As with all investment management companies, our activities are highly regulated in nearly every country in which we conduct business. The regulatory environment in which we operate frequently changes, and in recent years we have seen a significant increase in both regulatory changes and enforcement actions and proceedings brought by governmental agencies and self-regulatory authorities against financial services companies. Laws and regulations generally grant governmental agencies and industry self-regulatory authorities broad administrative discretion over our activities, including the power to require registrations or licenses, limit or restrict our business activities, conduct examinations, risk assessments, investigations and capital adequacy reviews and impose remedial programs to address perceived deficiencies. As a result of regulatory oversight, we could face requirements, actions or proceedings that negatively impact the way in which we conduct business, delay or deny approval for new products or service offerings, cause or contribute to reduced sales of or increased redemptions of our existing products or services, impair the investment performance of certain of our products or services, impact our product mix, increase our compliance costs and/or impose additional capital requirements. Our regulators likewise have the authority to commence enforcement actions or proceedings that could lead to penalties and sanctions up to and including the revocation of registrations or licenses necessary to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular jurisdiction or market of any of our business organizations or their key personnel or the imposition of fines and censures on us or our employees. Further, regulators across borders can coordinate actions against us as issues arise resulting in impacts on our business in multiple jurisdictions. Judgments or findings of wrongdoing or non-compliance with applicable law or regulation by governmental authorities, or in private civil litigation against us, could affect our reputation, increase our costs of doing business and/or negatively impact our revenues. Any of the effects discussed above could have a material negative impact on our AUM, revenue, net income or liquidity.
A substantial portion of the products and services we offer in the U.S. are regulated by the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the National Futures Association, Department of Labor (DOL) and/or the Texas Department of Banking and in the U.K. are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and in Hong Kong and China are regulated by the Securities Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission, respectively. Subsidiaries operating in the EU and the products and services they provide are mainly regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier in Luxembourg, the Central Bank of Ireland, the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht in Germany and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). Such subsidiaries are also subject to various EU Directives, which generally are implemented by member state national legislation and by EU Regulations. Our operations elsewhere in the world are regulated by similar agencies and authorities.
Regulators in the U.S., U.K., EU and Asia, have promulgated or are considering whether to promulgate various new or revised regulatory measures pertaining to financial services, including investment management.
Regulatory developments and changes specific to our business will or may include, without limitation:
- Regulations that place restrictions on outbound investments, such as the U.S. Department of Treasury's Outbound Investment Screening Rule that became effective earlier this year, may impede our ability to provide certain products and add complexity to our compliance program with heightened regulatory requirements.
- Regulations pertaining to the privacy and use, security, transfer and management of personal data with respect to clients, employees and business partners. Privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe have strengthened privacy rules for organizations handling personal data, granted individuals more rights and control over the use of their personal data, and greatly increased penalties for non-compliance. In many other jurisdictions similar regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, China's Personal Information Protection Law and the Bermuda Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), have been adopted. In addition, rules and legal requirements for international transfers of personal data from Europe and Asia, create additional complexity and risk, particularly regarding integrated global cloud-based systems and business services employed by us.
- Regulations promulgated to address perceptions that the asset management industry, or certain products or services provided by the industry, pose systematic risks to the financial system, which could impede our ability to provide certain products or services or subject us, certain of our activities or products to heightened regulation or increased liquidity or capital adequacy requirements.
- Regulations aimed at addressing concerns regarding open-end funds that are investing in less liquid asset classes. Regulators in the U.S., U.K. and EU have expressed concern that the daily redeemability features of these funds may create a "liquidity mismatch" with the assets in which they invest, and that can give rise to investor dilution and systemic risk, especially in times of financial market stress. In the EU, recent amendments to the Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) and Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMD) directive frameworks introduce new rules regarding the use of certain liquidity management tools (e.g., swing pricing and side pockets) by UCITS funds and AIFs. In the U.S., the SEC has proposed changes to the regulations governing liquidity risk management programs for registered open-end funds (including ETFs) that, if finalized without change, could impede our ability to sponsor mutual funds and ETFs that invest in certain asset classes, including syndicated bank loans.
- Regulations aimed at the use of leverage by funds (in particular, leverage attained through derivatives), an example of which is the SEC's 2020 rules with respect to the use of derivatives by U.S. registered funds. New or further regulations in this area could negatively impact our existing products that employ leverage or derivatives, impede our ability to bring new products to market and raise our compliance costs associated with sponsoring and managing products that employ leverage or derivatives.
- Regulations pertaining to the integration of ESG factors in asset management. These regulations have materially impacted the asset management industry in the EU and U.K. In particular, the integration of sustainability risks, the disclosure of information on the ESG characteristics of EU products and the integration of investors' ESG preferences at the point of sale have had a significant impact on the features of EU products and on investment management activities. In the U.K., the FCA published a new regime on sustainability disclosure requirements, including product sustainability labels, that became applicable in 2024. In the EU, ESMA published in 2024 new guidelines on fund naming aimed at avoiding greenwashing practices. Separately, several changes to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) are being considered, including changes to the current ESG disclosure templates and longer-term amendments to the broader SFDR framework. On top of the disclosure obligations applying to the financial sector, the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive sets out new ESG disclosure requirements for EU undertakings based on new European standards. The new regime will have an impact on EU domiciled companies and on non-EU groups having substantial activities in the EU, including us. The SEC and other regulators in the U.S. are pursuing similar initiatives albeit with varying requirements, and the SEC during the past several years has increased its enforcement activity relating to ESG disclosures and practices of asset managers. Equally, a number of Asian jurisdictions are introducing climate-related risk and reporting requirements as well as ESG product disclosure standards.
- Enhanced licensing and qualification requirements for key personnel of financial services firms, including asset managers, such as the U.K. Senior Managers and Certification Regime and the SFC's Manager-in-Charge Regime, which could make it more difficult for the company to hire and retain key personnel.
- Strengthened laws and regulations applicable to asset managers with respect to preventing money laundering and the financing of terrorism, which may increase our compliance costs and burdens and regulatory enforcement risk. In June 2024, the EU introduced a new set of measures that resulted in the establishment of the Anti Money Laundering Authority (AMLA), which will gradually assume the supervision and regulatory responsibilities for anti-money laundering within the EU.
- Regulations promulgated to address risks of fraud, malfeasance, adverse consequences stemming from cyber-attacks and/or cross-border data transfer, and to ensure the digital operational resilience of firms. In particular, the new EU Digital Operational Resilience Act harmonizes the requirements applying to Information and Communication Technology risk management, outsourcing and operational resilience in the financial sector.
- The application of antitrust, change in bank control and similar competition laws and regulations to the asset management industry, including proposed amendments to these laws and regulations that could require asset managers to make pre-acquisition notification filings or requests for approval with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice and/or U.S. banking regulators and the potential for antitrust regulators to promulgate regulations limiting common ownership of competitive companies by a single fund or by affiliated funds in a single fund complex. Developments in these laws and regulations and their application to our business could impede our ability to provide certain products or limit the AUM of certain investment strategies that we provide.
- Guidelines regarding the structure and components of fund manager compensation and other related rules, regulations and disclosure requirements. Certain proposals could impose requirements for more widespread disclosures of compensation to highly-paid individuals. Depending upon the scope of any such requirements, we could be disadvantaged in retaining key employees vis-à-vis private companies, including hedge fund sponsors.
We cannot predict the full impact of legal and regulatory changes, changes in the interpretation of existing laws and regulations or possible enforcement actions or proceedings on our business. Such changes have imposed, and are likely to continue to impose, new compliance costs and/or capital requirements or impact us in other ways that could have a material adverse impact on our AUM, revenues, net income or liquidity. Moreover, certain legal or regulatory changes could require us to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur other new constraints or costs, including the investment of significant management time and resources to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment. In recent years, certain regulatory developments have also added to downward pressures on our fee levels.