tiprankstipranks
Barclays Plc (BCS)
:BCS
US Market
Holding BCS?
Track your performance easily

Barclays (BCS) Risk Factors

1,087 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

Barclays disclosed 18 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Barclays reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q4, 2021

Risk Distribution
18Risks
44% Finance & Corporate
22% Macro & Political
11% Legal & Regulatory
11% Production
11% Ability to Sell
0% Tech & Innovation
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

2020
Q4
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Barclays Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q4, 2021

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 8 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 8 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
18
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
18
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
3Risks added
2Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Dec 2021
3Risks added
2Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Dec 2021
Number of Risk Changed
0
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
0
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of Barclays in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 18

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 8/18 (44%)Below Sector Average
Accounting & Financial Operations1 | 5.6%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Holding company structure of Barclays PLC and its dependency on distributions from its subsidiaries
Barclays PLC is a holding company and its principal sources of income are, and are expected to continue to be, distributions (in the form of dividends and interest payments) from operating subsidiaries which also hold the principal assets of the Group. As a separate legal entity, Barclays PLC relies on such distributions in order to be able to meet its obligations as they fall due (including its payment obligations with respect to its debt securities) and to create distributable reserves for payment of dividends to ordinary shareholders. The ability of Barclays PLC’s subsidiaries to pay dividends and interest and Barclays PLC’s ability to receive such distributions from its investments in its subsidiaries and other entities will be subject not only to the financial performance of such subsidiaries and entities and prevailing macroeconomic conditions but also to applicable local laws, capital regulations (including internal MREL requirements) and other restrictions (including restrictions imposed by governments and/or regulators, which limit management’s flexibility in managing the business and taking action in relation to capital distributions and capital allocation). These laws and restrictions could limit the payment of dividends and distributions to Barclays PLC by its subsidiaries and any other entities in which it holds an investment from time to time, which could restrict Barclays PLC’s ability to meet its obligations and/or to pay dividends to ordinary shareholders.
Debt & Financing5 | 27.8%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
Impact of benchmark interest rate reforms on the Group
Global regulators and central banks in the UK, US and EU have been driving international efforts to reform key benchmark interest rates and indices, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which are used to determine the amounts payable under a wide range of transactions and make them more reliable and robust. These benchmark reforms have resulted in significant changes to the methodology and operation of certain benchmarks and indices, the adoption of alternative risk-free reference rates (RFRs), the discontinuation of certain reference rates (including LIBOR), and the introduction of implementing legislation and regulations. Specifically, regulators in the UK, US and EU directed that certain non-US dollar LIBOR tenors would cease at the end of 2021. Furthermore, certain US dollar LIBOR tenors are to cease by the end of June 2023, and restrictions have been imposed on new use of US dollar LIBOR. Notwithstanding these developments, given the unpredictable consequences of benchmark reform, any of these developments could have an adverse impact on market participants, including the Group, in respect of any financial instruments linked to, or referencing, any of these benchmark interest rates. Uncertainty associated with such potential changes, including the availability and/or suitability of alternative RFRs, the participation of customers and third party market participants in the transition process, challenges with respect to required documentation changes, and impact of legislation to deal with certain legacy contracts that cannot convert into or add fall-back RFRs before cessation of the benchmark they reference, may adversely affect a broad range of transactions (including any securities, loans and derivatives which use LIBOR or any other affected benchmark to determine the interest payable which are included in the Group’s financial assets and liabilities) that use these reference rates and indices, and present a number of risks for the Group, including but not limited to: •Conduct risk: in undertaking actions to transition away from using certain reference rates (such as LIBOR) to new alternative RFRs, the Group faces conduct risks. These may lead to customer complaints, regulatory sanctions or reputational impact if the Group is considered to be (among other things): (i) undertaking market activities that are manipulative or create a false or misleading impression; (ii) misusing sensitive information or not identifying or appropriately managing or mitigating conflicts of interest; (iii) providing customers with inadequate advice, misleading information, unsuitable products or unacceptable service; (iv) not taking a consistent approach to remediation for customers in similar circumstances; (v) unduly delaying the communication and migration activities in relation to client exposure, leaving them insufficient time to prepare; or (vi) colluding or inappropriately sharing information with competitors. •Litigation risk: members of the Group may face legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and/or other actions or proceedings regarding (among other things): (i) the conduct risks identified above, (ii) the interpretation and enforceability of provisions in LIBOR-based contracts, and (iii) the Group’s preparation and readiness for the replacement of LIBOR with alternative RFRs. •Financial risk: the valuation of certain of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities may change. Moreover, transitioning to alternative RFRs may impact the ability of members of the Group to calculate and model amounts receivable by them on certain financial assets and determine the amounts payable on certain financial liabilities (such as debt securities issued by them) because certain alternative RFRs (such as the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) and the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)) are look-back rates whereas term rates (such as LIBOR) allow borrowers to calculate at the start of any interest period exactly how much is payable at the end of such interest period. This may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s cash flows. •Pricing risk: changes to existing reference rates and indices, discontinuation of any reference rate or indices and transition to alternative RFRs may impact the pricing mechanisms used by the Group on certain transactions. •Operational risk: changes to existing reference rates and indices, discontinuation of any reference rate or index and transition to alternative RFRs may require changes to the Group’s IT systems, trade reporting infrastructure, operational processes, and controls. In addition, if any reference rate or index (such as LIBOR) is no longer available to calculate amounts payable, the Group may incur additional expenses in amending documentation for new and existing transactions and/or effecting the transition from the original reference rate or index to a new reference rate or index. •Accounting risk: an inability to apply hedge accounting in accordance with IAS 39 could lead to increased volatility in the Group’s financial results and performance. Any of these factors may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and reputation.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss to the Group from the failure of clients, customers or counterparties, including sovereigns, to fully honour their obligations to members of the Group, including the whole and timely payment of principal, interest, collateral and other receivables. a) Impairment Impairment is calculated in line with the requirements of IFRS9 which results in recognition of loss allowances, based on ECLs, on a forward-looking basis using a broad scope of financial instruments. Measurement involves complex judgement and impairment charges are potentially volatile, particularly under stressed conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group's business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. For further details, refer to Note 7. b) Specific sectors and concentrations The Group is subject to risks arising from changes in credit quality and recovery rates of loans and advances due from borrowers and counterparties in any specific portfolio. Any deterioration in credit quality could lead to lower recoverability and higher impairment in a specific sector. The following are areas of uncertainties to the Group’s portfolio which could have a material impact on performance: •UK retail, hospitality and leisure: softening demand, rising costs and a structural shift to online shopping, which have been exacerbated due to restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in consumer behaviour, continue to pressurise the UK High Street and other sectors heavily reliant on consumer discretionary spending. As these sectors continue to reposition themselves, the trend represents a potential risk in the Group’s UK corporate portfolio as a higher probability of default exists for retailers, hospitality providers and their landlords while this transition takes place. •Consumer affordability: this has remained a key area of focus, particularly in unsecured lending. Macroeconomic factors, such as unemployment, higher interest rates or broader inflationary pressures, that impact a customer’s ability to service debt payments could lead to increased arrears in both unsecured and secured products. •UK real estate market: UK property represents a significant portion of the overall Group retail and corporate credit exposure. In 2021, property prices rose, particularly in the residential property market where customers took advantage of temporary changes in stamp duty rates or sought more space as home working became more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there can be no assurance that house price growth will continue in 2022. House price growth and fewer new high loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages in 2020 and the beginning of 2021 have diluted the Group’s high LTV stock to very low levels but there is potential for house prices to fall, especially in London and the South East of the UK where the Group has a high exposure. In addition, small segments of the housing market could be subject to specific valuation impacts (for example, certain properties within the Group's residential loan portfolio may be subject to remediation activities relating to fire safety standards). The Group’s corporate exposure is vulnerable to the impacts of the ongoing COVID-19 stress, with particular weakness in retail property as a result of reduced rent collections and residential development constrained by supply chain issues. The Group remains at risk of increased impairment from a material fall in property prices. •Leverage finance underwriting: the Group takes on sub-investment grade underwriting exposure, including single name risk, particularly in the US and Europe. The Group is exposed to credit events and market volatility during the underwriting period. Any adverse events during this period may potentially result in loss for the Group, or an increased capital requirement should there be a need to hold the exposure for an extended period. •Oil & Gas sector: the Group’s corporate credit exposure includes companies whose performance is dependent on the oil and gas sector. Whilst market prices have recovered in 2021, a sustained period of lower energy prices in recent years has led to the erosion of balance sheet strength, particularly for higher cost producers and those businesses which supply goods and services to the oil and gas sector. In the longer term, costs associated with the transition towards renewable sources of energy may place greater financial demands on companies that the Group has exposure to globally. These factors could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects through increased impairment charges. •Air travel: the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant reduction in demand for air travel as both the willingness and ability to travel have reduced, impacting revenues of the Group’s clients and their ability to service their debt obligations. While the situation is expected to improve as travel restrictions are eased, changes in consumer behaviour both due to COVID-19 and climate change create uncertainty for the sector. Furthermore, the possibility of further global and regional pandemics pose additional risks for the sector. The Group also has large individual exposures to single name counterparties, both in its lending activities and in its financial services and trading activities, including transactions in derivatives and transactions with brokers, central clearing houses, dealers, other banks, mutual and hedge funds and other institutional clients. The default of such counterparties could have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets. In addition, where such counterparty risk has been mitigated by taking collateral, credit risk may remain high if the collateral held cannot be monetised, or has to be liquidated at prices which are insufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure. Any such defaults could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s results due to, for example, increased credit losses and higher impairment charges.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
Application of resolution measures and stabilisation powers under the Banking Act
Under the Banking Act 2009, as amended (Banking Act), substantial powers are granted to the Bank of England (or, in certain circumstances, HM Treasury), in consultation with the PRA, the FCA and HM Treasury, as appropriate, as part of a special resolution regime (SRR). These powers enable the relevant UK resolution authority to implement resolution measures and stabilisation options with respect to a UK bank or investment firm and certain of its affiliates (currently including Barclays PLC) (each, a relevant entity) in circumstances in which the relevant UK resolution authority is satisfied that the resolution conditions are met. The SRR consists of five stabilisation options: (i) private sector transfer of all or part of the business or shares of the relevant entity; (ii) transfer of all or part of the business of the relevant entity to a ‘bridge bank’ established by the Bank of England; (iii) transfer to an asset management vehicle wholly or partly owned by HM Treasury or the Bank of England; (iv) the cancellation, transfer or dilution of the relevant entities’ equity (including Barclays PLC’s ordinary share capital) and write-down or conversion of the relevant entity’s capital instruments and liabilities (the bail-in tool); and (v) temporary public ownership (i.e. nationalisation). In addition, the relevant UK resolution authority may, in certain circumstances, in accordance with the Banking Act require the permanent write-down or conversion into equity of any outstanding Tier 1 capital instruments, Tier 2 capital instruments and internal MREL prior to, or together with, the exercise of any stabilisation option. Any such action could result in the dilution of Barclays PLC’s ordinary share capital, restrict Barclays PLC’s ability to meet its obligations and/or to pay dividends to ordinary shareholders. Shareholders should assume that, in a resolution situation, public financial support will only be available to a relevant entity as a last resort after the relevant UK resolution authorities have assessed and used, to the maximum extent practicable, the resolution tools, including the bail-in tool (the Bank of England’s preferred approach for the resolution of the Group is a bail-in strategy with a single point of entry at Barclays PLC). The exercise of any of such powers under the Banking Act or any suggestion of any such exercise could materially adversely affect the value of Barclays PLC ordinary shares and could lead to shareholders losing some or all of their investment. In addition, any safeguards within the Banking Act (such as the ‘no creditor worse off’ principle) may not result in compensation to shareholders that is equivalent to the full losses incurred by them in the resolution and there can be no assurance that shareholders would recover such compensation promptly.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
The impact of interest rate changes on the Group’s profitability
Changes to interest rates are significant for the Group, especially given the uncertainty as to the direction of interest rates and the pace at which they may change, particularly in the Group’s main markets of the UK and the US. A period of low interest rates and flat yield curves, including any rate cuts and/or negative interest rates, may affect and put pressure on the Group’s net interest margins (the difference between its lending income and borrowing costs) and could adversely affect the profitability and prospects of the Group. Interest rate rises could positively impact the Group’s profitability as retail and corporate business income increases due to margin decompression. However, further increases in interest rates, if larger or more frequent than expected, could lead to generally weaker than expected growth, reduced business confidence and higher unemployment. This, combined with the impact interest rate rises may have on the affordability of loan arrangements for borrowers, could cause stress in the lending portfolio and underwriting activity of the Group with resultant higher credit losses driving an increased impairment charge which would most notably impact retail unsecured portfolios and wholesale non-investment grade lending and could have a material effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, changes in interest rates could have an adverse impact on the value of the securities held in the Group’s liquid asset portfolio. Consequently, this could create more volatility than expected through the Group’s Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVOCI) reserve.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Treasury and capital risk
There are three primary types of treasury and capital risk faced by the Group: a) Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its contractual or contingent obligations or that it does not have the appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets. This could cause the Group to fail to meet internal and/or regulatory liquidity requirements, make repayments as they fall due or be unable to support day-to-day banking activities. Key liquidity risks that the Group faces include: •Stability of the Group’s deposit funding profile: deposits which are payable on demand or at short notice could be affected by the Group failing to preserve the current level of customer and investor confidence. •Ongoing access to wholesale funding: the Group regularly accesses the money and capital markets to provide short-term and long-term unsecured and secured funding to support its operations. A loss of counterparty confidence, or adverse market conditions could lead to a reduction in the tenor, or an increase in the costs, of the Group’s unsecured and secured wholesale funding. •Impacts of market volatility: adverse market conditions, with increased volatility in asset prices can negatively impact the Group’s liquidity position through increased derivative margin requirements and/or wider haircuts when monetising liquidity pool securities, and make it more difficult to execute secured financing transactions. •Intraday liquidity usage: increased collateral requirements at payments and securities settlement systems could negatively impact the Group’s liquidity position, as cash and liquid assets required for intraday purposes are unavailable to meet other outflows. •Off-balance sheet commitments: deterioration in economic and market conditions could cause customers to draw on off-balance sheet commitments provided to them, for example revolving credit facilities, negatively affecting the Group’s liquidity position. •Credit rating changes and the impact on funding costs: any reductions in a credit rating (in particular, any downgrade below investment grade) may affect the Group’s access to the money or capital markets and/or terms on which the Group is able to obtain market funding (for example, this could lead to increased costs of funding and wider credit spreads, the triggering of additional collateral or other requirements in derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements, or limits on the range of counterparties who are willing to enter into transactions with the Group). b) Capital risk Capital risk is the risk that the Group has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support its normal business activities and to meet its regulatory capital requirements under normal operating environments and stressed conditions (both actual and as defined for internal planning or regulatory stress testing purposes). This also includes the risk from the Group’s pension plans. Key capital risks that the Group faces include: •Failure to meet prudential capital requirements: this could lead to the Group being unable to support some or all of its business activities, a failure to pass regulatory stress tests, increased cost of funding due to deterioration in investor appetite or credit ratings, restrictions on distributions including the ability to meet dividend targets, and/or the need to take additional measures to strengthen the Group’s capital or leverage position. •Adverse changes in FX rates impacting capital ratios: the Group has capital resources, risk weighted assets and leverage exposures denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely impact the sterling equivalent value of these items. As a result, the Group’s regulatory capital ratios are sensitive to foreign currency movements. Failure to appropriately manage the Group’s balance sheet to take account of foreign currency movements could result in an adverse impact on the Group’s regulatory capital and leverage ratios. •Adverse movements in the pension fund: adverse movements in pension assets and liabilities for defined benefit pension schemes could result in deficits on a technical provision and/or IAS 19 accounting basis. This could lead to the Group making substantial additional contributions to its pension plans and/or a deterioration in its capital position. Under IAS 19, the liabilities discount rate is derived from the yields of high-quality corporate bonds. Therefore, the valuation of the Group’s defined benefits schemes would be adversely affected by a prolonged fall in the discount rate due to a persistent low interest rate and/or credit spread environment. Inflation is another significant risk driver to the pension fund as the liabilities are adversely impacted by an increase in long-term inflation expectations. c) Interest rate risk in the banking book Interest rate risk in the banking book is the risk that the Group is exposed to capital or income volatility because of a mismatch between the interest rate exposures of its (non-traded) assets and liabilities. The Group’s hedging programmes for interest rate risk in the banking book rely on behavioural assumptions and, as a result, the effectiveness of the hedging strategy cannot be guaranteed. A potential mismatch in the balance or duration of the hedging assumptions could lead to earnings deterioration. A decline in interest rates in sterling, US dollars or euros may also compress net interest margin on retail and corporate portfolios. In addition, the Group’s liquid asset portfolio is exposed to potential capital and/or income volatility due to movements in market rates and prices which may have a material adverse effect on the capital position of the Group. For further details on the Group’s approach to treasury and capital risk, refer to the treasury and capital risk management and treasury and capital risk performance sections.
Corporate Activity and Growth2 | 11.1%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
Conduct risk
Conduct risk is the risk of poor outcomes for, or harm to, customers, clients and markets, arising from the delivery of the Group's products and services. This risk could manifest itself in a variety of ways, including: a) Market integrity The Group’s businesses are exposed to risk from potential non-compliance with its policies and standards and instances of wilful and negligent misconduct by employees, all of which could result in potential customer and client detriment, enforcement action (including regulatory fines and/or sanctions), increased operation and compliance costs, redress or remediation or reputational damage which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Examples of employee misconduct which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business include: (i) employees improperly selling or marketing the Group’s products and services; (ii) employees engaging in insider trading, market manipulation or unauthorised trading; or (iii) employees misappropriating confidential or proprietary information belonging to the Group, its customers or third parties. These risks may be exacerbated in circumstances where the Group is unable to rely on physical oversight and supervision of employees (such as during the COVID-19 pandemic where employees have worked remotely). b) Customer protection The Group must ensure that its customers, particularly those that are vulnerable, are able to make well-informed decisions on how best to use the Group’s financial services and understand that they are appropriately protected if something goes wrong. Poor customer outcomes can result from the failure to: (i) communicate fairly and clearly with customers; (ii) provide services in a timely and fair manner; (iii) handle and protect customer data appropriately; and (iv) undertake appropriate activity to address customer detriment, including the adherence to regulatory and legal requirements on complaint handling. The Group is at risk of financial loss and reputational damage as a result. c) Product design and review risk Products and services must meet the needs of clients, customers, markets and the Group throughout their life cycle, However, there is a risk that the design and review of the Group’s products and services fail to reasonably consider and address potential or actual negative outcomes, which may result in customer detriment, enforcement action (including regulatory fines and/or sanctions), redress and remediation and reputational damage. Both the design and review of products and services are a key area of focus for regulators and the Group. d) Financial crime The Group may be adversely affected if it fails to effectively mitigate the risk that third parties or its employees facilitate, or that its products and services are used to facilitate, financial crime (money laundering, terrorist financing, breaches of economic and financial sanctions, bribery and corruption, and the facilitation of tax evasion). UK and US regulations covering financial institutions continue to focus on combating financial crime. Failure to comply may lead to enforcement action by the Group’s regulators, including severe penalties, which may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition and prospects. e) Regulatory focus on culture and accountability Regulators around the world continue to emphasise the importance of culture and personal accountability and enforce the adoption of adequate internal reporting and whistleblowing procedures to help to promote appropriate conduct and drive positive outcomes for customers, colleagues, clients and markets. The requirements and expectations of the UK Senior Managers Regime, Certification Regime and Conduct Rules have reinforced additional accountabilities for individuals across the Group with an increased focus on governance and rigour, with similar requirements also introduced in other jurisdictions globally. Failure to meet these requirements and expectations may lead to regulatory sanctions, both for the individuals and the Group. For further details on the Group’s approach to conduct risk, refer to the conduct risk management and conduct risk performance sections.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
Model risk
Model risk is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. The Group relies on models to support a broad range of business and risk management activities, including informing business decisions and strategies, measuring and limiting risk, valuing exposures (including the calculation of impairment), conducting stress testing, assessing capital adequacy, supporting new business acceptance and risk and reward evaluation, managing client assets, and meeting reporting requirements. Models are, by their nature, imperfect representations of reality and have some degree of uncertainty because they rely on assumptions and inputs, and so are subject to intrinsic uncertainty, errors and inappropriate use affecting the accuracy of their outputs. This may be exacerbated when dealing with unprecedented scenarios, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the lack of reliable historical reference points and data. For instance, the quality of the data used in models across the Group has a material impact on the accuracy and completeness of its risk and financial metrics. Model uncertainty, errors and inappropriate use may result in (among other things) the Group making inappropriate business decisions and/or inaccuracies or errors in the Group’s risk management and regulatory reporting processes. This could result in significant financial loss, imposition of additional capital requirements, enhanced regulatory supervision and reputational damage, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. For further details on the Group’s a
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 4/18 (22%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment1 | 5.6%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Business conditions, general economy and geopolitical issues
The Group’s operations are subject to potentially unfavourable global and local economic and market conditions, as well as geopolitical developments, which may have a material effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. A deterioration in global or local economic and market conditions may lead to (among other things): (i) deteriorating business, consumer or investor confidence and lower levels of fixed asset investment and productivity growth, which in turn may lead to lower client activity, including lower demand for borrowing from creditworthy customers; (ii) higher default rates, delinquencies, write-offs and impairment charges as borrowers struggle with the burden of additional debt; (iii) subdued asset prices and payment patterns, including the value of any collateral held by the Group; (iv) mark-to-market losses in trading portfolios resulting from changes in factors such as credit ratings, share prices and solvency of counterparties; and (v) revisions to calculated ECLs leading to increases in impairment allowances. In addition, the Group’s ability to borrow from other financial institutions or raise funding from external investors may be affected by deteriorating economic conditions and market disruption. Geopolitical events may lead to further financial instability and affect economic growth. In particular: •Global GDP growth recovered in 2021 from the severe contraction in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. While government support packages, accommodative monetary policy and the lifting of certain restrictions on movement bolstered economic growth and confidence in 2021, the global outlook remains highly uncertain, especially regarding: (a) ongoing concerns about how the COVID-19 pandemic may develop; (b) the disruptive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply chains; and (c) how long inflationary pressures will persist and whether central banks will succeed in normalising monetary policy. These factors could adversely affect economic growth, affect specific industries or countries or affect the Group’s employees and business operations in affected countries. Refer to 'i) Risks relating to the impact of COVID-19' above for further details. •In the UK, the UK Government's subsidised job retention and furlough schemes, which were implemented as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, came to an end on 30 September 2021. Prior to the end of the job retention and furlough schemes, the UK labour market performed more favourably than initially predicted at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with low unemployment rates and the number of employees on UK company payrolls surpassing pre-pandemic levels. However, the end of the job retention and furlough schemes, exacerbated by further uncertainty arising from the impact of new strains of COVID-19 (including the Omicron variant), may cause upward pressure on unemployment which may result in higher impairment charges. •Recent increases in inflation have been partly driven by a rebalancing of supply and demand, following the relaxation of restrictions on movement that were imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monetary policy remains highly accommodative, increasing the risk that more abrupt government action will be necessary later if inflation does not prove transitory. A prolonged period of rising inflation may develop into slow or stagnant economic growth if combined with slowing economic expansion and elevated unemployment. Inflation may be further driven by supply chain disruptions and labour shortages, the imposition of further restrictions on movement due to the failure to contain the spread of COVID-19 and structural changes in the UK economy after the UK's exit from the European Union. •A significant proportion of the Group’s portfolio is located in the US, including a major credit card portfolio and a range of corporate and investment banking exposures. The possibility of significant continued changes in US policy in certain sectors (including trade, healthcare and commodities) may have an impact on the Group’s associated portfolios. Stress in the US economy, weakening GDP and the associated exchange rate fluctuations, heightened trade tensions (such as between the US and China), an unexpected rise in unemployment and/or an increase in interest rates could lead to increased levels of impairment, which may have a material adverse effect on the Group's results of operations and profitability. •An escalation in geopolitical tensions or increased use of protectionist measures may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business in the affected regions. •In China the pace of credit growth remains a concern, given the high level of leverage and despite government and regulatory action. A stronger than expected slowdown could result if authorities fail to manage growth appropriately during the transition from manufacturing towards services and the end of the investment and credit-led boom. Deterioration in emerging markets could have a material adverse effect on the Group's results of operations if contagion results in higher impairment charges via sovereign or counterparty defaults. •Trading disruption between the EU and the UK may have a significant impact on economic activity in the EU and the UK which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Unstable economic conditions could result in (among other things): –a recession in the UK and/or one or more member states of the EEA in which it operates, with lower growth, higher unemployment and falling property prices, which could lead to increased impairments in relation to a number of the Group’s portfolios (including, but not limited to, its UK mortgage portfolio, unsecured lending portfolio (including credit cards) and commercial real estate exposures) –increased market volatility (in particular in currencies and interest rates), which could impact the Group’s trading book positions and affect the underlying value of assets in the banking book and securities held by the Group for liquidity purposes –a credit rating downgrade for one or more members of the Group (either directly or indirectly as a result of a downgrade in the UK sovereign credit ratings), which could significantly increase the Group’s cost of and/or reduce its access to funding, widen credit spreads and materially adversely affect the Group’s interest margins and liquidity position and/or –a widening of credit spreads more generally or reduced investor appetite for the Group’s debt securities, which could negatively impact the Group’s cost of and/or access to funding.
Natural and Human Disruptions2 | 11.1%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Added
Risks relating to the impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and continues to have, a material impact on businesses around the world and the economic environments in which they operate. Additionally, the impacts of the economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and post-recovery environment, from a commercial, regulatory and risk perspective could be significantly different to past crises and persist for a prolonged period. As a result, there are a number of factors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on global economies that have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on the profitability, capital and liquidity of the Group. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruption to the Group’s customers, suppliers and staff globally. Most jurisdictions in which the Group operates, implemented severe restrictions on the movement of their respective populations, with a resultant significant impact on economic activity in those jurisdictions. While a number of restrictions have been eased with the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination programmes, others still remain in place and future developments are highly uncertain. In some jurisdictions, restrictions that had been previously lifted were re-imposed in response to a resurgence in cases. These decisions are being taken by the governments of individual jurisdictions (including through the implementation of emergency powers) and impacts (including any subsequent lifting, extension or reimposition of restrictions) may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and/or within jurisdictions. It remains unclear how the COVID-19 pandemic will evolve through 2022 (including whether there will be further waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether COVID-19 vaccines continue to prove effective, whether further new strains of COVID-19 will emerge and whether, and in what manner, additional restrictions will be imposed and/or existing restrictions extended) and the Group continues to monitor the situation closely. However, despite the COVID-19 contingency plans established by the Group, the ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by disruptions to infrastructure and supply chains, business processes and technology services, resulting from the unavailability of staff due to illness or the failure of third parties to supply services. This may cause significant customer detriment, costs to reimburse losses incurred by the Group’s customers, potential litigation costs (including regulatory fines, penalties and other sanctions), and reputational damage. In many of the jurisdictions in which the Group operates, schemes were initiated by central banks, national governments and regulators to provide financial support to parts of the economy most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid introduction and varying nature of these support schemes, as well as customer expectations, required the Group to implement large-scale changes in a short period of time, leading to an increase in certain risks faced by the Group, including operational risk, conduct risk, reputation risk and fraud risk. These risks are likely to be heightened further as and when those government and other support schemes expire, are withdrawn or are no longer supported. Furthermore, the impact from participating in government and central bank-supported loan and other financing schemes may be exacerbated if the Group is required by any government or regulator to offer forbearance or additional financial relief to borrowers or if the Group is unable to rely on guarantees provided by governments in connection with financial support schemes. As these schemes and other financial support schemes provided by national governments (such as job retention and furlough schemes, payment deferrals and mass lending schemes) expire, are withdrawn or are no longer supported, there is a risk that economic growth and employment may be negatively impacted which may, in turn, impact the Group’s results of operations and profitability. In addition, the Group may experience a higher volume of defaults and delinquencies in certain portfolios which may negatively impact the Group’s RWAs, level of impairment and, in turn, capital position, and may initiate collection and enforcement actions to recover defaulted debts. The inception of large-scale collections and recovery programmes (including the use of third party debt collection agents) may also create significant risk if (because of the complexity, speed and scale of these programmes) defaulting borrowers are harmed by the Group’s conduct, which may also give rise to civil legal proceedings, including class actions, regulatory censure, potentially significant fines and other sanctions, and reputational damage. Other legal disputes may also arise between the Group and defaulting borrowers relating to matters such as breaches or enforcement of legal rights or obligations arising under loan and other credit agreements. Adverse findings in any such matters may result in the Group’s rights not being enforced as intended. Changes in macroeconomic variables such as gross domestic product (GDP) and unemployment have a significant impact on the modelling of expected credit losses (ECLs) by the Group. As a result, the Group experienced higher ECLs in 2020 compared to prior periods though this trend was reversed in 2021 as economic conditions partially recovered. The economic environment remains uncertain and future impairment charges may be subject to further volatility (including from changes to macroeconomic variable forecasts) depending on the longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures and the continued efficacy of any COVID-19 vaccines, as well as the longer- term effectiveness of central bank, government and other support measures. For further details on macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECLs, refer to the credit risk performance section. In addition, ECLs may be adversely impacted by increased levels of default for single name exposures in certain sectors directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic (such as the retail, airline, and hospitality and leisure sectors). Furthermore, the Group relies on models to support a broad range of business and risk management activities, including informing business decisions and strategies, measuring and limiting risk, valuing exposures (including the calculation of impairment), conducting stress testing and assessing capital adequacy. Models are, by their nature, imperfect and incomplete representations of reality because they rely on assumptions and inputs, and so they may be subject to errors affecting the accuracy of their outputs and/or misused. This may be exacerbated when dealing with unprecedented scenarios, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the lack of reliable historical reference points and data. For further details on model risk, refer to ‘vi) Model risk’ below. There can be no assurance that economic activity will return to pre-pandemic levels and, accordingly, there could be further adverse impacts on the Group’s income and profitability caused by lower lending and transaction volumes due to volatility or weakness in the capital markets. Furthermore, in order to support lending activity to promote economic growth, governments and/or regulators may limit management’s flexibility in managing its business, require the deployment of capital in particular business lines or otherwise restrict or limit capital distributions and capital allocation. Any and all such events mentioned above could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects, liquidity, capital position and credit ratings (including potential credit rating agency changes of outlooks or ratings), as well as on the Group’s customers, employees and suppliers.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 2
Added
Climate risk
The risks associated with climate change are subject to rapidly increasing societal, regulatory and political focus, both in the UK and internationally. Embedding climate risk into the Group’s risk framework in line with regulatory expectations and requirements, and adapting the Group’s operations and strategy to address the financial risks resulting from both: (i) the physical risk of climate change; and (ii) the risk from the transition to a low-carbon economy, could have a significant impact on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects, the Group's customers and clients and the creditworthiness of the Group's counterparties. Physical risks from climate change arise from a number of factors and relate to specific weather events and longer-term shifts in the climate. The nature and timing of extreme weather events are uncertain but they are increasing in frequency and their impact on the economy is predicted to be more acute in the future. The potential impact on the economy includes, but is not limited to, lower GDP growth, higher unemployment and significant changes in asset prices and profitability of industries. Damage to properties and operations of borrowers could impair asset values and the creditworthiness of customers leading to increased default rates, delinquencies, write-offs and impairment charges in the Group’s portfolios. In addition, the Group’s premises and resilience may also suffer physical damage due to weather events leading to increased costs for the Group. As the economy transitions to a low-carbon economy, financial institutions such as the Group may face significant and rapid developments in stakeholder expectations, policy, law and regulation which could impact the lending activities the Group undertakes, as well as the risks associated with its lending portfolios, and the value of the Group’s financial assets. As sentiment towards climate change shifts and societal preferences change, the Group may face greater scrutiny of the type of business it conducts, adverse media coverage and reputational damage, which may in turn impact customer demand for the Group’s products, returns on certain business activities and the value of certain assets and trading positions resulting in impairment charges. In addition, the impacts of physical and transition climate risks can lead to second order connected risks, which have the potential to affect the Group’s retail and wholesale portfolios. The impacts of climate change may increase losses for those sectors sensitive to the effects of physical and transition risks. For example, the Group’s UK mortgage and agriculture portfolios are particularly exposed to both the physical and transition risks of climate change. The mortgage portfolio is affected by the risks of flooding, subsidence and energy efficiency performance requirements, all of which may impact property valuations, whilst the agriculture portfolio is exposed to flooding and drought, as well as the potential for legislative changes and changes in consumer behaviour. Furthermore, any subsequent increase in defaults and rising unemployment could create recessionary pressures, which may lead to wider deterioration in the creditworthiness of the Group’s clients, higher ECLs, and increased charge-offs and defaults among retail customers. With effect from 1 January 2022, climate risk became one of the principal risks within the Group’s Enterprise Risk Management Framework. Failure to adequately embed risks associated with climate change into its risk framework to appropriately measure, manage and disclose the various financial and operational risks it faces as a result of climate change or failure to adapt the Group's strategy and business model to the changing regulatory requirements and market expectations on a timely basis, may have a material and adverse impact on the Group’s level of business growth, competitiveness, profitability, capital requirements, cost of funding, and financial condition. In March 2020, the Group announced its ambition to become a net zero bank by 2050 and its commitment to align all of its financing activities with the goals and timelines of the Paris Agreement. In order to reach these ambitions and targets or any other climate-related ambitions or targets the Group may commit to in future, the Group will need to incorporate climate considerations into its strategy, business model, the products and services it provides to customers and its financial and non-financial risk management processes (including processes to measure and manage the various financial and non-financial risks the Group faces as a result of climate change). The Group also needs to ensure that its strategy and business model adapt to changing national and international standards, industry and scientific practices, regulatory requirements and market expectations regarding climate change, which remain under continuous development and are subject to different interpretations. There can be no assurance that these standards, practices, requirements and expectations will not be interpreted differently than what was the Group’s understanding when defining its climate-related ambitions and targets, or change in a manner that substantially increases the cost or effort for the Group to achieve such ambitions and targets. In addition, the Group’s ambitions and targets may prove to be considerably more difficult or even impossible to achieve under such changing circumstances. This may be exacerbated if the Group chooses or is required to accelerate its climate-related ambitions or targets as a result of (among other things) UK or international regulatory developments or stakeholder expectations. Achieving the Group’s climate-related ambitions and targets will also depend on a number of factors outside the Group’s control, including (among other things) availability of data to measure and assess the climate impact of the Group’s customers, advancements of low-carbon technologies and supportive public policies in the markets where the Group operates. If these external factors and other changes do not occur, or do not occur on a timely basis, the Group may fail to achieve its climate-related ambitions and targets and this could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and reputation. For further details on the G
Capital Markets1 | 5.6%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Market risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from potential adverse changes in the value of the Group’s assets and liabilities from fluctuation in market variables including, but not limited to, interest rates, foreign exchange, equity prices, commodity prices, credit spreads, implied volatilities and asset correlations. Economic and financial market uncertainties remain elevated, as the path of the COVID-19 pandemic is inherently difficult to predict. Further waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, a disruptive adjustment to monetary policy normalisation, intensifying social unrest that weighs on market sentiment, and deteriorating trade and geopolitical tensions are some of the factors that could heighten market risks for the Group’s portfolios. In addition, the Group’s trading business is generally exposed to a prolonged period of elevated asset price volatility, particularly if it adversely affects market liquidity. Such a scenario could impact the Group’s ability to execute client trades and may also result in lower client flow-driven income and/or market-based losses on its existing portfolio of market risks. These can include higher hedging costs from rebalancing risks that need to be managed dynamically as market levels and their associated volatilities change. It is difficult to predict changes in market conditions, and such changes could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 2/18 (11%)Below Sector Average
Regulation1 | 5.6%
Regulation - Risk 1
Regulatory change agenda and impact on business model
The Group remains subject to ongoing significant levels of regulatory change and scrutiny in many of the countries in which it operates (including, in particular, the UK and the US). As a result, regulatory risk will remain a focus for senior management. Furthermore, a more intensive regulatory approach and enhanced requirements together with the potential lack of international regulatory co-ordination as enhanced supervisory standards are developed and implemented may adversely affect the Group’s business, capital and risk management strategies and/or may result in the Group deciding to modify its legal entity, capital and funding structures and business mix, or to exit certain business activities altogether or not to expand in areas despite otherwise attractive potential. There are several significant pieces of legislation and areas of focus which will require considerable management attention, cost and resource, including: •Changes in prudential requirements may impact minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) (including requirements for internal MREL), leverage, liquidity or funding requirements, applicable buffers and/or add-ons to such minimum requirements and risk weighted assets calculation methodologies all as may be set by international, EU or national authorities. This includes the upcoming implementation of the remaining Basel III reforms, as well as the expected incorporation of risks associated with climate change into the prudential framework and increased scrutiny of firms’ governance and risk management frameworks (including in respect of climate change and Environmental, Social and Governance ( ESG ) risks). Such or similar changes to prudential requirements or additional supervisory and prudential expectations, as well as requirements imposed by the Group's regulators under the resolution framework, either individually or in aggregate, may result in, among other things, a need for further management actions to meet the changed requirements, such as: –increasing capital, MREL or liquidity resources, reducing leverage and risk weighted assets –modifying the terms of outstanding capital instruments – modifying legal entity structure (including with regard to issuance and deployment of capital, MREL and funding) –changing the Group’s business mix or exiting other businesses and/or –undertaking other actions to strengthen the Group’s position or resolvability. •The derivatives market has been the subject of particular focus for regulators in recent years across the G20 countries and beyond, with regulations introduced which require the on-venue trading and clearing of standardised over the counter (OTC) derivatives and the mandatory margining of non-cleared OTC derivatives. These regulations may increase costs for market participants, as well as reduce liquidity in the derivatives markets, in particular, if there are areas of overlapping or conflicting regulation. More broadly, changes to the regulatory framework could entail significant costs for market participants and may have a significant impact on certain markets in which the Group operates. •The Group and certain of its members are subject to supervisory stress testing exercises in a number of jurisdictions. These exercises currently include the programmes of the Bank of England, the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). Failure to meet the requirements of regulatory stress tests, or the failure by regulators to approve the stress test results and capital plans of the Group, could result in the Group or certain of its members being required to enhance their capital position, limit capital distributions or position additional capital in specific subsidiaries. •As a result of the on-shoring of EU legislation in the UK, UK-based entities within the Group are currently subject to substantially the same rules and regulations as prior to the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. It is the UK’s intention to recast on-shored EU legislation as part of UK legislation and PRA and FCA rules, which could result in changes to regulatory requirements in the UK. If the regulatory regimes for EU and UK financial services change further, the provision of cross-border banking and investment services across the Group may become more complex and costly which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business and results of operations and could result in the Group modifying its legal entity, capital and funding structures and business mix, exiting certain business activities altogether or not expanding in areas despite otherwise attractive potential returns. This may also be exacerbated if Barclays Bank Ireland PLC expands further and, as a result of its growth and importance to the Group and the EEA banking system as a whole, Barclays Bank Ireland PLC is made subject to higher capital requirements or restrictions are imposed by regulators, on capital allocation and capital distributions by Barclays Bank Ireland PLC.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities1 | 5.6%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Legal risk and legal, competition and regulatory matters
The Group conducts activities in a highly regulated global market which exposes it and its employees to legal risk arising from: (i) the multitude of laws and regulations that apply to the businesses it operates, which are highly dynamic, may vary between jurisdictions and/or conflict, and are often unclear in their application to particular circumstances especially in new and emerging areas; and (ii) the diversified and evolving nature of the Group’s businesses and business practices. In each case, this exposes the Group and its employees to the risk of loss or the imposition of penalties, damages or fines from the failure of members of the Group to meet their respective legal obligations, including legal or contractual requirements. Legal risk may arise in relation to any number of the material existing and emerging risks identified above. A breach of applicable legislation and/or regulations by the Group or its employees could result in criminal prosecution, regulatory censure, potentially significant fines and other sanctions in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates. Where clients, customers or other third parties are harmed by the Group’s conduct, this may also give rise to civil legal proceedings, including class actions. Other legal disputes may also arise between the Group and third parties relating to matters such as breaches or enforcement of legal rights or obligations arising under contracts, statutes or common law. Adverse findings in any such matters may result in the Group being liable to third parties or may result in the Group’s rights not being enforced as intended. Details of legal, competition and regulatory matters to which the Group is currently exposed are set out in Note 26. In addition to matters specifically described in Note 26, the Group is engaged in various other legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Group is also subject to requests for information, investigations and other reviews by regulators, governmental and other public bodies in connection with business activities in which the Group is, or has been, engaged and may (from time to time) be subject to legal proceedings and other investigations relating to financial and non-financial disclosures made by members of the Group (including, but not limited to, in relation to ESG disclosures). Additionally, due to the increasing number of new climate and sustainability-related laws and regulations (or laws and regulatory processes seeking to protect the energy sector from any risks of divestment or challenges in accessing finance), growing demand from investors and customers for environmentally sustainable products and services, and regulatory scrutiny, financial institutions, including the Group, may through their business activities face increasing litigation, conduct, enforcement and contract liability risks related to climate change, environmental degradation and other social, governance and sustainability-related issues. Furthermore, there is a risk that shareholders, campaign groups, customers and other interest groups could seek to take legal action against the Group for financing or contributing to climate change and environmental degradation. The outcome of legal, competition and regulatory matters, both those to which the Group is currently exposed and any others which may arise in the future, is difficult to predict. In connection with such matters, the Group may incur significant expense, regardless of the ultimate outcome, and any such matters could expose the Group to any of the following outcomes: substantial monetary damages, settlements and/or fines; remediation of affected customers and clients; other penalties and injunctive relief; additional litigation; criminal prosecution; the loss of any existing agreed protection from prosecution; regulatory restrictions on the Group’s business operations including the withdrawal of authorisations; increased regulatory compliance requirements or changes to laws or regulations; suspension of operations; public reprimands; loss of significant assets or business; a negative effect on the Group’s reputation; loss of confidence by investors, counterparties, clients and/or customers; risk of credit rating agency downgrades; potential negative impact on the availability and/or cost of funding and liquidity; and/or dismissal or resignation of key individuals. In light of the uncertainties involved in legal, competition and regulatory matters, there can be no assurance that the outcome of a particular matter or matters (including formerly active matters or those arising after the date of this Annual Report) will not have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Production
Total Risks: 2/18 (11%)Above Sector Average
Manufacturing2 | 11.1%
Manufacturing - Risk 1
Operational risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss to the Group from inadequate or failed processes or systems, human factors or due to external events where the root cause is not due to credit or market risks. Examples include: a) Operational resilience The Group functions in a highly competitive market, with market participants that expect consistent and smooth business processes. The loss of or disruption to business processing is a material inherent risk within the Group and across the financial services industry, whether arising through impacts on the Group’s technology systems, real estate services including its retail branch network, or availability of personnel or services supplied by third parties. Failure to build resilience and recovery capabilities into business processes or into the services of technology, real estate or suppliers on which the Group’s business processes depend, may result in significant customer detriment, costs to reimburse losses incurred by the Group’s customers, and reputational damage. b) Cyberattacks Cyberattacks continue to be a global threat that is inherent across all industries, with the number and severity of attacks continuing to rise. The financial sector remains a primary target for cybercriminals, hostile nation states, opportunists and hacktivists. The Group, like other financial institutions, experiences numerous attempts to compromise its cybersecurity. The Group dedicates significant resources to reducing cybersecurity risks, but it cannot provide absolute security against cyberattacks. Malicious actors are increasingly sophisticated in their methods, seeking to steal money, gain unauthorised access to, destroy or manipulate data, and disrupt operations, and some of their attacks may not be recognised until launched, such as zero-day attacks that are launched before patches and defences can be readied. Cyberattacks can originate from a wide variety of sources and target the Group in numerous ways, including attacks on networks, systems, or devices used by the Group or parties such as service providers and other suppliers, counterparties, employees, contractors, customers or clients, presenting the Group with a vast and complex defence perimeter. Moreover, the Group does not have direct control over the cybersecurity of the systems of its clients, customers, counterparties and third party service providers and suppliers, limiting the Group’s ability to effectively defend against certain threats. Some of the Group’s third party service providers and suppliers have experienced successful attempts to compromise their cybersecurity. These included ransomware attacks that disrupted the service providers’ or suppliers’ operations and, in some cases, had a limited impact on the Group’s operations. Such cyberattacks are likely to continue. A failure in the Group’s adherence to its cybersecurity policies, procedures or controls, employee malfeasance, and human, governance or technological error could also compromise the Group’s ability to successfully defend against cyberattacks. Furthermore, certain legacy technologies that are at or approaching end-of-life may not be able to maintain acceptable levels of security. The Group has experienced cybersecurity incidents and near-misses in the past, and it is inevitable that additional incidents will occur in the future. Cybersecurity risks will continue to increase, due to factors such as the increasing demand across the industry and customer expectations for continued expansion of services delivered over the internet; increasing reliance on internet-based products, applications and data storage; and changes in ways of working by the Group’s employees, contractors, and third party service providers and suppliers and their subcontractors as a potentially long-term consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bad actors have taken advantage of remote working practices and modified customer behaviours that have taken hold during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting the situation in novel ways that may elude defences. Common types of cyberattacks include deployment of malware to obtain covert access to systems and data; ransomware attacks that render systems and data unavailable through encryption; denial of service and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks; infiltration via business email compromise; social engineering, including phishing, vishing and smishing; automated attacks using botnets; and credential validation or stuffing attacks using login and password pairs from unrelated breaches. A successful cyberattack of any type has the potential to cause serious harm to the Group or its clients and customers, including exposure to potential contractual liability, litigation, regulatory or other government action, loss of existing or potential customers, damage to the Group’s brand and reputation, and other financial loss. The impact of a successful cyberattack is also likely to include operational consequences (such as unavailability of services, networks, systems, devices or data), remediation of which could come at significant cost. Regulators worldwide continue to recognise cybersecurity as an increasing systemic risk to the financial sector and have highlighted the need for financial institutions to improve their monitoring and control of, and resilience to cyberattacks. A successful cyberattack may, therefore, result in significant regulatory fines for the Group. For further details on the Group’s approach to cyberattacks, refer to the operational risk performance section. For further details on cyber security regulation applicable to the Group, refer to the Supervision and regulation section. c) New and emergent technology Technology is fundamental to the Group’s business and the financial services industry. Technological advancements present opportunities to develop new and innovative ways of doing business across the Group, with new solutions being developed both in-house and in association with third party companies. For example, payment services and securities, futures and options trading are increasingly occurring electronically, both on the Group’s own systems and through other alternative systems, and becoming automated. Whilst increased use of electronic payment and trading systems and direct electronic access to trading markets could significantly reduce the Group’s cost base, it may, conversely, reduce the commissions, fees and margins made by the Group on these transactions which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Introducing new forms of technology, however, has the potential to increase inherent risk. Failure to evaluate, actively manage and closely monitor risk exposure during all phases of business development could introduce new vulnerabilities and security flaws and have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. d) External fraud The nature of fraud is wide-ranging and continues to evolve, as criminals continually seek opportunities to target the Group’s business activities and exploit changes to customer behaviour and product and channel use (such as the increased use of digital products and enhanced online services) or exploit new products. Fraud attacks can be very sophisticated and are often orchestrated by highly organised crime groups who use ever more sophisticated techniques to target customers and clients directly to obtain confidential or personal information that can be used to commit fraud. The UK market has also seen significant growth in ‘scams’ where the Group takes increased levels of liability as part of a voluntary code to provide additional safeguards to customers and clients who are tricked into making payments to fraudsters. The impact from fraud can lead to customer detriment, financial losses (including the reimbursement of losses incurred by customers), loss of business, missed business opportunities and reputational damage, all of which could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. e) Data management and information protection The Group holds and processes large volumes of data, including personal information, intellectual property, and financial data and the Group’s businesses are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of personal information of individuals. The protected parties can include: (i) the Group’s clients and customers, and prospective clients and customers; (ii) clients and customers of the Group’s clients and customers; (iii) employees and prospective employees; and (iv) employees of the Group’s suppliers, counterparties and other external parties. The international nature of both the Group’s business and its IT infrastructure also means that personal information may be available in countries other than those from where it originated. Accordingly, the Group needs to ensure that its collection, use, transfer and storage of personal information complies with all applicable laws and regulations in all relevant jurisdictions (including as such new and existing regulations continue to be implemented, interpreted and applied), which could: (i) increase the Group’s compliance and operating costs, particularly in the context of ensuring that adequate data protection and data transfer mechanisms are in place; (ii) impact the development of new products or services, impact the offering of existing products or services, or affect how products and services are offered to clients and customers; (iii) demand significant oversight by the Group’s management; and (iv) require the Group to review some elements of the structure of its businesses, operations and systems in less efficient ways. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Group’s measures to safeguard personal information, or even the perception that those measures are inadequate, could expose the Group to the risk of loss or unavailability of data or data integrity issues and/or cause the Group to lose existing or potential clients and customers, and thereby reduce the Group’s revenues. Furthermore, any failure or perceived failure by the Group to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations (and the evolving standards imposed by data protection authorities in connection therewith) may subject it to potential contractual liability, litigation, regulatory or other government investigation or action (including significant regulatory fines) and require changes to certain operations or practices which could also inhibit the Group’s development or marketing of certain products or services, or increase the costs of offering them to customers. Any of these events could damage the Group’s reputation, subject the Group to material fines or other monetary penalties, make the Group liable to the payment of compensatory damages, divert management's time and attention, lead to enhanced regulatory oversight and otherwise materially adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. For further details on data protection regulation applicable to the Group, refer to the supervision and regulation section. f) Algorithmic trading In some areas of the investment banking business, trading algorithms are used to price and risk manage client and principal transactions. An algorithmic error could result in erroneous or duplicated transactions, a system outage, or impact the Group’s pricing abilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and reputation. g) Processing errors The Group’s businesses are highly dependent on its ability to process and monitor, on a daily basis, a very large number of transactions, many of which are highly complex and occur at high volumes and frequencies, across numerous and diverse markets in many currencies. As the Group’s customer base and geographical reach expand and the volume, speed, frequency and complexity of transactions, especially electronic transactions (as well as the requirements to report such transactions on a real-time basis to clients, regulators and exchanges) increase, developing, maintaining and upgrading operational systems and infrastructure becomes more challenging, and the risk of systems or human error in connection with such transactions increases, as well as the potential consequences of such errors due to the speed and volume of transactions involved and the potential difficulty associated with discovering errors quickly enough to limit the resulting consequences. Furthermore, events that are wholly or partially beyond the Group’s control, such as a spike in transaction volume, could adversely affect the Group’s ability to process transactions or provide banking and payment services. Processing errors could result in the Group, among other things: (i) failing to provide information, services and liquidity to clients and counterparties in a timely manner; (ii) failing to settle and/or confirm transactions; (iii) causing funds transfers, capital markets trades and/or other transactions to be executed erroneously, illegally or with unintended consequences; and (iv) adversely affecting financial, trading or currency markets. Any of these events could materially disadvantage the Group’s customers, clients and counterparties (including them suffering financial loss) and/or result in a loss of confidence in the Group which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. h) Supplier exposure The Group depends on suppliers for the provision of many of its services and the development of technology. Whilst the Group depends on suppliers, it remains fully accountable for any risk arising from the actions of suppliers. The dependency on suppliers and sub-contracting of outsourced services introduces concentration risk where the failure of specific suppliers could have an impact on the Group’s ability to continue to provide material services to its customers. Failure to adequately manage supplier risk could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. i) Estimates and judgements relating to critical accounting policies and regulatory disclosures The preparation of financial statements requires the application of accounting policies and judgements to be made in accordance with IFRS. Regulatory returns and capital disclosures are prepared in accordance with the relevant capital reporting requirements and also require assumptions and estimates to be made. The key areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions are significant to the consolidated and individual financial statements, include credit impairment provisions, taxes, fair value of financial instruments, goodwill and intangible assets, pensions and post-retirement benefits, and provisions including conduct and legal, competition and regulatory matters (refer to the notes to the audited financial statements for further details). There is a risk that if the judgement exercised, or the estimates or assumptions used, subsequently turn out to be incorrect, this could result in material losses to the Group, beyond what was anticipated or provided for. Further development of accounting standards and regulatory interpretations could also materially impact the Group’s results of operations, financial condition and prospects. j) Tax risk The Group is required to comply with the domestic and international tax laws and practice of all countries in which it has business operations. There is a risk that the Group could suffer losses due to additional tax charges, other financial costs or reputational damage as a result of failing to comply with such laws and practice, or by failing to manage its tax affairs in an appropriate manner, with much of this risk attributable to the international structure of the Group. In addition, increasing tax authority focus on reporting and disclosure requirements around the world and the digitisation of the administration of tax has potential to increase the Group’s tax compliance obligations further. For example, the OECD and G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting has announced plans to introduce a global minimum tax from 2023 which, if enacted, will increase the Group’s tax compliance obligations. In addition, the proposed Build Back Better Act includes proposals to implement changes to US international tax provisions which may require systems and process changes if enacted. Any systems and process changes associated with these changes introduce additional operational risk. k) Ability to hire and retain appropriately qualified employees As a regulated financial institution, the Group requires diversified and specialist skilled colleagues. The Group’s ability to attract, develop and retain a diverse mix of talent is key to the delivery of its core business activity and strategy. This is impacted by a range of external and internal factors, such as potential effects on employee engagement and wellbeing from long-term periods of working remotely. Failure to attract or prevent the departure of appropriately qualified and skilled employees could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Additionally, this may result in disruption to service which could in turn lead to disenfranchising certain customer groups, customer detriment and reputational damage. For further details on the Group’s approach to operational risk, refer to the operational risk management and operational risk performance sections.
Manufacturing - Risk 2
Added
Change delivery and execution risks
The Group will need to adapt and/or transform the way it conducts business in response to changing customer behaviour and needs, technological developments, regulatory expectations, increased competition and cost management initiatives. Accordingly, effective management of transformation projects is required to successfully deliver the Group's strategic priorities, involving delivering both on externally driven programmes, as well as key business initiatives to deliver revenue growth, product enhancement and operational efficiency outcomes. The magnitude, complexity and, at times, concurrent demands of the projects required to meet these priorities can result in heightened execution risk. The ability to execute the Group’s strategy may be limited by operational capacity and the increasing complexity of the regulatory environment in which the Group operates. In addition, whilst the Group continues to pursue cost management initiatives, they may not be as effective as expected and cost saving targets may not be met. The failure to successfully deliver or achieve any of the expected benefits of these strategic initiatives and/or the failure to meet customer and stakeholder expectations could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition, customer outcomes, prospects and reputation.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 2/18 (11%)Above Sector Average
Competition1 | 5.6%
Competition - Risk 1
Competition in the banking and financial services industry
The Group operates in a highly competitive environment (in particular, in the UK and US) in which it must evolve and adapt to the significant changes as a result of financial regulatory reform, technological advances, increased public scrutiny and prevailing economic conditions. The Group expects that competition in the financial services industry will continue to be intense and may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s future business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. New competitors in the financial services industry continue to emerge. Technological advances and the growth of ecommerce have made it possible for non- banks to offer products and services that traditionally were banking products such as electronic securities trading, payments processing and online automated algorithmic-based investment advice. Furthermore, payments processing and other services could be significantly disrupted by technologies, such as blockchain (used in cryptocurrency systems) and 'buy now pay later' lending, both of which are currently subject to lower levels of regulatory oversight. Furthermore, the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies could potentially have significant impacts on the banking system and the role of commercial banks within it by disrupting the current provision of banking products and services. It could allow new competitors, some previously hindered by banking regulation (such as FinTechs), to provide customers with access to banking facilities and increase disintermediation of banking services. New technologies have required and could require the Group to spend more to modify or adapt its products or make additional capital investments in its businesses to attract and retain clients and customers or to match products and services offered by its competitors, including technology companies. Ongoing or increased competition and/or disintermediation of banking services may put pressure on the pricing for the Group’s products and services, which could reduce the Group’s revenues and profitability, or may cause the Group to lose market share, particularly with respect to traditional banking products such as deposits, bank accounts and mortgage lending. This competition may be on the basis of quality and variety of products and services offered, transaction execution, innovation, reputation and price. The failure of any of the Group’s businesses to meet the expectations of clients and customers, whether due to general market conditions, underperformance, a decision not to offer a particular product or service, changes in client and customer expectations or other factors, could affect the Group’s ability to attract or retain clients and customers. Any such impact could, in turn, reduce the Group’s revenues.
Brand / Reputation1 | 5.6%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Reputation risk
Reputation risk is the risk that an action, transaction, investment, event, decision or business relationship will reduce trust in the Group’s integrity and/or competence. Any material lapse in standards of integrity, compliance, customer service or operating efficiency may represent a potential reputation risk. Stakeholder expectations constantly evolve, and so reputation risk is dynamic and varies between geographical regions, groups and individuals. A risk arising in one business area can have an adverse effect upon the Group’s overall reputation and any one transaction, investment or event (in the perception of key stakeholders) can reduce trust in the Group’s integrity and competence. The Group’s association with sensitive topics and sectors has been, and in some instances continues to be, an area of concern for stakeholders, including: (i) the financing of, and investments in, businesses which operate in sectors that are sensitive because of their relative carbon intensity or local environmental impact; (ii) potential association with human rights violations (including combating modern slavery) in the Group’s operations or supply chain and by clients and customers; and (iii) the financing of businesses which manufacture and export military and riot control goods and services. Reputation risk could also arise from negative public opinion about the actual, or perceived, manner in which the Group (including its employees, clients and other associations) conducts its business activities, or the Group’s financial performance, as well as actual or perceived practices in banking and the financial services industry generally. Modern technologies, in particular, online social media channels and other broadcast tools that facilitate communication with large audiences in short time frames and with minimal costs, may significantly enhance and accelerate the distribution and effect of damaging information and allegations. Negative public opinion may adversely affect the Group’s ability to retain and attract customers, in particular, corporate and retail depositors, and to retain and motivate staff, and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition to the above, reputation risk has the potential to arise from operational issues or conduct matters which cause detriment to customers, clients, market integrity, effective competition or the Group (refer to ‘v) Operational risk’ above). For further details on the Group’s approach to reputation risk, refer to the reputation risk management and reputation risk performance sections.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis