Company is a public reporting company by means of consummating the Business Combination rather than by means of a traditional underwritten initial public offering, there is no independent third-party underwriter selling Common Shares, and, accordingly, the Company's shareholders do not have the benefit of an independent review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in a public securities offering. Due diligence reviews typically include an independent investigation of the background of the company, any advisors and their respective affiliates, review of the offering documents and independent analysis of the plan of business and any underlying financial assumptions. In an underwritten initial public offering, a due diligence investigation would be conducted by an underwriter that would be subject to strict liability for any material misstatements or omissions in a registration statement. In addition, because the Company did not become a public reporting company by means of a traditional underwritten initial public offering, security or industry analysts may not provide, or be less likely to provide, coverage of the Company. Investment banks may also be less likely to agree to underwrite follow-on or secondary offerings on behalf of the Company than they might if the Company became a public reporting company by means of a traditional underwritten initial public offering, because they may be less familiar with the Company as a result of not having performed similar work during the initial public offering process or because of more limited coverage by analysts and the media. The failure to receive research coverage or support in the market for Common Shares could have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to develop a liquid market for Common Shares.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
We qualify as a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and, as such, is exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies. The Company could lose its status as a foreign private issuer in the future, causing it to incur substantial costs, time and resources.
Because the Company is incorporated under the laws of Canada, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon the Company's directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against the Company's directors or officers.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
As a foreign private issuer, the Company is permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from Nasdaq listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with Nasdaq listing standards.
The Company is subject to the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. However, the Nasdaq rules will permit a foreign private issuer like the Company to follow the corporate governance practices of the Company's home country. Certain corporate governance practices in Canada, which is the Company's home country, may differ significantly from the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. For instance, the Company will not be required to: - have a majority of the board be independent (although all of the members of the audit committee must be independent under the Exchange Act); or - have a compensation committee and a nominating committee to be comprised solely of "independent directors." However, though Canada does not require a majority of independent directors, the Company has a majority of independent directors in accordance with the Nasdaq corporate governance standards. Should the Company instead rely on the "foreign private issuer" exemptions, shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would enjoy under the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10
The by-laws of the Company that are in effect designate the Superior Court of Justice of the Province of Québec, Canada and the appellate courts therefrom as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by the Company's shareholders, which could limit the Company's shareholders' ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company.
Our by-laws provide that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum and except as set out below, the Superior Court of Québec, Canada and the appellate courts therefrom will, to the fullest extent permitted by law be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, any action or proceeding asserting breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Company to the Company, any action or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the "CBCA") or the articles or by-laws of the Company, or any action or proceeding asserting a claim related to the relationships among the Company, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors or officers (other than the business carried on by the Company or its affiliates). Our by-laws provide that, notwithstanding the foregoing, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America will have exclusive jurisdiction for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the U.S. Securities Act. The exclusive forum provision in our by-laws will not apply to actions arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Our by-laws further provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of the Company is deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of the Company's by-laws described above. The forum selection provisions in our by-laws may increase a shareholder's cost and limit the shareholder's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with the Company or the Company's directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against the Company and the Company's directors, officers and other employees. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies' certificates of incorporation, memorandum and articles of association and/or equivalent constitutional documents has been challenged in legal proceedings and there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provisions. In addition, investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. It is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable, and if a court were to find this provision in our by-laws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could have adverse effect on the Company's business, financial conditions and results of operations.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 11
If analysts do not publish research about our business or if they publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our Common Shares will depend in part on the research and reports that analysts publish about our business. The Company does not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover the Company downgrade its Common Shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about its business, the price of its Common Shares would likely decline. If few analysts cover the Company, demand for its Common Shares could decrease and its Common Share price and trading volume may decline. Similar results may occur if one or more of these analysts stop covering the Company in the future or fail to publish reports on it regularly. Our business and operations could be negatively affected if it becomes subject to any securities litigation or shareholder activism, which could cause the Company to incur significant expense, hinder execution of business and growth strategy and impact its stock price. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Shareholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing recently. Volatility in the stock price of Common Shares or other reasons may in the future cause it to become the target of securities litigation or shareholder activism. Securities litigation and shareholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs and divert management's and our board of directors' attention and resources from our business. Additionally, such securities litigation and shareholder activism could give rise to perceived uncertainties as to the Company future, adversely affect its relationships with service providers and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Also, we may be required to incur significant legal fees and other expenses related to any securities litigation and activist shareholder matters. Further, its stock price could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and shareholder activism.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 12
Recent market volatility could impact the stock price and trading volume of the Company's securities.
The trading market for Common Shares could be impacted by recent market volatility, which volatility was greater in the technology industry. While the Company does not believe that it is more likely to be affected by market volatility than other public companies, recent stock run-ups, divergences in valuation ratios relative to those seen during traditional markets, high short interest or short squeezes, and strong and atypical retail investor interest in the markets may impact the demand for Common Shares. A possible "short squeeze" due to a sudden increase in demand of Common Shares that largely exceeds supply may lead to price volatility in Common Shares. Investors may purchase Common Shares to hedge existing exposure or to speculate on the price of Common Shares. Speculation on the price of Common Shares may involve both long and short exposures. To the extent aggregate short exposure exceeds the number of Common Shares available for purchase, investors with short exposure may have to pay a premium to repurchase Common Shares for delivery to lenders. Those repurchases may in turn, dramatically increase the price of Common Shares. This is often referred to as a "short squeeze." A short squeeze could lead to volatile price movements in Common Shares that are not directly correlated to the operating performance of the Company.
Accounting & Financial Operations7 | 10.8%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
The obligations associated with being a public company will involve significant expenses and will require significant resources and management attention.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Province of Québec's securities legislation. The Exchange Act and securities laws applicable in the Province of Québec require the filing of annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to a public company's business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that a public company establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that the Company did not previously incur. Our entire management team and many of its other employees will need to devote substantial time to compliance, and may not effectively or efficiently manage its transition into a public company. These rules and regulations will result in the Company incurring substantial legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations will likely make it more difficult and more expensive for the Company to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and it may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified people to serve on its board of directors, its board committees or as executive officers.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
The Company does not intend to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
The Company currently intends to retain its future earnings, if any, to finance the further development and expansion of its business and does not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Company's board of directors and will depend on its financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions contained in future agreements and financing instruments, business prospects and such other factors as its board of directors deems relevant.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
Changed
If we determine that our intangible assets have become impaired, we could incur significant charges that would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
As of September 30, 2024, the amounts of intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet subject to future impairment testing was $5.6 million. Pursuant to IAS 36, we capitalize costs for product development projects. Initial capitalization of costs is based on management's judgment that the Company can demonstrate the existence of a market for the product developed and that it will have the technical and financial capacity to complete the project until commercialization. Therefore, we conduct regular tests to determine if impairment has occurred. If the testing performed indicates that impairment has occurred, we are required to record a non-cash impairment charge for the difference between the carrying value of intangible assets and the implied fair value of the intangible assets in the period the determination is made. This testing of intangible assets for impairment requires us to make significant estimates about our future performance and cash flows, as well as other assumptions. These estimates can be affected by numerous factors, including changes in economic, industry or market conditions; changes in business operations; changes in competition; or potential changes in the price of Common Shares and LeddarTech's market capitalization. Changes in these factors, or changes in actual performance compared with estimates of our future performance, could affect the fair value of goodwill or other intangible assets, which may result in an impairment charge. We cannot accurately predict the amount or timing of any impairment of assets. Should the value of our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we could incur significant charges that would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
Changed
Our historical financial information, historical financial results and operating and business history, which were achieved under our prior sensory hardware-focused business model, may not be representative of our future results under an AI-based fusion and perception software-focused business model.
The historical combined financial information included in this Annual Report may not be meaningful to an understanding of our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows in the future or what they would have been had we been pursuing our sensory software-focused business model strategy during the years presented. Our historical financial data presented in this Annual Report includes costs of our business under our prior sensory hardware-focused business strategy, which may not, however, reflect the expenses we would have incurred had we pursued our current sensory software-focused business model during the years presented. Actual costs that may have been incurred if we had pursued our sensory software-focused business model would depend on a number of factors, including the extent of research and development costs, data acquisition and storage costs, and other strategic decisions. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects" and our historical combined financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 5
Changed
We have previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and if our remediation of such material weaknesses is not effective, or if we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Prior to the completion of the Business Combination, the Company was a private company, and we addressed our internal control over financial reporting with internal accounting and financial reporting personnel and other resources. In the course of preparing for the Business Combination in fiscal year 2022, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. As of September 30, 2024, we have remediated our material weaknesses previously identified in the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2022. See "- Item 15 "Controls and Procedures" for additional information about these material weaknesses and our remediation efforts. These remediation measures may be time-consuming, costly, and might place significant demands on our financial and operational resources. Moreover, significant operating cost reductions may materially adversely impact our accounting and finance function, and make it more difficult to maintain our remediated internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls. If we are unable to further maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, our ability to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the required time periods could be adversely affected. This, in turn, could jeopardize our ability to comply with our reporting obligations, limit our ability to access the capital markets and adversely impact our stock price. We cannot assure you that we have identified all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses. Material weaknesses may still exist when we report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by reporting requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may distract our officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify our existing processes and take significant time to complete. These changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and harm our business. In addition, investors' perceptions that our internal controls are inadequate or that we are unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm our stock price and make it more difficult for us to effectively market and sell our software solutions to new and existing customers.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 6
We have incurred significant operating losses and net cash outflows since inception, and it is uncertain when, if ever, we will generate meaningful revenue and profitability under LeddarTech's new business model.
LeddarTech had an accumulated deficit of $644.2 million as at September 30, 2024, and, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, incurred a net loss from continuing expenses of $167.3 million and $43.8 million, respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, LeddarTech realized net cash outflows relating to operating and investing activities amounting to $40.9 million and $11.5 million, respectively, and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, $36.7 million and $11.2 million, respectively. As of December 20, 2024, after giving effect to the completion of the Bridge Funding (as defined below) and including the US$9.89 million royalty fee under the software license agreement with Texas Instruments (the "TI Pre-paid Royalty Fee," which is not obligated to be repaid but is characterized as debt under IFRS), the Company had approximately $106.4 million of indebtedness outstanding. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and Capital Management." The Company is currently dependent on its shareholders, business partners and lenders to fund its operations, including the development of its technology. We have devoted most of LeddarTech's financial resources to research and development activities. We expect to continue to incur substantial and increased expenses, losses and negative cash flows as we expand our development activities and progress with the commercialization of our products.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 7
Our financial statements contain disclosure regarding the significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to execute our business plan, to fund our operations and to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to raise capital and the continuous support of our creditors.
Prior to 2022, we had been focused on research and development activities with a view to developing advanced detection and ranging systems and solutions based on light ("LiDAR"). As of September 30, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $644.2 million. We do not know whether or when we will become profitable. Our losses have resulted principally from disbursements made in development and discovery activities. The opinion of our independent registered public accounting firm on our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2024 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.
Debt & Financing6 | 9.2%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
LeddarTech has limited sources of available liquidity and if it does not raise additional capital is expected to operate under an alternative operating plan. A reduction in LeddarTech's operating costs may materially adversely affect LeddarTech in a number of ways.
LeddarTech has limited sources of liquidity. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and capital management," and our historical combined financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. If LeddarTech does not raise additional capital in sufficient amounts LeddarTech will need to seek relief from its lenders and reduce its operating costs to ensure sufficient liquidity for its operations and to comply with the requirements of its debt obligations. The Company has developed a flexible and scalable cost management plan to be implemented to the extent deemed necessary and appropriate so that LeddarTech can maintain operating costs at targeted levels (through strict cost control and budgeting discipline) to ensure operating costs will not exceed anticipated available liquidity. The cost management plan includes the possibility of significant reduction in product development expenditures, significant headcount reductions, and compensation adjustments. The extent to which the cost management plan would need to be implemented will be dependent upon several factors, including scope and terms of any forbearance agreement, waiver, amendment to, or relief from, the Minimum Cash Covenant (as defined herein) applicable to LeddarTech and the amount and extent to which the Company is able to raise additional capital in a timely manner, if at all. It is expected that LeddarTech will need to implement the cost management plan to some degree if it is not successful in its efforts to raise sufficient amounts of additional capital, and depending on the level of relief from the Minimum Cash Covenant LeddarTech is able to negotiate with its lender. Implementation of the cost management plan, if necessary, may materially adversely affect LeddarTech in a number of ways, and would exacerbate risks to which LeddarTech is already subject. For example, a reduction in product development expenditures and headcount reductions may materially limit LeddarTech's ability to complete, test and offer to the market a comprehensive suite of integrated features and services, and if LeddarTech is only able to offer a limited suite of features and services, it will be less likely to realize the full revenue and profitability potential of its solutions and less able to effectively compete in its targeted markets. Implementation of the cost management plan may also significantly reduce the number of Tier 1, Tier 2 and OEM customers that LeddarTech would be able to support, which in turn would be expected to have a material adverse effect on its revenue and potential profitability. See "- Any significant reduction in headcount as part of the Implementation of the Company's cost management plan may have a material adverse effect on LeddarTech's operations and future prospects" and "- We operate in a highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing market and compete against a large number of established competitors and new market entrants, some of whom have substantially greater resources." Implementation of the cost management plan also may adversely affect LeddarTech's ability to retain skilled software engineers and other key employees. See "- If we are unable to attract, retain, and motivate key employees, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected." Further, a reduction in headcount across LeddarTech may adversely affect LeddarTech's ability to timely prepare and publish accurate financial information, develop effective internal controls over financial reporting and remediate existing significant deficiencies and material weaknesses (or identify significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the future). See "- Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities - We have previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and if our remediation of such material weaknesses is not effective, or if we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future." In connection with any cost reduction plans or activities, the Company will be required to incur cash and non-cash expenses.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Changed
LeddarTech's liquidity position will be further constrained by the requirement to maintain a minimum cash balance. If LeddarTech is not able to maintain compliance with the minimum cash balance requirements, its debt obligations may be declared due and payable at a time when LeddarTech does not have sufficient resources to repay such debt obligations.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated financing offer (the "Desjardins Credit Facility") between LeddarTech and Fédération des Caisses Desjardins du Québec ("Desjardins"), LeddarTech has been required to maintain a minimum cash balance of $5.0 million (the "Minimum Cash Covenant"). The Desjardins Credit Facility was amended on July 5, 2024 (Ninth Amendment), July 26, 2024 (Tenth Amendment), August 5, 2024 (Eleventh Amendment), August 14, 2024 (Twelfth Amendment), August 16, 2024 (Thirteenth Amendment) and December 6, 2024 (Fourteenth Amendment) to reduce the Minimum Cash Covenant to (i) $3.5 million from July 5, 2024 to July 6, 2024, (ii) $1.8 million from July 7, 2024 to July 26, 2024, (iii) $1.3 million from July 27, 2024 to August 5, 2024, (iv) $250,000 from August 6, 2024 to August 19, 2024, (v) $1.0 million from August 20, 2024 to December 6, 2024, (vi) $1.0 million from the earlier of (w) December 13, 2024 and (x) the date of the full disbursement of the first installment of the TI Pre-paid Royalty Fee (the "First Royalty Installment") to the earlier of (y) the date of completion of one or more equity financing transactions generating gross proceeds of not less than US$35.0 million (including, without limitation, Common Shares sold pursuant to the Standby Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2024, by and between LeddarTech and YA II PN, LTD.("Yorkville") (the "SEPA"), the TI Pre-paid Royalty Fee and the conversion of Bridge Loans into equity, the "Equity Financing") (the "Short-Term Outside Date") and (z) January 31, 2025, and (vii) $5.0 million at all times after the earlier of the Short-Term Outside Date and January 31, 2025. Desjardins also agreed, pursuant to the terms of the Eleventh Amendment, to temporarily postpone payment of interest for the months of July, August, September and October 2024 until the earlier of (x) the date on which a default under the Desjardins Credit Facility has occurred and is continuing, (y) the Short-Term Outside Date and (z) December 13, 2024 (which was automatically extended to January 31, 2025, upon full disbursement to the Company of the First Royalty Installment on December 12, 2024). Additionally, the Desjardins Credit Facility was amended on August 16, 2024 (Thirteenth Amendment) and December 6, 2024 (Fourteenth Amendment) to align the Desjardins Credit Facility with the bridge facility entered into on August 16, 2024 by the Company and several of its principal shareholders and its principal lender (as amended, the "Bridge Facility") by, among other amendments, (i) excepting from the required repayment of the Desjardins Credit Facility of 10% from the net proceeds of the Equity Financing, (ii) on the Short-Term Outside Date, requiring repayment, in an amount of (x) the outstanding principal amounts under the Desjardins Bridge Loan, (y) all other amounts owed to Desjardins under the Bridge Facility, and (z) any amount payable under the Desjardins Credit Facility, including amendment fees, with such cash payment to Desjardins estimated to be approximately $7.1 million, assuming completion of the Equity Financing on January 31, 2025. An additional $875,000 would be capitalized and added to the principal balance of the Desjardins Term Loan. The Fourteenth Amendment also provided that a failure to receive the First Royalty Installment by December 13, 2024, and a failure to complete the Equity Financing by January 31, 2025, would constitute liquidity events triggering repayment of the Desjardins Term Loan. The First Royalty Installment was received on December 12, 2024. While it is expected that receipt of the proceeds from the Bridge Facility and the TI Pre-Paid Royalty and other sources of capital, including the SEPA, may enable LeddarTech to comply with the Minimum Cash Covenant, LeddarTech may in the future be unable to comply with the minimum cash balance requirement, absent an agreement by the lender to further amend, waive or otherwise provide relief from this Minimum Cash Covenant, unless it raises additional capital and/or implements its cost management plan. If LeddarTech is unable to enter into a forbearance agreement, waiver or amendment with, or obtain other relief from, Desjardins, or following receipt of any such relief is nonetheless unable to comply with its terms, and as a result LeddarTech were to fail to comply with such minimum cash balance requirements, Desjardins would have the right to declare the Desjardins Credit Facility to be due and payable, and if it elected to do so, approximately $102.2 million aggregate principal amount of indebtedness of LeddarTech (including the Desjardins Term Loan, the PIPE Convertible Notes and the Bridge Loan) as of December 20, 2024 would also be subject to acceleration. While LeddarTech may seek additional financing to avoid or cure such an outcome or seek from Desjardins further forbearance, waiver or other relief from such requirements, there is no assurance that it would be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In such circumstances, LeddarTech's ability to continue as a going concern would be materially and adversely affected and investors in LeddarTech's common shares could lose all or a substantial part of their investment.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
Changed
We need to raise substantial amounts of additional capital to address our liquidity needs and to realize our operational goals. The issuance of additional shares of the Common Shares would result in dilution of our shareholders and could have a negative impact on the market price of Common Shares.
In order to address our liquidity needs and to realize our operational goals without materially reducing our operational costs, the Company needs to raise substantial amounts of additional capital, which may include the issuance of additional equity securities. To the extent this occurs, it could impose significant dilution on our shareholders. Any issuances of additional Common Shares would result in dilution of our shareholders and could have a negative impact on the market price of Common Shares and our ability to obtain additional financing. For example, on April 8, 2024, in furtherance of addressing our liquidity needs, the Company entered into the SEPA with Yorkville, pursuant to which the Company has the right from time to time to issue and sell to Yorkville, up to US$50.0 million in Common Shares over the course of 36 months after the date of the SEPA. The SEPA Registration Statement covers the (i) up to 19,836,637 SEPA Advance Shares that we may, in our discretion, elect to issue and sell to Yorkville from time to time and (ii) 163,363 SEPA Commitment Shares that we issued to Yorkville in satisfaction of an upfront commitment fee under the SEPA. Through December 17, 2024, we issued a total of 5,490,000 Common Shares under the SEPA for gross proceeds of approximately US$9.0 million, leaving available 14,346,637 Common Shares available for sale under the SEPA Registration Statement. Without giving effect to any other potential future issuance other than pursuant to the SEPA, and assuming that the issue price for such sales is US$1.41 per share (the closing price on December 17, 2024), additional issuances up to the remaining US$41.0 million under the SEPA would represent in the aggregate approximately 29,078,014 million additional Common Shares or approximately 82% of the total number of Common Shares outstanding as of December 17, 2024, after giving effect to only such issuance. The timing, frequency, and the price at which we issue Common Shares are subject to market prices and management's decision to sell Common Shares, if at all. For more information, see "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and capital management - Financing Transactions - Standby Equity Purchase Agreement."
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Added
If LeddarTech does not raise additional capital or is not otherwise able to refinance the Desjardins Term Loan, investors may lose all or a substantial part of their investment.
The Desjardins Term Loan matures on January 31, 2026. As of September 30, 2024, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Desjardins Term Loan was $28.2 million. The Desjardins Term Loan requires that the Company, no later than August 5, 2025, shall have either (x) launched a formal merger and acquisition process with an investment bank selected by the board of directors of the Company and received expressions of interest in connection with such process, or (y) entered into a non-binding term sheet in respect of an equity or debt financing which would allow for the repayment in full of all amounts owing under the Desjardins Credit Facility. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and Capital Management - Financing Transactions - Desjardins Credit Facility." If the Company is unable to timely enter into a term sheet for the refinancing of the Desjardins Term Loan, it may be compelled to begin a formal merger and acquisition process, which could result in a transaction with per share value lower than the market price, or no transaction at all. If the Company is unable to procure additional financing in amounts sufficient to repay the Desjardins Term Loan or otherwise refinance the Desjardins Term Loan, investors may lose all or a substantial part of their investment.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Added
Upon the occurrence of a "liquidity event" under the Desjardins Credit Facility, including the failure to complete the Equity Financing by January 31, 2025, the Company would be obligated to repay all amounts under the Desjardins Credit Facility, and investors could lose all or a substantial part of their investment.
The Desjardins Credit Facility, as amended, provides that the Company must provide notice to Desjardins within two business days of a "liquidity event" and repay all amounts owing under the Desjardins Credit Facility. Liquidity events under the Desjardins Credit Facility, as amended, include a change of control of the Company, a sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, the occurrence of a default under the Desjardins Credit Facility and the failure to complete the Equity Financing by January 31, 2025. If a liquidity event were to occur, Desjardins would have the right to declare the Desjardins Credit Facility to be due and payable, and if it elected to do so, approximately $102.2 million aggregate principal amount of indebtedness of LeddarTech (including the Desjardins Credit Facility, the PIPE Convertible Notes and the Bridge Loan) as of December 20, 2024 plus payment in kind (PIK) interest accrued on the PIPE Convertible Notes would also be subject to acceleration. While LeddarTech may seek additional financing to avoid or cure such an outcome or seek from Desjardins further forbearance, waiver or other relief from such requirements, there is no assurance that it would be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In such circumstances, LeddarTech's ability to continue as a going concern would be materially and adversely affected and investors in LeddarTech's Common Shares could lose all or a substantial part of their investment. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Liquidity and capital management - Financing Transactions - Desjardins Credit Facility."
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
The Company will need to raise additional funds to meet its capital requirements, and such funds may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which could materially and adversely affect LeddarTech's business, results of operations or financial condition and its ability to continue as a going concern.
LeddarTech will need to raise additional capital to, among other things, conduct research and development, and to complete development, testing, qualification, and marketing of its solutions, including its Surround View Solution (LVS-2+). If LeddarTech is not successful in raising additional capital, it is expected that it will need to implement a cost management plan that could have a number of material adverse effects on its business, operations and profitability. See "- LeddarTech has limited sources of available liquidity and if it does not raise additional capital is expected to operate under an alternative operating plan. A reduction in LeddarTech's operating costs may materially adversely affect LeddarTech in a number of ways." LeddarTech's future capital requirements may be uncertain and actual capital requirements may be different from those it currently anticipates. LeddarTech may seek equity or debt financing to finance a portion of its future capital expenditures. Such financing might not be available to it in a timely manner or on terms that are acceptable, or at all. LeddarTech's ability to obtain the necessary financing to carry out its business plan is subject to a number of factors, including general market conditions and investor acceptance of its business plan. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of such financing unattractive or unavailable to it. In particular, recent disruptions in the financial markets and volatile economic conditions could affect its ability to raise capital. LeddarTech's future capital needs and other business reasons could require it to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity or equity-linked securities could dilute its shareholders. The issuance of debt securities and incurrence of additional indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations. Holders of any debt securities or preferred shares will have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of its Common Shares in the event of liquidation. Any financial or other restrictive covenants from any debt securities would restrict its operations or its ability to pay dividends to its shareholders.
Corporate Activity and Growth3 | 4.6%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
As part of growing our business, we may make acquisitions. If we fail to successfully select, execute or integrate our acquisitions, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected, and our stock price could decline.
From time to time, we may undertake acquisitions to add new products and technologies, acquire talent, gain new sales channels or enter into new markets or sales territories. In addition to possible shareholder approval, we may need approvals and licenses from relevant government authorities for the acquisitions and to comply with any applicable laws and regulations, which could result in increased delay and costs, and may disrupt our business strategy if we fail to do so. Furthermore, acquisitions and the subsequent integration of new assets, businesses, key personnel, customers, vendors and suppliers require significant attention from our management and could result in a diversion of resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our operations. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate the financial results we expect. Acquisitions could result in the use of substantial amounts of cash, dilutive issuances of equity securities, the occurrence of significant goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business. Moreover, the costs of identifying and consummating acquisitions may be significant. To date, we have limited experience with acquisitions and the integration of acquired technology and personnel. Failure to successfully identify, complete, manage and integrate acquisitions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause our stock price to decline.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
We have an unproven business model in a new market and face significant challenges in a rapidly evolving industry. LeddarTech's prospects may be considered speculative and any failure to commercialize LeddarTech's strategic plans would have an adverse effect on LeddarTech's operating results and business, harm LeddarTech's reputation and could result in substantial liabilities that exceed LeddarTech's resources.
We have a limited operating history under LeddarTech's new unproven business model and LeddarTech's operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including a lack of operating history under LeddarTech's new business model. We cannot be certain that LeddarTech's business strategy will be successful or that we will be solvent at any particular time. LeddarTech's likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the establishment of any company. If we fail to address any of these risks or difficulties adequately, LeddarTech's business will likely suffer. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing and commercializing LeddarTech's raw data fusion and perception software solutions, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if ever. We may never become profitable and you may never receive a return on an investment in LeddarTech's securities. An investor in LeddarTech's securities must carefully consider the substantial challenges, risks and uncertainties inherent in the attempted development and commercialization of procedures and products in the sensory software industries. We may never successfully commercialize LeddarTech's LeddarVision™ solutions and LeddarTech's business may fail.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Changed
We have entered into strategic collaborations, but not yet signed commercial agreements, with Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers. If we fail to sign commercial agreements with those prospective customers, or to subsequently achieve an OEM design win with such customers, our future business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We are in various stages of discussion with Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers and OEMs, covering more than 30 design win opportunities. As a result of such discussions, we have previously publicly announced strategic collaborations with two Tier 1 suppliers in the automotive industry, FICOSA ADAS S.L. ("Ficosa") and Trimble Inc. ("Trimble"). However, since the Trimble collaboration was established, Trimble completed an agreement to transfer its precision agricultural technology business (the division with which LeddarTech has a strategic collaboration) to a joint venture with AGCO Corp., forming PTx Trimble, LLC. AGCO owns 85% of the joint venture, with Trimble retaining the remaining 15%. Because there have been no activities in 2024 under this arrangement, we believe it is likely that this strategic collaboration will be terminated in 2025. See "Item 4.B. Business Overview – Customers." We have recently announced collaborations with Tier 2 suppliers Arm Holdings plc and Texas Instruments, however we have not yet entered into commercial agreements with any Tier 1 supplier or OEM, and there is no assurance that these strategic collaborations will result in either commercial agreements or OEM design wins. In the event we execute commercial agreements with prospective customers, such agreements may have contractual rights to cancel or delay orders, or the time frame for development and integration of our software may be extended beyond the timing provided for in such agreements, potentially resulting in the agreements expiring without generating revenue or achieving OEM design wins. Any subsequent renegotiation of such agreements may result in terms less favorable to us. Such cancelations, delays, expirations and renegotiations could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenue (which could in turn affect our ability to raise needed capital on reasonable terms), diminish supplier or customer willingness to enter into transactions with us and have other adverse effects that may decrease our long-term viability. See "- We have not achieved any OEM design wins, and while we have invested significant time, funds and efforts seeking OEM, Tier 1 and Tier 2 customer selection of our solutions, our solutions ultimately may not be chosen for use in production models. If we fail to achieve OEM design wins after incurring substantial expenditures in these efforts, our future business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected."
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 12/65 (18%)Above Sector Average
Innovation / R&D5 | 7.7%
Innovation / R&D - Risk 1
Changed
We have not achieved any OEM design wins, and while we have invested significant time, funds and efforts seeking OEM and Tier 1 and Tier 2 customer selection of our solutions, our solutions ultimately may not be chosen for use in production models. If we fail to achieve OEM design wins after incurring substantial expenditures in these efforts, our future business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We invest significant effort and money developing our sensory software solutions to support automotive advanced driver assistance systems ("ADAS") or autonomous driving ("AD") applications, developed by original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs")" or automotive system integrators that are direct suppliers to OEMs ("Tier 1" suppliers) and suppliers to Tier 1 suppliers ("Tier 2" suppliers), which we intend to be incorporated in one or more specific vehicle models to be produced by the OEMs. We refer to the selection by a Tier 1 supplier of our software for inclusion in such ADAS or AD applications, for the purposes of submitting such applications to an OEM, as a "Tier 1 design and integration win." We use the term "OEM design win" to refer to the selection by an OEM of our software, whether directly from us for integration in the ADAS or AD applications developed by the OEM, or through selection of a Tier 1 supplier's ADAS or AD application integrating our software, for incorporation in specific vehicle models with identified SOPs. There is no assurance that a Tier 1 design and integration win will develop into an OEM design win. We could expend significant resources pursuing, but fail to achieve, either a Tier 1 design and integration win or an OEM design win. While we are in various stages of discussion with Tier 1 suppliers and OEMs, we have not yet achieved an OEM design win, and there is no assurance that these assessments will result in either a Tier 1 design and integration win or an OEM design win or that we will otherwise successfully commercialize our product offering at scale, whether through the collaboration agreement with Texas Instruments or otherwise in the future. After an OEM design win, it is typically difficult for a product or technology that did not receive the design win to displace the winner until the OEM issues a new request for quotation because an OEM will generally not change complex technology already integrated in its systems until a vehicle model is revamped. In addition, the firm with the winning design may have an advantage with the OEM going forward because of the established relationship between the winning firm and the OEM, which would make it more difficult for that firm's competitors to win the designs for other production models. If we fail to win a significant number of OEM design competitions in the future, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected. Because we have not yet achieved an OEM design win, we cannot be certain as to our revenue model and anticipated pricing terms, whether royalty fees on a per unit basis, fees for engineering services and software licensing, data streams and other revenue sources. Additionally, future contracts with OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers may have certain contractual rights to cancel or delay their orders under certain circumstances. Such cancelations or delays could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenue (which could in turn affect our ability to raise needed capital on reasonable terms), diminish supplier or customer willingness to enter into transactions with us and have other adverse effects that may decrease our long-term viability. If our products are not successfully developed or commercialized, including because of a lack of capital, if we do not achieve broad market acceptance of our products and services, or if we cannot agree on attractive pricing terms with our target customers, we will not achieve profitability and our business may fail.
Innovation / R&D - Risk 2
Changed
Even if we achieve OEM design wins, prospective customers may not purchase our solutions in any certain quantity, at any certain price or at all, and there may be significant delays between the time we achieve either a Tier 1 design and integration win or an OEM design win and the time a contract for production is agreed to and we are able to realize revenue. Any failure to obtain OEM or Tier 1 or Tier 2 customers for our solutions and services, whether following Tier 1 design and integration wins, OEM design wins or otherwise, would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we achieve an OEM design win, any resulting contracts with customers may not require them to purchase our solutions in any certain quantity or at any certain price, and our sales could be less than we forecast if a vehicle model for which we achieved an OEM design win is unsuccessful (including for reasons unrelated to our solutions), if an OEM decides to discontinue or reduce production of a vehicle model or of the use of our solutions in a vehicle model, or if we face downward pricing pressure. As a result, achieving OEM design wins is not a guarantee of revenue, and our sales may not correlate with the achievement of additional OEM design wins. Moreover, pricing estimates are made at the time of a request for quotation by an OEM, so that worsening market or other conditions between the time of a request for quotation and an order for our solutions may require us to sell our solutions for a lower price than we initially expected. We may also face pricing pressures from our customers as a result of their restructuring, consolidation, and cost-cutting initiatives or as a result of increased competition. As a particular solution matures and unit volumes increase, we also generally expect its average selling price to decline. If we are not able to introduce solutions with additional features and functionality at higher price points to offset price reductions, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected. Furthermore, our solutions are technologically complex, incorporate many technological innovations, and are typically subject to significant safety testing, and OEMs generally must make significant commitments of resources to test and validate our solutions before including them in any particular vehicle model. Our low-level sensor fusion and perception technology controls supports ADAS and autonomous driving solutions control of various vehicle functions including engine, transmission, safety, steering, navigation, acceleration, and braking and therefore must be integrated effectively with the other systems of the vehicle developed by the OEMs, our Tier 1 customers, our Tier 2 customers, and other suppliers, and we may be unable to achieve the requisite level of interoperability in a vehicle model for our solutions to be implemented even after an OEM design win. We expect the integration cycles of our solutions with new OEMs to be approximately one to three years after an OEM design win, depending on the OEM and the complexity of the solution. These integration cycles result in our investment of resources prior to realizing any revenue from a vehicle model. An OEM may choose to cancel production of the vehicle model for which we achieved the OEM design win or cancel or postpone the vehicle model. In connection with any OEM design wins, we would expect to receive preliminary estimates from OEMs of their anticipated production volumes for the models relating to those design wins. Those estimates may be revised significantly by the OEMs, potentially multiple times, and may not be representative of future production volumes associated with those OEM design wins, which could be significantly higher or lower than estimated. Furthermore, long development cycles or vehicle model cancellations or postponements would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Innovation / R&D - Risk 3
LeddarTech's recent transition from a sensory hardware-focused development business model to a sensory software-focused development business model means that effectively we are a "pre-revenue" business, and the transition makes evaluating LeddarTech's business and future prospects difficult and may increase the risk of your investment.
In fiscal 2022, LeddarTech transitioned its business activities into an automotive software business model pursuant to which it is developing and marketing raw data fusion and perception software solutions. Prior to this transition in its business plan, LeddarTech's costs and revenues were principally related to the development, production and sale of hardware and sensor components. LeddarTech has a limited operating history under this new business model, and is operating in a rapidly evolving market. As a result, there is limited historical financial information that investors can use in evaluating LeddarTech's business, strategy, operating plan, results, and prospects. Furthermore, LeddarTech has not yet successfully commercialized its software solutions.
Innovation / R&D - Risk 4
We invest significantly in research and development, and to the extent our research and development efforts are unsuccessful, our competitive position would be negatively impacted and our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
To compete successfully, we must maintain successful research and development efforts, develop new solutions, and improve our existing solutions, all ahead of competitors. We are focusing our research and development efforts across several key emerging technologies, including computer vision, software-defined radar and solid-state LiDAR, low-level sensor fusion, and the LeddarVision™ Front - Entry-Level, LeddarVision™ Premium Surround and LeddarVision™ Parking systems. These are ambitious initiatives, and we cannot guarantee that all of these efforts will deliver the benefits we anticipate or be homologated as expected. We must make research and development investments based on our views of the most promising approaches to address future customer needs in rapidly evolving markets, and we cannot be certain that we will target our research and development investments appropriately, or correctly anticipate the manner in which these markets will evolve. To the extent our research and development efforts do not produce timely improvements in utility, accuracy, safety, cost and operational efficiency, our competitive position will be harmed. We do not expect all of our research and development investments to be successful. Some of our efforts to develop and market new solutions may fail, and the solutions we invest in and develop may be rejected by regulators or may not be well received by customers, who may adopt competing technologies. We make significant investments in research and development, and our investments at times may not contribute to our future operating results for several years, if at all, and such contributions at times may not meet our expectations or even cover the costs of such investments, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Innovation / R&D - Risk 5
If we are unable to develop and introduce new solutions and improve existing solutions in a cost-effective and timely manner, then our competitive position would be negatively impacted and our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition depend on our ability to complete development of our raw data fusion and perception software solutions for the automotive market and to develop and introduce new and enhanced solutions that incorporate and integrate the latest technological advancements in sensing and perception technologies, software and hardware, and camera, radar, LiDAR, mapping, and AI technologies to satisfy evolving customer, regulatory, and safety rating requirements. For example, we will need to complete the development in a cost-effective manner of new generations of our LeddarVision™ Front - Entry-Level and LeddarVision™ Surround View Solution, each of which are important components of our planned approach to address the ADAS consumer and off-road vehicle markets. This Annual Report contains descriptions of our current expectations regarding the time frame in which we expect to have our software solutions deployed by our Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers. These time periods are subject to significant uncertainty. We may encounter significant unexpected technical and production challenges, or delays in completing the development of these and other solutions and ramping production in a cost-efficient manner. The development of these and other new and enhanced solutions requires us to invest resources in research and development and also requires that we: - design innovative, accurate, and safety- and comfort-enhancing functions that differentiate our solutions from those of our competitors;- continuously improve the reliability of, and reduce and ultimately remove the requirement for human intervention with, our ADAS and autonomous driving technology;- cooperate effectively on new designs and development with our customers, suppliers and partners;- respond effectively to technological changes and product announcements by our competitors; and - adjust to changing customer requirements, market conditions, and regulatory and rating standards quickly and cost-effectively. If we must significantly reduce our operating costs, we could experience delays in completing development of our solutions. If there are delays in, or if we fail to complete when expected or at all, our existing and new development programs, we may not be able to satisfy our customers' requirements, achieve either Tier 1 design and integration wins or OEM design wins with our target customers, or achieve market acceptance of our solutions, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Trade Secrets3 | 4.6%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
We may not be able to adequately protect, defend or enforce our intellectual property rights, and our efforts to do so may be costly.
The success of our solutions and business depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and other intellectual property rights and to maintain adequate legal protection for our solutions in the United States, Canada and other international jurisdictions. If we are not able to adequately protect or enforce the proprietary aspects of our technology, competitors could be able to access, replicate or circumvent our proprietary technology and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected. We currently attempt to protect our technology through a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, employee invention assignment agreements, employee and third-party non-disclosure agreements and similar means, all of which provide only limited protection. We have filed for patent and trademark registration in the United States, Canada and in certain other international jurisdictions. However, effective intellectual property protection may be unavailable in some countries where we operate or seek to enforce our intellectual property rights or more limited in foreign jurisdictions relative to those protections available in the United States, or may not be applied for in one or more relevant jurisdictions. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective enforcement in foreign countries may not be available. Our issued patents and trademarks and any pending or future patent and trademark applications that may result in issuances or registrations may not provide sufficiently broad protection or may not prove to be enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. The patent prosecution process is expensive, time-consuming, and complex, and we may not be able to file, prosecute, maintain, enforce, or license all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output in time to obtain patent protection. Failure to timely seek patent protection on products or technologies generally precludes us from seeking future patent protection on these products or technologies. Even if we do timely seek patent protection, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before a patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted after issuance. As a result, we may not be able to protect our proprietary rights adequately in the United States, Canada or elsewhere. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could result in our competitors offering similar products or services, potentially resulting in the loss of some of our competitive advantage and a decrease in our revenue, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Despite our efforts, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy, reverse engineer, disassemble, disclose, obtain, or use our technologies or systems. Our competitors may also be able to independently develop similar products or services that are competitive to ours or design around our issued patents. If third parties obtain patent protection with respect to such technologies, they may assert that our technology infringes their patents and seek to charge us a licensing fee or otherwise preclude or make costlier the use of our technology. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, to prevent unauthorized parties from copying or reverse engineering our solutions, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to block the importation of infringing products into the United States or other countries. We may be a party to claims and litigation as a result of alleged infringement by third parties of our intellectual property. Even when we sue other parties for such infringement, that suit may have adverse consequences for our business. Any such suit is likely to be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and may divert our management's time and attention from our business, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and legal fees related to such litigation would increase our operating expenses and may reduce our net income. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us, alleging that we infringe their intellectual property or alleging that our intellectual property is invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, any litigation initiated by us could result in a court or governmental agency invalidating or rendering unenforceable our patents or other intellectual property rights upon which the suit is based, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Trade Secrets - Risk 2
We may become subject to claims and litigation brought by third parties alleging infringement by us of their intellectual property rights.
The industry in which our business operates is characterized by a large number of patents, some of which may be of questionable scope, validity, or enforceability, and some of which may appear to overlap with other issued patents. As a result, there is a significant amount of uncertainty in the industry regarding patent protection and infringement. In addition to these patents, participants in this industry typically also protect their technology, especially embedded software, through copyrights and trade secrets. In recent years, there has been significant litigation globally involving patents and other intellectual property rights. In the event that we recruit employees from other technology companies, including certain potential competitors, and these employees are used in the development of solutions that are similar to the solutions they were involved in developing for their former employers, we may become subject to claims that such employees have improperly used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information. We may also in the future be subject to claims by our suppliers, employees, consultants, or contractors asserting an ownership right in our patents or patent applications, as a result of the work they performed on our behalf. These claims and any resulting lawsuits, if resolved adversely to us, could subject us to significant liability for damages, impose temporary or permanent injunctions against our solutions or business operations or invalidate or render unenforceable our intellectual property. In addition, because patent applications can take many years until the patents issue, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, which may later result in issued patents that our solutions may infringe. If any of our solutions infringe a third party's patent rights, or if we wish to avoid potential intellectual property litigation on any alleged infringement relating to our solutions, we could be prevented from selling, or we could elect not to sell, such solutions unless we obtain additional intellectual property rights and licenses, which may involve substantial royalty or other payments and may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. Alternatively, we could be forced to redesign one or more of our solutions to avoid any infringement or allegations thereof. Procuring or developing substitute solutions that do not infringe could require significant effort and expense, and we may not be successful in any attempt to redesign our solutions to avoid any alleged infringement. A successful claim of infringement against us, or our failure or inability to develop and implement non-infringing technology, or license the infringed intellectual property rights, on acceptable terms and on a timely basis, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. A party making such a claim, if successful, could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages or obtain an injunction. An adverse determination also could invalidate our intellectual property rights and adversely affect our ability to offer our solutions to our customers. Additionally, we may face liability to our customers, business partners or third parties for indemnification or other remedies in the event that they are sued for infringement in connection with their use of our solutions. We currently have a number of agreements in effect pursuant to which we have agreed to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless our customers, suppliers and other business partners from damages and costs which may arise from the infringement by our solutions of third-party patents or other intellectual property rights. The scope of these indemnity obligations varies, but may, in some instances, include indemnification for damages and expenses, including attorneys' fees. Furthermore, our defense of intellectual property rights claims brought against us or our customers, business partners or other related third parties, regardless of our success, would likely be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management's time and attention from our business, which could seriously harm our business. A claim that our solutions infringe a third party's intellectual property rights, even if untrue, could adversely affect our relationships with our customers or suppliers, may deter future customers from purchasing our solutions and could seriously harm our reputation with our customers or suppliers, as well as our reputation in the industry at large.
Trade Secrets - Risk 3
In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented proprietary technology, trade secrets, processes and know-how that can be more difficult to protect or enforce, which could allow competitors to independently develop or commercialize superior technology, software and products.
We rely on proprietary information (such as trade secrets, know-how, and confidential information) to protect intellectual property that may not be patentable and may not be subject to copyright, trademark, trade dress or service mark protection, or that we believe is best protected by means that do not require public disclosure. Such proprietary information may be owned by us or disclosed to us by our licensors, suppliers or other third parties. We generally seek to protect this proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements, or consulting, services or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions with our employees, consultants, contractors, scientific advisors and other third parties. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement, or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. We have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our third-party manufacturers and suppliers and could lose future trade secret protection if any unauthorized disclosure of such information occurs. In addition, our proprietary information may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. To the extent that our employees, consultants, contractors, scientific advisors and other third parties use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in or to related or resulting know-how and inventions. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain protection for our proprietary information could adversely affect our competitive business position. Furthermore, laws regarding trade secret rights in certain markets where we operate may afford little or no protection to our trade secrets. We also rely on physical and electronic security measures to protect our proprietary information, but we cannot provide assurance that these security measures will not be breached or provide adequate protection for our property. There is a risk that third parties may obtain and improperly utilize our proprietary information to our competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to detect or prevent the unauthorized use of such information or take appropriate and timely steps to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. The theft or unauthorized use or publication of our trade secrets and other confidential business information as a result of such an incident would affect our competitive position and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Cyber Security2 | 3.1%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
Interruptions to our information technology systems and networks and cybersecurity incidents could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We collect and maintain information in digital form that is necessary to conduct our business, and we rely on IT systems to process, transmit, and store electronic information, and to manage or support our business and consumer facing activities. Our operations routinely involve receiving, storing, processing, and transmitting confidential or sensitive information pertaining to our business, customers, suppliers, employees, and other sensitive matters, including trade secrets, other proprietary business information, and personal information. Although we have established physical, electronic, and organizational measures designed to safeguard and secure our systems to prevent a data breach or compromise, and rely on commercially available systems, software, tools, and monitoring to provide security for our IT systems and the processing, transmission, and storage of digital information, we cannot guarantee that such measures will be adequate to detect, prevent, or mitigate cyber incidents. The implementation, maintenance, segregation, and improvement of these measures requires significant management time, support, and cost. Moreover, there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving, expanding, and updating current systems, including the disruption of our data management, procurement, production execution, finance, supply chain, and sales and service processes. These risks may affect our ability to manage our data and inventory, procure parts or supplies, or produce, sell, deliver, and service our solutions, adequately protect our intellectual property, or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, applicable laws, regulations, and contracts. We cannot be sure that the IT systems upon which we rely, including those of our third-party vendors or suppliers, will be effectively implemented, maintained, or expanded as planned. While cyberattacks against our third-party vendors or suppliers have not materially adversely affected us to date, future cyberattacks on such third parties may cause significant disruptions and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, despite the implementation of preventative and detective security controls, such IT systems are vulnerable to damage, shutdown, or interruption from a variety of sources, including telecommunications or network failures or interruptions, system malfunction, natural disasters, terrorism, and war. Additionally, our IT systems and products may be vulnerable to malicious acts by hackers, including through use of computer viruses, malware (including ransomware), phishing attacks, or denial of service attacks. We regularly face attempts by others to gain unauthorized access, or to introduce malicious software, to our IT systems. Individuals or organizations, including malicious hackers, state-sponsored organizations, insider threats, including employees and third-party service providers, or intruders into our physical facilities, at times may attempt to gain unauthorized access to or corrupt our IT systems, products, or services. We are a target for computer hackers and organizations that intend to sabotage, take control of, or otherwise corrupt our processes, solutions, and services. We are also a target for malicious attackers who attempt to gain access to our network or data centers or those of our suppliers, customers, partners, or end users, steal proprietary information related to our business, products, employees, suppliers, and customers, interrupt our infrastructure, systems, and services or those of our suppliers, customers, or others, or demand ransom to return control of such systems and services. Such attempts are increasing in number and in technical sophistication, and if successful, expose us and the affected parties to risk of loss or misuse of confidential or other proprietary or commercially sensitive information, compromise personal information regarding users or employees, disrupt our business operations, and jeopardize the security of our facilities. Our IT infrastructure also includes products and services provided by third parties, and these providers may experience breaches of their systems and products that impact the security of our systems and our proprietary or confidential information. We have experienced attempted data breaches, cyberattacks, and other similar incidents, none of which have resulted in a material adverse impact to our business or operations, but there can be no guarantee we will not experience an incident that would have such an impact. Such incidents, whether or not successful, could result in our incurring significant costs related to, for example, rebuilding internal systems, writing down inventory value, implementing additional threat protection measures, providing modifications to our solutions, defending against litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages, providing customers with incentives to maintain the business relationship, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties, as well as reputational harm. In addition, cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving, thereby increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventative measures. There has also been an increase in cyberattack volume, frequency, and sophistication driven by the global enablement of remote workforces. We seek to detect and investigate unauthorized attempts and attacks against our network and solutions and to prevent their recurrence where practicable through changes to our internal processes and tools and changes or updates to our solutions. However, despite the implementation of preventative and detective security controls, we, and the third parties upon which we rely, remain potentially vulnerable to additional known or unknown cybersecurity threats. In some instances, we, our suppliers, our customers, and end users, can be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. Even when a security breach is detected, the full extent of the breach may not be determined, and even if determined, a full investigation may require time and resources. Any actual or perceived security incident could result in, among other things, unfavorable publicity, governmental inquiry and oversight, difficulty in marketing our services, allegations by our customers that we have not performed our contractual obligations, litigation by affected parties, including our customers, and possible financial obligations for damages related to the theft or misuse of such information or inventory, any of which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. The costs related to cybersecurity breaches, attacks or other similar incidents or network or computer system disruptions typically would not be fully insured or indemnified. We cannot ensure that any limitations of liability provisions in our agreements with customers, service providers and other third parties with which we do business would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from any liabilities or damages with respect to any particular claim in connection with a cybersecurity breach, attack or other similar incident.
Cyber Security - Risk 2
Security breaches and other disruptions of our in-vehicle systems and related data could impact the safety of our end users and reduce confidence in us and our solutions.
Our operations are rich in technology and computing and may be exposed to risks related to the stability of the information systems, their compatibility with the scope of its operations, information security, technical failures and overload of system servers. Impairment of the stability of computer systems and inability on our part to return its systems to normal operation within a reasonable time frame, or the lack of technological ability to meet commitments or the expectations of potential customers and strategic partners, may damage our reputation and harm its business outcomes. Our low-level sensor fusion and perception solutions contain complex information technology. These solutions, as integrated in ADAS and AD technologies, may affect the control of various vehicle functions including engine, transmission, safety, steering, navigation, acceleration, and braking. Hackers may attempt in the future to gain unauthorized access to modify, alter, and use such systems to gain control of, or to change, the functionality, user interface and performance characteristics of vehicles incorporating our solutions, or to gain access to data stored in or generated by the vehicle. In addition, as we transition to offering solutions that involve cloud-based solutions, including over-the-air updates, our solutions may increasingly be subject to cyber threats. Hackers may attempt to infiltrate, steal, corrupt, or manipulate such data on the cloud, which could also result in our low-level fusion technology malfunctioning. Malicious cybersecurity attacks against our technology, utilized by in-vehicle systems that relate to automotive safety and related data, such as the data described in the preceding sentence, could potentially lead to bodily injury or death of end users, passengers, and others. Any unauthorized access to or control of vehicles incorporating our solutions or their systems could adversely impact the safety of those vehicles, or result in legal or regulatory claims or proceedings, liability, or regulatory penalties. Moreover, new laws, such as the new data law in Massachusetts that would permit third-party access to vehicle data and related systems, could expose our vehicles and vehicle systems to third-party access without appropriate security measures in place, leading to new safety and security risks, and reducing trust and confidence in our solutions. In addition, regardless of their accuracy, reports of unauthorized access to our solutions, their systems, or data, as well as other factors that may result in the perception that our solutions, their systems, or data are capable of being hacked, could harm our reputation, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Technology2 | 3.1%
Technology - Risk 1
ADAS and AD systems rely on a complex set of technologies, and there is no assurance that the rate of acceptance and adoption of these technologies will increase in the near future or that a market for fully autonomous vehicles will fully develop.
ADAS and AD systems rely on a complex set of technologies, which requires the coordinated development of sensing, mapping, object detection and classification as well as path planning and navigation. These functions and capabilities are in different stages of development, and their reliability must continue to improve in order to meet the higher standards required for AD. Sensing technology provides information to the car and includes the physical sensors, as well as object classification and perception software. In many cases, it will be sold as part of a system where it must work within the core AD platform of an OEM. If customer technology is not ready to be deployed in vehicle models when our sensing technology is ready for adoption, launch of production could be delayed, perhaps for a significant time period, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There are a number of additional challenges to AD, all of which are outside of our control, including market acceptance of AD, particularly fully AD, national or state certification requirements and other regulatory measures, concerns regarding litigation, cyber security risks, as well as a general aversion by some consumers to the idea of self-driving vehicles. There can be no assurance that the market will accept any vehicle model, including a vehicle containing our technology, in which case our future business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Technology - Risk 2
We use certain software and data governed by open-source licenses, which under certain circumstances could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Certain of our software and data, as well as that of our customers and vendors, may be derived from or otherwise incorporate so-called "open source" software and data that is generally made available to the public by its authors and/or other third parties. Some open-source software is made available under licenses that impose certain obligations on us regarding modifications or derivative works we create based upon the open-source software. These obligations may require us to make source code for the derivative works available to the public and/or license such derivative works under a particular type of license, rather than the forms of license we customarily use to protect our intellectual property. Additionally, if we combine our proprietary software with open-source software in certain manners we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software or to make our proprietary software available under open-source licenses to third parties at little or no cost or on unfavorable license terms. In the event that the copyright holder of, or other third party that distributes, open-source software alleges that we have not complied with the terms of an open-source license, we could incur significant legal costs defending ourselves against such allegations. If such claims are successful, we could be subject to significant damages, required to release the source code that we developed using that open-source software to the public, enjoined from distributing our software and/or required to take other actions that could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. While we take steps to monitor the use of open-source software in our solutions, processes and technology and try to ensure that no open-source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose the source code to the related product, processes, or technology when we do not wish to do so, such use could inadvertently occur. Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source software into software we license from such third party for our solutions, processes, or technology, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code to our solutions, processes, or technology. This could harm our intellectual property position and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Further, the use of open-source software can lead to vulnerabilities that may make our software susceptible to attack, and although some open-source vendors provide warranty and support agreements, it is common for such software to be available "as is" with no warranty, indemnity, or support. Although we monitor our use of such open-source code to avoid subjecting our solutions to unintended conditions, such use, under certain circumstances, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results and cash flow, including if we are required to take remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 8/65 (12%)Below Sector Average
Regulation2 | 3.1%
Regulation - Risk 1
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations that affect our operations and that could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We are subject to laws and regulations worldwide that affect our operations and that differ among jurisdictions, including automotive safety regulations, regulations governing ADAS and AD technology, intellectual property ownership and infringement laws, tax laws, import and export regulations, anti-corruption laws, foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, data privacy laws, competition laws, advertising regulations, employment laws, product regulations, environmental laws, health and safety requirements, consumer laws and national security laws. Compliance with such requirements can be onerous and expensive, and may otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Although we have policies, controls, and procedures designed to help ensure compliance with applicable laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, suppliers, or agents will not violate such laws or our policies. There may also be laws and regulations that limit the functionality of our solutions or require us to adapt our solutions to retain functionality. For example, the regulatory environment in China creates challenges for the proliferation of our solutions in that market. Due to regulations there, we also depend on our partners in China in order to collect and analyze data, and such partners may choose to cease, or be unable to, continue cooperating with us. Other countries have, or may implement, similar restrictions. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and damage to our reputation. The automotive and technology industries are subject to intense media, political, and regulatory scrutiny, which can increase our exposure to government investigations, legal actions, and penalties.
Regulation - Risk 2
Changed
Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations regarding ADAS and AD, which may increase our costs or delay or halt adoption of our sensor fusion solutions.
There are a variety of international, foreign, federal, and state regulations that apply to vehicle safety that could affect the marketability of our sensor fusion solutions. Regulations relating to AD include many existing vehicle standards that were not originally intended to apply to vehicles that may not have a human driver, and AD may never be globally approved. There has been relatively little mandatory government regulation of the self-driving industry to date. Currently, there are no Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards that relate to the performance of self-driving technology and no widely accepted uniform standards to certify self-driving technology and its commercial use on public roads. It is also possible that future self-driving regulations are not standardized, and our technology could become subject to differing regulations across jurisdictions. For example, in Europe, certain vehicle safety regulations apply to automated braking and steering systems, which may rely in part on sensor fusion technology, and certain treaties also restrict the legality of certain higher levels of automation, while certain U.S. states have legal restrictions on automation that many other states are also considering. Such regulations continue to rapidly change, which increases the likelihood of varying complex or conflicting regulations or may limit global adoption, impede our strategy, or negatively impact our long-term expectations for our investments in these areas. Government safety regulations are subject to change based on a number of factors that are not within our control, including new scientific or technological data, adverse publicity regarding the industry, recalls, concerns regarding safety risks of AD and ADAS, accidents involving our sensor fusion solutions or those of our competitors, domestic and foreign political developments or considerations and litigation relating to our solutions and our competitors' products. Changes in government regulations, especially those relating to ADAS and AD, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Regulations governing the automotive industry impose stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in the automotive industry, including a duty to report, subject to strict timing requirements, safety defects with, or reports of injuries relating to, systems integrating our solutions and requirements that a manufacturer recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with applicable safety standards. If we do not rapidly address any safety concerns or defects involving our solutions, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities1 | 1.5%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Any significant reduction in headcount as part of the implementation of the Company's cost management plan may have a material adverse effect on LeddarTech's operations and future prospects.
Pursuant to the Company's cost management plan, in the event the Company does not raise sufficient additional capital, we expect that LeddarTech will reduce its employee headcount. Such headcount reduction would result in a substantial decrease in the number of Company employees to the extent the cost management plan is fully implemented. The extent of any headcount reduction will be based primarily on management's assessment of available liquidity, key operating and business needs, and prevailing conditions at the time. Any significant reduction in headcount has the potential to materially adversely affect our operations and future operating results, including by: - delaying our ability to timely deliver operational software solutions to our target customers;- impairing our ability to obtain requisite industry certifications, which would then need to be obtained by the Tier 1, Tier 2, or OEM customer;- restricting our ability to calibrate and configure our software solutions for more than one set of sensor types, which may make our solutions less appealing to our customers and delay our ability to sell our software solutions to a broad range of Tier 1, Tier 2 and OEM customers;- delaying our ability to expand the domain capabilities of our software solutions, such as being able to market our software solution for use in snow conditions without additional software capabilities being added to our solutions, which we would be unable to do on the same time frame as if we had not reduced our headcount; and - further limiting our revenue opportunities due to the fact that a reduced headcount would constrain our ability to service a desired number of Tier 1, Tier 2 and OEM customers. Each of these potential consequences of any headcount reductions could adversely affect the marketability of our software solutions and the timing and extent of our ability to generate revenue. Additionally, significant headcount reductions may adversely impact our accounting and finance function, and make it more difficult to remediate existing significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Reductions in headcount also will result in immediate severance and other cash costs, which could be significant and may therefore reduce the effectiveness and objectives of our cost management plan in the short-term. Realization of any of these consequences of a headcount reduction could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Taxation & Government Incentives4 | 6.2%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
Added
The Company may be or may become a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC"), which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders.
If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year, or portion thereof, that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder, such U.S. Holder may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences in connection with the ownership and disposition of Common Shares and Warrants. No assurance can be given as to whether or not the Company will be treated as a PFIC for its current taxable year. In addition, no assurance can be given as to whether or not the Company will be a PFIC in future taxable years. The Company has not determined whether it will provide U.S. Holders with this information to make or maintain a QEF election if it determines it is a PFIC and has not committed to make a determination as to whether it is a PFIC. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules to the Common Shares and Warrants. For a more detailed explanation of the tax consequences of PFIC classification to U.S. Holders, see "Item 10.E. - Taxation - Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders."
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations relating to the collection of withholding or sales tax and payment of income taxes in the various jurisdictions in which we do business, we could be exposed to unexpected costs, expenses, penalties and fees as a result of our non-compliance, which could harm our business.
By engaging in business activities in a number of jurisdictions, we become subject to various local laws and regulations, including requirements to collect withholding or sales tax within those jurisdictions, and the payment of income taxes on revenue generated from activities in those jurisdictions. A successful assertion by one or more jurisdictions that we were required to collect withholding, sales or other taxes or to pay income taxes where we did not could result in substantial tax liabilities, fees and expenses, including substantial interest and penalty charges, which could harm our business.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 3
Unanticipated changes in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A number of factors can increase our effective tax rates, which could reduce our net income, including: - changes in the volume and mix of profits earned and location of assets across jurisdictions with varying tax rates and the associated impacts of legislative actions affecting multi-national enterprises;- changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and in associated deferred tax asset valuation allowance;- adjustments to income taxes upon finalization of tax returns;- increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including equity-based compensation or impairments of goodwill;- changes in available tax credits;- changes in our ability to secure new, or renew existing, tax holidays and incentives;- changes in U.S. federal, state, or foreign tax laws or their interpretation, including changes in the U.S. to the taxation of non-U.S. income and expenses and changes resulting from the adoption by countries of OECD recommendations or other legislative actions; and - changes in accounting standards.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 4
Our subsidiary has received Israeli government grants for certain of its research and development activities and it may receive additional grants in the future. The terms of those grants restrict our ability to transfer technologies outside of Israel, and we may be required to make payments in such cases.
Our subsidiary, VayaVision, received a total of approximately $3.0 million from the Israel Innovation Authority ("IIA"), of which approximately $1.5 million is subject to royalties. We may in the future apply to receive additional grants from the IIA to support our research and development activities. With respect to such grants we are committed to pay royalties at a rate of 3% on sales proceeds up to the total amount of grants received, linked to the dollar and bearing interest at annual rates linked to a benchmark rate, with a cumulative maximum value of 50%. Even after payment in full of these amounts, we will still be required to comply with the requirements of the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research, Development and Technological Innovation Law, 1984, or the "R&D Law," and related regulations, with respect to those past grants. When a company develops know-how, technology or products using IIA grants, the terms of these grants and the R&D Law restrict the transfer outside of Israel of such know-how, and of the manufacturing or manufacturing rights of such products, technologies or know-how, without the prior approval of the IIA. Therefore, if aspects of our technologies are deemed to have been developed with IIA funding, the discretionary approval of an IIA committee would be required for any transfer to third parties outside of Israel of know-how or manufacturing or manufacturing rights related to those aspects of such technologies. Furthermore, the IIA would impose certain conditions on any arrangement under which it permits us to transfer technology or development out of Israel, including requiring retroactive redemption payments up to a maximum amount, or may not grant such approvals at all. While we have submitted a request to the IIA to permit the development work being done using aspects of technologies developed by VayaVision using IIA funding, there can be no assurance that such approvals will be granted on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain such approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the consideration available to our shareholders in a future transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of technology or know-how developed with IIA funding (such as a merger or similar transaction) may be reduced by any amounts that we are required to pay to the IIA. Any such mergers require IIA approval and may require payments. In addition to the above, any non-Israeli citizen, resident or entity that, among other things, (i) becomes a holder of 5% or more of the share capital or voting rights of VayaVision, (ii) is entitled to appoint one or more of the directors or the chief executive officer of VayaVision or (iii) serves as one of the directors or as the chief executive officer (including holders of 25% or more of the voting power, equity or the right to nominate directors in such direct holder, if applicable) is required to notify the IIA and undertake to comply with the rules and regulations applicable to the grant programs of the IIA, including the restrictions on transfer described above. Such notification will be required in connection with the investment being made by an investor. Approval for any transfer of IIA funded know-how, if requested, is within the discretion of the IIA. Furthermore, the IIA may impose conditions on any arrangement under which it permits us to transfer IIA funded know-how or manufacturing out of Israel.
Environmental / Social1 | 1.5%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Failures or perceived failures to comply with privacy, data protection, and information security requirements, or theft, loss, or misuse of personal information about our employees, customers, end users, or other third parties, or other information, could increase our expenses, damage our reputation, or result in legal or regulatory proceedings.
The theft, loss, or misuse of personal information collected, used, stored, or transferred by us to run our business could result in significantly increased business and security costs or costs related to defending legal claims. For example, data collected by the sensor of our solutions during the development cycle of a project may include personal information such as license plate numbers of other vehicles, facial features of pedestrians, appearance of individuals, GPS data, and geolocation data. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect the security and integrity of our customers' personal information, we may be required to expend significant resources to comply with data breach requirements if, for example, third parties improperly obtain and use the personal information of our customers, or we otherwise experience a data loss with respect to customers' personal information. A major breach of our network security and systems may result in fines, penalties, and damages, harm our reputation, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations, which sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions and countries in which we provide services. We are subject to a variety of local, state, national and international laws, directives, and regulations that apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, security, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in the different jurisdictions in which we operate ("Data Protection Laws"). Any failure by us or our vendors or other business partners to comply with our public privacy notice or with U.S. federal, state, local, Canadian, Israeli, Chinese, or other foreign or international Data Protection Laws could result in regulatory or litigation-related actions against us, legal liability, fines, damages, ongoing audit requirements, and other significant costs. Global privacy legislation, enforcement, and policy activity in this area are rapidly expanding and creating a complex regulatory compliance environment. Because many Data Protection Laws are new or subject to recent revisions or updates, there is often little clarity as to their interpretation or best practices for compliance, as well as a lack of precedent for the scope of enforcement. Costs to comply with Data Protection Laws and implement related privacy and data protection measures are significant, and may require us to change our business practices and compliance manners. Any non-compliance could adversely affect our ability to collect, analyze, and store data, expose us to significant monetary penalties, damage to our reputation, result in suspension of online services or sites in certain countries, and even result in criminal sanctions. Even our inadvertent failure to comply with Data Protection Laws could result in audits, regulatory inquiries, or proceedings against us by governmental entities or other third parties. Any inability to adequately address data privacy or data protection, or other information security-related concerns, even if unfounded, to successfully negotiate privacy, data protection, or information security-related contractual terms with customers, or to comply with Data Protection Laws, could result in additional cost and liability to us, harm our reputation and brand, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 7/65 (11%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment3 | 4.6%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
The current uncertain economic environment and inflationary conditions may adversely affect global vehicle production and demand for our solutions.
Our business depends on, and is directly affected by, the global automobile industry. Economic conditions in North America, Europe and Asia can have a large impact on the production volume of new vehicles, and, accordingly, have an impact on our revenue. Automotive production and sales are highly cyclical and depend on general economic conditions and other factors, including consumer spending and preferences, changes in interest rate levels and credit availability, consumer confidence and purchasing power, energy and fuel costs, fuel availability, environmental impact, governmental incentives, regulatory requirements, and political volatility, especially in energy-producing countries and growth markets. In addition, automotive production and sales can be affected by our customers' ability to continue operating in response to challenging economic conditions, such as those caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and in response to labor relations issues and shortages, supply chain disruptions, regulatory requirements, trade agreements and other factors. Moreover, automakers continue to face supply chain shortages, and we expect that global vehicle production will not fully recover from the impact of supply chain constraints in 2023. Furthermore, current uncertain economic conditions and inflation may contribute to a reduction in consumer demand, which may reduce vehicle production over at least the next several quarters. In addition to these general economic factors, uncertainties in specific markets may further contribute to lower vehicle production. For example, the disruption by Russia of gas supplies to Western Europe could significantly impact industrial production, including vehicle production, in significant markets such as Germany. We cannot predict when the impact of these factors on global vehicle production will substantially diminish. We believe that the expected continued constraint on global automotive production resulting from supply chain shortages and the effect of economic uncertainty will limit our ability to increase our revenue. More generally, the volume of automotive production in North America, Europe, China, and the rest of the world has fluctuated, sometimes significantly, from year to year, for many reasons, and such fluctuations give rise to fluctuations in the demand for our solutions. As a result, in addition to the impact of the current uncertainties that we anticipate to impact automotive production in the near term, adverse changes in economic or market conditions or other factors, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, the bankruptcy of any of our customers or the closure of OEM manufacturing facilities may result in a reduction in automotive sales and production, and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
The current conflict between Ukraine and Russia has exacerbated market instability and disrupted the global economy.
The current conflict between Ukraine and Russia has caused uncertainty about economic and political stability, increasing volatility in the credit and financial markets and disrupting the global economy. The United States, the European Union, and several other countries are imposing far-reaching sanctions and export control restrictions on Russian entities and individuals. These measures could constrain our ability to work with Russian companies or individuals in connection with the development of our solutions in the future. These sanctions and export controls may also contribute to higher oil and gas prices and inflation, which could reduce demand in the global automotive sector and therefore reduce demand for our solutions. There is also a risk that Russia, as a retaliatory action to sanctions, may launch cyberattacks against the United States, the European Union, or other countries or their infrastructures and businesses. Additional consequences of the conflict may include diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, and various shortages and supply chain disruptions. While we do not currently directly rely on goods or services sourced in Russia or Ukraine and thus have not experienced any direct disruptions, we may experience indirect disruptions in our supply chain. Any of the foregoing factors, including developments or effects that we cannot yet predict, may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
Global or regional conditions can adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We have testing, research and development, sales and other operations in several other countries, and some of our business activities are concentrated in one or more geographic areas. As a result, our business, operating results, and financial condition, including our ability to test, design, develop, or sell products, and the demand for our solutions, are at times adversely affected by a number of global and regional factors outside of our control. Adverse changes in global or regional economic conditions periodically occur, including recession or slowing growth, changes, or uncertainty in fiscal, monetary, or trade policy, higher interest rates, tighter credit, inflation, lower capital expenditures by businesses including on IT infrastructure, increases in unemployment and lower consumer confidence and spending. Adverse changes in economic conditions can significantly harm demand for our solutions and make it more challenging to forecast our operating results and make business decisions, including regarding prioritization of investments in our business. An economic downturn or increased uncertainty may also lead to increased credit and collectability risks, higher borrowing costs or reduced availability of capital markets, reduced liquidity, adverse impacts on our suppliers, failures of counterparties including financial institutions and insurers, asset impairments and declines in the value of our financial instruments. Additionally, VayaVision Sensing Ltd. ("VayaVision"), our subsidiary that conducts a substantial portion of our research and development activities, is located in Israel. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its neighboring countries, as well as incidents of terror activities and other hostilities, and a number of state and non-state actors have publicly committed to its destruction. Political, economic and security conditions in Israel could directly affect our operations. We could be adversely affected by hostilities involving Israel, including acts of terrorism or any other hostilities involving or threatening Israel, the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners, a significant increase in inflation or a significant downturn in the economic or financial condition of Israel. The current hostilities between Israel and Hamas, and any escalation of such hostilities, as well as any future armed conflicts, terrorist activities, tension along the Israeli borders or with other countries in the region, including Iran, or political instability in the region could disrupt international trading activities in Israel and may materially and negatively affect our business and could harm our results of operations. In connection with the current hostilities with Hamas, Israel has called up 360,000 reservists, including a number of VayaVision's employees. The call-up of reservists, and any additional call-up in the future, could also negatively affect our business, and harm our results of operations. Certain countries, as well as certain companies and organizations, continue to participate in a boycott of Israeli companies, companies with large Israeli operations and others doing business with Israel and Israeli companies. The boycott, restrictive laws, policies or practices directed towards Israel, Israeli businesses or Israeli citizens could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business in the future. We can be adversely affected by other global and regional factors that periodically occur, including: - geopolitical and security issues, such as armed conflict and civil or military unrest, political instability, human rights concerns and terrorist activity;- natural disasters, public health issues (including the COVID-19 pandemic) and other catastrophic events;- inefficient infrastructure and other disruptions, such as supply chain interruptions and large-scale outages or unreliable provision of services from utilities, transportation, data hosting or telecommunications providers;- formal or informal imposition of new or revised export, import or doing-business regulations, including trade sanctions, tariffs, and changes in the ability to obtain export licenses, which could be changed without notice; government restrictions on, or nationalization of, our operations in any country, or restrictions on our ability to repatriate earnings from a particular country;- adverse changes relating to government grants, tax credits or other government incentives, including more favorable incentives provided to competitors;- differing employment practices and labor issues;- ineffective legal protection of our intellectual property rights in certain countries;- local business and cultural factors that differ from our current standards and practices;- continuing uncertainty regarding social, political, immigration and tax and trade policies; and - fluctuations in the market values of any of our investments, which can be negatively affected by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, interest rate changes, financial results, political risk, sovereign risk, or other factors.
Natural and Human Disruptions1 | 1.5%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Catastrophic events can adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our operations and business, and those of our customers and direct and indirect vendors and suppliers of OEMs, can be disrupted by natural disasters, industrial accidents, public health issues (including the COVID-19 pandemic), cybersecurity incidents, interruptions of service from utilities, transportation, telecommunications or information technology systems and networks ("IT systems") providers, production equipment failures or other catastrophic events. For example, we have at times experienced disruptions in our production processes as a result of power outages, improperly functioning equipment, and disruptions in supply of raw materials or components, including due to cybersecurity incidents affecting our suppliers. Global climate change can result in certain natural disasters occurring more frequently or with greater intensity, such as drought, wildfires, storms, sea-level rise, and flooding. The long-term effects of climate change on the global economy and the IT industry in particular are unclear, but could be severe. Catastrophic events could make it difficult or impossible to produce or deliver products to our customers, receive production materials from our suppliers or perform critical functions, which could adversely affect our revenue and require significant recovery time and expenditures to resume operations. While we maintain business recovery plans, some of our systems are not fully redundant and we cannot be sure that our plans will fully protect us from such disruptions. Furthermore, even if our operations are unaffected or recover quickly, if our customers or suppliers cannot timely resume their own operations due to a catastrophic event, we may experience reduced or cancelled orders or disruptions to our supply chain that would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Capital Markets3 | 4.6%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Disruptions in financial markets may adversely impact the availability and cost of credit and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our stock.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance, our debt obligations will depend on our operating and financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. The global equity and credit markets have experienced in the past, and may experience in the future, periods of extraordinary turmoil and volatility. These circumstances may materially and adversely impact liquidity in the financial markets at times, making terms for certain financings less attractive or in some cases unavailable. Disruptions and uncertainty in the equity and credit markets, including as a result of recent bank failures and uncertainty in the banking sector generally, may negatively impact our ability to refinance existing indebtedness and access additional financing for acquisitions, development of our properties and other purposes at reasonable terms or at all, which may negatively affect our business and the market price of our Common Shares. If we are not successful in refinancing our existing indebtedness when it becomes due, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms, which might adversely affect our ability to service other debt and to meet our other obligations. A prolonged downturn in the financial markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. These events also may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of our common or preferred stock.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
We are subject to risks related to trade policies, sanctions, and import and export controls.
Trade policies and international disputes at times result in increased tariffs, trade barriers and other restrictions, which can increase our manufacturing costs, make our solutions less competitive, reduce demand for our solutions, limit our ability to sell to certain customers, limit our ability to procure components or raw materials or impede or slow the movement of our goods across borders. Increasing protectionism and economic nationalism may lead to further changes in trade policies and regulations, domestic sourcing initiatives, or other formal and informal measures. Likewise, national security and foreign policy concerns may prompt governments to impose trade or other restrictions, which could make it more difficult to sell our solutions in, or restrict our access to, certain markets. In this regard, our business activities are subject to various trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control's sanctions programs and the Export Administration Regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce. These rules may prohibit or restrict our ability to, directly or indirectly, conduct activities or dealings in or with certain countries or involving certain persons, or otherwise affect our business. New measures imposed by the United States, the European Union, or others could restrict certain of our operations and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Although we take steps to comply with applicable laws and regulations, our failure to successfully comply with applicable sanctions or export control rules may expose us to negative legal and business consequences, including civil or criminal penalties and government investigations. In particular, in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the United States, the European Union, and several other countries are imposing far-reaching sanctions and export control restrictions on Russian entities and individuals. See "- The current conflict between Ukraine and Russia has exacerbated market instability and disrupted the global economy." Additionally, tensions between the United States and China have led to increased tariffs and trade restrictions, including tariffs applicable to some of our solutions, and have affected customer ordering patterns. In addition to imposing economic sanctions on certain Chinese individuals and entities, the United States has imposed restrictions on the export of U.S.-regulated products and technology to certain Chinese technology companies. It is difficult to predict what further trade-related actions governments may take, which may include trade restrictions and additional or increased tariffs and export controls imposed on short notice, and we may be unable to quickly and effectively react to or mitigate such actions. Trade disputes and protectionist measures, or continued uncertainty about such matters, could result in declining consumer confidence and slowing economic growth or recession, and could cause our customers to reduce, cancel, or alter the timing of their purchases with us. Sustained geopolitical tensions could lead to long-term changes in global trade and technology supply chains, and decoupling of global trade networks, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Given our international supply chain and distribution, we are subject to import and export laws of multiple countries. Failure to comply with the requirements of such laws may lead to the imposition of additional taxes or duties on imports or exports, fines, or penalties.
Capital Markets - Risk 3
We are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, including those in connection with recent inflationary trends in the United States of America ("United States" or "U.S."), Canada, and globally.
We are exposed to adverse as well as beneficial movements in currency exchange rates. Our functional currency is the Canadian dollar, and we incur financial expenses in connection with fluctuations in value due to foreign exchange differences between our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies. Our financial results are reported in Canadian dollars and a substantial portion of our payroll and other operating expenses are accrued in New Israel Shekels and U.S. dollars. A weakened Canadian dollar will increase the cost of expenses such as payroll, utilities, tax, marketing expenses, and capital expenditures. We anticipate that we will realize a substantial portion of our revenue in U.S. dollars. A decline in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar could adversely affect our reported revenue. Changes in exchange rates would adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 6/65 (9%)Above Sector Average
Competition1 | 1.5%
Competition - Risk 1
We operate in a highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing market and compete against a large number of established competitors and new market entrants, some of whom have substantially greater resources.
The markets for sensing technology applicable to the ADAS and AD industries are highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing. Our future success will depend on our ability to remain a leader in our targeted markets by continuing to develop and protect from infringement low-level sensor fusion and perception software in a timely manner and to stay ahead of existing and new competitors. Our competitors are numerous and they compete with us directly by offering sensor software and indirectly by attempting to solve some of the same challenges with different technology. We face competition from sensor fusion and perception software companies, Tier 1 suppliers, Tier 2 suppliers and other technology and automotive supply companies, and OEMS, and most of our principal competitors have significantly greater resources than we do. In the automotive market, our competitors have commercialized both LiDAR and non-LiDAR-based ADAS technology that have achieved market adoption, strong brand recognition and may continue to improve. Other competitors are working towards commercializing ADAS and autonomous driving technology and either by themselves, or with a publicly announced partner, have substantial financial, marketing, research and development and other resources. Some of our existing and prospective customers in the ADAS and AD markets have announced development efforts or made acquisitions directed at creating their own sensing technologies, which would compete with our solutions. We cannot be certain how close these competitors may be to commercializing autonomous driving systems or novel ADAS applications. If our target customers purchase a competing solution from any of our competitors, it may be difficult to displace such competitor with our solutions until the OEM issues a new request for quotation because an OEM will generally not change complex technology already integrated in its systems until a vehicle model is revamped. Accordingly, it is important that the Company achieves both Tier 1 design and integration wins and OEM design wins with its target customers quickly. If we must significantly reduce our operating costs, we could experience delays in completing development of our solutions, and suffer significant competitive disadvantage. Additionally, increased competition may result in pricing pressure and reduced margins and may impede our ability to increase the sales of our products or cause us to lose market share, any of which will adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Demand2 | 3.1%
Demand - Risk 1
Changed
We operate in an industry that is new and rapidly evolving. The market and industry projections included in this Annual Report are subject to significant uncertainty. If markets for sensor fusion products develop more slowly than we expect, or long-term end-customer adoption rates and demand are slower than we expect, our operating results and growth prospects could be harmed.
We are pursuing opportunities in markets that are undergoing rapid changes, including technological and regulatory changes, and it is difficult to predict the timing and size of the opportunities. For example, ADAS and AD applications require complex technology and are subject to uncertainties with respect to, among other things, the rate of consumer acceptance and the impact of current or future regulations. Because these automotive systems depend on technology from many companies in addition to ours, commercialization of some ADAS or AD solutions could be delayed or impaired on account of certain technological components of our or others not being ready to be deployed in vehicles. Regulatory, safety or reliability developments, many of which are outside of our control, could also cause delays or otherwise impair commercial adoption of these new technologies, which will adversely affect our growth. This Annual Report contains estimates and forecasts concerning our industry, including estimates of the growth of the market for higher levels of automation and for low-level fusion, that are based on industry publications and reports or other publicly available information as well as our internal estimates and expectations. These estimates and forecasts involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and are subject to significant uncertainty, and you are cautioned not to give them undue weight. Industry surveys and publications generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy and completeness of the included information. We have not independently verified this third-party information. Similarly, our internal estimates and forecasts are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions regarding market acceptance of low-level sensor fusion and perception technology, AD and ADAS and the manner in which this new and rapidly evolving market will develop. While we believe our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates and forecasts are reasonable, these assumptions and estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. As a result, our estimates and forecasts may prove to be incorrect. If third-party or internally generated data prove to be inaccurate or we make errors in our assumptions based on that data, the market for our solutions may be smaller than we have estimated, our future growth opportunities and sales growth may be smaller than we estimate, and our future business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. Our future financial performance will depend on our ability to make timely investments in the correct market opportunities. If one or more of these markets experience a shift in customer or prospective customer demand, then our solutions may not compete as effectively, if at all, and they may not be incorporated into commercialized end customer products. Given the evolving nature of the markets in which we operate, it is difficult to predict customer demand or adoption rates for our solutions or the future growth of the markets in which we operate. Even if the market for low-level sensor fusion and perception technology, ADAS and AD solutions grows substantially, there is no guarantee that demand for our solutions will correlate with that growth if we fail to effectively pursue such opportunities. If demand does not develop or if we cannot accurately forecast customer demand, then the size of our prospective markets or our future business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Demand - Risk 2
Changed
We expect that a substantial portion of future revenue will come from a small number of OEMs and Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers, and the loss of or a significant reduction in sales to, one or more of major Tier 1 or Tier 2 customers and/or the discontinued incorporation of our solutions by one or more major OEMs in their vehicle models, would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We seek to supply OEMs with the LeddarVision™ platform directly or through our arrangements with Tier 1 suppliers and Tier 2 suppliers, which are direct suppliers to OEMs. See "- Even if we achieve OEM design wins, prospective customers may not purchase our solutions in any certain quantity, at any certain price or at all, and there may be significant delays between the time we achieve either a Tier 1 design and integration win or an OEM design win and the time a contract for production is agreed to and we are able to realize revenue. Any failure to obtain OEM or Tier 1 or Tier 2 customers for our solutions and services, whether following Tier 1 design and integration wins, OEM design wins or otherwise, would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition." We believe our business, results of operations, and financial condition for the foreseeable future will likely depend on sales to a relatively small number of Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers and the incorporation of our solutions by a relatively small number of OEMs in their vehicle models. In the future, our target OEM and Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers may decide not to purchase our solutions or may alter their purchasing patterns, and OEMs may discontinue incorporation of our solutions in their vehicle models, including as a result of a transition to in-house solutions or solutions provided by our competitors, or their individual or aggregate production levels may decline due to a number of factors, including supply chain challenges and macroeconomic conditions. Further, the amount of revenue attributable to any single OEM or Tier 1 or Tier 2 customer, or our OEM and Tier 1 and Tier 2 customer concentration generally, may fluctuate in any given period. In the event we achieve OEM design wins in the future, the loss of one or more key OEM or Tier 1 or Tier 2 customers, a reduction in sales to any key OEM or Tier 1 customer, the discontinued or decreased incorporation of our solutions by a key OEM, or our inability to attract new significant Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers and OEMs would negatively impact our revenue and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Sales & Marketing1 | 1.5%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
Continued pricing pressures and customer cost reduction initiatives may result in lower than anticipated margins, or losses, which may adversely affect our business.
Cost-cutting initiatives adopted by our customers often result in increased downward pressure on pricing. We expect that our agreements with customers may require step-downs in pricing over the term of the agreement or, if commercialized, over the period of production. In addition, our customers may reserve the right to terminate their supply contracts for convenience, which enhances their ability to obtain price reductions. Automotive OEMs also possess significant leverage over their suppliers because the automotive component supply industry is highly competitive, serves a limited number of customers and has a high fixed cost base. We expect to be subject to substantial continuing pressure from customers and suppliers to reduce the price of our products. It is possible that pricing pressures beyond our expectations could intensify as customers pursue restructuring, consolidation and cost-cutting initiatives. If we are unable to generate sufficient production cost savings in the future to offset price reductions, our gross margin and profitability would be adversely affected.
Brand / Reputation2 | 3.1%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Our business may suffer from claims relating to, among other things, actual or alleged defects in our solutions. If our solutions actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected, publicity related to these claims could harm our reputation and decrease demand for our solutions or increase regulatory scrutiny of our solutions.
Our software products are complex and, from time to time, have had, and could have or could be alleged to have, defects in design, security vulnerabilities or other errors, failures, or other issues of not functioning in accordance with their specifications or as expected. Some errors or defects in our solutions have been, and could be, initially undetected and only discovered after they have been tested, commercialized, and deployed by customers. Alleged or actual defects in any of our solutions could result in adverse publicity for us, warranty claims, litigation against us, legal expenses and damages, our customers never being able to commercialize technology incorporating our solutions, negative publicity for our customers, and other consequences. Errors, defects, or security vulnerabilities could result in serious injury to or death of the end users of vehicles incorporating our solutions, or those in the surrounding area, including as a result of traffic accidents and collisions. If that is the case, we would incur significant additional development costs and product recall, repair, or replacement costs. If any of our solutions are or are alleged to be defective, we may be required to participate in a recall involving such solutions. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. However, as suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process, OEMs may look to their direct and indirect suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. OEMs also require their suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. Depending on the terms under which we supply products to a Tier 1, Tier 2 or OEM customer, a vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold us responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties if and when the OEM asserts that the solution supplied did not perform as warranted. Our potential liability may increase to the extent that OEMs increasingly purchase our products directly, as opposed to incorporating our solutions through indirect purchases from our Tier 1 customers or Tier 2 customers. Product liability, warranty, and recall costs would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, product liability claims present the risk of protracted litigation, legal fees, and diversion of management's attention from the operation of our business, even if our defense of these claims is ultimately successful. Furthermore, the automotive industry in general is subject to significant litigation claims due to the potentially severe consequences of traffic collisions or other accidents. As a provider of solutions related to, among other things, preventing traffic collisions and other accidents, we could be subject to litigation for traffic collisions or other accidents, even if our solutions or their features or the failure thereof did not cause any particular traffic collision or accident. We expect in the future that our technology may be involved in accidents resulting in death or personal injury, and such accidents where our solutions or their features are involved may be the subject of significant public attention. There also remains significant uncertainty in the legal implications to providers of emerging ADAS and AD technologies of traffic collisions or other accidents involving such technologies, particularly given variations in legal and regulatory regimes that are emerging in different jurisdictions, and we may become liable for losses that exceed the current industry norms as the regulatory and legal landscape develops. Publicity regarding claims involving our solutions can also have an adverse effect on our reputation and the reputation for low-level sensor fusion technology, and the ADAS and AD solutions utilizing such technology, which could decrease consumer demand for vehicles incorporating these technologies. Further, enhanced publicity surrounding such claims may also increase the regulatory scrutiny of our platforms, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to complete our business plans. Although we intend to use disclaimers, limitations of liability, and similar provisions in our agreements with our customers, there is no assurance that any or all of these provisions will prove to be effective barriers to product liability claims. In addition, although we intend to procure and maintain product liability insurance in respect of our software solutions, there is no assurance that such insurance will be adequate to cover any or all of our potential losses as a result of large deductibles and broad exclusions. The cost of such insurance may substantial, and there can be no assurance that such insurance will be available in adequate amounts or on acceptable terms, or at all. Our insurers may also discontinue our insurance coverage, and we may be unable to find replacement insurance on acceptable terms, or at all.
Brand / Reputation - Risk 2
If we are unable to overcome our limited sensory fusion solutions sales history and are unable establish and maintain confidence in our long-term business prospects among our customer prospects and within our industry or are subject to negative publicity, then our future business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
OEM, Tier 1 and Tier 2 customers may be less likely to purchase our sensor fusion solutions if they are not convinced that our business will succeed or that our service and support and other operations will continue in the long term. Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will be less likely to invest time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will succeed. Accordingly, in order to build and maintain our business, we must maintain confidence among OEM customers, Tier 1 customers, Tier 2 customers, suppliers, analysts, ratings agencies and other parties in our products, long-term financial viability and business prospects. Maintaining such confidence may be particularly complicated by certain factors including those that are largely outside of our control, such as customer unfamiliarity with low-level sensor fusion solutions, any delays in scaling production, delivery and service operations to meet demand, competition and uncertainty regarding the future of ADAS and autonomous vehicles or our other services and our production and sales performance compared with market expectations.
Production
Total Risks: 4/65 (6%)Below Sector Average
Manufacturing1 | 1.5%
Manufacturing - Risk 1
Product integration could face complications or unpredictable difficulties, which may adversely impact customer adoption of our products and our financial performance.
Our products are designed to function as part of a system, and therefore are to be integrated with other sensing technologies, software products and customer applications. Required integration efforts can be time-consuming and costly and there is no guarantee that results will be satisfactory to the end customer. These challenges are even more present in the automotive sector where components are subject to as much as several years of product and design validation before they are fitted into a vehicle program. While the Company expects to work with system integrators which lend their experience to these workstreams, there is no guarantee that unforeseen delays or setback would not arise that would impair our ability to launch with key programs across our sectors of focus.
Employment / Personnel2 | 3.1%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
We are highly dependent on the services of our senior executive officers and loss of key personnel could impair our success.
We are highly dependent on our senior executive officers, including Frantz Saintellemy, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Saintellemy and other members of our executive team are highly active in our management and allocate a significant amount of time to our company. The loss of Mr. Saintellemy or other members of our executive team would adversely affect our business because their loss could make it more difficult to, among other things, compete with other market participants, manage our research and development activities and retain existing customers or cultivate new ones, particularly if any such departure occurs while LeddarTech is operating under its cost management plan. Negative public perception of, or negative news related to, Mr. Saintellemy and other members of our executive team may adversely affect our brand, relationship with customers or standing in the industry.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
If we are unable to attract, retain, and motivate key employees, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Hiring and retaining qualified executives, developers, engineers, technical staff, and sales representatives are critical to our business. The competition for highly skilled employees in our industry is increasingly intense. Competitors for technical talent increasingly seek to hire our employees. Changes in the interpretation and application of employment-related laws to our workforce practices may also result in increased operating costs and less flexibility in how we meet our changing workforce needs. To help attract, retain, and motivate qualified employees, we intend to use employee incentives such as share-based awards. Our employee hiring and retention also depend on our ability to build and maintain a diverse and inclusive workplace culture and be viewed as an employer of choice. If our share-based or other compensation programs and workplace culture cease to be viewed as competitive, our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees would be weakened, which would harm our results of operations. Equity compensation has been, and will continue to be, an important part of our future compensation strategy and a significant component of our future expenses, which we expect to increase over time. Moreover, sustained declines in our stock price can reduce the retention value of our share-based awards. If we do not effectively hire, onboard, retain, and motivate key employees, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected. Unplanned changes in our management team can also disrupt our business. Our management and senior leadership team has significant industry experience, and their knowledge and relationships would be difficult to replace. Leadership changes may occur from time to time, and we cannot predict whether significant unplanned resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit qualified personnel. In addition, the relationships and reputation that members of our management and key leadership have established and maintain with our target Tier 1, Tier 2 and OEM customers contribute to our ability to maintain strong relationships with key partners and to identify new business opportunities.
Costs1 | 1.5%
Costs - Risk 1
We have incurred material charges in connection with our decision to exit our modules and components business, and may incur additional charges related to the related exit activities in the future.
In connection with the Company's transition to a pure-play automotive software business model, the Company has exited its modules and components business. In connection with this decision, the Company incurred restructuring costs of approximately $46,000 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024. During the same period, the Company wrote down inventory by approximately $1.1 million. The Company may incur additional charges in connection with the exit from its modules and components business.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis