Buenaventura is involved in legal proceedings against SUNAT in connection with SUNAT's refusal to recognize Buenaventura's deductions with respect to contracts for physical deliveries and certain contractual payments made by the Company during the years 2007 and 2008, as well as tax loss, which was offset in 2009 and 2010.
During 2007 and 2008, Buenaventura modified its client contracts for the purposes of the sale of gold, shifting from a fixed price arrangement to a variable price arrangement. This allowed the Company to appropriately benefit from improved market prices. Additionally, it caused Buenaventura to incur significant expenses during the two-year transition period from 2007 to 2008, which also impacted the income tax payable by Buenaventura for fiscal years 2008 and 2009. However, the modified pricing structure also favorably impacted Buenaventura's financial results with a corresponding increase in Buenaventura's income tax payment to SUNAT during subsequent fiscal years.
SUNAT's position is that Buenaventura should disregard the additional expenses incurred in connection with the shift to variable price arrangement for purposes of calculating its income tax for fiscal years 2007 and 2008. According to SUNAT, said payments correspond to an early settlement of financial derivative contracts in situations where the Company did not establish the purpose or risks covered by such instruments. Additionally, SUNAT does not recognize the tax losses which the Company offset during fiscal years 2009 and 2010, related to the losses incurred during fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
The claim for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 initially amounted to 373.3 million soles (approximately US$100.5 million updated at the exchange rate of December 31, 2023) which, when accounting for alleged penalties and fees at the date SUNAT commenced collection proceedings, and according to SUNAT's estimations, amounted to 2,107.5 million soles (approximately US$567.6 million based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023).
On November 26, 2020, following the intervening tax court's decision to dismiss the Company's appeal against certain Administrative Resolutions issued by SUNAT in connection with the above-referenced matter, SUNAT began collection proceedings in respect of such amounts. Following the commencement of such collection proceedings by SUNAT, the Company filed a request for deferral and payment plan of the amounts claimed by SUNAT in order to make such tax payments over a 67-month term, in addition to making interest payments in connection with such payments. The requested payment plan consists of an initial payment in an amount equal to 14% of the amount claimed by SUNAT and 66 equal installments for the remaining amounts. In order to finalize the deferral and payment agreement with SUNAT, the Company was required to deliver Letters of Credit in an amount equal to the aggregate claimed amount in accordance with applicable law. To satisfy this requirement, on December 30, 2020, the Company entered into the Syndicated L/C Agreement with a group of financial entities and following delivery of the Letters of Credit, SUNAT approved the Company's payment plan.
On July 30, 2021, the Company paid the full amount of the disputed tax assessment related to the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax proceedings that were subject to deferment and installment and that are recorded in the caption "Trade and other receivables, net". For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, the total amount paid was S/1,584,227,000 (equivalent to US$426,670,000 based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023), which included updating the debt to reflect interest accrued as of July 30, 2021, such interest amounting to S/78,279,000 (equivalent to US$21,082,000 based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023). For fiscal year 2009, total amount paid was S/193,398,000 (equivalent to US$52,199,000 based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023) which included updating the amount claimed to reflect interest accrued as of July 30, 2021, such interest amounting to S/8,477,000 (equivalent to US$2,283,000 based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023). For fiscal year 2010, as a result of a deferral and installment, the total amount paid was S/356,691,000 (equivalent to US$96,273,000 based on the exchange rate corresponding to December 31, 2023) which included the updating the amount claimed to reflect interest accrued as of July 30, 2021, such interest amounting to S/16,762,000 (equivalent to US$4,514,000).
As of December 31, 2023, as a result of the advance payment mentioned above, the deferral and installment resolutions of the SUNAT tax claim have been rendered null and the letters of credit that were delivered as collateral for said disputed payments have been returned to the issuing banks.
On November 2023, the Fifth Chamber of Transitory Constitutional and Social Law of the Supreme Court notified the Cassation Ruling declaring the lawsuit filed by the Company unfounded. In response, on December 22, 2023, the Company and its sponsoring lawyers filed an amparo request before the Constitutional Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice with the purpose of declaring the annulment of the cassation ruling in response to the violations to the right constitutional protection of the Company.
As part of the assessment of the status of the process as of 2023, the Buenaventura's legal advisors concluded that the probabilities of recovering a portion of the paments made under protest to the Tax Administration related to fiscal years 2009 and 2010 were less than 50%, for which it was recognized with effect on the results of the year a liability due to a claim to the Tax Administration for S/420,231,000 (equivalent to US$113,178,000) regarding the portion of accounts receivable related to such carry-forwarded losses. The impact in profit or loss was distributed as follows: others, net (US$9,598,000), financial expenses (US$58,454,000), and income tax (US$45,126,000).
In March 2024, the Supreme court notified the cassation ruling that declared unfounded the lawsuit filed by the Company to assert its position regarding derivative financial instruments operations in 2007. In the opinion of the sponsored lawyers, there are solid grounds to file an amparo claim, that will be ultimately resolved by the Constitutional Court, requesting the annulment of the aforementioned cassation as a result of the violation of constitutional rights and guarantees. The Company will file said constitutional action in the following days. The liability previously mentioned does not represent a withdrawal from the process, since the process remains in progress. Moreover, it does not imply a cash outflow as it is related to a payment in full made in previous years prior to the recognition of the account receivable.
We will continue to pursue appeals on this matter in Peruvian courts. These legal proceedings may be costly and time consuming and there can be no guarantee in respect of the final outcome of these proceedings or that SUNAT will not bring future claims against us.