tiprankstipranks
HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBC)
NYSE:HSBC
US Market
Holding HSBC?
Track your performance easily

HSBC Holdings (HSBC) Risk Factors

2,046 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

HSBC Holdings disclosed 36 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. HSBC Holdings reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q4, 2021

Risk Distribution
36Risks
33% Finance & Corporate
19% Legal & Regulatory
19% Macro & Political
17% Production
6% Tech & Innovation
6% Ability to Sell
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

2020
Q4
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
HSBC Holdings Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q4, 2021

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 12 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 12 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
36
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
36
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
2Risks added
3Risks removed
4Risks changed
Since Dec 2021
2Risks added
3Risks removed
4Risks changed
Since Dec 2021
Number of Risk Changed
4
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
4
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of HSBC Holdings in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 36

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 12/36 (33%)Below Sector Average
Accounting & Financial Operations4 | 11.1%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Changes in accounting standards may have a material impact on how we report our financial results and financial condition
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), including interpretations (‘IFRICS’) issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee. From time to time, the IASB or the IFRS Interpretations Committee may issue new accounting standards or interpretations that could materially impact how we calculate, report and disclose our financial results and financial condition, and which may affect our capital ratios, including the CET1 ratio. For example, IFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’ sets the requirements that an entity should apply in accounting for insurance contracts it issues and reinsurance contracts it holds. IFRS 17 is effective from 1 January 2023 and could have a significant adverse impact on the profitability of our insurance business. We could also be required to apply new or revised standards retrospectively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements in material amounts.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
Our financial statements are based in part on judgements, estimates and assumptions that are subject to uncertainty
The preparation of financial information requires management to make judgements and use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Due to the inherent uncertainty in making estimates, particularly those involving the use of complex models, actual results reported in future periods could differ from those on which management’s estimates are based. Estimates, judgements, assumptions and models are continually evaluated, and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the prevailing circumstances. The impacts of revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Accounting policies deemed critical to our results and financial position are those that involve a high degree of uncertainty and have a material impact on the financial statements. In 2021 these include impairment of amortised cost financial assets and assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, impairment of goodwill and non-financial assets, valuation of financial instruments, deferred tax assets, provisions, impairment of interests in associates and post-employment benefit plans, which are discussed in detail in ‘Critical accounting estimates and judgements’ on page 90. The measurement of impairment of amortised cost financial assets and financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income requires the selection and calibration of complex models and the use of estimates and assumptions to incorporate relevant information about past events, current conditions and forecasts of economic conditions. Additionally, significant judgement is involved in determining what is considered to be significant increases in credit risk and what the point of initial recognition is for revolving facilities. The assessment of whether goodwill and non-financial assets are impaired, and the measurement of any impairment, involves the application of judgement in determining key assumptions, including discount rates, estimated cash flows for the periods for which detailed cash flows are available and projecting the long-term pattern of sustainable cash flows thereafter. The recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets involves significant judgement regarding the probability and sufficiency of future taxable profits, taking into account the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and tax planning strategies, including corporate reorganisations. The recognition and measurement of provisions involve significant judgements due to the high degree of uncertainty in determining whether a present obligation exists, and in estimating the probability and amount of any outflows that may arise. The valuation of financial instruments measured at fair value can be subjective, in particular where models are used that include unobservable inputs. The assessment of interests in associates for impairment involves significant judgements in determining the value in use, in particular estimating the present values of cash flows expected to arise from continuing to hold the investment, based on a number of management assumptions. At 31 December 2021, we performed an impairment review of our investment in BoCom and concluded it was not impaired based on our value in use calculation. The calculation of the defined benefit pension obligation involves the determination of key assumptions, including discount rate, inflation rate, pension payments and deferred pension and pay and mortality. Given the uncertainty and subjectivity associated with the above critical accounting judgements and estimates, future outcomes may differ materially from those assumed using information available at the reporting date. The effect of these changes on the future results of operations and the future financial position of the Group may be material, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. For further details, see ‘Critical accounting estimates and judgements’ on page 90.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
Non-Financial risks are inherent in our business, including the risk of fraudulent activity
We are exposed to many types of non-financial risks that are inherent in banking operations. Non-financial risk can be defined as the risk to HSBC of achieving its strategy or objectives as a result of inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. It includes; fraudulent and other criminal activities (both internal and external), breakdowns in processes or procedures, breaches of regulations or law, financial reporting and tax errors, external events and systems failure or non-availability. These risks are also present when we rely on outside suppliers or vendors to provide services to us and our customers. In particular, fraudsters may target any of our products, services and delivery channels, including lending, internet banking, payments, bank accounts and cards. This may result in financial loss to the Group and/or our customers, an adverse customer experience, reputational damage and potential litigation, regulatory proceeding, administrative action or other adversarial proceeding in any jurisdiction in which we operate, depending on the circumstances of the event. These non-financial risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, strategy and reputation.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
Changed
HSBC Holdings is a holding company and, as a result, is dependent on loan/instrument payments and dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its obligations, including obligations with respect to its debt securities, and to provide profits for payment of future dividends to shareholders
HSBC Holdings is a non-operating holding company and, as such, its principal source of income is from operating subsidiaries that hold the principal assets of the Group. As a separate legal entity, HSBC Holdings relies on remittance of its subsidiaries’ loan/instrument interest payments and dividends in order to be able to pay obligations to debt holders as they fall due, and to pay dividends to its shareholders. The ability of HSBC Holdings' subsidiaries and affiliates to pay remittances and dividends to HSBC Holdings is subject to such subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ financial performance and could also be restricted by applicable laws, regulations, exchange controls and other requirements.
Debt & Financing6 | 16.7%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
We could incur losses or be required to hold additional capital as a result of model limitations or failure
HSBC uses models for a range of purposes in managing its business, including regulatory capital calculations, stress testing, credit approvals, calculation of ECLs on an IFRS9, Financial Instruments ('IFRS9') basis, financial crime and fraud risk management and financial reporting. HSBC could face adverse consequences as a result of decisions that may lead to actions by management based on models that are poorly developed, implemented or used, or as a result of the modelled outcome being misunderstood or the use of such information for purposes for which it was not designed or by inherent limitations arising from the uncertainty inherent in predicting or estimating future outcomes. Regulatory scrutiny and supervisory concerns over banks’ use of models is considerable, particularly the internal models and assumptions used by banks in the calculation of regulatory capital. If regulatory approval for key capital models is not achieved in a timely manner or if those models are subject to review and challenge, HSBC could be required to hold additional capital. Evolving regulatory requirements have resulted in changes to HSBC’s approach to model risk management, which poses execution challenges. The adoption of more sophisticated modelling approaches including artificial intelligence related risks and technology by both HSBC and the financial services industry could also lead to increased model risk. HSBC’s commitment to changes to business activities due to climate and sustainability challenges will also have an impact on model risk going forward. Models will play an important role in risk management and financial reporting of climate related risks. Challenges such as uncertainty of the long dated impacts of climate change and lack of robust and high quality climate related data present challenges to creating reliable and accurate model outputs for these models. The economic consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic have impacted the reliability of model outputs beyond how IFRS 9 models have been built and calibrated to operate. Moreover, complexities of current governmental support programmes and regulatory guidance on the treatment of customer impacts, such as forbearance and payment holidays, and the unpredictable pathways of the pandemic, cannot realistically be factored into the modelling. Consequently, IFRS 9 models under the current economic conditions are generating outputs that do not accurately assess the actual level of credit quality in all cases. In order to calculate more realistic valuation of assets, compensating controls, such as post model management adjustments based on expert judgement are required. Such compensating controls require a significant degree of management judgment and assumptions. There is a risk that future actual results/performance may differ from such judgments and assumptions. Risks arising from the use of models could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, capital position and reputation.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
We and our UK subsidiaries may become subject to stabilisation provisions under the Banking Act, in certain significant stress situations
The Banking Act implemented the BRRD in the UK and creates a special resolution regime (the ‘SRR’). Under the SRR, HM Treasury, the BoE and the PRA and FCA (together, the ‘Authorities’) are granted substantial powers to implement resolution measures and stabilisation options with respect to UK banks or certain investment firms in circumstances in which the relevant Authority is satisfied that the resolution conditions are met. The SRR presently consists of five stabilisation options: (i) transfer of all of the business of a relevant entity or the shares of the relevant entity to a private sector purchaser; (ii) transfer of all or part of the business of the relevant entity to a ‘bridge bank’ wholly owned by the BoE; (iii) transfer of part of the assets, rights or liabilities of the relevant entity to one or more asset management vehicles for management of the transferor’s assets, rights or liabilities; (iv) the write-down, conversation, transfer, modification, or suspension of the relevant entity’s equity, capital instruments and liabilities (the so-called “bail-in power”); and (v) temporary public ownership of the relevant entity. These tools may also be applied to a parent company or affiliate of a UK bank or relevant investment firm (which, in respect of HSBC, could include HSBC Holdings) where certain conditions are met. In addition, the SRR provides for modified insolvency and administration procedures for relevant entities. It also confers ancillary powers on the Authorities, including the power to modify or override certain contractual arrangements in certain circumstances. The Authorities are also empowered by order to amend the law for the purpose of enabling the powers under the SRR to be used effectively. Such orders may promulgate provisions with retrospective applicability. In addition to the stabilisation options, the relevant Authority may, in certain circumstances, in accordance with the Banking Act, require the permanent write-down or conversion into equity of any outstanding tier 1 capital instruments and tier 2 capital instruments prior to the exercise of any stabilisation option (including the bail-in power), which may lead to the cancellation, transfer or dilution of HSBC Holdings’ ordinary share capital. In general, the Banking Act requires the Authorities to have regard to specified objectives in exercising the powers provided for by the Banking Act. One of the objectives (which is required to be balanced as appropriate with the other specified objectives) refers to the protection and enhancement of the stability of the financial system of the UK. The Banking Act includes, in certain circumstances, and with respect to the exercise of certain powers provided for by the Banking Act, provisions related to compensation in respect of transfer instruments and orders made under it. This includes a ‘no creditor worse off’ safeguard, which requires that no shareholder or creditor must be left worse off from the use of resolution powers than they would have been had the entity entered insolvency rather than resolution. However, if we are at or approaching the point where we may be deemed by our regulators to be failing, or likely to fail, such as to require regulatory intervention, any exercise of the above mentioned powers by the Authorities may result in holders of our ordinary shares, or other instruments that may fall within the scope of the ‘bail in’ or other write-down and conversion powers granted under the Banking Act, being materially adversely affected, including by the cancellation of shares, the write-down or conversion into shares of other instruments, the transfer of shares to a third party appointed by the BoE, the loss of rights associated with shares or other instruments (including rights to dividends or interest payments), the dilution of their percentage ownership of our share capital, and any corresponding material adverse effect on the market price of our ordinary shares and other instruments.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to our businesses
Our ability to borrow on a secured or unsecured basis, and the cost of doing so, can be affected by increases in interest rates or credit spreads, the availability of credit, regulatory requirements relating to liquidity or the market perceptions of risk relating to the Group or the banking sector, including our perceived or actual creditworthiness. Current accounts and savings deposits payable on demand or at short notice form a significant part of our funding, and we place considerable importance on maintaining their stability. For deposits, stability depends upon preserving investor confidence in our capital strength and liquidity, and on comparable and transparent pricing. Although deposits have been a stable source of funding historically, this may not continue. We also access wholesale markets in order to provide funding for entities that do not accept deposits, to align asset and liability maturities and currencies, and to maintain a presence in local markets. In 2021 we issued the equivalent of $24.3bn of debt securities in the public capital markets in a range of currencies and maturities from a number of Group entities, including $19bn of senior securities issued by HSBC Holdings. An inability to obtain financing in the unsecured long-term or short-term debt capital markets, or to access the secured lending markets, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. Unfavourable macroeconomic developments, market disruptions or regulatory developments may increase our funding costs or challenge our ability to raise funds to support or expand our businesses. If we are unable to raise funds through deposits and/or in the capital markets, our liquidity position could be adversely affected, and we might be unable to meet deposit withdrawals on demand or at their contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature, to meet our obligations under committed financing facilities and insurance contracts or to fund new loans, investments and businesses. We may need to liquidate unencumbered assets to meet our liabilities. In a time of reduced liquidity, we may be unable to sell some of our assets, or we may need to sell assets at reduced prices, which in either case could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Risks concerning borrower credit quality are inherent in our businesses
Risks arising from changes in credit quality and the recoverability of loans and amounts due from borrowers and counterparties (e.g. reinsurers and counterparties in derivative transactions) are inherent in a wide range of our businesses. Adverse changes in the credit quality of our borrowers and counterparties arising from a general deterioration in economic conditions or systemic risks in the financial systems, including from the impact of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic (see 'Risks relating to the impact of Covid-19') could reduce the recoverability and value of our assets, and require an increase in our ECLs. We estimate and recognise ECLs in our credit exposure. This process, which is critical to our results and financial condition, requires difficult, subjective and complex judgements, including forecasts of how the economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans and the ability of other counterparties to meet their obligations. This assessment considers multiple alternative forward-looking economic conditions (including GDP estimates) and incorporates this into the ECL estimates to meet the measurement objective of IFRS 9. As is the case with any such assessments, we may fail to estimate accurately the effect of factors that we identify or fail to identify relevant factors. Further, the information we use to assess the creditworthiness of our counterparties may be inaccurate or incorrect. Any failure by us to accurately estimate the ability of our counterparties to meet their obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Any reduction in the credit rating assigned to HSBC Holdings, any subsidiaries of HSBC Holdings or any of their respective debt securities could increase the cost or decrease the availability of our funding and adversely affect our liquidity position and net interest margin
Credit ratings affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain market funding. Rating agencies regularly evaluate HSBC Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries, as well as their respective debt securities. Their ratings are based on a number of factors, including their assessment of the relative financial strength of the Group or of the relevant subsidiary, as well as conditions affecting the financial services industry generally. There can be no assurance that the rating agencies will maintain HSBC Holdings’ or the relevant subsidiary’s current ratings or outlook, particularly given the rating agencies’ current review of their bank rating methodologies and the potential impact on HSBC Holdings’ or its subsidiaries’ ratings. At the date hereof, HSBC Holdings’ long-term debt was rated ‘A+’ by Fitch, ‘A-’ by Standard and Poor’s (‘S&P’) and ‘A3’ by Moody’s. The ratings outlook by both S&P and Moody's were stable and the ratings outlook by Fitch was negative. Any reductions in these ratings and outlook could increase the cost of our funding, limit access to capital markets and require additional collateral to be placed and, consequently, materially adversely affect our interest margins and our liquidity position. Under the terms of our current collateral obligations under derivative contracts, we could be required to post additional collateral as a result of a downgrade in HSBC Holdings’ credit rating.
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
Changed
We may not manage risks associated with the replacement of benchmark rates and indices effectively
Key benchmark rates and indices, including interbank offered rates (“Ibors”) such as the London interbank offered rate (‘Libor’), have been the subject of national, international and other regulatory scrutiny and reform for a number of years. This has resulted in significant changes to the methodology and operation of certain benchmarks and indices, the adoption of replacement near risk free rates (“RFRs”) and the proposed discontinuation of certain reference rates (including Libor). In May 2019, the European Money Markets Institute (‘EMMI’) announced the cessation of the Euro Overnight Index average (Eonia) from the end of 2021 and, in March 2021, ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (‘IBA’) announced that it would cease publication of (i) all sterling, Euro, Swiss franc and Japanese yen settings, and the 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar Libor settings immediately after 31 December 2021 and (ii) the remaining U.S. dollar Libor settings immediately after 30 June 2023. The FCA subsequently used its regulatory powers to compel IBA to publish a number of sterling and Japanese Yen Libor settings on an alternative methodology basis (so-called “synthetic Libor”) from 1 January 2022 for an undetermined period of time. The discontinuation of sterling, Swiss franc, Euro and Japanese Yen Libor interest rates, and Eonia has occurred with the adoption of respective replacement near risk free rates (‘RFR’). The continued existence of legacy contracts in benchmark rates that demised from the end of 2021, so called ‘tough legacy,’ and legacy contracts referencing other Ibors that are expected to demise at a later date, notably a number of US dollar Libor settings, results in a number of risks for HSBC, its clients and the financial services industry more widely. These include but are not limited to; •Regulatory compliance, legal and conduct risks, that arise from the transition of legacy contracts to RFRs or alternative rates and from the sales of products referencing RFRs could lead to unintended or unfavourable outcomes for clients and market participants. These risks could be heightened if HSBC’s sales processes and procedures are not appropriately adapted or executed to detail the risks and complexity of the RFR market conventions; •Legal risks are associated with legacy contracts that HSBC is unable to appropriately transition and legacy contracts that rely on the use of legislative solutions, such as 'synthetic' Libor. If HSBC is unable to appropriately transition legacy contracts this could lead to reliance on fallback provisions which do not contemplate the permanent cessation of the relevant Ibor, and there is a risk that these fallback provisions do not work from a contractual, practical or financial perspective, potentially resulting in unintended outcomes for clients. While legislative solutions are (in some circumstances) expected to assist market participants with transitioning contracts or mitigating risks associated with 'tough legacy' contracts, there remains some uncertainty around the operation and implementation of such solutions as well as their longevity. For legacy contracts that utilise 'synthetic' Libor there is a risk that we are unable to transition such contracts to a new RFR or alternative rate before the relevant 'synthetic' Libor is discontinued. This could lead to reliance on the above mentioned fallback provisions, which do not contemplate permanent cessation of Libor. Each of these issues could result in unintended or unfavourable outcomes for clients and market participants and this could potentially increase the risk of disputes; •Financial risks result from the discontinuation of US dollar Libor and the development of liquidity in its replacement RFR, Secured Overnight Funding rate (‘SOFR’). Differences in US dollar Libor and SOFR interest rate levels create a basis risk in the trading book and banking book due to asymmetric adoption of SOFR across assets, liabilities and products that we need to actively manage through appropriate financial hedging. In addition, this may limit the ability to hedge effectively; and •Resilience and operational risks, resulting from ‘tough legacy’ and other legacy Ibor contracts that are expected to be transitioned to RFRs and alternative rates. In particular, there is a risk that our systems, processes and controls have not been appropriately adapted to account for new RFR methodology changes or fallback provisions, leading to complaints and disputes. The operational and resilience risks may be further heightened if there is a slow take-up of the use of the SOFR benchmark for new financing and hedging activities in 2022, as this could compress the timelines for transition of legacy contracts referencing US dollar Libor settings that are demising in 2023. If any of these risks materialise this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and customers.
Corporate Activity and Growth2 | 5.6%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
Our risk management measures may not be successful
The management of risk is an integral part of all our activities. Risk constitutes our exposure to uncertainty and the consequent variability of return. Specifically, risk equates to the adverse effect on profitability or financial condition arising from different sources of uncertainty, including retail and wholesale credit risk, market risk, non-traded market risk, operational risk, insurance risk, concentration risk, liquidity and funding risk, litigation risk, reputational risk, strategic risk, pension risk and regulatory risk. While we employ a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, such methods and the judgements that accompany their application cannot anticipate every unfavourable event or the specifics and timing of every outcome. Failure to manage risks appropriately could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, strategy and reputation.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
The delivery of our strategic actions is subject to execution risk and we may not achieve any of the expected benefits of our strategic initiatives
Effective management of transformation projects is required to effectively deliver the Group's strategic priorities, involving delivering both on externally driven programmes for example, Ibor transition, as well as key business initiatives to deliver revenue growth, product enhancement and operational efficiency outcomes. The magnitude, complexity and, at times, concurrent demands of the projects required to meet these can result in heightened execution risk. The Group’s strategy (see pages 12 to 13) set out in February 2021 was supported by global trends – the continued economic development in Emerging Markets, growth of international trade and capital flows, and wealth creation, particularly in faster-growing markets. We took into consideration global trends along with our strategic advantages to help us better deploy capital. The development and implementation of our strategy requires difficult, subjective and complex judgements, including forecasts of economic conditions in various parts of the world. We may fail to correctly identify the relevant factors in making decisions as to capital deployment and cost reduction. We may also encounter unpredictable changes in the external environment that are unfavourable to our strategy. Our ability to execute our strategy may be limited by our operational capacity and the increasing complexity of the regulatory environment in which we operate. We continue to pursue our cost management initiatives, though they may not be as effective as expected, and we may be unable to meet our cost saving targets. The global economic outlook continues to remain uncertain, particularly with regard to the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, interest rate volatility, changes in tax legislation, heightened geopolitical tensions and the UK relationship with the EU. There remains a risk that, in the absence of an improvement in economic conditions, our cost and investment actions may not be sufficient to achieve the expected benefits. The failure to successfully deliver or achieve any of the expected benefits of these key strategic initiatives could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 7/36 (19%)Above Sector Average
Regulation2 | 5.6%
Regulation - Risk 1
We may fail to meet the requirements of regulatory stress tests
We are subject to regulatory stress testing in many jurisdictions, which are described on page 246. These exercises are designed to assess the resilience of banks to potential adverse economic or financial developments and ensure that they have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for the risks associated with their business profile. Assessment by regulators is on both a quantitative and qualitative basis, the latter focusing on our data provision, stress testing capability and internal management processes and controls. Failure to meet quantitative or qualitative requirements of regulatory stress test programmes, or the failure by regulators to approve our stress results and capital plans, could result in the Group being required to enhance its capital position and/or position additional capital in specific subsidiaries, and this could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, capital position and reputation.
Regulation - Risk 2
Changed
We are subject to numerous legislative or regulatory requirements and developments and changes in the policy of regulators or governments and we may fail to comply with applicable regulations, particularly any changes thereto
Our businesses are subject to ongoing regulation and associated regulatory risks, including the effects of changes in the laws, regulations, policies, voluntary codes of practice and interpretations in the UK, the US, Hong Kong, the EU, China and the other markets in which we operate. Many regulatory changes relevant to our business may have an effect beyond the country in which they are enacted, either because our regulators deliberately enact regulation with extra-territorial impact or our global operations mean that the Group is obliged to give effect to ‘local’ laws and regulations on a wider basis. In recent years, regulators and governments have focused on reforming both the prudential regulation of the financial services industry and the ways in which the business of financial services is conducted. Measures taken include enhanced capital, liquidity and funding requirements, the separation or prohibition of certain activities by banks, changes in the operation of capital markets activities, the introduction of tax levies and transaction taxes, changes in compensation practices and more detailed requirements on how business is conducted. The governments and regulators in the UK, the US, Hong Kong, the EU or elsewhere may intervene further in relation to areas of industry risk already identified, or in new areas, which could adversely affect us. Specific areas where regulatory changes could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, capital position, and reputation and current and anticipated areas of particular focus for HSBC’s regulators, include, but are not limited to: •the ongoing regulatory response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its implications for banks credit risk management and provisioning processes, capital adequacy and liquidity, and a renewed focus on vulnerable customers including the treatment of customers, including consideration of longer-term initiatives to support borrowers in financial difficulty and measures designed to maximise access to cash for consumers; •the increasing focus by regulators, international bodies, organisations and unions on how institutions conduct business, particularly with regard to the delivery of fair outcomes for customers, promoting effective competition in the interests of consumers and ensuring the orderly and transparent operation of global financial markets, including the proposed introduction in the UK of a new Consumer Duty and measures resulting from ongoing thematic reviews into the workings of the retail, SME and wholesale banking sectors and the provision of financial advice to consumers; •the implementation of any conduct measures as a result of regulators’ focus on organisational culture, employee behaviour and whistleblowing; •the demise of certain Ibor reference rates and the transition to new replacement rates (as discussed further under ‘We may not manage risks associated with the replacement of benchmark rates and indices effectively’); •reviews of regulatory frameworks applicable to the wholesale financial markets, including reforms and other changes to conduct of business, listing, securitisation and derivatives related requirements; •the focus globally on technology adoption and digital delivery, underpinned by customer protection, including the use of artificial intelligence and digital assets (data, identity and disclosures), financial technology risks, payments and related infrastructure, operational resilience, virtual currencies (including central bank digital currencies and global stablecoins) and cybersecurity. This also includes the introduction of new and/or enhanced regulatory standards in these areas; •the increased supervisory expectations arising from expanding and increasingly complex regulatory reporting obligations, including expectations on data integrity and associated governance and controls, as evidenced in regulatory fines imposed against other financial institutions. HSBC has commissioned a number of independent external reviews of its regulatory reporting processes and controls, some at the request of its regulators, including one of its credit risk RWA reporting process which is currently ongoing; •increasing regulatory expectations of firms around governance and risk management frameworks, particularly for management of climate change, diversity and inclusion and other ESG risks and enhanced ESG disclosure and reporting obligations; •the continued evolution of the UK’s regulatory framework following the UK's withdrawal from the EU, and similarly regarding the access of UK and other non-EU financial institutions to EU markets, for example, in the light of proposals within the EU Commission’s CRDVI package which could restrict cross border activity by non-EU firms without a branch, except on a reverse solicitation basis. For further details see 'The UK’s trading relationship with the EU, following the UK's withdrawal from the EU, may adversely affect our operating model and financial results'; •the recommendations of an independent panel appointed by HM Treasury which undertook a statutory review of the UK regime for ring-fencing and proprietary trading during 2021 are expected during the first quarter of 2022. This may result in proposed legislative amendments to the regime in due course; •the implementation of the reforms to the Basel III package, which includes changes to the RWA approaches to credit risk, market risk, counterparty risk, operational risk, and credit valuation adjustments and the application of RWA floors and the leverage ratio (as discussed further under the 'Risks to Capital’ section on page 225; •the implementation of more stringent capital, liquidity and funding requirements, including changes to IRB modelling; •the financial effects of climate changes being incorporated within the global prudential framework, including the transition risks resulting from a shift to a low carbon economy; •restrictions on the structure of remuneration and increasing requirements to detail management accountability within the Group (for example, the requirements of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime in the UK and similar regimes in Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and elsewhere that are either in effect or under consideration/implementation); •changes in national or supra-national requirements regarding the ability to offshore or outsource the provision of services and resources or transfer material risk to financial services companies located in other countries, which impact our ability to implement globally consistent and efficient operating models; •financial crime, fraud and market abuse standards and increasing expectations for related control frameworks, to ensure firms are adapting to new threats such as those arising from the Covid-19 pandemic, and are protecting customers from cyber-enabled crime; •the application and enforcement of economic sanctions including those with extra-territorial effect and those arising from geopolitical tensions (see ‘We are subject to political, social and other risks in the countries in which we operate’); •requirements flowing from arrangements for the resolution strategy of the Group and its individual operating entities that may have different effects in different countries; •the increasing regulatory expectations and requirements relating to various aspects of operational resilience, including an increasing focus on the response of institutions to operational disruptions; and •continuing regulatory focus on the effectiveness of internal controls and risk management frameworks, as evidenced in regulatory fines and other measures imposed against other financial institutions.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities2 | 5.6%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
We are subject to the risk of current and future legal, regulatory or administrative actions and investigations, the outcomes of which are inherently difficult to predict
We face significant risks in our business relating to legal, regulatory or administrative actions and investigations. The volume and amount of damages claimed in litigation, regulatory proceedings, investigations, administrative actions and other adversarial proceedings against financial institutions are increasing for many reasons, including a substantial increase in the number of regulatory changes taking place globally, increasing focus from regulators, investors and other stakeholders on ESG disclosures, including in relation to the measurement and reporting of such matters as both local and international standards in this area continue to significantly evolve and develop, increased media attention and higher expectations from regulators and the public. In addition, criminal prosecutions of financial institutions for, among other things, alleged conduct breaches, breaches of AML, anti-bribery/corruption and sanctions regulations, antitrust violations, market manipulation, aiding and abetting tax evasion, and providing unlicensed cross-border banking services, have become more commonplace and may increase in frequency due to increased media attention and higher expectations from prosecutors and the public. Any such legal, regulatory or administrative action or investigation against HSBC Holdings or one or more of our subsidiaries could result in, among other things, substantial fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties, cease and desist orders, forfeitures, the suspension or revocation of key licences, requirements to exit certain businesses, other disciplinary actions and/or withdrawal of funding from depositors and other stakeholders. Any threatened or actual litigation, regulatory proceeding, administrative action, investigation or other adversarial proceeding against HSBC Holdings or one or more of our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation. Additionally, the Group’s financial statements reflect provisioning for legal proceedings, regulatory and customer remediation matters. Provisions for legal proceedings, regulatory and customer remediation matters, such as, for example, the customer redress programme related to and any legal claims resulting from the mis-selling of payment protection insurance policies, typically require a higher degree of judgement than other types of provisions, and the actual costs resulting from such proceedings and matters may exceed existing provisioning. Additionally, as described in Note 34 on the Financial Statements, we continue to be subject to a number of material legal proceedings, regulatory actions and investigations, the outcomes of which are inherently difficult to predict, particularly those cases in which the matters are brought on behalf of various classes of claimants, seek damages of unspecified or indeterminate amounts or involve novel legal claims. Moreover, we may face additional legal proceedings, investigations or regulatory actions in the future, including in other jurisdictions and/or with respect to matters similar to, or broader than, the existing legal proceedings, investigations or regulatory actions. An unfavourable result in one or more of these proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
Third parties may use us as a conduit for illegal activities without our knowledge
We are required to comply with applicable AML and sanctions laws and regulations, and have adopted various policies and procedures, including internal control and ‘know your customer’ procedures, aimed at preventing use of HSBC products and services for the purpose of committing or concealing financial crime. Moreover, in relevant situations, and where permitted by regulation, we may rely upon certain counterparties to maintain and properly apply their own appropriate AML procedures. While permitted by regulation, such reliance may not prevent third parties from using us (and our relevant counterparties) as a conduit for money laundering, without our knowledge (and that of our relevant counterparties). Further, a major focus of US and UK government policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been combating money laundering and enforcing compliance with US and EU sanctions. HSBC Bank USA has taken a number of remedial actions as a result of the matters to which the AML DPA related, which are intended to better protect the Group’s businesses in respect of these risks. However, there can be no assurance that these will be completely effective. Becoming a party to, associated with, or even accusations of being associated with, money laundering, or violations of sanctions laws or regulations could damage our reputation and could make us subject to fines, sanctions and/or legal enforcement. Any one of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation. HSBC Bank USA, as the primary US dollar correspondent bank for the Group, is subject to heightened financial crime risk arising from business conducted on behalf of its non-US HSBC affiliates. HSBC Bank USA has implemented policies, procedures and controls reasonably designed to comply with financial crime legal and regulatory requirements and mitigate financial crime risk from its affiliates. Nevertheless, in the event that these controls are ineffective, it could lead to a breach of these requirements resulting in a potential enforcement action by OFAC or other US agencies that may include substantial fines or penalties. Any such action against HSBC Bank USA could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Taxation & Government Incentives1 | 2.8%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
We are subject to tax-related risks in the countries in which we operate
We are subject to the substance and interpretation of tax laws in all countries in which we operate and are subject to routine review and audit by tax authorities in relation thereto. Our interpretation or application of these tax laws may differ from those of the relevant tax authorities and we provide for potential tax liabilities that may arise on the basis of the amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. The amounts ultimately paid may differ materially from the amounts provided depending on the ultimate resolution of such matters. In December 2021, the OECD published model rules that provided a template for countries to implement a new global minimum tax rate of 15% from 2023. In January 2022, the UK government opened a consultation on how the UK implements the rules. The impact on HSBC will depend on exactly how the UK implements the model rules, as well as the profitability and local tax liabilities of HSBC’s operations in each tax jurisdiction from 2023. Separately, potential changes to tax legislation and tax rates in the countries in which we operate could increase our effective tax rate in future as governments seek revenue to pay for Covid-19 support packages.
Environmental / Social2 | 5.6%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Added
Our data management and data privacy controls must be sufficiently robust to support the increasing data volumes and evolving regulations.
As HSBC Group becomes more data-driven and our business processes move to digital channels, the volume of data that we rely on has grown. As a result, management of data (including data retention and deletion, data quality, data privacy and data architecture policies and procedures) from creation to destruction must be robust and designed to identify quality and availability issues. Inadequate data management could result in negative impacts to customer service, business process, or require manual intervention and reconciliation to reduce the risk of errors in reporting to senior management, regulators, or executives. In addition, failure to comply with data privacy laws and other legislation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may result in regulatory sanctions. Any of these failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Environmental / Social - Risk 2
Added
We are subject to financial and non-financial risks associated with Environmental, Social and Governance ('ESG') related matters, such as climate change, nature-related and human rights issues.
ESG related matters such as climate change, society’s impact on nature and human rights violations brings risks to our business, our customers and wider society. Climate change, through transitional and physical channels, could have both financial and non-financial impacts on HSBC either directly or indirectly through our customers. Transition risk can arise from the move to a low-carbon economy, such as through policy, regulatory and technological changes. Physical risk can arise through increasing severity and/or frequency of severe weather or other climatic events, such as rising sea levels and flooding. We currently expect that the following are the most likely ways in which climate risk may materialise for the Group: •transition and physical risk may impact our corporate customers, for example if regulatory, legislative or technological developments impact customers' business models resulting in financial difficulty for customers and/or stranded assets; •residential real estate may be affected by changes to the climate and extreme weather events which could impact both property values and the ability of borrowers to afford their mortgage payments; •physical risk may impact HSBC’s operations, for example if flooding or extreme weather events impacted our critical operations; •regulatory compliance risk may result from the increasing pace, breadth and depth of regulatory expectations requiring implementation in short timeframes across multiple jurisdictions; •conduct risks could develop associated with the increasing demand for ‘green’ products where there are differing and developing standards or taxonomies; and •reputational risks may result from our decisions on how we support our customers in high-emitting sectors, including our ability to reach our climate-related ambitions, targets and commitments. We also face increased reputational, legal and regulatory risks as we make progress towards our net zero ambition, with stakeholders likely to place greater focus on our actions, such as the development of climate-related policies, our disclosures and financing and investment decisions relating to our ambition. We will face additional risks if we are perceived to mislead stakeholders in respect of our climate strategy, the climate impact of a product or service, or the commitments of our customers. In addition, there is increasing evidence that a number of nature-related risks beyond climate change - which include risks that can be represented more broadly by economic dependency on nature – can and will have significant economic impact. These risks arise when the provision of natural services such as water availability, air quality, and soil quality is compromised by overpopulation, urban development, natural habitat and ecosystem loss, and other environmental stresses beyond climate change. They can show themselves in a variety of ways, including through macroeconomic, market, credit, reputational, legal and regulatory risks, for both HSBC and its customers. The key human rights risks that currently impact HSBC include discrimination, in particular with respect to our employees and our customers, and modern slavery in our supply chains and those of our customers. Failure to manage these risks may result in negative impacts on our people (both in terms of hiring and retention), our business and our reputation. Such failure could also lead to breaches of rapidly evolving legal and regulatory requirements and expectations in certain markets and this could have reputational, legal and financial consequences for HSBC. Human rights issues have recently become a focus for geopolitical tensions, notably between the US and China, and these issues are further heightened for HSBC due to its extensive geographic footprint and presence in a number of markets. In respect of all ESG-related risks, we also need to ensure that our strategy and business model, including the products and services we provide to customers and non-financial risk management processes (including processes to measure and manage the various financial and non-financial risks the Group faces as a result of ESG related matters) adapt to meet regulatory requirements and stakeholder and market expectations, which continue to evolve significantly and at pace. Achieving our strategy with respect to ESG matters, including any ESG-related ambitions, commitments and targets that we may set, will depend on a number of different factors outside of the Group’s control, such as advancements in technologies and supportive public policies in the markets where we operate. If these external factors and other changes do not occur, or do not occur on a timely basis, the Group may fail to achieve its ESG related ambitions, commitments and targets. In order to track and report on our progress against our ESG-related ambitions, commitments and targets, we rely on internal and, where appropriate and available, external data sources, guided by certain industry standards. While ESG related reporting has improved over time, data remains of limited quality and consistency. Methodologies we have used may develop over time in line with market practice, regulation and/or developments in science, where applicable. Any such developments in methodologies, and changes in the availability and quality of data over time could result in revisions to reported data going forward, including on financed emissions, meaning that such data may not be reconcilable or comparable year-on-year. This could also result in the Group having to re-evaluate its progress towards its ESG-related ambitions, commitments and targets in the future and this could result in reputational, legal and regulatory risks. If any of the above risks materialise, this could have financial and non-financial impacts for HSBC which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation, prospects and strategy.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 7/36 (19%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment4 | 11.1%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
We are likely to be affected by global geopolitical trends, including the risk of government intervention
While economic globalisation appears to remain deeply embedded in the international system, it is increasingly challenged by nationalism and protectionism and international institutions may be less capable of arresting this trend. A dispersion of global economic power from the US and Europe towards China and emerging markets appears to be occurring, providing a backdrop for greater US-China competition. A rise in nationalism and protectionism, including trade barriers, may be driven by populist sentiment and structural challenges facing developed and developing economies. Similarly, if capital flows are disrupted, some emerging markets may impose protectionist measures that could affect financial institutions and their clients, and other emerging, as well as developed, markets, may be tempted to follow suit. This rise could contribute to weaker global trade, potentially affecting HSBC’s traditional lines of business. The broad geographic footprint and coverage of HSBC will make us and our customers susceptible to protectionist measures taken by national governments and authorities, including imposition of trade tariffs, restrictions on market access, restrictions on the ability to transact on a cross border basis, expropriation, restrictions on international ownership, interest-rate caps, limits on dividend flows and increases in taxation. There may be uncertainty as to the conflicting nature of such measures, their duration, the potential for escalation, and their potential impact on global economies. Whether these emerging trends are cyclical or permanent is hard to determine, and their causes are likely to be difficult to address. The occurrence of any of these events or circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
We are subject to political, social and other risks in the countries in which we operate
We operate through an international network of subsidiaries and affiliates across countries and territories around the world. Our global operations are subject to potentially unfavourable political, social, environmental and economic developments in such jurisdictions, which may include: •coups, civil wars or acts of terrorism; •political and/or social instability; •geopolitical tensions; •climate change, acts of God, including epidemics and pandemics (such as Covid-19, further details on which can be found in 'Risks relating to the impact of Covid-19') and natural disasters (such as floods and hurricanes); and •infrastructure issues, such as transportation or power failures. Each of the above could impact credit RWAs, and the financial losses caused by any of these risk events or developments could impair asset values and the creditworthiness of customers. These risk events or developments may also give rise to disruption to the Group's services and some may result in physical damage to our operations and/or risks to the safety of our personnel and customers. Geopolitical tensions could have significant ramifications for the Group and its customers. In particular: •Diplomatic tensions between China and the US, and extending to the UK, the EU, India and other countries, and developments in Hong Kong and Taiwan, may affect the Group, creating regulatory, reputational and market risks. •In particular, the US-China relationship remains complex, with tensions over a number of critical issues. The US, the UK, the EU, Canada and other countries have imposed various sanctions and trade restrictions on Chinese individuals or companies, and the US continues to develop its approach to perceived strategic competition with China. Among these, the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act authorises the imposition of secondary sanctions against non-US financial institutions found to be knowingly engaged in significant transactions with individuals and entities subject to US sanctions for engaging in certain activities that undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy. In addition, the US has imposed restrictions on US persons’ ability to buy or sell certain publicly traded securities linked to a number of prominent Chinese companies. •There is also a risk of increased sanctions being imposed by the US and other governments in relation to human rights, technology and other issues with China, and this could create a more complex operating environment for the Group and its customers. Notably, alongside the EU, UK, and Canada, the US has increasingly imposed sanctions and other measures in response to allegations of human rights abuses in Xinjiang. •China, in turn, has announced a number of its own sanctions and trade restrictions that target, or provide authority to target, foreign individuals or companies. These have been imposed mainly against certain public officials associated with the implementation of foreign sanctions against China. China has also promulgated new laws that provide a legal framework for imposing further sanctions and export restrictions, including laws prohibiting implementation of – or compliance with – foreign sanctions against China and creating a private rights of action in Chinese courts for damages caused by third parties implementing foreign sanctions or other discriminatory measures. •These and any future measures and countermeasures that may be taken by the US, China and other countries may affect the Group, its customers and the markets in which the Group operates. The financial impact to the Group of geopolitical risks in Asia is heightened due to the importance and profitability of the region, and Hong Kong in particular. •Political disagreements between the UK and the EU, notably over the future operation of the Northern Ireland Protocol ('the protocol'), has meant work on the creation of a framework for voluntary regulatory cooperation in financial services following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU has stalled. While negotiations are continuing, it is unclear whether or when an agreement will be reached, and this has led to speculation that the UK may trigger Article 16 of the Protocol, which could suspend the operation of the Protocol in certain respects. Any decision to do so could be met with retaliatory action by the EU, complicating the terms of trade between the UK and the EU and potentially preventing progress in other areas such as financial services. See “The UK’s trading relationship with the EU, following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, may adversely affect our operating model and financial results" •Tensions between Russia and the US and a number of European states have heightened significantly following the increasing risk of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine. While negotiations are ongoing to seek a resolution, a continuation of or any further deterioration to the situation could have significant geopolitical implications, including economic, social and political repercussions on a number of regions that may impact HSBC and its customers. In addition, the US, the UK and the EU have threatened a significant expansion of sanctions and trade restrictions against Russia in the event of a Russian incursion into Ukraine, and Russian countermeasures are also possible. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, the compliance by multinational corporations with their legal or regulatory obligations in one jurisdiction may be seen as supporting the law or policy objectives of that jurisdiction over another, creating additional compliance, reputational and political risks for the Group. While it is the Group's policy to comply with all applicable laws and regulations of all jurisdictions in which it operates, geopolitical risks and tensions, and potential ambiguities in the Group’s compliance obligations, will continue to present challenges and risks for the Group and could have a material adverse impact on the Group's business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and strategy, as well as on the Group’s customers.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
Changed
The UK’s trading relationship with the EU, following the UK's withdrawal from the EU, may adversely affect our operating model and financial results
The EU and the UK agreed a Trade and Cooperation Agreement on 31 December 2020, following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The agreement mainly focused on goods and services but also covered a wide range of other areas, including competition, state aid, tax, fisheries, transport, data and security. While the agreement only addressed financial services in a limited manner, bilateral discussions have now concluded at a technical level to create a framework for voluntary regulatory cooperation in financial services between the UK and EU through the establishment of a Joint UK-EU Financial Regulatory Forum. This is expected to provide a platform within which both parties will be able to discuss financial services-rellated issues, including future equivalence determinations. Broader political disagreements, notably over the future operation of the Northern Ireland Protocol, have, however, increased tensions in the UK-EU relationship. While negotiations relating to the Protocol between the UK and the EU are continuing, it remains uncertain whether an agreement will be reached. If the failure to reach an agreement were to lead to the UK triggering Article 16 of the Protocol, this could suspend the Protocol’s operation in certain respects, which may further complicate the terms of trade between the UK and the EU and prevent progress in other areas such as financial services. As the financial passporting arrangement that existed prior to, and during, the transition period expired, we put in place new arrangements in the provision of cross-border banking and investment services to customers and counterparties in the EEA. Notwithstanding the progress made in ensuring we were prepared for the end of the transition period, there remain risks, many of them linked to the uncertain outcome of ongoing negotiations relating to potential developments in the financial services trading relationship between the UK and EU, including the rules under which financial services may be provided on a cross-border basis into the EU and its member states. Significant uncertainty also remains as to the extent to which EU laws will diverge from UK law (including bank regulation) in the future. Any changes to the current rules in this respect and any further divergences in the legal regimes could require modifications to our UK and European operating models, with resulting impacts to our clients and employees. The exact impacts on our clients will depend on the nature of any developments and their individual circumstances and, in a worst case scenario, could include disruption to the provision of products and services, and this could in turn increase operational complexity and/or costs for the Group. More generally, over the medium to long term, the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the operation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (and any complexities that may result there from), may lead to increased market volatility and economic risk, particularly in the UK, which could adversely impact our profitability and prospects for growth in this market. In addition, the UK’s future trading relationship with the EU and the rest of the world will likely take a number of years to fully resolve. This may result in a prolonged period of uncertainty, unstable economic conditions and market volatility. This could include reduced international trade flows and loss of export market shares, as well as currency fluctuations.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 4
Current economic and market conditions may adversely affect our results
Our earnings are affected by global and local economic and market conditions. Uncertain and at times volatile economic conditions can create a challenging operating environment for financial services companies such as HSBC. In particular, we have faced and may continue to face the following challenges to our operations and operating model in connection with these factors: •the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on global economies could have a material adverse effect on (among other things) the profitability, capital and liquidity of financial services companies such as HSBC (see 'Risks relating to the impact of Covid-19'); •the demand for borrowing from creditworthy customers may diminish during periods of recession or where economic activity slows or remains subdued; •low or negative interest rates could impact bank profitability due to reductions in banks’ net interest income. This deterioration in bank profits might affect financial stability or cause credit supply to subsequently tighten; •our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in funding transactions may be adversely affected by market disruption; and •market developments may depress consumer and business confidence beyond expected levels. If economic growth is subdued, for example, asset prices and payment patterns may be adversely affected, leading to greater than expected increases in delinquencies, default rates and ECLs. However, if growth is too rapid, new asset valuation bubbles could appear, particularly in the real estate sector, with potentially negative consequences for banks. The occurrence of any of these events or circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and customers.
Natural and Human Disruptions1 | 2.8%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Risks relating to the impact of Covid-19
The Covid-19 pandemic and its effect on the global economy have continued to impact our customers and organisation, and the future effects of the pandemic remain uncertain. Covid-19 necessitated governments to respond at unprecedented levels to protect public health, and to support local economies and livelihoods. It has affected regions at different times and to varying degrees as it has developed. The resulting government support measures and restrictions have created additional challenges given the rapid pace of change and significant operational demands. Renewed outbreaks, particularly those resulting from the emergence of new variants of the virus, emphasise the ongoing threat of Covid-19 and could result in further tightening of government restrictions. Over the course of 2021, government restrictions across many countries were gradually unwound, allowing the global economy to stage a robust recovery up until the fourth quarter, when the highly transmissible Omicron variant began to emerge. While government restrictions were re-imposed in many countries in response to this variant, they have in certain countries been less restrictive than those that were imposed during previous waves of the pandemic. The global vaccination roll-out in 2021 helped reduce the social and economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, although there has been significant divergence in the speed at which vaccines have been deployed around the world. Most developed countries have now vaccinated a large proportion of their populations, but many less developed countries have struggled to secure supplies and are at an earlier stage of their roll-out. By the end of 2021, high vaccination rates had ensured that many Covid-19-related restrictions on activity in developed markets had been lifted and travel constraints were easing. However, the emergence of the Omicron variant, which proved to be more contagious and able, to a certain extent, to evade vaccine immunity, demonstrated the risk that new variants pose and led to government restrictions being reintroduced. A full return to pre-pandemic levels of social interaction across all our key markets is therefore, unlikely in the short to medium term. There remains a divergence in approach taken by countries with regards to the level of restrictions on activity and travel imposed in response to the pandemic. Such diverging approach to future pandemic waves could prolong or worsen supply chain and international travel disruptions. The evolving Covid-19 restrictions in Hong Kong, including travel, public gathering and social distancing restrictions are impacting the Hong Kong economy, and may affect the ability to attract and retain staff. Mismatches between the supply and demand of goods and services contributed to a rise in inflation in 2021. Central banks in major markets are expected to raise interest rates, but such increases are expected to be gradual and monetary policy is expected to remain accommodative overall. Policy tightening in major emerging markets has already begun in order to counteract rising inflation and the risk of capital outflows. Governments are also expected to reduce the level of fiscal support they offer households and businesses as the appetite for broad lockdowns and public health restrictions decreases. Government debt has risen in most advanced economies, and is expected to remain high into the medium term. High government debt burdens have raised fiscal vulnerabilities, increasing the sensitivity of debt service costs to interest rate increases and potentially reducing the fiscal space available to address any future economic downturns. Economic growth in the Group's major markets is expected to slow in 2022 to more sustainable rates, contingent on the successful further containment of the virus, the continued roll-out of vaccination programmes, and the evolution of other top risks. There remains a material risk of a renewed drop in economic activity, particularly in countries with low vaccination rates. The economic fallout from Covid-19 risks increasing inequality across markets, which may leave the burden on governments and central banks to continue providing fiscal and monetary stimulus, possibly in a more targeted fashion than seen during 2020 and 2021. After financial markets suffered a sharp fall in the early phases of the spread of Covid-19, they rebounded but still remain volatile. Depending on the long-term impact on global economic growth, financial asset prices may suffer a further sharp fall. Depending on the time taken for economic activity to return to previous levels, there could be further adverse impacts on the Group's income due to lower lending and transaction volumes and lower wealth and insurance manufacturing revenue due to equity market volatility and weakness. Lower or negative interest rates globally increase the cost of guarantees for insurance manufacturing, and there could also be adverse impacts on other assets, such as the Group's investment in Bank of Communications Co., Limited, goodwill and other intangible assets. The Covid-19 pandemic may also have material impacts on capital and liquidity. This may include downward customer credit rating migration, which could negatively impact the Group's risk-weighted assets ('RWAs') and capital position, and potential liquidity stress due, among other factors, to increased customer drawdowns, notwithstanding the significant initiatives that governments and central banks have put in place to support funding and liquidity. Central banks in some markets also initiated a series of capital measures, including the reduction of certain regulatory capital buffers, to support the ability of banks to supply credit to businesses and households through periods of economic disruption. The Group continues to support its personal and business customers through market-specific measures initiated during the Covid-19 pandemic and by supporting the remaining national government schemes that focus on the parts of the economy most impacted by the pandemic. Central bank and government actions and support measures taken in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Group's responses to those, have created, and may in the future create, restrictions in relation to capital. This has limited and may in the future limit management's flexibility in managing the business and taking action in relation to capital distribution and capital allocation. Should central banks or regulatory authorities introduce new or further restrictions in relation to our capital distributions, our ability to declare, or to pay, dividends or to carry out share buybacks may be negatively impacted. The rapid introduction and varying nature of the government support schemes introduced throughout the Covid-19 pandemic led to increased operational risks, including complex conduct considerations, increased reputational risk and increased risk of fraud. These risks are likely to be heightened further as and when those remaining government support schemes are unwound. These events have also led to increased litigation risk. The impact of the pandemic on the long-term prospects of businesses in the most vulnerable sectors of the economy – such as retail, hospitality and commercial real estate – remains uncertain and may lead to significant credit losses on specific exposures, which may not be fully captured in ECL estimates. In addition, in times of stress, fraudulent activity is often more prevalent, leading to potentially significant credit or operational losses. Our financial models continue to be impacted by the pandemic. These include retail and wholesale credit models such as IFRS loss models, as well as capital models, traded risk models and models used in the asset/liability management process. This continues to require enhanced monitoring of model outputs and the use of model overlays, including management judgemental adjustments based on the expert judgement of senior credit risk managers and the recalibration of key loss models to take into account the impacts of Covid-19 on critical model inputs. See "We could incur losses or be required to hold additional capital as a result of model limitations or failure." The operational support functions on which the Group relies are based in a number of countries worldwide, some of which were particularly affected by the Covid-19 pandemic during 2021. We continue to monitor the situation, in particular in those countries and regions where Covid-19 infections are most prevalent and/or where travel restrictions are in place. Despite the ongoing economic recovery, significant uncertainties remain in assessing the duration and impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, including where government restrictions are re-imposed as a result of further outbreaks of the virus, in particular those outbreaks which result from the emergence of new variants. There is a risk that economic activity remains below pre-pandemic levels for a prolonged period and this could have a material adverse effect on the Group's financial condition, results of operations, prospects, liquidity, capital position and credit ratings.
Capital Markets2 | 5.6%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Market fluctuations may reduce our income or the value of our portfolios
Our businesses are inherently subject to risks in financial markets and in the wider economy, including changes in, and increased volatility of, interest rates, inflation rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, commodity, equity, bond and property prices, and the risk that our customers act in a manner inconsistent with our business, pricing and hedging assumptions. Market pricing can be volatile and ongoing market movements could significantly affect us in a number of key areas. For example, banking and trading activities are subject to interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, inflation risk and credit spread risk. Changes in interest rate levels, interbank spreads over official rates and yield curves affect the interest rate spread realised between lending and borrowing costs. The potential for future volatility and margin changes remains. See 'Risks relating to the impact of Covid-19' above regarding the impact of Covid-19 on the interest rate environment. Competitive pressures on fixed rates or product terms in existing loans and deposits sometimes restrict our ability to change interest rates applying to customers in response to changes in official and wholesale market rates. Our pension scheme assets include equity and debt securities, the cash flows of which change as equity prices and interest rates vary. Our insurance businesses are exposed to the risk that market fluctuations may cause mismatches to occur between product liabilities and the investment assets that back them. Market risks can affect our insurance products in a number of ways depending upon the product and associated contract. For example, mismatches between assets and liability yields and maturities give rise to interest rate risk. Some of these risks are borne directly by the customer and some are borne by the insurance businesses, with their excess capital invested in the markets. Some insurance contracts involve guarantees and options that increase in value in adverse investment markets. There is a risk that the insurance businesses could bear some of the cost of such guarantees and options. The performance of the investment markets could thus have a direct effect upon the value embedded in the insurance and investment contracts and our operating results, financial condition and prospects. It is difficult to predict with any degree of accuracy changes in market conditions, and such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates may affect our results
We prepare our accounts in US dollars because the US dollar and currencies linked to it form the major currency bloc in which we transact and fund our business. However, a substantial portion of our assets, liabilities, assets under management, revenues and expenses are denominated in other currencies. Changes in foreign exchange rates, including those that may result from a currency becoming de-pegged from the US dollar, have an effect on our accounting standards, reported income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity. Unfavourable changes in foreign exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Production
Total Risks: 6/36 (17%)Above Sector Average
Employment / Personnel3 | 8.3%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
We may suffer losses due to employee misconduct
Our businesses are exposed to risk from potential non-compliance with Group policies, including the HSBC Values, and related behaviours and employee misconduct such as fraud, negligence or non-financial misconduct, all of which could result in regulatory sanctions and/or reputational or financial harm. In recent years, a number of multinational financial institutions have suffered material losses due to the actions of ‘rogue traders’ or other employees. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not always be effective. Misconduct risks could be increased if prevent and detect measures are less effective because of remote and home working. Employee misconduct or regulatory sanctions if a regulator deems HSBC's actions to deter such activity to be insufficient, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
We rely on recruiting, retaining and developing appropriate senior management and skilled personnel
Meeting the demand to recruit, retain and develop appropriate senior management and skilled personnel remains subject to a number of challenges. These include rapidly changing skill requirements and ways of working, the evolving regulatory landscape plus increased requirements and expectations regarding nationalisation and diversity in some jurisdictions. Ongoing talent shortages in key markets and capabilities, particularly where those with the scarce capabilities are globally mobile, add to the complexity of our supply challenge. Our continued success and implementation of our growth strategy depend in part on the retention of key members of our management team and wider employee base, the availability of skilled management in each of our global businesses and global functions, and the ability to continue to attract, train, motivate and retain highly qualified professionals, each of which may depend on factors beyond our control, including economic, market and regulatory conditions, and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on health and well-being. In addition, the Group announced goals in relation to increasing the representation of women and Black employees in senior leadership roles by 2025. If the Group fails to achieve these goals, its ability to attract and retain qualified professionals may be negatively affected. If global businesses or global functions fail to staff their operations appropriately or lose one or more of their key senior executives and fail to successfully replace them in a satisfactory and timely manner, or fail to implement successfully the organisational changes required to support the Group’s strategy, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including control and operational risks, could be materially adversely affected.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 3
We may be required to make substantial contributions to our pension plans
We operate a number of pension plans throughout the world for our personnel, including defined benefit plans. Pension scheme obligations fluctuate with changes in long-term interest rates, inflation, salary levels and the longevity of scheme members. They can also be affected by operational and legal risks. The level of contributions we make to our pension plans has a direct effect on our cash flow. To the extent plan assets are insufficient to cover existing liabilities, higher levels of contributions may be required. As a result, deficits in those pension plans could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operations and prospects.
Supply Chain2 | 5.6%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
We have significant exposure to counterparty risk
We are exposed to counterparties that are involved in virtually all major industries, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in financial services, including brokers and dealers, central clearing counterparties, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default by our counterparty or client. Our ability to engage in routine transactions to fund our operations and manage our risks could be materially adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial services institutions. Financial institutions are necessarily interdependent because of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. As a consequence, a default by, or decline in market confidence in, individual institutions, or anxiety about the financial services industry generally, can lead to further individual and/or systemic difficulties, defaults and losses. Mandatory central clearing of OTC derivatives poses risks to the Group. As a clearing member, we are required to underwrite losses incurred at a central counterparty by the default of other clearing members and their clients. Increased moves towards central clearing brings with it a further element of interconnectedness between clearing members and clients that we believe may increase rather than reduce our exposure to systemic risk. At the same time, our ability to manage such risk ourselves will be reduced because control has been largely outsourced to central counterparties, and it is unclear at present how, at a time of stress, regulators and resolution authorities will intervene. Where bilateral counterparty risk has been mitigated by taking collateral, our credit risk may remain high if the collateral we hold cannot be realised or has to be liquidated at prices that are insufficient to recover the full amount of our loan or derivative exposure. There is a risk that collateral cannot be realised, including situations where this arises by change of law that may influence our ability to foreclose on collateral or otherwise enforce contractual rights. The Group also has credit exposure arising from mitigants, such as credit default swaps, and other credit derivatives, each of which is carried at fair value. The risk of default by counterparties to credit default swaps and other credit derivatives used as mitigants affects the fair value of these instruments depending on the valuation and the perceived credit risk of the underlying instrument against which protection has been purchased. Any such adjustments or fair value changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Supply Chain - Risk 2
Our operations utilise third-party suppliers and service providers
HSBC relies on third parties to supply goods and services. The use of third-party service providers by financial institutions is of particular focus to global regulators. This includes how outsourcing decisions are made, how key relationships are managed and our understanding of third party dependencies and their impact on service provision. The inadequate management of third-party risk could impact our ability to meet strategic, regulatory and client expectations. This may lead to a range of impacts, including regulatory censure, civil penalties or damage both to shareholder value and to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and strategy.
Costs1 | 2.8%
Costs - Risk 1
Our insurance businesses are subject to risks relating to insurance claim rates and changes in insurance customer behaviour
We provide various insurance products for customers with whom we have a banking relationship, including several types of life insurance products. The cost of claims and benefits can be influenced by many factors, including mortality and morbidity rates, lapse and surrender rates and, if the policy has a savings element, the performance of assets to support the liabilities. Adverse developments in any of these factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 2/36 (6%)Below Sector Average
Cyber Security1 | 2.8%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
We remain susceptible to a wide range of cyber risks that impact and/or are facilitated by technology
The threat of cyber-attacks remains a concern for our organisation, as it does across the entire financial sector. Failure to protect our operations from cyber-attacks may result in financial loss, disruption for customers or a loss of data. This could negatively affect our reputation and ability to attract and retain customers, and as we continue to grow and digitise at scale, we may be exposed to new cyber threats. Adversaries attempt to achieve their objectives by compromising HSBC and related third party systems. They use techniques that include malware (including ransomware), exploitation of both known and unpublished (zero-day) vulnerabilities in vendor-supplied and HSBC-developed software, phishing emails, distributed denial of service, as well as potentially physical compromise of premises and coercion of staff. Our customers are also subject to these cyber-attack techniques. These techniques are constantly evolving and cyber-attacks are increasing in terms of frequency, sophistication, impact and severity. The Group, like other financial institutions, experiences numerous attempts to compromise its cyber security. We expect to continue to be the target of such attacks in the future. Cybersecurity risks will continue to increase, due to factors such as the increasing demand across the industry and customers’ expectations for the continued expansion of services delivered over the internet; increasing reliance on internet-based products, applications and data storage; and changes in ways of working by HSBC’s employees, contractors, third party service providers and suppliers and their sub-contractors in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. A failure in HSBC’s adherence to its cyber security policies, procedures or controls, employee malfeasance, or human, governance or technological error could also compromise HSBC’s ability to successfully defend against cyber-attacks. Should any of the aforementioned cybersecurity risks materialise, they could have a material adverse effect on our customers, business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, and reputation.
Technology1 | 2.8%
Technology - Risk 1
Our operations are highly dependent on our information technology systems
The reliability and security of the HSBC Group's information technology infrastructure is crucial to HSBC Group's provision of banking services and protecting the HSBC brand. The effective functioning of our payment systems, financial control, risk management, credit analysis and reporting, accounting, customer service and other information technology systems, as well as the communication networks between our branches and main data processing centres, are important to our operations. Critical system failure, prolonged service unavailability or a material breach of data security, particularly of confidential customer data, could compromise HSBC Group's ability to service its clients, could breach regulations and could cause long-term damage to our business and brand that could have a material adverse effect on the HSBC Group's business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 2/36 (6%)Below Sector Average
Competition1 | 2.8%
Competition - Risk 1
We operate in markets that are highly competitive
We compete with other financial institutions in a highly competitive industry that continues to undergo significant change as a result of financial regulatory reform, including Open Banking in the UK, as well as increased public scrutiny and a continued challenging macro-economic environment. We target internationally mobile clients who need sophisticated global solutions. We generally compete on the basis of the quality of our customer service; the wide variety of products and services that we can offer our customers; the ability of our products and services to satisfy our customers’ needs; the extensive distribution channels available for our customers;our innovation; and our reputation. Continued and increased competition in any one or all of these areas may negatively affect our market share and/or cause us to increase our capital investment in our businesses in order to remain competitive. Additionally, our products and services may not be accepted by our targeted clients. In many markets, there is increased competitive pressure to provide products and services at current or lower prices. Consequently, our ability to reposition or reprice our products and services from time to time may be limited, and could be influenced significantly by the actions of our competitors who may or may not charge similar fees for their products and services. Any changes in the types of products and services that we offer our customers, and/or the pricing for those products and services, could result in a loss of customers and market share. Further, new entrants to the market or new technologies challenge HSBC to continue to innovate and optimise to take advantage of new digital capabilities to best serve our customers, and adapt our products to attract and retain customers. We may not respond effectively to these competitive threats from existing and new competitors, and as a result may need to increase our investment in our business to modify or adapt our existing products and services or develop new products and services to respond to our customers’ needs. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and reputation.
Brand / Reputation1 | 2.8%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Our business has inherent reputational risk
Reputational risk is the risk of failing to meet stakeholder expectations as a result of any event, behaviour, action or inaction, either by HSBC, our employees or those with whom we are associated. Any material lapse in standards of integrity, compliance, customer service or operating efficiency may represent a potential reputational risk. Stakeholder expectations constantly evolve, and so reputational risk is dynamic and varies between geographical regions, groups and individuals. In addition, our business faces increasing scrutiny in respect to ESG related matters. If we fail to act responsibly, or to achieve our announced targets, commitments, goals or ambitions, in a number of areas, such as diversity and inclusion, climate change, sustainability, workplace conduct, human rights, and support for local communities, our reputation and the value of our brand may be negatively affected. Modern technologies, in particular online social media channels and other broadcast tools that facilitate communication with large audiences in short time frames and with minimal costs, may significantly enhance and accelerate the distribution and effect of damaging information and allegations. Reputational risk could also arise from negative public opinion about the actual, or perceived, manner in which we conduct our business activities, or our financial performance, as well as actual or perceived practices in banking and the financial services industry generally. Negative public opinion may adversely affect our ability to retain and attract customers, in particular, corporate and retail depositors, and to retain and motivate staff, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis