tiprankstipranks
Enhabit, Inc (EHAB)
NYSE:EHAB
US Market

Enhabit, Inc (EHAB) Risk Analysis

Compare
25 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

Enhabit, Inc disclosed 27 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Enhabit, Inc reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q3, 2024

Risk Distribution
27Risks
33% Finance & Corporate
26% Legal & Regulatory
26% Ability to Sell
7% Production
4% Tech & Innovation
4% Macro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

2022
Q4
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Enhabit, Inc Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q3, 2024

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 9 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 9 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
27
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
27
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of Enhabit, Inc in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 27

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 9/27 (33%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights2 | 7.4%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, and of Delaware law, may prevent or delay an acquisition of Enhabit, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions consistent with Delaware law that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others: - rules regarding the number of votes of stockholders required to amend certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and approve a business combination;- limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings;- the right of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval;- rules regarding how stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings; and - the ability of our directors, and not stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors. In addition, because we have not elected to be exempt from Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, this provision could also delay or prevent a change of control. Section 203 provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that acquire, or are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15% of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation (an "interested stockholder") shall not engage in any business combination with that corporation, including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year period following the date on which the person became an interested stockholder, unless (i) prior to such time, our board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock; or (iii) after our board of directors approves the business consideration, it is authorized at a meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder. Furthermore, our board of directors has the power, subject to applicable law, to issue series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of the series, impede the completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt that some, or a majority, of the stockholders may believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders would have received a premium for their stock over the then-prevailing market price of the stock. For instance, subject to applicable law, a series of preferred stock may impede a business combination by including class voting rights, which would enable the holder or holders of such series to block a proposed transaction. Our board of directors will make any determination to issue shares of preferred stock based on its judgment as to our and our stockholders' best interests. Although we believe these provisions will protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors determines is not in the best interests of Enhabit and its stockholders.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Consolidation in the healthcare industry and the actions of activist shareholders could materially affect our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows and our ability to operate as an independent entity.
The healthcare industry faces strong competition and consistent pressure to grow revenues while containing escalating costs. In recent periods, these aspects of our industry have caused some consolidation. We could become an acquisition target, which could disrupt our business or impact our ability to operate as an independent entity. Even the announcement that we were an acquisition target could materially impact our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Additionally, our business could be negatively affected by the actions of activist shareholders, including without limitation by causing increased volatility in our share price. We value constructive input from investors and regularly engage in dialogue with our shareholders. But responding to actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming and divert management's attention from operations. Activist shareholder activity can create uncertainties as to our future direction and could lead to the perception of a change in the direction of our business or other instability. In such a case, our competitors or other activist shareholders could exploit these uncertainties and perceptions, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Accounting & Financial Operations3 | 11.1%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
The carrying value of our Goodwill or other Intangible assets, net is subject to impairment testing and may result in the incurrence of impairment charges and adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2023, we had Goodwill of $1.1 billion and Intangible assets, net of $80.0 million. The net carrying value of Goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date or subsequent impairment date, if applicable. The carrying value of Intangible assets, net represents the fair value of certificates of need, licenses, noncompete agreements, trade names, internal-use software, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date or subsequent impairment date, if applicable, net of accumulated amortization, if applicable. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, and therefore must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment or when events occur or circumstances change that could potentially reduce the fair value of the reporting unit or intangible asset. Amortized intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. For example, as a result of the quantitative impairment analysis performed, we recorded impairment charges totaling $85.8 million for the hospice reporting unit and $109.0 million for the home health reporting unit for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Impairments to Goodwill and other Intangible assets, net may also be caused by factors outside our control, such as increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") multiples or changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital and interest rates. As described above in the risk factor "If we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and stock price," we have identified material weaknesses related to Goodwill in the past, and although they have been remediated as of December 31, 2023, there can be no assurance that similar internal control issues will not be identified in the future. Any additional impairment to goodwill or other intangible assets in future periods could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Estimates," and Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures," in this Annual Report for additional information.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
If we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and stock price.
As a public company, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting in order to satisfy the rules and regulations of the SEC, which require annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm that addresses the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. A "material weakness" is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As described below, we have identified material weaknesses in the past. Although they have been remediated as of December 31, 2023, there can be no assurance that similar, or new, internal control issues will not be identified in the future. Management identified two material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. We did not design and maintain effective controls to (i) monitor and review the estimated recoverability of accounts receivable, including the impact of changes to our third-party payor mix and (ii) identify potential goodwill impairment triggering events, including the impact of changes to our third-party payor mix. These material weaknesses resulted in adjustments to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 to Net service revenue, Accounts receivable, net of allowances, Goodwill, and Net loss. During the quarter ended June 30, 2023, we identified an additional goodwill related material weakness. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective controls over our determination of the carrying amount allocated to each reporting unit and the measurement of potential goodwill impairment. This material weakness resulted in an adjustment to our unaudited interim financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 to Goodwill and Net loss. See Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures," in this Annual Report for additional information. If we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information accurately, and to prepare the consolidated financial statements within the time periods specified by the rules and regulations of the SEC could be adversely affected. An inability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information accurately could cause our investors to lose confidence in our publicly reported information, cause the market price of our stock to decline, expose us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, or impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
The administration of billings and collections is complex, and our estimates of accounts receivable require us to exercise judgment. Delays in reimbursement due to administrative issues or inadequate reserve estimates may cause financial reporting issues or liquidity problems.
The billing and collection of our accounts receivable is subject to numerous and complex administrative processes and requires a significant amount of time and effort, including, but not limited to, the assessment of patient eligibility, the process of pre-authorization, the recording and collection of provider documentation, the timely and complete submission of claims for reimbursement, the application of cash receipts to patient accounts, the timely response to payor denials, and the conduct of collection activities. Additional administrative processes are also required when patients elect to change their third-party payors, such as when patients switch from Medicare to Medicare Advantage. If we incorrectly estimate our Accounts receivable, net of allowances, it may result in adjustments to our financial statements. For example, we previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which related to the design and maintenance of effective controls to monitor and review the estimated recoverability of accounts receivable, including the impact of changes to our third-party payor mix. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 to Net service revenue, Accounts receivable, net of allowances, and Net loss. While this material weakness has been remediated as of December 31, 2023, there can be no assurance that similar internal control issues will not be identified in the future. See Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures," in this Annual Report for additional information. In addition, our accounts receivable with Medicare and Medicaid are subject to the complex regulations that govern Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and rules imposed by nongovernment payors, and a portion of our accounts receivable are typically under medical review by payors. The amount collected may materially differ from the amount billed. Our inability to bill and collect on a timely basis pursuant to these regulations and rules could subject us to payment delays that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and liquidity. Further, if our reserve estimates are inadequate and we do not collect the amount of accounts receivable that we expect in a timely fashion, or at all, our financial position may materially differ from financial results that we have historically recorded. In addition, timing delays in, or unrealized levels of, billings and collections may cause working capital shortages. Working capital management, including prompt and diligent billing and collection, is an important factor in our financial position, results of operations, and in maintaining liquidity. It is possible that Medicare, Medicaid, documentation support, system problems or other provider issues or industry trends may extend our collection period, which may materially adversely affect our working capital, and our working capital management procedures may not successfully mitigate this risk.
Debt & Financing2 | 7.4%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
Medicare reimbursement of hospice services is subject to caps, which may result in our having to reimburse Medicare for certain amounts previously paid to us.
Payments made by Medicare to each hospice provider are subject to an inpatient cap amount and an overall payment cap amount, which are calculated and published by the Medicare fiscal intermediary on an annual basis covering the period from October 1 through September 30. If payments made to our hospice providers exceed either of these caps, we may be required to reimburse Medicare for payments received in excess of the caps, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Although we are currently restricted under the terms of our credit agreement, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future, and that debt or the associated increased leverage may have negative consequences for our business. The restrictive covenants included in the terms of our indebtedness could affect our ability to execute aspects of our business plan successfully.
We utilize a $400.0 million term loan A facility and a $220.0 million revolving credit facility for working capital purposes. Subject to specified limitations, the credit agreement governing this indebtedness generally restricts our ability to incur additional debt, other than additional draws on the revolving credit facility. Any additional debt we incur could exacerbate these risks. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including: - limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy and other general corporate purposes;- making us more vulnerable to unfavorable economic, industry and competitive conditions and government regulation by limiting our flexibility in planning for, and reacting to, changing conditions;- placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared with competing providers that have less debt or better access to capital resources; and - exposing us to risks inherent in interest rate fluctuations, which could result in higher interest expense, as discussed in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in this Annual Report. Changes in our business or other factors could prevent us from satisfying our obligations under our credit agreement or other future debt instruments. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt and any other cash payment obligations, we may have to refinance all or a portion of our debt, obtain additional financing, reduce expenditures, or sell assets we deem necessary to our business. We cannot assure these measures would be possible or any additional financing could be obtained. The credit agreement also includes customary remedies, including the right of the lenders to take action with respect to the collateral securing the indebtedness, that would apply should we default or otherwise be unable to satisfy our obligations under the credit agreement. In addition, the various restrictive covenants in our credit agreements could also adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs and pursue available business opportunities. Further, we are required to maintain certain financial tests and ratios under the credit agreement. If we become concerned that we may not be in compliance with such financial tests and ratios, we may seek to negotiate a waiver or amendment of the applicable covenant, as we did in November 2023 when we entered into an amendment to the credit agreement. However, there can be no assurance we will be able to obtain such waiver or amendment on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Various risks, uncertainties and events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with the covenants and financial tests and ratios in the credit agreement. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in our existing or future financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under any other agreements containing cross-default provisions. A default that occurs, and is not cured within any applicable cure period or is not waived, would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. Under these circumstances, we might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of our obligations. For additional discussion of our indebtedness, see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources," in this Annual Report, and Note 8, Long-term Debt, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Corporate Activity and Growth2 | 7.4%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
There can be no assurance that our review of strategic alternatives will result in our pursuing any strategic transaction or that we will successfully consummate any particular strategic transaction on attractive terms or at all, and there may be negative impacts on our business and stock price as a result of the process of exploring strategic alternatives.
On August 23, 2023, we announced a formal process to explore strategic alternatives for our business. Our board of directors is considering a range of options, including, among other things, a potential sale, merger or other strategic transaction. We have not set a timetable for completion of this strategic review process, and our board of directors has not approved a definitive course of action. We do not intend to disclose developments or provide updates on the progress or status of the strategic alternatives review process until our board of directors deems further disclosure is appropriate or necessary. Accordingly, speculation regarding any developments related to the review of strategic alternatives and perceived uncertainties related to the future of the Company could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly. The process of continuing to evaluate our strategic alternatives may be costly, time-consuming, and complex, and we may incur significant legal, accounting, and advisory fees and other expenses, some of which may be incurred regardless of whether we identify or consummate a strategic transaction, and the attention of management and our board of directors could be diverted from our core business operations. Whether the process will result in any transaction, our ability to complete any transaction, and if our board of directors decides to pursue one or more transactions, will depend on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the interest of potential acquirers or strategic partners in a potential transaction, the value potential acquirers or strategic partners attribute to our business and its prospects, market conditions, interest rates and industry trends. Our stock price may be adversely affected if the evaluation does not result in a transaction or if one or more transactions are consummated on terms that stockholders view as unfavorable to us. Our ability to consummate a strategic transaction also depends upon our ability to retain our employees. A material departure of employees, or the departure of certain key employees, may adversely impact our ability to attract strategic partners or the value we could command in a potential strategic transaction with such partners. Any strategic transaction may also increase our risk of litigation, require government approval, or result in a government investigation, even if no wrongdoing has occurred. The costs of defending litigation or responding to a government investigation could be significant and could adversely affect our ability to consummate a potential strategic transaction.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
We may make investments or complete transactions that could expose us to unforeseen risks and liabilities. Further, we may not be able to successfully integrate acquisitions or realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisitions.
Historically, we selectively pursued strategic acquisitions of, and in some instances joint ventures with, other healthcare providers. Although our existing credit facility currently restricts acquisitions, they remain part of our long-term growth strategy. We may face limitations on our ability to identify sufficient acquisitions or other development targets and to complete those transactions to meet goals. In the home health industry, there is significant competition to acquire companies that have a large number of locations. Any acquisitions, investments, and joint ventures that we complete involve numerous risks including: - legal and regulatory limitations on our ability to complete such acquisitions, particularly those involving not-for-profit providers, on terms, timelines, and valuations reasonable to us;- obtaining financing for acquisitions at a cost reasonable to us;- difficulties integrating acquired operations, personnel, and information systems, and in realizing projected revenues, efficiencies, and cost savings, or returns on invested capital;- entry into markets, businesses, or services in which we may have little or no experience;- diversion of business resources or management's attention from ongoing business operations; and - exposure to undisclosed or unforeseen liabilities of acquired operations, including liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and anti-trust considerations in specific markets, successor liability imposed by Medicare, and risks and liabilities related to previously compromised information systems. We may face substantial difficulties, costs, and delays involved in the integration of acquired businesses. In some cases, the acquired business has itself grown through acquisitions, and there may be legacy systems, operating policies and procedures, and financial and administrative practices yet to be fully integrated. To the extent we are attempting to integrate multiple businesses at the same time, we may not be able to do so as efficiently or effectively as we initially anticipate. The failure to successfully integrate on a timely basis any acquired business could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. In addition, acquired businesses may not contribute to our revenues or earnings to the extent anticipated, and any expected synergies may not be realized. If the acquired businesses underperform, we may be required to take an impairment charge. Failure to achieve the anticipated benefits could also divert management's time and energy and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 7/27 (26%)Above Sector Average
Regulation6 | 22.2%
Regulation - Risk 1
Federal regulation may impair our ability to open new agencies or consummate acquisitions.
Changes in federal laws or regulations may materially adversely impact our ability to open de novo home health agencies or acquire home health agencies. For example, CMS has adopted a regulation known as the "36 Month Rule" that is applicable to home health agency acquisitions. Subject to certain exceptions, the 36 Month Rule prohibits buyers of certain home health agencies, those that either enrolled in Medicare or underwent a change in ownership within 36 months before the acquisitions, from assuming the Medicare billing privileges of the acquired agency. Instead, the acquired home health agencies must enroll as new providers with Medicare. CMS has recently extended the 36 Month Rule to Medicare-enrolled hospices as well. As a result, the 36 Month Rule may further increase competition for acquisition targets that are not subject to the rule and may cause significant Medicare billing delays for the purchases of home health and hospice agencies that are subject to the rule.
Regulation - Risk 2
If any of our home health or hospice agencies fails to comply with the Medicare enrollment requirements or conditions of participation, that agency could be subject to sanctions or terminated from the Medicare program.
Each of our home health and hospice agencies must comply with extensive enrollment requirements and conditions of participation for the Medicare program. Failure to comply with applicable certification requirements may make our agencies ineligible for Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement. A determination by a regulatory authority that an agency is not in compliance with applicable requirements could also lead to the assessment of fines or other penalties, loss of licensure, exclusion from participation in Medicare and Medicaid, and the imposition of requirements that the offending agency must take corrective action. In addition, Medicare or Medicaid may seek retroactive reimbursement from noncompliant providers or otherwise impose sanctions for noncompliance. Non-governmental payors often have the right to terminate provider contracts if the provider loses its Medicare or Medicaid certification. Termination of one or more of our care centers from the Medicare program for failure to satisfy the program's conditions of participation, or the imposition of alternative sanctions, could disrupt operations, require significant attention by management, or have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Regulation - Risk 3
Compliance with the extensive laws and government regulations applicable to healthcare providers requires substantial time, effort, and expense, and if we fail to comply with them, we could suffer penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.
Healthcare providers are required to comply with extensive and complex laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local government levels. These laws and regulations relate to, among other things: - licensure, certification, enrollments, and accreditation;- policies, at either the national or local level, delineating what conditions must be met to qualify for reimbursement under Medicare (also referred to as coverage requirements);- coding and billing for services;- relationships with physicians and other referral sources, including physician self-referral and anti-kickback laws;- quality of medical care;- use and maintenance of medical supplies and equipment;- maintenance, security and privacy of patient information and medical records, including electronic health data and health system interoperability;- minimum staffing;- acquisition and dispensing of pharmaceuticals and controlled substances; and - disposal of medical and hazardous waste. In the future, changes in these laws or regulations or the manner in which they are enforced could subject our current or past practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require us to make changes in our equipment, personnel, services, capital expenditure programs, operating procedures, and contractual arrangements, as well as the way in which we deliver home health and hospice services. Those changes could also affect reimbursements as well as future compliance, training, and staffing costs. Examples of regulatory changes that can affect our business, beyond direct changes to Medicare reimbursement rates, can be found from time to time in CMS's annual rulemaking. For example, to implement the 2018 Budget Act, the final rule for the 2019 Hospice-PS amended the hospice regulations to permit physician assistants to serve as "attending physicians" for patients in addition to physicians and nurse practitioners. In addition, the use of sub-regulatory guidance, statistical sampling, and extrapolation by CMS, Medicare contractors, HHS-OIG, and DOJ to deny claims, expand enforcement claims, and advocate for changes in reimbursement policy increases the risk that we could experience reduced revenue, suffer penalties, or be required to make significant changes to our operations. Because Medicare payments comprise a significant portion of our Net service revenue, failure to comply with the laws and regulations governing the Medicare program and related matters, including anti-kickback and anti-fraud requirements,could materially and adversely affect us. Settlements of alleged violations or imposed reductions in reimbursements, substantial damages and other remedies assessed against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Even the assertion of a violation, depending on its nature, could have a material adverse effect upon our stock price or reputation and could cost us significant time and expense to defend.
Regulation - Risk 4
Other legislative and regulatory initiatives and changes affecting the industry could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In addition to the legislative and regulatory actions that directly affect our reimbursement rates or further the evolution of the current healthcare delivery system, other legislative and regulatory changes affect healthcare providers like us from time to time. For example, the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws provide for the expansion of the federal Anti-Kickback Law and the FCA, likely increasing investigation and enforcement efforts in the healthcare industry generally. Changes include increased resources for enforcement, lowered burden of proof for the government in healthcare fraud matters, expanded definition of claims under the FCA, enhanced penalties, and increased rewards for relators in successful prosecutions. CMS may also suspend payment for claims prospectively if, in its opinion, credible allegations of fraud exist. The initial suspension period may be up to 180 days. However, the payment suspension period can be extended almost indefinitely if the matter is under investigation by the HHS-OIG or the DOJ. Any such suspension would adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Some states in which we operate have also undertaken, or are considering, healthcare reform initiatives that address similar issues. While many of the stated goals of other federal and state reform initiatives are consistent with our own goal to provide high-quality and cost-effective care, legislation and regulatory proposals may lower reimbursements, increase the cost of compliance, decrease patient volumes, promote frivolous or baseless litigation, and otherwise adversely affect our business. We cannot predict what legislative or regulatory reforms or changes, if any, will ultimately be enacted or the timing or effect any of those changes or reforms will have on us. If enacted, they may be challenging for all providers, and have the effect of limiting Medicare beneficiaries' access to healthcare services, which could have a material adverse impact on our Net service revenue, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. For additional discussion of healthcare reform and other factors affecting reimbursement for our services, see Item 1, "Business-Regulation-Sources of Revenue-Medicare Reimbursement," in this Annual Report.
Regulation - Risk 5
We operate in a highly regulated industry in which healthcare providers are routinely subject to litigation, the outcome of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We operate in a highly regulated industry in which healthcare providers are routinely subject to litigation. Various lawsuits, claims, and legal and regulatory proceedings have been and can be expected to be instituted or asserted against us. We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits, most of which are general and professional liability matters inherent in treating patients with medical conditions. On any given day, we have thousands of care providers driving to and from the homes of patients where we provide services and administer care to individuals with a variety of serious, sometimes terminal, medical conditions. We cannot predict the impact any claims arising out of the travel, the home visits or the care being provided (regardless of their ultimate outcomes) could have on our business or reputation or on our ability to attract and retain patients and employees. Substantial damages, fines or other remedies assessed against us or agreed to in settlements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Additionally, the costs of defending litigation and investigations, even if frivolous or non-meritorious, could be significant. We also cannot predict the adequacy of any reserves for such losses or recoveries from any insurance or re-insurance policies we maintain, and there can be no guarantee that our insurance policies cover all risks that our business may face.
Regulation - Risk 6
Our quality of care and CMS quality reporting requirements could adversely affect the Medicare reimbursement we receive.
The focus on alternative payment models and value-based purchasing of healthcare services has led to more extensive quality of care reporting requirements. In many cases, our reporting requirements are linked to reimbursement incentives. For example, home health and hospice agencies are required to submit quality of care data to CMS each year. Failure to comply with quality reporting requirements may result in a penalty on our reimbursement. For home health agencies that do not comply with quality reporting requirements, the penalty is 2%; for hospices that do not comply, the penalty is 4%. Increased scrutiny and oversight in these industries may pose a heightened risk to reimbursement. The IMPACT Act mandated that CMS adopt several new quality reporting measures for the various post-acute provider types. The adoption of additional quality reporting measures to track and report will require additional time and expense and could affect reimbursement in the future. In healthcare generally, the burdens associated with collecting, recording, and reporting quality data are increasing. Currently, CMS requires home health providers to track and submit patient assessment data to support the calculation of 20 quality of care reporting measures. In addition, CMS instituted a Star rating methodology for home health agencies to meet the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws' call for more transparent public information on provider quality. All Medicare-certified home health agencies are eligible to receive a Star rating (from 1 to 5 Stars) based on a number of quality of care measures, such as timely initiation of care, drug education provided to patients, fall risk assessment, depression assessments, improvements in bed transferring, and bathing, among others. Failing to maintain satisfactory Star rating scores could affect some of our reimbursement and patient referrals and have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. There can be no assurance that all of our agencies will meet quality reporting requirements or quality performance expectations in the future, which may result in one or more of our agencies seeing a reduction in its Medicare reimbursements or patient referral volume. We, like other healthcare providers, are likely to incur additional expenses in an effort to comply with additional and changing quality reporting requirements.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities1 | 3.7%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
We face periodic and routine reviews, audits, and investigations under our contracts with federal and state government agencies and private payors, and these audits could have adverse findings that may negatively impact our business.
As a result of our participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, we are subject to various governmental reviews, audits, and investigations to verify our compliance with these programs and applicable laws and regulations. We also are subject to audits under various federal and state government programs in which third-party firms engaged by CMS conduct extensive reviews of claims data and medical and other records to identify potential improper payments under the Medicare program. For additional discussion of the reviews, audits, and investigations to which we are subject, see Item 1, "Business-Regulation-Governmental Review, Audits, and Investigations," in this Annual Report. The HHS-OIG also conducts audits and has included various home health agency and hospice payment and quality issues in its current workplan. Additionally, private pay sources reserve the right to conduct audits. If billing errors are identified in the sample of reviewed claims, the billing error can be extrapolated to all claims filed which could result in a larger overpayment than originally identified in the sample of reviewed claims. Our costs to respond to and defend reviews, audits and investigations may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Moreover, an adverse review, audit or investigation could result in: - required refunding or retroactive adjustment of amounts we have been paid pursuant to the federal or state programs or from private payors;- state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties, and other sanctions on us;- loss of our ability to participate in the Medicare program, state programs or one or more private payor networks; or - damage to our business and reputation in various markets.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 7/27 (26%)Above Sector Average
Competition1 | 3.7%
Competition - Risk 1
We face intense competition for patients from other healthcare providers.
We operate in the highly competitive and fragmented home health and hospice industries. Our primary competitors in home health services are two large insurance companies, a large public home health company, privately owned home health and hospice companies, and acute care hospitals with adjunct home health services. Some of these competitors have greater financial and other resources, advantages of scale and more established presences in their respective communities. Competing companies may offer newer or different services from those we offer or have better relationships with referring physicians and may thereby attract patients who are presently, or would be candidates for, receiving our services. Other companies, including hospitals and other healthcare organizations that are not currently providing competing services, may expand their services to include home health, hospice care, or similar services. In several states in which we operate, a majority of the Medicare Advantage patients within the state are insured by two large managed care companies that either currently offer home health services or are actively pursuing the acquisition of a business that offers home health services. The managed care companies have substantial resources and existing relationships with customers, which may serve as a large patient base for their current or future home health services. Competition by these managed care companies in home health services may adversely affect our growth strategy of capturing greater Medicare Advantage volumes. In addition, from time to time, there are efforts in states with certificate of need laws to weaken those laws, which could potentially increase competition in those states. Conversely, competition and statutory procedural requirements in some CON states may inhibit our ability to expand our operations in those states. For a breakdown of the CON status of the states and territories in which we have operations, see Item 2, "Properties," in this Annual Report. There can be no assurance current or future competition will not adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Sales & Marketing6 | 22.2%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
If we are unable to provide a consistently high quality of care, our business will be adversely impacted.
Providing quality patient care is fundamental to our business. We believe hospitals, physicians and other referral sources refer patients to us in large part because of our reputation for delivering quality care. Clinical quality is becoming increasingly important within our industry. For example, Medicare imposes a financial penalty upon hospitals that have excessive rates of patient readmissions within 30 days from hospital discharge. We believe this regulation provides a competitive advantage to home health providers who can differentiate themselves based upon quality, particularly by achieving low patient acute care hospital readmission rates and by implementing disease management programs designed to be responsive to the needs of patients served by referring hospitals. If we fail to attain our goals regarding acute care hospital readmission rates and other quality metrics, we expect our ability to generate referrals to be adversely impacted, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Additionally, Medicare has established consumer-facing websites, Home Health Compare and Hospice Compare, that present data regarding our performance on certain quality measures compared to state and national averages. Failure to achieve or exceed these averages may affect our ability to generate referrals, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 2
The ongoing evolution of the healthcare delivery system, including alternative payment models and value-based purchasing initiatives, may significantly affect our business and results of operations.
The healthcare industry faces regulatory uncertainty around attempts to improve outcomes and reduce costs, including coordinated care and integrated delivery payment models. In an integrated payment delivery model, hospitals, physicians, and other care providers are incentivized to coordinate healthcare on a more efficient, patient-centered basis. Providers are paid based on the overall value and quality, rather than the number, of services provided. While this is consistent with our goal and proven track record of being a high-quality, cost-effective provider, broad-based implementation of a new delivery payment model would disrupt the healthcare industry, which may have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. In recent years, HHS has been studying the feasibility of bundling, including conducting a voluntary, multi-year bundling pilot program to test and evaluate alternative payment methodologies. CMS's voluntary BPCI Advanced initiative ran through December 31, 2023 and covers 29 types of inpatient and three types of outpatient clinical episodes, including stroke and hip fracture. Accordingly, reimbursement may be increased or decreased, compared to what would otherwise be due, based on whether the total Medicare expenditures and patient outcomes meet, exceed, or fall short of the targets. Similarly, CMS has established several ACO programs, the largest of which is the Medicare Shared Savings Program ("MSSP"), a voluntary ACO program in which hospitals, physicians, and other care providers pursue the delivery of coordinated healthcare on a more efficient, patient-centered basis. Conceptually, ACOs receive a portion of any savings generated from care coordination as long as benchmarks for the quality of care are maintained. The ACO rules are extremely complex and remain subject to further refinement by CMS. Additionally, as the number and types of bundling, direct contracting, and ACO models increase, the number of Medicare beneficiaries who are treated in these models increases. Our unwillingness or inability to participate in integrated delivery payment and other alternative payment models and the referral patterns of other providers participating in those models may limit our access to Medicare patients who would benefit from treatment by home health services. In an attempt to reduce costs, ACOs may seek to discourage referrals to post-acute care altogether. For further discussion of coordinated care and integrated delivery payment models and value-based purchasing initiatives, the associated challenges, and our efforts to respond to them, see Item 1, "Business-Our Industries and Opportunity-Emphasis on Value-Based Payment Models," in this Annual Report.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 3
If we are unable to maintain or develop relationships with patient referral sources, our growth and profitability could be adversely affected.
Our success depends in large part on referrals from physicians, hospitals, case managers and other patient referral sources in the communities we serve. By law, referral sources cannot be contractually obligated to refer patients to any specific provider. However, there can be no assurance that individuals will not attempt to steer patients to competing post-acute providers or otherwise limit our access to potential referrals. The establishment of joint ventures or networks between referral sources, such as acute care hospitals, and other post-acute providers may hinder patient referrals to us. The growing emphasis on integrated care delivery across the healthcare continuum increases that risk. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing referral source relationships or that we will be able to develop and maintain new relationships in existing or new markets. Our loss of, or failure to maintain, existing relationships or our failure to develop new relationships could adversely affect our ability to grow our business and operate profitably.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 4
Changes in our payor mix or the needs of our patients could adversely affect our Net service revenue or our profitability.
Although the reimbursement rates we receive from traditional Medicare Fee for Service are generally higher than those received from other payors, an increasing percentage of Medicare eligible individuals are choosing to enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan. We are attempting to grow the number of Medicare Advantage networks in which we participate, so we expect the payor mix to continue to shift with that growth. Not only do Medicare Advantage and managed care payors generally pay less than Medicare Fee for Service, but bad debt and longer collection cycles also tend to be higher for patients covered by Medicare Advantage and managed care, as patients typically retain more payment responsibility under those arrangements. Further, it generally is more time and labor intensive to bill claims with Medicare Advantage, meaning our collection cycle will lengthen as we grow the number of Medicare Advantage networks in which we participate. The expansion and growth of Medicaid resulting from the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws have increased the number of Medicaid patients coming to us. Medicaid reimbursement rates are consistently the lowest among those of our payors, and frequently Medicaid patients come to us with other complicating conditions that make treatment more difficult and costly.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 5
Efforts to reduce payments to healthcare providers undertaken by third-party payors, conveners, and referral sources could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Health insurers and managed care companies, including Medicare Advantage plans, may utilize certain third parties, known as conveners, to attempt to control costs. Conveners offer patient placement and care transition services to those payors as well as bundled payment participants, ACOs, and other healthcare providers with the intent of managing post-acute utilization and associated costs. Conveners may influence referral source decisions on which post-acute setting to recommend, as well as how long to remain in a particular setting. Conveners are not healthcare providers and may suggest a post-acute setting or duration of care that may not be appropriate from a clinical perspective, potentially resulting in a costly acute care hospital readmission. We also depend on referrals from physicians, acute care hospitals, and other healthcare providers in the communities we serve. As a result of various alternative payment models, many referral sources are becoming increasingly focused on reducing post-acute costs by eliminating post-acute care referrals. Our ability to attract patients could be adversely affected if any of our home health agencies fails to provide or maintain a reputation for providing high-quality care on a cost-effective basis as compared to other providers. In addition, there are increasing pressures, including as a result of the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws, from many third-party payors to control healthcare costs and to reduce or limit increases in reimbursement rates for medical services. Our relationships with managed care and nongovernmental third-party payors are generally governed by negotiated agreements. These agreements set forth the amounts we are entitled to receive for our services and can add administrative complexity to our billing and collection process. Our Net service revenue and our ability to grow our business with these payors could be adversely affected if we are unable to negotiate and maintain favorable agreements with third-party payors.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 6
Reductions or changes in reimbursement from government or third-party payors could adversely affect our Net service revenue and other operating results.
We derive a substantial portion of our Net service revenue from the Medicare program. In addition to many ordinary course reimbursement rate changes that CMS adopts each year as part of its annual rulemaking processes, Congress and certain state legislatures periodically propose significant changes in laws and regulations governing the healthcare system. These changes may result in limitations on increases and, in some cases, significant reductions in the levels of payments to healthcare providers. There can be no assurance that future governmental initiatives will not result in pricing freezes, reimbursement reductions, or levels of reimbursement increases that are less than the increases we may experience in our costs of operations. There is also no assurance that our patient accounts receivable will be collected in a timely fashion, or at all. See Item 1, "Business-Sources of Revenue," in this Annual Report for a table identifying the sources and relative payor mix of our revenues. Many provisions within the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws have impacted or could in the future impact our business, including Medicare reimbursement reductions and promotion of alternative payment models, such as ACOs and bundled payment initiatives. For Medicare providers like us, the 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws included reductions in CMS's annual adjustments to Medicare reimbursement rates, commonly known as a "market basket update." The 2010 Healthcare Reform Laws also require market basket updates for home health and hospice providers to be reduced by a productivity adjustment on an annual basis. The productivity adjustment equals the trailing 10-year average of changes in annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multi-factor productivity. The Fiscal Year 2024 Hospice Payment Rate Update Final Rule finalized a 3.1% hospice payment update percentage. This was a result of a 3.3% inpatient hospital market basket percentage increase reduced by a 0.2% productivity adjustment. The hospice payment update includes a statutory aggregate cap that limits the overall annual payments per patient made to hospices. The 2024 Home Health Final Rule reflects an estimated overall increase in Medicare home health reimbursement rates of 0.8% relative to 2023 levels. This payment update is the collective impact of a 3.3% market basket positive adjustment and a 0.4% fixed-dollar loss ratio positive adjustment, offset by a 0.3% productivity negative adjustment and a 2.6% permanent behavioral negative adjustment. There is no assurance that rates will increase in future years or that rate increases will be adequate to offset increases in operating costs. Other federal legislation can also have a significant direct impact on our Medicare reimbursement. In 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which provided for an automatic 2% reduction of Medicare program payments. This automatic reduction, known as "sequestration," began affecting payments received after April 1, 2013. Under current law, the reimbursement we receive from Medicare will be reduced by this sequestration. Additional Medicare payment reductions are also possible under Statutory PAYGO. Statutory PAYGO requires, among other things, that mandatory spending and revenue legislation not increase the federal budget deficit over a five-or ten-year period. If the Office of Management and Budget (the "OMB") finds there is a deficit in the federal budget, Statutory PAYGO requires OMB to order sequestration of Medicare. In 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (the "American Rescue Plan Act"). The Protecting Medicare and American Farmers from Sequester Cuts Act also suspends until 2025 the Statutory PAYGO reductions that would have gone into effect because of the American Rescue Plan Act. Concerns held by federal policymakers about the federal deficit, national debt levels, or healthcare spending specifically, including solvency of the Medicare trust fund, could result in enactment of further federal spending reductions or limitations, further entitlement reform legislation affecting the Medicare program, and further reductions to provider payments. Each year, MedPAC advises Congress on issues affecting Medicare, including, among others, the HH-PPS and the Hospice payment systems. MedPAC's advice can affect the rates we are paid for our services. For example, CMS incorporated some of MedPAC's recommendations into the PDGM system mandated by the 2018 Bipartisan Budget Act and set out in the final rule for the 2019 HH-PPS. Beginning in 2020, PDGM replaced the prior 60-day episode payment methodology with a 30-day payment period and eliminated therapy usage as a factor in setting payments. CMS was required to make assumptions about potential behavior changes caused by the implementation of the 30-day unit of payment and the PDGM. As a result, CMS must annually determine the impact of differences between assumed and actual behavior changes on estimated aggregate expenditures, beginning with 2020 and ending with 2026, and make permanent and temporary increases or decreases to the 30-day payment amount to account for such differences. In the 2023 Home Health PPS final rule, CMS finalized a methodology for analyzing the impact of differences between assumed versus actual behavior changes on estimated aggregate expenditures and calculated levels of actual and estimated aggregate expenditures using 2020 and 2021 claims. This resulted in the application of a 3.925% permanent adjustment reduction to the home health base rate for 2023. In the 2024 Home Health PPS final rule, CMS finalized an additional 2.89% permanent adjustment reduction to the home health base rate. CMS may make future permanent or temporary adjustments based on analysis of estimated aggregate expenditures through 2026, which could significantly impact our home health agencies. Changes to MedPAC's recommendations could also affect reimbursements for our services. For example, in 2023, MedPAC recommended that, for fiscal year 2024, Congress should update the hospice base payment rate and wage adjust and reduce the hospice aggregate cap by 20%. Similarly, MedPAC has previously recommended that Congress adopt a unified payment system for all post-acute care, but has more recently concluded that due to the considerable resources this would require, and other changes already made, policymakers should consider smaller-scale site-neutral policies. There can be no assurance that future governmental action will not result in substantial changes to, or material reduction in, our reimbursements. In any given year, the net effect of statutory and regulatory changes may result in a decrease in our reimbursement rate, and that decrease may occur at a time when our expenses are increasing. As a result, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. For additional discussion of how we are reimbursed by Medicare, see Item 1, "Business-Sources of Revenue-Medicare Reimbursement-Regulation," in this Annual Report.
Production
Total Risks: 2/27 (7%)Below Sector Average
Employment / Personnel1 | 3.7%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
Competition for staffing, shortages of qualified personnel or other factors may increase our staffing costs and reduce profitability.
Our operations are dependent on the efforts, abilities, and experience of our medical personnel, such as physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech pathologists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. We compete with other healthcare providers in recruiting and retaining qualified personnel responsible for the daily operations of each of our locations. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel depends on several factors, including our ability to provide competitive wages and benefits. In some markets, the lack of availability of medical personnel is a significant operating issue facing all healthcare providers, including us. A shortage may require us to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain qualified personnel or to contract for more expensive temporary personnel. A failure to recruit and retain qualified medical personnel could cause the quality of our services to decline or constrain our ability to grow. If our staffing costs increase, we may not experience reimbursement rate or pricing increases to offset these additional costs. Because a significant percentage of our revenues consists of fixed, prospective payments, our ability to pass along increased staffing costs is limited. In particular, if staffing costs continue to rise at an annual rate greater than the annual net impact of reimbursement rates from Medicare, as is expected to happen in 2024, or we experience a significant shift in our payor mix to lower rate payors such as Medicaid, our results of operations and cash flows will be adversely affected. Conversely, decreases in reimbursement revenues, such as with sequestration, may limit our ability to increase compensation or benefits to the extent necessary to retain key employees, increasing our turnover and associated costs.
Costs1 | 3.7%
Costs - Risk 1
Our business depends on the ability of our employees to travel via fleet vehicles or their personal vehicles, and our business operations may be impacted by rising costs of fuel and access to fleet vehicles.
Our employees drive to our patients using either company fleet vehicles or personal vehicles. For the company fleet vehicles, we reimburse our employees' out-of-pocket expenses, including fuel cost, and we reimburse our employees using their personal vehicles for mileage pursuant to an established reimbursement methodology. Fluctuations in fuel prices affect our cost per visit and per patient day, and in an environment of increasing fuel prices, our cost per visit and per patient visit can increase due to factors beyond our control. If the costs associated with fuel, repair expenses, and new fleet vehicles continue to rise, our future operations and financial results may be adversely affected, and our profits and profit margins will likely be reduced.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 1/27 (4%)Below Sector Average
Cyber Security1 | 3.7%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
The proper function, availability, and security of our information systems are critical to our business, and failure to maintain them or to protect our data against unauthorized access could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
We are required to comply with HIPAA regulations regarding the privacy and security of protected health information, as well as state laws that focus on privacy, security, and notification requirements with regard to personal information. The HIPAA regulations impose significant requirements on providers and our third-party vendors with regard to how such protected health information may be used and disclosed. Further, the regulations include extensive and complex requirements for providers to establish reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of protected health information. HIPAA directs the Secretary of HHS to periodically audit compliance by covered entities. We are and will remain dependent on the proper function, availability, and security of our (and third parties') information systems, including our electronic clinical information system. We expend capital to protect our information systems and the data maintained within those systems from security breaches, including cyber-attacks, email phishing schemes, malware, and ransomware, and we periodically test the adequacy of our security and disaster recovery measures. We have implemented administrative, technical, and physical controls to prevent unauthorized access to that data, which includes patient information and other sensitive information, but we routinely identify attempts to gain unauthorized access to our systems. We are likely to face attempted attacks in the future. Given the rapidly evolving nature and proliferation of cyber threats, there can be no assurance our training and network security measures or other controls will detect, prevent, or remediate security or data breaches in a timely manner or otherwise prevent unauthorized access to, damage to, or interruption of our systems and operations. In recent years, several hospitals have reported being victims of ransomware attacks in which they lost access to their systems, including clinical systems, during the course of the attacks. There have been other recent significant incidents of software vendor compromises. Threat actors continue to attempt to exploit commonly used software and services to gain remote access to a large number of their customers' information systems. For example, in August 2021, Microsoft, our email exchange service provider, reported a vulnerability within its email exchange services which attackers can use to remotely bypass the access control list then elevate privileges. A compromise of our network security measures or other controls, or those of businesses or vendors with whom we interact, which results in confidential information being accessed, obtained, damaged or used by unauthorized persons or unavailability of systems necessary to the operation of our business, could impact patient care, harm our reputation, and expose us to significant remedial costs as well as regulatory actions (fines and penalties) and claims from patients, financial institutions, regulatory and law enforcement agencies, and other persons, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. A security breach, or threat thereof, could require that we expend significant resources to repair or improve our information systems and infrastructure and could distract management and other key personnel from performing their primary operational duties. In the case of a material breach or cyber-attack, the associated expenses and losses may exceed our current insurance coverage for such events. Some adverse consequences may not be insured, such as reputational harm and third-party business interruption. Failure to maintain proper function, security, or availability of our information systems or to protect our data against unauthorized access, or the failure of one or more of our key partners, vendors, or other counterparties to do these things, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 1/27 (4%)Below Sector Average
Natural and Human Disruptions1 | 3.7%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
A pandemic, public health catastrophe or other unforeseen event, including regional or global sociopolitical conflicts, war, terrorism, or other man-made or natural disasters, could materially impact our operations.
Our operations are vulnerable to disruption from the occurrence of pandemics, including COVID-19, and other public health catastrophes. For example, future federal, state, or local laws, regulations, orders or other governmental or regulatory actions addressing a pandemic or a future public health catastrophe, including without limitation vaccine mandates, shelter-in-place orders, and other government-mandated business closures, could limit our ability to operate efficiently and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. A pandemic or a future public health catastrophe could also, among other things, exacerbate staffing shortages, increase our costs, decrease institutional referrals, reduce elective health care procedures, restrict in-home visits and visits in assisted living facilities, or reduce patient volumes. Because the majority of our patients have complex medical challenges, they may be more vulnerable than the general public during a pandemic or other public health catastrophe, and our employees are at greater risk of contracting contagious diseases due to their increased exposure to vulnerable patients. In addition, supply chain disruptions caused by a pandemic or a future public health catastrophe could increase our expenses for necessary equipment, pharmaceuticals, and medical supplies, including without limitation, personal protective equipment. All of these potential effects would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, and operations results. Other unforeseen events, including acts of violence, war, terrorism, and other international, regional, or local instability or conflicts (including labor issues), embargoes, or natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods-whether occurring in the United States or abroad-could restrict or disrupt our operations. Among other undesirable effects, such events could cause volatility in global financial markets, the global supply chain, and the global credit and equity markets, and could cause our costs to increase. There can be no assurance that such events would not cause our business, financial condition, and operations results to suffer.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis