Wolfe Research says that aside from the name association of being a Boeing 737, or more specifically a 15-year-old 737-800, the tragic crash of Jeju Air flight 2216 should have no read-through to Boeing’s (BA) stock and the company’s “current struggles to ramp up its production” of the 737 MAX. The accident’s root cause could be among several factors, but workmanship and design “aren’t likely in the mix,” the analyst tells investors in a research note. “That said, commercial aerospace’s infrequent but sometimes catastrophic accidents are a reminder of the unique headline risk to aircraft makers,” contends Wolfe. The firm points out there was another 737, or more specifically a 24-year-old 737-800. that also experienced a runway excursion over the weekend after an apparent hydraulic failure limited that pilots’ ability to control the plane upon landing. This too should have no negative read-through to Boeing, says Wolfe. Nor should the tragic Christmas likely shoot-down of an Azerbaijan Embraer E190 be seen as anything other than a tragic accident unrelated to the manufacturer or its operator, it adds. The firm keeps Outperform ratings on Boeing and Embraer (ERJ).
Protect Your Portfolio Against Market Uncertainty
- Discover companies with rock-solid fundamentals in TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter.
- Receive undervalued stocks, resilient to market uncertainty, delivered straight to your inbox.
Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>
Read More on BA:
- Netflix draws big viewership for NFL Christmas games: Morning Buzz
- AerCap signs sale and leaseback agreement for one new Boeing 787-9 aircraft
- Average tenure of Boeing engineers drops over past decade, FT reports
- Deutsche sees big future for advanced aircraft, more challenging for F-35
- Investors Shouldn’t Bank on Boeing’s Swift Recovery