tiprankstipranks
Freddie Mac (FMCC)
OTHER OTC:FMCC
US Market

Freddie Mac (FMCC) Risk Analysis

Compare
703 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

Freddie Mac disclosed 35 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Freddie Mac reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q3, 2021

Risk Distribution
35Risks
51% Finance & Corporate
17% Macro & Political
11% Production
9% Ability to Sell
6% Tech & Innovation
6% Legal & Regulatory
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Freddie Mac Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q3, 2021

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 18 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 18 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
35
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
35
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Sep 2021
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Sep 2021
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 2
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 2
See the risk highlights of Freddie Mac in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 35

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 18/35 (51%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights1 | 2.9%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
The Purchase Agreement and the terms of the senior preferred stock significantly limit our business activities. In the event of non-compliance with any Purchase Agreement covenants, Treasury may be entitled to specific performance, damages, and other remedies, and if the corrective actions we were to take were determined by FHFA to be insufficient, FHFA could impose penalties on us or take other remedial actions.
The Purchase Agreement and the terms of the senior preferred stock place significant restrictions on our ability to manage our business, including limiting (i) our secondary market activities; (ii) the amount and type of single-family and multifamily loans we may acquire; (iii) the amount of indebtedness we may incur; (iv) the size of our mortgage-related investments portfolio; (v) our ability to maintain alignment and competitiveness with Fannie Mae issued UMBS; and (vi) our ability to pay dividends, transfer certain assets, raise capital, and pay down the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock. The Purchase Agreement prohibits us from taking a variety of actions without Treasury's consent. Treasury has the right to withhold its consent for any reason. The warrant held by Treasury, restrictions on our business under the Purchase Agreement, and the senior status and net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock could adversely affect our ability to attract capital from the private sector in the future, should we be in a position to do so. For more information, see Conservatorship and Related Matters - Freddie Mac's Future is Uncertain. In the event of non-compliance with any Purchase Agreement covenants, Treasury may be entitled to specific performance, damages, and other such remedies as may be available at law or in equity. In addition, if the corrective actions we were to take or plan to take to comply with such covenants were determined by FHFA to be insufficient or unsuccessful, FHFA could impose penalties on us or take other remedial action.
Accounting & Financial Operations3 | 8.6%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Our current Net Worth Amount may not be sufficient to absorb potential losses and could result in our having to request additional draws from Treasury in future periods.
As a result of the net worth sweep dividend requirement, from 2013 to 2017 we could not retain capital from the earnings generated by our business operations in excess of the applicable Capital Reserve Amount, which decreased by $600 million each year, from $3 billion in 2013 to $600 million in 2017. As a result of increases in the applicable Capital Reserve Amount since January 1, 2018, we have been able to retain earnings and build capital, and our Net Worth Amount was $16.4 billion as of December 31, 2020. If we were to have a net worth deficit in a future period as a result of significant future comprehensive losses, we would be required to draw funds from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement. A variety of factors could influence whether we could require a draw, including many of the other risk factors we have identified, as well as changes in tax rates and related changes in our deferred tax assets and reserves. Additional draws, which will decrease the amount of Treasury's remaining commitment under the Purchase Agreement, may result in reputational risk and add to the uncertainty regarding our long-term financial sustainability.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
Our loss mitigation activities may be unsuccessful or costly and may adversely affect our financial results.
Our loss mitigation activities may not be successful. The costs we incur related to loan modifications and other loss mitigation activities have been, and could continue to be, significant. For example, we generally bear the full cost of the monthly payment reductions related to modifications of loans we own or guarantee, as well as all applicable servicer incentive fees for our mortgage modifications. We could be required to make changes to our loss mitigation activities that could make these activities more costly to us. FHFA, as Conservator, may continue to issue directives and Advisory Bulletins to assist borrowers and align servicing practices for the GSEs. These directives could make these activities more costly to us, especially with regard to loan modification initiatives. FHFA may continue to issue these directives for a variety of reasons, including consumer relief and alignment of the prepayment behavior of our and Fannie Mae's respective UMBS. We have loans on trial period plans as required under certain loan modification programs. Some of these loans will fail to complete the trial period or fail to qualify for our other borrower assistance programs. For these loans, the trial period will have effectively delayed the foreclosure process and could increase our costs. Many of our HAMP loans, which initially were set at a below-market interest rate, have provisions for the interest rates to increase gradually until they reach the market rate that was in effect at the time of the modification. The resulting increase in the borrowers' payments may increase the risk that these borrowers will default. The type of loss mitigation activities we pursue could affect prepayments on our single-family securities (e.g., UMBS, 55-day MBS, PCs, and REMICs), which could affect the value of these securities or the earnings from mortgage-related assets in our Capital Markets segment mortgage investments portfolio. In addition, loss mitigation activities may adversely affect our ability to securitize, resecuritize, and sell the loans subject to those activities. We devote significant resources to our borrower assistance initiatives. The size and scope of these efforts may compete with other business opportunities or corporate initiatives. For more information on our loss mitigation activities, see MD&A - Our Business Segments - Single-Family Guarantee - Business Results - Loss Mitigation Activities and MD&A - Risk Management - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk - Engaging in Loss Mitigation Activities.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
We face risks and uncertainties associated with the models that we use to inform business and risk management decisions and for financial accounting and reporting purposes.
We use models to project significant factors in our businesses, including, but not limited to, interest rates and house prices under a variety of scenarios. We also use models to project borrower prepayment and default behavior and loss severity over long periods of time. Models are inherently imperfect predictors of actual results. There is inherent uncertainty associated with model projections of economic variables and the downstream projections of prepayment and default behavior dependent on these variables. Uncertainty and risks related to models may arise from a number of sources, including the following: n We could fail to design, implement, operate, adjust, or use our models as intended. We may fail to code a model correctly, we could use incorrect or insufficient data inputs or fail to fully understand the data inputs, or model implementation software could malfunction. We may not have performed user acceptance testing appropriately or correctly, including allowing sufficient testing time and resources and using the right subject matter experts before deploying the model. The complexity and interconnectivity of our models create additional risk regarding the accuracy of model output. We may not be able to deploy or update models in a timely manner. n When market conditions change in unforeseen ways, our model projections may not accurately reflect these conditions, or we may not fully understand the model outputs. For example, models may not fully reflect the effect of certain government policy changes or new industry trends. In such cases, it is often necessary to make assumptions and judgments to accommodate the effect of scenarios that are not sufficiently well represented in the historical data. While we may adjust our models in response to new events, considerable residual uncertainty remains. n We also use selected third-party models. While the use of such models may reduce our risk where no internal model is available, it exposes us to additional risk, as third parties typically do not provide us with proprietary information regarding their models. We have little control over the processes by which these models are adjusted or changed. As a result, we may be unable to fully evaluate the risks associated with the use of such models. Our use of models could affect decisions concerning the purchase, sale, securitization, and credit risk transfer of loans; the purchase and sale of securities; funding; the setting of guarantee fee prices; and the management of interest-rate, market, and credit risk. Our use of models also affects our quality-control sampling strategies for loans in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio and potential settlements with our counterparties. We also use models in our financial reporting process, including when measuring our allowance for credit losses and applying hedge accounting. See MD&A - Risk Management - Market Risk and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates for more information on our use of models.
Debt & Financing13 | 37.1%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
Any downgrade in the credit ratings of the U.S. government would likely be followed by a downgrade in our credit ratings. A downgrade in the credit ratings of our debt could adversely affect our liquidity and other aspects of our business.
Our credit ratings are important to our liquidity. We currently receive ratings for our unsecured debt from three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (S&P, Moody's, and Fitch). These ratings are primarily based on the support we receive from Treasury, and therefore are affected by changes in the credit ratings of the U.S. government. Any downgrade in the credit ratings of the U.S. government would be expected to be accompanied by a downgrade in our credit ratings. In addition to a downgrade in the credit ratings of or outlook on the U.S. government, several other events could adversely affect our debt credit ratings, including actions by governmental entities, changes in government support for us, future GAAP losses, and additional draws under the Purchase Agreement. Any such downgrades could lead to major disruptions in the mortgage and financial markets and to our business due to lower liquidity, higher borrowing costs, lower asset values, and higher credit losses, and could cause us to experience net losses and net worth deficits. For more information, see MD&A - Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Changes in interest rates could negatively affect the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, our results of operations, and our net worth.
Our financial results can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates. Interest rates can fluctuate for many reasons, including changes in the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies as well as geopolitical events or changes in general economic conditions. Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the cash flows and prepayment rates on assets that we own and related debt and derivatives. In addition, changes in interest rates could adversely affect the prepayment rate or default rate on the loans that we guarantee. For example: n When interest rates decrease, borrowers are more likely to prepay their loans by refinancing them at a lower rate. An increased likelihood of prepayment on the loans underlying our mortgage-related securities may adversely affect the value of these securities. n When interest rates increase: l Borrowers with higher risk adjustable-rate loans may have fewer opportunities to refinance into fixed-rate loans and l A borrower's payments on loans with adjustable payment terms, including any additional debt obligations (such as home equity lines of credit and second liens) with such terms, may increase, which in turn increases the risk that the borrower may default on a loan we own or guarantee. Additionally, we issue callable debt instruments to manage the duration and prepayment risk of expected cash flows of the mortgage assets we own. We may exercise the option to repay the outstanding principal balance when interest rates decrease. However, we may replace the called debt at a higher spread rate due to the market conditions at that time. In the event we decide not to call our debt, we may incur higher hedging costs. We incur costs as a result of our risk management activities, which may not be successful. Our interest-rate risk management activities are designed to reduce our economic exposure to changes in interest rates to a low level as measured by our models. However the accounting treatment for certain of our assets and liabilities, including derivatives, creates variability in our earnings that may not be indicative of the economics of our business when interest rates fluctuate, as some assets and liabilities are measured at amortized cost and some are measured at fair value, while all derivatives are measured at fair value. In addition, differences in amortization between our assets and the liabilities we use to fund them, including amortization of fair value hedging basis adjustments, may also contribute to earnings variability. We use hedge accounting for certain single-family mortgage loans and long-term debt, which is intended to reduce the interest-rate volatility in our GAAP earnings. Our single-family mortgage hedge accounting program is complex and unique in the industry. We may fail to properly execute this program and related changes to systems and processes. Even if implemented properly, our hedge accounting programs may not be effective in reducing earnings volatility, and our hedges may fail in any given future period, which could expose us to significant earnings variability in that period.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
The expected discontinuance of LIBOR could negatively affect the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, results of operations, and net worth. A transition to an alternative reference interest rate could present operational problems and subject us to possible litigation risk. We may be unable to take a consistent approach across our financial products.
We are not able to predict whether LIBOR will actually cease to exist in the future, whether SOFR will become the market-accepted benchmark in its place, or what impact such a transition may have on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In early December 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, began a consultation on its intention to cease the publication of the most relevant tenors of U.S. Dollar LIBOR after June 2023. The transition from LIBOR could affect the financial performance of instruments we hold, require changes to hedging strategies, and adversely affect our financial performance. For example, if for market or regulatory reasons we are required to prematurely unwind our existing LIBOR-based derivatives or are not allowed to engage in new LIBOR-based derivatives without adequate liquidity in alternate indices such as SOFR, we may incur economic costs. We have various financial products, including mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities, and derivatives, that are tied to LIBOR, and many of these products will mature after June 2023. While the documentation for certain of these products provides us with discretion to select an alternative reference rate if LIBOR is discontinued, there is a possibility of disputes arising with investors and counterparties concerning our exercise of this discretion. In certain cases, the documentation may not provide us with discretion to select an alternative reference rate if LIBOR is discontinued or our discretion may be limited, creating uncertainty and the risk of legal disputes. These potential challenges in implementing an alternative reference rate could result in investors and counterparties acquiring fewer products and entering into fewer transactions, which could adversely affect our business. The large volume of products and transactions that may require changes to documentation or remediation could present substantial operational and legal challenges and result in significant costs. We may be unable to have a consistent approach to a LIBOR transition, including within a particular class of products, which could disrupt the market for that product. It is possible that actions we take in connection with the discontinuance of LIBOR, including the adoption of SOFR or an alternative reference rate for certain products, could subject us to basis risk, monetary losses, and possible litigation. The use of SOFR as the alternative reference rate for LIBOR-based products may present certain market concerns. Among the concerns, a term structure for SOFR has not yet been developed and there is not yet a generally accepted or endorsed methodology for adjusting SOFR for all our products so that it will be substantially comparable to LIBOR. SOFR represents an overnight, risk-free rate, whereas LIBOR has various tenors and reflects a credit risk component. There is no guarantee that a market-accepted term structure for SOFR will exist prior to the expected discontinuance of LIBOR. It is still uncertain how soon widespread market adoption of SOFR will occur. As described above, we have identified material exposures to LIBOR but cannot reasonably estimate the expected impact of such exposure. For additional information regarding the actions we have taken to prepare for an orderly transition from LIBOR, see MD&A - Risk Management - Market Risk - Transition from LIBOR.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Our activities may be adversely affected by limited availability of financing and increased funding costs.
The amount, type, and cost of our unsecured funding directly affects our interest expense and results of operations. A number of factors could make such financing more difficult to obtain, more expensive, or unavailable on any terms, including market and other factors; changes in U.S. government support for us; and reduced demand for our debt securities.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
We have been, and will continue to be, adversely affected by delays and deficiencies in the single-family foreclosure process.
The average length of time for foreclosure of a Freddie Mac single-family loan has significantly increased since 2008, particularly in states that require a judicial foreclosure process, and may further increase. Delays in the foreclosure process could: n Cause our expenses to increase. For example, properties awaiting foreclosure could deteriorate until we acquire them, resulting in increased expenses to repair and maintain the properties and n Adversely affect trends in house prices regionally or nationally, which could adversely affect our financial results.
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
We are exposed to increased credit losses and credit-related expenses in the event of a major natural disaster, other catastrophic event, including a pandemic, or significant climate change effects.
The occurrence, severity, and duration of a major natural or environmental disaster or other catastrophic event, including a pandemic, as well as significant climate change effects such as rising sea levels or wildfires, in an area where we own or guarantee mortgage loans or REO properties, especially in densely populated geographic areas, could increase our credit losses and credit related expenses. A natural disaster or catastrophic event or other significant climate change effect that either damages or destroys single-family or multifamily real estate underlying mortgage loans or REO properties we own or guarantee, or negatively affects the ability of borrowers to continue to make payments on mortgage loans we own or guarantee, could increase our serious delinquency rates and average loan loss severity in the affected areas. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. We may not have adequate insurance coverage for some of these natural, catastrophic, or climate change-related events.
Debt & Financing - Risk 7
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk with respect to our business counterparties. Our financial results may be adversely affected if one or more of our counterparties fail to meet their contractual obligations to us.
We depend on our institutional counterparties to provide services that are critical to our business. We face the risk that one or more of our counterparties may fail to meet their contractual obligations to us. Our major counterparties include seller/servicers, credit enhancement providers, and counterparties to derivatives, short-term lending, and other funding transactions (e.g., cash and other investments transactions). For more information, see MD&A - Counterparty Credit Risk. Many of our major counterparties provide several types of services to us. The concentration of our exposure to our counterparties remains high. Efforts we take to reduce exposure to financially weak counterparties could increase the relative concentration of our exposure to other counterparties, increase our costs, and reduce our revenue. It is possible that our counterparties could experience challenging market conditions that could adversely affect their liquidity and financial condition and cause some of them to fail. Many of our counterparties are subject to increasingly complex regulatory requirements and oversight, which place additional stress on their resources and may affect their ability or willingness to do business with us.
Debt & Financing - Risk 8
Credit risk related to single-family seller/servicers
We are exposed to credit risk from the seller/servicers of our single-family loans, as described below. n A decline in servicing performance - A decline in a servicer's performance, such as delayed foreclosures or missed opportunities for loan modifications, could significantly affect our ability to mitigate credit losses and could affect the overall credit performance of our single-family credit guarantee portfolio. A large volume of seriously delinquent loans, the complexity of the servicing function, and heightened liquidity requirements are significant factors contributing to the risk of a decline in performance by servicers. Servicers may experience financial and other difficulties due to the advances they are required to make to us on delinquent single-family mortgages, including mortgages subject to forbearance plans. We could be adversely affected if our servicers lack appropriate controls, experience a failure in their controls, or experience a disruption in their ability to service loans, including as a result of legal or regulatory actions or ratings downgrades. We also are exposed to fraud by third parties in the loan servicing function, particularly with respect to short sales and other dispositions of non-performing assets. We could attempt to mitigate our exposure to a poorly performing servicer by terminating its right to service our loans; however, in a highly adverse economic environment, there could be a scarce capacity in the marketplace and we may not be able to find successor servicers who have the capacity to service the affected loans and who are also willing to assume the representations and warranties of the terminated servicer. In addition, terminating a large servicer may not be feasible because of the operational and capacity challenges related to transferring large servicing portfolios. There is also a possibility that the performance of some loans may degrade during the transition to new servicers. During a period of heightened delinquencies, we may incur costs and potential increases in servicing fees if we replace a servicer with a high concentration of loans in default which are more costly to service. We may also be exposed to concentrations of credit risk among certain servicers. n A failure by seller/servicers to fulfill their obligations to repurchase loans or indemnify us as a result of breaches of representations and warranties - While we may have the contractual right to require a seller or servicer to repurchase loans from us, it may be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to enforce such repurchase obligations. We could enter into settlements to resolve repurchase obligations; however, the amounts we receive under any such settlements may be less than the losses we ultimately incur on the underlying loans. Under our representation and warranty framework, revised as directed by FHFA, we are required in some cases to utilize an alternative remedy, such as indemnification, in lieu of repurchase. The amount we recover under an alternative remedy may be less than the amount we could have recovered in a repurchase. n Increased exposure to non-depository and smaller financial institutions - A large and increasing volume of our single-family loans is acquired from and serviced by non-depository and smaller financial institutions. Some of these institutions may not have the same financial strength or operational capacity, or be subject to the same level of regulatory oversight, as large depository institutions. As a result, we face increased risk that these counterparties could fail to perform their obligations to us. In particular, non-depository servicers rapidly grew their servicing portfolios in the last several years. This appears to have resulted in operational strains that have subjected some of these servicers to regulatory scrutiny. This rapid growth could expose us to increased risks if any operational strain adversely affects these servicers' servicing performance or their financial strength. These institutions also service portfolios for other investors and guarantors and operational issues related to those portfolios could affect the performance of our portfolio. In addition, these servicers may not always have ready access to appropriate sources of liquidity to finance their operations, particularly during periods when the mortgage market is experiencing a downturn. If these servicers reduce their servicing portfolios, overall servicing capacity may be constrained. Our seller/servicers also have a significant role in servicing loans in our multifamily mortgage portfolio. We are exposed to the risk that multifamily seller/servicers could come under financial pressure, which could potentially cause a decline in their servicing performance and cause us to terminate their right to service our loans, potentially resulting in further concentration of exposure to other seller/servicers. We are also exposed to settlement risk on the non-performance of sellers and servicers as a result of our forward settlement loan purchase programs in our single-family and multifamily businesses.
Debt & Financing - Risk 9
Credit risk related to counterparties to derivatives, funding, short-term lending, securities, and other transactions
We have significant exposure to institutions in the financial services industry relating to derivatives, funding, short-term lending, securities, securities purchased under agreements to resell, secured lending transactions and forward settlement of our loans and securities, and other transactions (e.g., cash and other investments transactions). These transactions are critical to our business, including our ability to: n Manage interest-rate risk and other risks related to our investments in mortgage-related assets; n Fund our business operations; and n Service our customers. We face the risk of operational failure of the clearing members, exchanges, clearinghouses, or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate derivatives, short-term lending, securities, and other transactions. If a clearing member or clearinghouse were to fail, we could lose the collateral or margin posted with the clearing member or clearinghouse. We are a clearing member of the clearinghouses through which we execute mortgage-related and Treasury securities transactions. As a result, we could be subject to losses because we are required to participate in the coverage of losses incurred by other clearing members if they fail to meet their obligations to the clearinghouse. If our counterparties to short-term lending transactions fail, we are exposed to losses to the extent the transaction is unsecured or the collateral posted to us is insufficient.
Debt & Financing - Risk 10
Credit risk related to credit enhancement providers
If a mortgage insurer fails to meet its obligations to reimburse us for claims, our credit losses could increase. In addition, if a regulator determines that a mortgage insurer lacks sufficient capital to pay all claims when due, the regulator could take action that might affect the timing and amount of claim payments made to us. We face similar risks with respect to our counterparties on ACIS transactions. We cannot differentiate pricing based on the strength of a mortgage insurer or revoke a mortgage insurer's status as an eligible insurer without FHFA approval. In addition, we generally do not select the mortgage insurance provider on a specific loan because the selection is usually made by the lender at the time the loan is originated. As a result, we could acquire a concentration of risk to certain insurance providers. We continue to acquire new loans with mortgage insurance from mortgage insurers that have credit ratings below investment grade.
Debt & Financing - Risk 11
We are subject to mortgage credit risk. Credit losses and costs related to this risk could adversely affect our financial results.
Mortgage credit risk is the risk that a borrower will fail to make timely payments on a loan we own or guarantee. This exposes us to the risk of credit losses and credit-related expenses, which could adversely affect our financial results. We are primarily exposed to mortgage credit risk with respect to the single-family and multifamily loans and securities reflected as assets on our consolidated balance sheets. We are also exposed to mortgage credit risk with respect to guaranteed securities and guarantee arrangements that are not reflected as assets on our consolidated balance sheets, including K Certificates, SB Certificates, and certain senior subordinate securitization structures. We continue to have loans in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio with certain characteristics, such as Alt-A loans, interest-only loans, option ARM loans, loans with original LTV ratios greater than 90%, and loans to borrowers with credit scores less than 620 at the time of origination, that expose us to greater credit risk than other types of loans. See MD&A - Risk Management - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk - Monitoring Loan Performance and Characteristics. We also expect to continue acquiring loans with higher LTV ratios through our Home Possible and Home One initiatives, as well as loans with higher DTI ratios, generally up to 50%, which will increase our exposure to credit risk. Our efforts to increase eligible borrowers' access to single-family mortgage credit, including our affordable housing program and our plan for fulfilling our duty to serve underserved markets, expose us to increased mortgage credit risk.
Debt & Financing - Risk 12
We face significant risks related to our delegated underwriting process for single-family loans, including risks related to data accuracy, mortgage fraud, and our sellers' origination operations. Changes to the process could increase our risks.
We delegate to our sellers the underwriting for the single-family loans we purchase or securitize. Our contracts with sellers describe mortgage eligibility and underwriting standards, and the sellers represent and warrant to us that the loans they deliver to us meet these standards. We rely on the strength of our sellers' origination processes and controls. We perform risk-based audits to test our counterparties' control environments. However, our review may not detect weak operations that could lead to errors in seller decisions like correspondent approvals, property valuations, and insurance coverage. We do not independently verify most of the information provided to us before we purchase or securitize a loan. This exposes us to the risk that one or more of the parties involved in a transaction (such as the borrower, property seller, broker, appraiser, title agent, loan officer, or lender) misrepresented facts about the borrower, property, or loan, or otherwise engaged in fraud. We review a sample of loans after we purchase them to determine if they comply with our contractual standards. However, our review may not detect any misrepresentations by the parties involved in the transaction, deter loan fraud, or reduce our exposure to these risks. We can exercise certain contractual remedies, including requiring repurchase of the loan, for loans that do not meet our standards. However, at the direction of FHFA, we have significantly revised our representation and warranty framework (including changes to remedies for certain defects) to relieve sellers of certain repurchase obligations in specific cases with respect to single-family loans. As a result, we may face greater exposure to credit and other losses under this revised framework, because our ability to seek recovery or repurchase from sellers is more limited and we must identify breaches of representations and warranties early in the life of the loan. Our suite of tools, collectively referred to as Loan Advisor, offers limited representation and warranty relief for certain loan components that satisfy automated data analytics related to appraisal quality, collateral valuation, borrower assets, and borrower income. In general, limited representation and warranty relief is offered when information provided by the lender is validated against independent data sources. However, there is a risk that the enhanced tools and processes provided by Loan Advisor will not enable us to identify all breaches in a timely manner. In turn, this could increase our exposure to credit and other losses. For more information, see MD&A - Risk Management - Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk.
Debt & Financing - Risk 13
If FHFA placed us into receivership, our assets would be liquidated. The liquidation proceeds might not be sufficient to pay claims outstanding against Freddie Mac, repay the liquidation preference of our preferred stock, or make any distribution to our common stockholders.
We can be put into receivership at the discretion of the Director of FHFA at any time for a number of reasons set forth in the GSE Act. Several bills were introduced in past sessions of Congress that provided for Freddie Mac to be placed into receivership. In addition, FHFA could be required to place us into receivership if Treasury were unable to provide us with funding requested under the Purchase Agreement to address a deficit in our net worth. Treasury might not be able to provide the requested funding if, for example, the U.S. government were not fully operational because Congress had failed to approve funding or the government had reached its borrowing limit. For more information, see MD&A - Regulation and Supervision. Being placed into receivership would terminate the conservatorship. The purpose of receivership is to liquidate our assets and resolve claims against us. The appointment of FHFA as our receiver would terminate all rights and claims that our stockholders and creditors might have against our assets or under our Charter as a result of their status as stockholders or creditors, other than possible payment upon our liquidation. The GSE Act provides that, if we were placed into receivership, the receiver would hold the mortgages underlying our mortgage-related securities (and the payments thereon) for the benefit of the holders of those securities. However, payments on the mortgages underlying our mortgage-related securities might not be sufficient to make full payments of principal and interest on the securities. If we were unable to fulfill our guarantee, the holders of our mortgage-related securities would experience delays in receiving payments because the relevant systems are not designed to make partial payments. If our assets were liquidated, the liquidation proceeds might not be sufficient to pay the secured and unsecured claims against us (including claims on our guarantees), repay the liquidation preference on any series of our preferred stock, or make any distribution to our common stockholders. Proceeds would first be applied to the secured and unsecured claims against us, the administrative expenses of the receiver, and the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock. Any remaining proceeds would then be available to repay the liquidation preference of other series of preferred stock. Only after the liquidation preference of all series of preferred stock is repaid would any proceeds be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock.
Corporate Activity and Growth1 | 2.9%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
We may make certain changes to our business in an attempt to meet our housing goals and duty to serve requirements, which may adversely affect our profitability.
We may make adjustments to our loan sourcing and purchase strategies in an effort to meet our housing goals and subgoals, including modifying some of our underwriting standards and expanding the use of targeted initiatives to reach underserved populations. For example, we may purchase loans that offer lower expected returns on our investment and potentially increase our exposure to credit losses. We may also make changes to our business in response to our duty to serve underserved markets that could adversely affect our profitability. If we do not meet our housing goals or duty to serve requirements, and FHFA finds that the goals or requirements were feasible, we may become subject to a housing plan that could require us to take additional steps that could potentially adversely affect our profitability. At this time, based on preliminary information, we believe we met four of our five single-family goals and all three of our multifamily goals. We expect that FHFA will make a final determination on our 2020 performance following the release of market data in 2021. In addition, our risk appetite constraints may make it difficult for us to meet our affordable housing goals in the future.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 6/35 (17%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment2 | 5.7%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Freddie Mac's future is uncertain.
Our future structure and role will be determined by the Administration, Congress, and FHFA, and it is possible, and perhaps likely, that there will be significant changes beyond the near-term that will materially affect our role in the mortgage industry, business model, structure, and results of operations. Some or all of our functions could be transferred to other institutions, and we could cease to exist as a stockholder-owned company. If any of these events occur, our shares could diminish in value, or cease to have any value. Our stockholders may not receive any compensation for such loss in value. Several bills have been introduced in past sessions of Congress concerning the future status of Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and the mortgage finance system, including bills which provided for the wind down of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and modification of the terms of the Purchase Agreement. While none of these bills has been enacted, it is possible that similar or new bills will be introduced and considered in the future. On January 14, 2021, Treasury released a blueprint on next steps for GSE reform, which includes building equity capital, determining capital structure, setting a commitment fee for ongoing government support, establishing appropriate pricing oversight, and assessing appropriate market concentration. The blueprint states that while Treasury will continue to evaluate potential administrative actions to end our conservatorship, Congress is best positioned to adopt comprehensive housing finance reform. The goals of the current Congress and Administration with respect to the Enterprises and housing market reform are unclear. The conservatorship is indefinite in duration. The timing, likelihood, and circumstances under which we might emerge from conservatorship are uncertain. Under the Purchase Agreement, as amended by the January 2021 Letter Agreement, we cannot exit from conservatorship, other than in connection with receivership, unless all currently pending material litigation relating to the conservatorship and/or the Purchase Agreement has been resolved or settled and for two or more consecutive periods we have common equity tier 1 capital (which does not include our senior preferred stock) of at least 3% of our adjusted total assets. While we will continue to increase our capital level as a result of the increase in the applicable Capital Reserve Amount under the Purchase Agreement, the increases in our capital level since September 30, 2019 have been or will be added to the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock. In addition, our ability to increase our capital, other than through retained earnings, is limited, and it may not be possible for us to raise private capital on acceptable terms, if at all. We are permitted to raise up to $70.0 billion to build capital through the issuance of common stock only after Treasury has exercised in full its warrant to purchase 79.9% of our common stock and pending material conservatorship-related litigation has been resolved or settled. Treasury’s potential substantial equity ownership in our company, along with new or increased restrictions imposed on our business, and post-recapitalization dividends and fees we will be required to pay to Treasury, will reduce our attractiveness as an investment opportunity for third-party investors. It is uncertain whether or when we will be able to retain or raise sufficient capital to permit an end to our conservatorship, and this may not happen for several years or at all. For additional information on the January 2021 Letter Agreement, see MD&A – Regulation and Supervision – January 2021 Letter Agreement with Treasury. Treasury would be required to consent to the termination of our conservatorship other than as discussed above, and there can be no assurance Treasury would do so. Even if the conservatorship is terminated, we would remain subject to the Purchase Agreement and the terms of the senior preferred stock unless they are terminated or amended. It is possible that the conservatorship could end with our being placed into receivership. Even if the conservatorship ends and the voting rights of common stockholders are restored, we could effectively remain under the control of the U.S. government because of the Purchase Agreement, Treasury's warrant to acquire nearly 80% of our common stock for nominal consideration, or Treasury’s ownership of our common stock after it exercises its warrant. If Treasury exercises the warrant, the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders will be substantially diluted.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
Our CRT transactions may not be available to us in adverse economic conditions. These transactions also lower our profitability.
Our ability to transfer credit risk (and the cost to us of doing so) could change rapidly depending on market conditions. Adverse market conditions may result in insufficient investor demand for CRT transactions at acceptable prices. It is possible that our CRT strategies may not prevent us from incurring substantial losses. Some of our CRT transactions have termination dates that are earlier than the maturities of the reference mortgage loans, and we are exposed to credit risk on those mortgage loans after termination of such transactions. The costs associated with CRT transactions are significant and may increase. For some CRT transactions, there may be a significant difference in time between when we recognize a credit loss in earnings and when we recognize the related recovery in earnings, and this lag could adversely affect our financial results in the earlier period. In addition, the implementation of the ERCF or additional guidance from FHFA may cause us to modify our credit risk transfer activities and could affect our risk appetite and our capital requirements. For more information regarding these transactions, see Note 8.
Natural and Human Disruptions1 | 2.9%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly and adversely affected general economic conditions and the housing market. These adverse changes, as well as the effects of actions taken in response to the pandemic, such as forbearance for Freddie Mac-owned mortgages and other relief measures, have significantly and adversely affected our business, results of operations, and financial condition and elevated our credit, market, and operational risk levels in 2020 and will likely continue to do so in 2021, and perhaps beyond.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Freddie Mac has taken several steps to support the mortgage market, such as forbearance for Freddie Mac-owned mortgages and other measures to assist homeowners, renters, multifamily property owners, lenders, and sellers. For additional information on our relief efforts, see MD&A - Introduction - COVID-19 Pandemic Response Efforts. These actions may not be successful and may negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations, perhaps significantly. Borrowers that obtain forbearance may be unable to resume making payments on their mortgage loans at the end of the forbearance period, which could result in losses. We expect serious delinquency rates and the volume of loss mitigation activity to remain elevated as a result of the pandemic and our forbearance programs, and we expect to advance significant amounts to cover principal and interest payments to security holders for loans in forbearance in the coming months. The pandemic and forbearance programs have caused a significant increase in our allowance for credit losses. Estimates of expected credit losses are subject to significant uncertainty and may increase in the future depending on the depth and severity of the economic downturn caused by the pandemic. The government has taken several actions to provide relief to those negatively affected by COVID-19, such as direct payments and federal unemployment insurance. In addition, the Federal Reserve has supported the financial markets, including by purchasing Freddie Mac mortgage-related securities. If the Federal Reserve discontinued or lessened this support, it could negatively affect our financial position and results of operations. For additional information on federal government relief efforts, see MD&A - Introduction - COVID-19 Pandemic Response Efforts. Current and future government relief efforts taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may provide insufficient support for the economy and the housing market. Our credit risk and market risk levels have increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and may increase further depending on the duration and severity of the pandemic. For example: n Our mortgage credit risk level is heightened, as a result of increased forbearance, modifications, and defaults due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These trends have adversely affected our results of operations through increased expected credit losses and are expected to continue. Payment defaults on mortgages could result in accelerated prepayments of certain of our securities as a result of our repurchase practices relating to seriously delinquent mortgages and mortgage modifications, foreclosures, and workouts. n Our ability to transfer single-family credit risk was, and may in the future be, negatively affected by adverse market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. n We generally fund our obligations to advance principal and interest to security holders for loans in forbearance and our purchase of delinquent and modified loans from our securities trusts through debt issuances. Depending on the extent of forbearance and delinquencies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible that we may not be able to meet our contractual obligations as a result of the aggregate indebtedness limit and mortgage-related investments portfolio limit under the Purchase Agreement, without breaching limits or obtaining the prior written consent of Treasury and FHFA to increase these limits. n Increased market instability and uncertainty associated with the volume of loans we may purchase from trusts may adversely affect our ability to hedge, and demand for Freddie Mac securities, other than from the Federal Reserve, may decrease substantially. Our operational risk level has increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Freddie Mac has instituted temporary operational changes, such as shifting to remote work for the majority of our employees. While we have not experienced material impacts to operations, it is possible that certain procedures we have in place to monitor our employees may not be effective, or any significant technological or infrastructure-related disruptions during this period of remote work could adversely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented potential risks to staffing, such as stress on our workforce as a result of home schooling, caring for themselves and loved ones, and potential burnout, and it is possible that key employees or a significant number of employees may be adversely affected by the virus. In addition, model risk levels are heightened. There is an increased degree of uncertainty concerning key inputs into our financial cash flows, such as projections of mortgage interest rates, house prices, credit defaults, negative yields, prepayments, and interest rates, and we expect our models to face significant challenges in accurately forecasting these inputs. We are attempting to mitigate this increased risk by applying model overlays and adjustments, where deemed appropriate, but these adjustments have an element of subjectivity, and are based upon difficult and complex judgments. Actual results could differ from our estimates, and the use of different judgments and assumptions related to these estimates could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. For additional information on operational risk, see MD&A - Risk Management - Operational Risk.
Capital Markets3 | 8.6%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Market and Other Factors
Our ability to obtain funding in the public unsecured debt markets or by selling or pledging mortgage-related and other securities as collateral to other institutions could change rapidly or cease. The cost of available funding could increase significantly due to changes in interest rates, market confidence, operational risks, regulatory requirements, or other factors. Prolonged wide market spreads on long-term debt could cause us to reduce our long-term debt issuances and increase our reliance on short-term and callable debt issuances. Such increased reliance on short-term and callable debt could increase the risk that we may be unable to refinance our debt when it becomes due and result in a greater use of derivatives. Greater derivatives use could increase the variability of our comprehensive income or increase our credit exposure to our counterparties. Additionally, we may incur higher hedging costs in the event we decide not to call our debt. We may incur higher funding costs due to our liquidity management requirements, practices, and procedures. For example, in June 2020, FHFA provided us with updated minimum short-, medium-, and long-term liquidity requirements. These updated requirements have been effective since December 1, 2020, and are more stringent than our previous liquidity requirements and result in higher funding costs. In addition, the updated requirements have impacted the size and the allowable investments in our other investments portfolio. Our practices and procedures may not provide us with sufficient liquidity to meet our ongoing cash obligations under all circumstances. In particular, we believe that our liquidity contingency plans may be inadequate or difficult to execute during a liquidity crisis or period of significant market turmoil. If we cannot access the unsecured debt markets, our ability to repay maturing indebtedness and fund our operations could be significantly impaired or eliminated, as our alternative sources of liquidity (e.g., cash and other investments) may not be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. We have limited ability to use the less liquid assets in our mortgage-related investments portfolio as a significant source of liquidity (e.g., through sales or as collateral in secured borrowing transactions). We make extensive use of the Federal Reserve's payment system in our business activities. The Federal Reserve requires that we fully fund accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to the extent necessary to cover cash payments on our debt and mortgage-related securities each day, before the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, acting as our fiscal agent, will initiate such payments. Although we seek to maintain sufficient intraday liquidity to fund our activities through the Federal Reserve's payment system, we have limited access to cash once the debt markets are closed for the day. Insufficient cash may cause our account to be overdrawn, potentially resulting in penalties and reputational harm. Unlike certain of our competitors, we do not have access to the Federal Reserve's discount window.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
If the UMBS does not continue to receive widespread market acceptance, the liquidity and price performance of our single-family mortgage-related securities and our market share and profitability could be adversely affected. Commingling certain Fannie Mae securities in resecuritizations has increased our counterparty risk.
As part of the combined UMBS market, we have been required by FHFA to align certain of our single-family mortgage purchase offerings, servicing, and securitization programs, policies and practices with Fannie Mae to achieve market acceptance of the UMBS. We cannot provide any assurance that these efforts will reduce the pricing disparities discussed above over the long-term. Aligning prepayment outcomes of Freddie Mac UMBS with Fannie Mae UMBS is the focus of the FHFA Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security Final Rule issued in February 2019. This alignment is more challenging during periods of increased refinances, automation, innovation, and change in the industry, which we experienced in 2020. These alignment activities may adversely affect our business and our ability to compete with Fannie Mae. We may be required to further align our business processes with those of Fannie Mae. Uncertainty concerning the extent of the alignment between Freddie Mac's and Fannie Mae's mortgage purchase, servicing, and securitization programs, policies, and practices may affect the degree to which the UMBS receives widespread market acceptance. If investors do not continue to accept the fungibility of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae UMBS and instead prefer Fannie Mae UMBS over Freddie Mac UMBS, it could have a significant adverse impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition, net worth, and results of operations, and could affect the liquidity or market value of our single-family mortgage-related securities. We have counterparty credit exposure to Fannie Mae due to investors' ability to commingle certain Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae securities in resecuritizations. When we resecuritize Fannie Mae securities, our guarantee of timely principal and interest extends to the underlying Fannie Mae securities. In the event Fannie Mae were to fail to make a payment on a Fannie Mae security that we resecuritized, Freddie Mac would be responsible for making the payment. We do not control or limit the amount of resecuritized Fannie Mae securities that we could be required to guarantee. We are dependent on FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Treasury (pursuant to Fannie Mae's and our respective Purchase Agreements with Treasury) to avoid a liquidity event or default. We have not modified our liquidity strategies to address the possibility of non-timely payment by Fannie Mae, but we may do so in the future. We and Fannie Mae both rely on the Federal Reserve Banks to make payments on our respective mortgage-related securities. As noted above, in the event Fannie Mae were to fail to make a payment on a Fannie Mae security that we resecuritized, Freddie Mac would be responsible for providing the Federal Reserve Banks with the funds to make the payment. If we failed to provide the Federal Reserve Banks with all funds to make such payment on such resecuritized Fannie Mae securities, the Federal Reserve Banks would not make any payment on any of our outstanding Freddie Mac-issued UMBS, Supers, REMICs, or other securities to be paid on that payment date, regardless of whether such Freddie Mac-issued securities were backed by Fannie Mae-issued securities.
Capital Markets - Risk 3
Changes in market spreads could negatively affect the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, our results of operations, and net worth.
Changes in market conditions, including changes in interest rates, liquidity, prepayment, and/or default expectations and the level of uncertainty in the market for a particular asset class, may cause fluctuations in market spreads (also referred to as OAS). Our financial results and net worth can be significantly affected by changes in market spreads, especially results driven by financial instruments that are measured at fair value. These instruments include trading securities, available-for-sale securities, derivatives, loans held-for-sale, and loans and debt with the fair value option elected. A widening of the market spreads on a given asset is typically associated with a decline in the fair value of that asset or tightening of the market spread on a given liability is typically associated with a decline in the fair value of that liability, which may adversely affect our near-term financial results and net worth. While wider market spreads may create favorable investment opportunities, our ability to take advantage of any such opportunities is limited due to various restrictions on our mortgage-related investments portfolio activities. See MD&A - Conservatorship and Related Matters. A narrowing or tightening of the market spreads on a given asset is typically associated with an increase in the fair value of that asset. Narrowing market spreads may reduce the number of attractive investment opportunities and could increase the cost of our activities to support the liquidity and price performance of our UMBS and other securities. Consequently, a tightening of the market spreads on our assets may adversely affect our future financial results and net worth. Changes in market spreads also affect the fair value of our debt with the fair value option elected. A narrowing or tightening of the market spreads on a given liability is typically associated with an increase in the fair value of that liability, which is recognized as a loss by us.
Production
Total Risks: 4/35 (11%)Above Sector Average
Employment / Personnel1 | 2.9%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
Our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are unable to attract and retain well-qualified, talented employees across the company. The conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and limitations on our compensation structure may put us at a disadvantage compared to other companies in attracting and retaining employees.
Our business is highly dependent on the talents and efforts of our employees. We face competition, particularly from the financial services and technology industries, for qualified talent. If we are unable to attract and retain talent, we increase our risk of operational failures. Restrictions on employee compensation have been and may be imposed on us, while we remain in conservatorship, by Congress, FHFA, or Treasury. For example, FHFA as Conservator has the authority to approve the terms and amount of our executive compensation and may require us to make changes to our executive and employee compensation programs. For example, FHFA has imposed limits on executive and employee compensation and has required prior approval of certain compensation arrangements. Such limitations on our executive and employee compensation structure, as well as the ongoing conservatorship and uncertainty about our future, could have an adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain talent. Leadership departures, such as the recent departure of our former CEO, or a combination of such departures at approximately the same time, could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. For example, turnover in key positions and challenges in integrating new leaders could harm our ability to manage our business effectively and successfully implement current strategic initiatives and could adversely affect our financial performance.
Supply Chain1 | 2.9%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
We rely on third parties, or their vendors and other business partners, for certain important functions. Any failures by those third parties to deliver products or services, or to manage risks effectively, could disrupt our business operations, or expose us to other operational risks.
Our use of third-parties, including service providers, sellers, servicers and other financial counterparties, exposes us to the risk of failures in their risk and control environments. We outsource certain key functions to these external parties, including some that are critical to financial reporting (including our use of hedge accounting), valuations, our mortgage-related investment activity, loan underwriting, loan servicing, and UMBS issuance and administration (i.e., CSS). We may enter into other key outsourcing relationships in the future and continue to expand our existing reliance on public cloud services. If one or more of these key external parties were not able to perform their functions for a period of time, perform them at an acceptable service level or handle increased volumes, or if one of them experiences a disruption in its own business or technology from any cause, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted, or otherwise negatively affected. Our use of third-parties also exposes us to other harm, such as breach of our data, fraud or damage to our reputation if one or more of these third parties fails to maintain adequate risk and control environments. Our ability to monitor the activities or performance of third-parties may be constrained, which may make it difficult for us to assess and manage the risks associated with these relationships.
Costs2 | 5.7%
Costs - Risk 1
A significant decline in the price performance of or demand for our UMBS could have an adverse effect on the volume and/or profitability of our new single-family guarantee business.
Our UMBS are an integral part of our loan purchase program. Our competitiveness in purchasing single-family loans from our sellers and the volume and profitability of our new single-family guarantee business are directly affected by the price performance of UMBS issued by us relative to comparable Fannie Mae-issued UMBS. If our UMBS were to trade at a discount relative to comparable Fannie Mae securities due to prepayment performance or other factors, such a difference in relative pricing may create an incentive for sellers to conduct a disproportionate share of their single-family business with Fannie Mae. It is possible that a liquid market for our UMBS may not be sustained over the short- or long-term, which could adversely affect their price performance and our single-family market share. A significant reduction in our market share, and thus in the volume of loans that we securitize, or a reduction in the trading volume of our UMBS could reduce the liquidity of our UMBS. While we may decide to employ various strategies to support the liquidity and price performance of our UMBS, any such strategies may fail or adversely affect our business and financial results. We may cease any such activities at any time, or FHFA could require us to do so, which could adversely affect the liquidity and price performance of our UMBS. We may incur costs to support our presence in the agency securities market and to support the liquidity and price performance of our securities. Liquidity-related price differences could occur between UMBS issued by us and comparable Fannie Mae-issued UMBS due to factors that are largely outside of our control. For example, the level of the Federal Reserve’s purchases and sales of agency mortgage-related securities could affect the demand for and values of our UMBS. Therefore, any strategies we employ to reduce any liquidity-related price differences may not reduce or eliminate any such price differences over the long term. We may experience price differences with Fannie Mae on individual new production pools of TBA-eligible mortgages, particularly with respect to specified pools and our multilender securities. From time to time, we may need to adjust our pricing for a particular new production pool category to maintain alignment and competitiveness with Fannie Mae with respect to the acquisition of such pools. Depending on the amount of pricing adjustments in any period, it is possible they could adversely affect the profitability of our single-family guarantee business for that period. This risk is heightened with diminished cash window volumes per the amended Purchase Agreement, and FHFA restrictions on pooling, limiting our pooling flexibility and ability to manage alignment. For more information, see MD&A - Our Business Segments - Capital Markets Segment - Business Overview - Products and Activities.
Costs - Risk 2
Declines in national or regional house prices or other adverse changes in the housing market could negatively affect both our single-family and multifamily businesses.
Our financial results and business volumes can be negatively affected by declines in house prices and other adverse changes in the housing market. This could (i) significantly increase our expected credit losses; (ii) result in higher stress losses for both the single-family and multifamily portfolios; (iii) increase our losses on foreclosure alternatives, third-party sales, and dispositions of REO properties; (iv) reduce our return or result in losses on our single-family and multifamily guarantee business, as default rates could be higher than we expected when we issued the guarantees; (v) negatively affect loan pricing, which could cause us to change our disposition strategies for our single-family seasoned loans; or (vi) adversely impact our ability to transfer credit risk. For more information regarding these risks, see MD&A - Risk Management - Credit Risk. The proportion of our refinance loan purchases to total loan purchases could decrease if mortgage interest rates increase. This could increase our exposure to mortgage credit risk, as refinance loans (particularly those that do not involve "cash-out") generally present less credit risk than purchase loans. Some of our seller/servicer counterparties are highly dependent on refinance loan volumes. A decrease in such volumes could adversely affect these counterparties, which could increase our exposure to counterparty credit risk.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 3/35 (9%)Above Sector Average
Demand3 | 8.6%
Demand - Risk 1
The profitability of our multifamily business could be adversely affected by a significant decrease in demand for our K Certificates and SB Certificates.
Our current multifamily business model is highly dependent on our ability to finance purchased multifamily loans through securitization into K Certificates and SB Certificates. A significant decrease in demand for K Certificates and SB Certificates could have an adverse impact on the profitability of the multifamily business to the extent that our holding period for the loans increases and we are exposed to credit, spread, and other market risks for a longer period of time or receive reduced proceeds from securitization. We employ various strategies to support the liquidity of our K Certificates and SB Certificates, but those strategies may fail or adversely affect our business. We may cease such activities at any time, or FHFA could require us to do so, which could adversely affect the liquidity and price performance of our K Certificates and SB Certificates.
Demand - Risk 2
Changes in U.S. Government Support
Treasury supports us through the Purchase Agreement and Treasury's ability to purchase up to $2.25 billion of our obligations under its permanent statutory authority. Changes or perceived changes in the U.S. government's support for us could have a severe negative effect on our access to the unsecured debt markets and our debt funding costs. Our access to the unsecured debt markets and the costs of our debt funding could be adversely affected by several factors relating to U.S. government support, including uncertainty about the future of the GSEs; any concerns by debt investors that we face increasing risk of being placed in receivership; and future draws that significantly reduce the amount of available funding remaining under the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the January 2021 Letter Agreement, it is possible that we may be required to pay a dividend to Treasury in the future that would cause us to fall below our capital requirements under the ERCF. In addition, we and Treasury are required to agree to a periodic commitment fee that we will pay to Treasury for a five-year period (after we have reached prescribed capital levels) in return for Treasury's remaining funding commitment.
Demand - Risk 3
Reduced Demand for Debt Securities
If investor demand for our debt securities were to decrease, our liquidity, business, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The willingness of investors to purchase and hold our debt securities can be influenced by many factors, including changes in the world economy, changes in exchange rates, and regulatory and political factors, as well as the availability of and investor preferences for other investments. We compete for debt funding with Fannie Mae, the FHLBs, and other institutions. Our funding costs and liquidity contingency plans may also be affected by changes in the amount of, and demand for, debt issued by Treasury. If investors were to reduce their purchases of our debt securities or divest their holdings, our funding costs could increase and our business activities could be curtailed. The market for our debt securities may become less liquid as a result of our having reached the Purchase Agreement limits on the size of our mortgage-related investments portfolio and the amount of our unsecured debt. This could lead to a decrease in demand for our debt securities and an increase in our funding costs.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 2/35 (6%)Below Sector Average
Cyber Security1 | 2.9%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
Potential cybersecurity threats are changing rapidly and growing in sophistication. We may not be able to protect our systems or the confidentiality of our information from cyberattack and other unauthorized access, disclosure, and disruption.
Our operations rely on the secure, accurate, and timely receipt, processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our systems and networks and with counterparties, service providers, and financial institutions. Information risks for companies like ours have significantly increased in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, and other external parties, including foreign state-sponsored actors. There have been several highly publicized cases involving financial services companies, consumer-based companies, and other organizations reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client, customer, or other confidential information, as well as cyberattacks involving the dissemination, theft, or destruction of corporate information, intellectual property, cash, or other valuable assets. There have also been several highly publicized cases where hackers have requested "ransom" payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information or for not making the targets' computer systems unavailable. In addition, there have been cases where hackers have misled company personnel into making unauthorized transfers of funds to the hackers' accounts. Like many companies and government entities, from time to time we have been, and likely will continue to be, the target of attempted cyberattacks, including malware, denial-of-service, and phishing, as part of an effort to disrupt operations, potentially test cybersecurity capabilities, or obtain confidential, proprietary, or other information. We could also be adversely affected by cyberattacks that target the infrastructure of the internet, as such attacks could cause widespread unavailability of websites and degrade website performance. Our risk and exposure to these matters remain heightened because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats, our role in the financial services industry, the outsourcing of some of our business operations, and the current global economic and political environment. Because we are interconnected with and dependent on third-party vendors, exchanges, clearinghouses, fiscal and paying agents, and other financial institutions, we could be adversely affected if any of them is subject to a successful cyberattack or other information security event. Third parties with which we do business may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technology risks. We routinely transmit and receive personal, confidential, and proprietary information by electronic means. This information could be subject to interception, misuse, or mishandling. Our exposure to these risks could increase as a result of our migration of core systems and applications to a third-party cloud environment. Although we devote significant resources to protecting our critical assets and provide employee awareness training about phishing, malware, and other cyber risks, these measures may not provide effective security. Our computer systems, software, end point devices, and networks may be vulnerable to cyberattack, unauthorized access, supply chain disruptions, computer viruses or other malicious code, or other attempts to harm them or misuse or steal information. We routinely identify cyber threats as well as vulnerabilities in our systems and work to address them, but these efforts may be insufficient. Breaches of our security measures may result from employee error or misconduct. Outside parties may attempt to induce employees, customers, counterparties, service providers, financial institutions, or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our systems and the information they contain. We may not be able to anticipate, detect, or recognize threats to our systems and assets, or implement effective preventative measures against security breaches, especially because the techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched. A cyberattack could occur and persist for an extended period of time without detection. We expect that any investigation of a cyberattack would take time, during which we would not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it. Although to date we have not experienced any cyberattacks resulting in significant impacts to the company, our cybersecurity risk management program may not prevent cyberattacks from having significant impacts in the future. We have obtained insurance coverage relating to cybersecurity risks, but this insurance may not be sufficient to provide adequate loss coverage. The occurrence of one or more cyberattacks could result in thefts of important assets (such as cash or source code) or the unauthorized disclosure, misuse, or corruption of confidential and other information (including information about our borrowers, our customers, or our counterparties) or could otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers or counterparties. This could result in significant losses or reputational damage, adversely affect our relationships with our customers and counterparties, negatively affect our competitive position, or otherwise harm our business. We could also face regulatory and other legal action, including for any failure to provide timely disclosure concerning, or appropriately to limit trading in our securities following, an attack. We might be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our internal controls and other protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we might be subject to litigation and financial losses that are not fully insured. In addition, customers, counterparties, financial intermediaries, and governmental organizations may not be adequately protecting the information that we share with them. As a result, a cyberattack on their systems and networks, or a breach of their security measures, may result in harm to our business and business relationships.
Technology1 | 2.9%
Technology - Risk 1
A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could impair our ability to provide market liquidity, disrupt our business, damage our reputation, and cause financial losses.
Operational risk is elevated due to the volume, complexity, and pace of change across the company. We face significant levels of operational risk due to a variety of factors, including the size and complexity of our business operations, the amount of change to our core systems required to keep pace with market demands, regulatory requirements, and business initiatives, and the ever-changing cybersecurity landscape. Shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people, or systems, or those of third parties with which we interact, could lead to impairment of our liquidity, disruption of our business (e.g., issuing mortgage and/or debt securities), incorrect payments to investors in our securities, errors in our financial statements, liability to customers or investors, further legislative or regulatory intervention, reputational damage, and financial and economic loss. Our business is highly dependent on our ability to process a large number of transactions on a daily basis and manage and analyze significant amounts of information, much of which is provided by third parties. This information may be incorrect, or we may fail to properly manage or analyze it. The transactions we process are complex and are subject to various legal, accounting, tax, and regulatory standards, which can change rapidly in response to external events, such as the implementation of government-mandated programs and changes in market conditions. Our financial, accounting, data processing, or other operating systems and facilities may contain design flaws or may fail to operate properly, adversely affecting our ability to process these transactions, including our ability to compile and process legally required information. We have certain systems that require manual support and intervention, which may lead to heightened risk of system failures. The inability of our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions or new types of transactions or products could constrain our ability to pursue new business initiatives or improve existing business activities. Our technological connections with our customers, counterparties, service providers, and other financial institutions continue to increase, which increases our risk exposure with respect to an operational failure of their infrastructure systems. We have developed, and expect to continue to develop, software tools for use by our customers in the customers' loan production and other processes. These tools may fail to operate properly, which could disrupt our or our customers' business and adversely affect our relationships with our customers. We continue to increase our use of a third-party cloud infrastructure platform for both customer-facing applications as well as internal-use applications. If we do not implement changes to this platform in a well-managed, secure, and effective manner, we may experience unplanned service disruption or unplanned costs which may harm our business and operating results. In addition, our cloud infrastructure providers, or other service providers, could experience system breakdowns or failures, outages, downtime, cyber-attacks, adverse changes to financial condition, bankruptcy, or other adverse conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation. Thus, our plans to increase the amount of our infrastructure that we outsource to the cloud or to other third parties may increase our risk exposure We face increased operational risk due to the magnitude and complexity of the new initiatives we are undertaking, including our efforts to help build a better housing finance system. Some of these initiatives require significant changes to our operational systems. In some cases, the changes must be implemented within a short period of time. Our legacy systems may create increased operational risk for these new initiatives. Internal corporate reorganizations may also increase our operational risk, particularly during the period of implementation. We also face significant risks related to CSS and the operation and continued development of the CSP. We rely on CSS and the CSP (which is owned and operated by CSS) for the operation of many of our single-family securitization activities. Our business activities would be adversely affected and the market for Freddie Mac securities would be disrupted if the CSP were to fail or otherwise become unavailable to us or if CSS were unable to perform its obligations to us, including as a result of an operational failure by Fannie Mae. In the event of a CSS operational failure, we may be unable to issue certain new single-family mortgage-related securities, and investors in mortgage-related securities hosted on the CSS platform may experience payment delays. Any measures we could take to mitigate these risks might not be sufficient to prevent our business from being harmed. We update our internal systems and processes on a regular basis, including to improve existing processes and respond to market and regulatory developments. We could be adversely affected if CSS and/or the CSP are unable to make any necessary corresponding changes to their systems and processes in a timely manner. CSS could adopt or prioritize strategies that could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations to us. Amendments to the CSS LLC agreement in January 2020 reduced Freddie Mac's and Fannie Mae's ability to control CSS Board decisions, even after conservatorship, including decisions about strategy, business operations, and funding. Our employees could act improperly for their own or third-party gain and cause unexpected losses or reputational damage. While we have processes and systems in place designed to prevent and detect fraud, these processes may not be successful. Most of our key business activities are conducted in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and represent a concentrated risk of people, technology, and facilities. As a result, an infrastructure disruption in or around our offices or affecting the power grid, such as from a terrorist event, active shooter, or natural disaster, could significantly adversely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations. Any measures we take to mitigate this risk may not be sufficient to respond to the full range of events that may occur or allow us to resume normal business operations in a timely manner.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 2/35 (6%)Below Sector Average
Regulation2 | 5.7%
Regulation - Risk 1
Legislative or regulatory actions could adversely affect our business activities and financial results. We face risk of non-compliance with our legal and regulatory obligations as a result of identified weaknesses in our compliance program.
We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to heightened supervision from FHFA, as our Conservator. Our compliance systems and programs may not be adequate to ensure that we are in compliance with all legal and other requirements. We could incur fines or other negative consequences for violations. For example, FHFA has raised concerns that we need to strengthen our compliance risk management practices by documenting and implementing an effective comprehensive framework for identifying, assessing, testing and reporting compliance risk. Although we are taking steps to strengthen our compliance program and address FHFA’s concerns, our efforts may not be successful. Until we satisfactorily remediate FHFA’s concerns, we may be subject to continued regulatory criticism. We also rely upon third parties and their respective compliance risk management programs, and the failure or limits of any such third-party compliance programs may expose us to legal and compliance risk. Our business may be directly adversely affected by future legislative, regulatory, or judicial actions at the federal, state, and local levels. Such actions could affect us in a number of ways, including by imposing significant additional legal, compliance, and other costs on us, limiting our business activities, and diverting management attention or other resources. Such actions, and any required changes to our business or operations or those of third parties upon whom we rely in response thereto, could result in reduced profitability and increased compliance risk, particularly because of the identified weaknesses in our compliance program noted above. If we were not to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations, this could result in fines and penalties and harm to our reputation.
Regulation - Risk 2
FHFA, as our Conservator, controls our business activities. We may be required to take actions that reduce our profitability, are difficult to implement, or expose us to additional risk.
We are under the control of FHFA, as our Conservator, and are not managed to maximize stockholder returns. FHFA determines our strategic direction. We face a variety of different, and sometimes competing, business objectives and FHFA-mandated activities, such as the initiatives we are pursuing under the Conservatorship Scorecards. Some of the activities FHFA has required us to undertake have been costly and/or difficult to implement, such as development and support of the CSP. FHFA has required us to make changes to our business that have adversely affected our financial results and could require us to make additional changes at any time. For example, FHFA may require us to undertake activities that (i) reduce our profitability; (ii) expose us to additional credit, market, funding, operational, and other risks; or (iii) provide additional support for the mortgage market that serves our public mission, but adversely affects our financial results. FHFA also has required us to take other actions that may adversely affect our business or financial results, such as requiring us to maintain increased liquidity and directing us to amend the CSS LLC agreement in January 2020 in a manner that reduces our ability to control CSS Board decisions, even after conservatorship, including decisions about strategy, business operations, and funding. FHFA has also appointed three additional CSS Board members, and as a result, the CSS Board members we and Fannie Mae appoint could be outvoted by non-GSE designated Board members on any matter during conservatorship and on a number of significant matters after conservatorship. It is possible that FHFA may require us to make additional changes to the CSS LLC agreement, or may otherwise impose restrictions or provisions relating to CSS or the UMBS, that may adversely affect us. From time to time, FHFA has prevented us from engaging in business activities or transactions that we believe would be profitable, and it may do so again in the future. For example, FHFA has limited the size and composition of our mortgage-related investments portfolio and the amount and type of new single-family and multifamily loans we may acquire. We may be required to adopt business practices that help serve our public mission and other non-financial objectives, but that may negatively affect our future financial results. Congress or FHFA may require us to set aside or otherwise pay monies to fund third-party initiatives, such as the existing requirement under the GSE Act that we allocate amounts for certain housing funds. FHFA also could require us to take actions that would adversely affect our ability to compete and innovate, such as through its proposed rule for new GSE products and activities; changing our risk appetite and risk limits; and limiting our control over pricing. FHFA is also Conservator of Fannie Mae, our primary competitor. FHFA’s actions, as Conservator of both companies, could require us and Fannie Mae to take a uniform approach to certain activities, limiting innovation and competition and possibly putting us at a competitive disadvantage because of differences in our respective businesses. FHFA also could limit our ability to compete with new entrants and other institutions. The combination of the restrictions on our business activities and our potential inability to generate sufficient revenue through our guarantee activities to offset the effects of those restrictions may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis